I have the requirement to select different SAP APO alerts (e. g. quantity or time alerts). How do I get this data? Is there a specific function module or something like this?
I already tried different data sources, e. g. method READ_ALERTS of /SAPAPO/CL_AMOALRT_MANAGER class, or function module /SAPAPO/RRP_GET_ALERTS_AMON and /SAPAPO/READ_PP_ALERTS. Nothing provides me with the correct data. Do you have an idea?
Thank you very much in advance!
You can check the transaction Alert monitor in APO system. Alerts are broadly defined In to 3 applications E.g DP, SNP & PPDS. In SNP/PPDS you have alerts for the under/over delivery quantity, planning requirement quantity and order delay (time) alerts. Please check these function modules
/SAPAPO/RRP_GET_ALERTS_AMON and /SAPAPO/READ_PP_ALERTS.
Related
As I know of, When you're using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE at the same time(by loop or just coincidence), Using same material number puts you an error about locked object (Material XXXX is locked by USER YYYY).
But, as i know of, using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE at the same time, but different material number WITH same production order makes no error.
Issue
Recently I found an error about M3/897 (Plant Data of Material XXXX is locked by user XXXX) when I'm doing BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE when I'm trying GI for Production order, by parallel processing, which are putting different Material number to same production order.
Question
So, I'm asking about constraint of BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE.
So far I know is -
A. You can't issue GI for Production Order(Mvt 261) at the same time, when you're putting same material number for different production order.
B. (I'm not sure about this) You can't issue GI for Production Order(Mvt 261) at the same time, when you're putting different material number for same production order.
Is both is right, or just A is right? Any help from experienced ABAPer or MM consultant would be appreciated!
To post GI in a loop you need to make commit after each run, and unlock the object explicitly, otherwise you will get the PP lock.
Try like this:
LOOP AT lt_orders ASSIGNING <fs>.
...
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
EXPORTING
goodsmvt_header = ls_header
goodsmvt_code = ls_code
IMPORTING
goodsmvt_headret = ls_headret
materialdocument = ls_retmtd
TABLES
goodsmvt_item = lt_item
return = lt_return.
IF line_exists( lt_return[ type = 'E' ] ).
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_ROLLBACK'.
ELSE.
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
CALL FUNCTION 'DEQUEUE_ALL'.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Always use BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT with WAIT parameter or COMMIT WORK with the same after each BAPI call.
Also there can be tricky issues with the GR and implicit GI movements, see the note 369518 about this.
You can check the presence of existing lock at runtime using this FM - "ENQUE_READ2".
data: RAW_ENQ like LOCKSEDX_ENQ_TAB,
SUBRC type SY-SUBRC,
NUMBER type I.
clear : RAW_ENQ[], SUBRC, NUMBER.
add 1 to COUNTER.
call function 'ENQUE_READ2'
importing
SUBRC = SUBRC
NUMBER = NUMBER
tables
ENQ = RAW_ENQ.
But if you have to prevent a failure of GOODS mvt. in general you have instead to implement some reprocessing logic to store errors.
The steps would be : Catch errors --> store bapi information or header doc number --> retry later
I am saving the best solution into the DB, and we display that on the web page. I am looking for some solution where a user can add more visits, but that should not change already published trips.
I have checked the documentation and found ProblemFactChange can be used, but only when the solver is already running.
In my case solver is already terminated and the solution is also published. Now I want to add more visits to the vehicle without modifying the existing visits of the Vehicle. Is this possible with Optaplanner? if yes any example of documentation would be very helpful.
You can use PlanningPin annotation for avoiding unwanted changes.
Optaplanner - Pinned planning entities
If you're not looking for pinning (see Ismail's excellent answer), take a look at the OptaPlanner School Timetabling example, which allows adding lessons between solver runs. The lessons simply get stored in the database and then get loaded when the solver starts.
The difficulty with VRP is the chained model complexity (we're working on an alternative): If you add a visit X between A and B, then make sure that afterwards A.next = X, B.previous = X, X.previous = A, X.next = B and X.vehicle = A.vehicle. Not the mention the arrival times etc.
My suggestion would be to resolve what is left after the changes have been introduced. Let's say you are you visited half of your destinations (A -> B -> C) but not yet (C - > D -> E) when two new possible destinations (D' and E') are introduced. Would not this be the same thing as you are starting in C and trying plan for D, D', E and E'? The solution needs to be updated on the progress though so the remainder + changes can be input to the next solution.
Just my two cent.
I have columns taken from excel as a dataframe, the columns are as follows:
HolidayTourProvider|Packages|Meals|Accommodation|LocalTravelVehicle|Cancellationfee
Holiday Tour Provider has a couple of company names
Packages, the features provided in each package are mostly the same like
Meals,Accommodation etc... even though one company may call it "Saver", others may call it "Budget". (each of column mostly follow Yes/No, except Local travel vehicle are again car names like Ford Taurus,jeep cherokee etc..
Cancellation amount is integers)
I need to write a function like
match(HolidayTP,Package)
where the user can give input like
match(AdventureLife, Luxury)
then I need to return all the packages that have similar features with Luxury by other Holiday Tour Providers, no matter what name they give the package like 'Semi Lux', 'Comfort' etc...
I want to give a counter for every match and display all the packages that exceed the counter by 3 or 4.
This is my first python code. I am stuck here.
fb is the total df I exported to
def mapHol(HTP, PACKAGE):
mfb = (fb['HTP']== HTP)&(fb['package']== package)
B = fb[mfb]
for i in fb[i]:
for j in B[j]:
if fb[i]==B[j]:
count+=1
I dont know how to proceed, please help me this is my first major project, I started on my own.
I have a problem:
I create goods receipts using transaction MB1C, filling Document Date, Posting Date, Mov. type, Plant, Stor.Location ... Press New Item -> filling Material, quantity, stor. type, Batch, Storagin Bin and Manuf. Date ...
Then I can display the created batch in MSC3N... If I open the tab Classification, and press Set Classification Status, the status = 'Incomplete'.
The steps described above I do also with Batch Input Session ... !the same steps .. But, when I open Classification Status, the status = 'Released'.
My question is why that's happening? I use the same values in both cases, nothing is different!!!
thanks..
Technically speaking, there are many reasons why a batch input might behave differently from a manual input, so you should do several tests until you discover the reason.
>>> Please refer to this table (in SCN) which gives the possible reasons and solutions.
Note that this table is generic and is not limited to one transaction code (MB1C in your case).
PS: it's not clear what you exactly did: you are talking about running a batch input session and checking the "SY structure" (I guess you are talking about the return code SY-SUBRC), but a "session" means that it's a recording in transaction code SM35, but the only way to run it is by calling a "report", so you don't get SY-SUBRC. Therefore, I guess you are not running a session, but doing the batch input (not session) using the ABAP statement CALL TRANSACTION USING (CTU).
I'm trying to replace some un-reliable sap scripting we have in place to do an MB01 from a custom goods receipt application. I have come across the .NET connector and it looks like it could do a job for me.
Research has churned up the BAPI called BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE but can anyone tell me what parameters might be required to perform this transaction?
I have access to a SAP test environment.
BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE accepts a table of values called GOODSMVT_ITEM which contains 121 fields. I'm sure that not all of these fields are required.
Ultimately I guess my question is, what how can I work out which ones are required?
Do you have access to a SAP system? I have recently used this BAPI, and it has quite detailed documentation. To view the documentation, use transaction SE37, and enter the BAPI name. Unfortunately I don't currently have access to a system.
You will have to ask one of your MM/Logistics people to tell you what the movement type (BWART) is, and depending on the config you will need details like material number (MATNR), plant (WERKS), storage location etc.
MB01 is a Post GR for PO transaction, it is an equivalent of GM_Code 01 in MIGO or BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE. MIGO transaction is a modern successor for obsolete MB01.
So, as per the BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE documentation for GM_Code 01 the following fields are mandatory:
Purchase order
Purchase order item
Movement type
Movement indicator
Quantity in unit of entry
ISO code unit of measurement for unit of entry or
quantity proposal
Here is the sample:
gmhead-pstng_date = sy-datum.
gmhead-doc_date = sy-datum.
gmhead-pr_uname = sy-uname.
gmcode-gm_code = '01'.
loop at pcitab.
itab-move_type = pcitab-mvt_type.
itab-mvt_ind = 'B'.
itab-plant = pcitab-plant.
itab-material = pcitab-material.
itab-entry_qnt = pcitab-qty.
itab-move_stloc = pcitab-recv_loc.
itab-stge_loc = pcitab-issue_loc.
itab-po_number = pcitab-pur_doc.
itab-po_item = pcitab-po_item.
concatenate pcitab-del_no pcitab-del_item into itab-item_text.
itab-move_reas = pcitab-scrap_reason.
append itab.
endloop.
call function 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
exporting
goodsmvt_header = gmhead
goodsmvt_code = gmcode
IMPORTING
goodsmvt_headret = mthead
tables
goodsmvt_item = itab
return = errmsg