org.apache.avro.SchemaParseException: Undefined name: - serialization

For converting generics to avro schema i use the below annotation , but I get the exception after that
public class Test2<T>
{
#AvroSchema("{\"type\":\"array\",\"items\":[\"null\",\"Test4\"]}")
private Set<T> test4;
}
public class Test4 {
public Integer getX() {
return x;
}
public void setX(Integer x) {
this.x = x;
}
public Test4(Integer x) {
this.x = x;
}
public Test4() {
}
private Integer x;
}
The error I get here is
org.apache.avro.SchemaParseException: Undefined name:Test4

This thing worked
#AvroSchema("{\"type\":\"array\",\"items\":{\"name\":\"Child\",\"type\":\"record\",\"fields\":[{\"name\":\"x\",\"type\":\"int\"}]}}")
Thanks btw.

Related

How to use JSON-B to serialize a transient property?

Given a
public class Foo {
private String x;
transient private String y;
public String getX() {
return x;
}
public void setX(String x) {
this.x = x;
}
public String getY() {
return y;
}
public void setY(String y) {
this.y = y;
}
}
How can you instruct JSON-B to serialise property y?
This is a case where type Foo is used in a JPA context (#Entity) where transient indicates a property should not be persisted.
Instead of using the transient keyword, annotate the field with the #javax.persistence.Transient annotation.
i.e.
#Transient
private String y;
Effectively this makes the property available to JSON-B for serialisation.

Tweak jackson polymorphic deserialization

I have a simple polymorphic model like this
public class Foo {
private Bar bar1;
private Bar bar2;
public Bar getBar1() {
return bar1;
}
public Bar getBar2() {
return bar2;
}
public void setBar1(Bar bar1) {
this.bar1 = bar1;
}
public void setBar2(Bar bar2) {
this.bar2 = bar2;
}
}
#JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.CLASS, include = JsonTypeInfo.As.PROPERTY, property = "#type")
public class Bar {
}
public class BarExpression extends Bar {
private String expression;
public String getExpression() {
return expression;
}
#JsonIgnore
public Object getValue() {
return null;
}
public void setExpression(String expression) {
this.expression = expression;
}
}
public class BarLiteral extends Bar {
private String value;
private String type;
public String getType() {
return type;
}
public Object getValue() {
return value;
}
public void setType(String type) {
this.type = type;
}
public void setValue(String value) {
this.value = value;
}
}
Serializing a simple example like this
public void run() throws Exception {
Foo foo;
BarLiteral bar1;
BarExpression bar2;
//
foo = new Foo();
bar1 = new BarLiteral();
bar1.setType("java.lang.String");
bar1.setValue("gnu");
foo.setBar1(bar1);
bar2 = new BarExpression();
bar2.setExpression("bean.property * 2");
foo.setBar2(bar2);
//
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.enable(SerializationFeature.INDENT_OUTPUT);
StringWriter w = new StringWriter();
mapper.writeValue(w, foo);
System.out.println(w.toString());
}
gives the expected result:
{
"bar1" : {
"#type" : "de.mit.jackson.BarLiteral",
"value" : "gnu",
"type" : "java.lang.String"
},
"bar2" : {
"#type" : "de.mit.jackson.BarExpression",
"expression" : "bean.property * 2"
}
}
The question is now: I want to improve user experience when handwriting this "DSL" by supporting "primitive shortcuts" for the typed "Bar..." classes like this
{
"bar1" : "gnu",
"bar2" : "#{bean.property * 2}"
}
The solution that came closest was using a converter on Foo#bar1 and Foo#bar2, checking for either String or "Bar" input, but this solution requires decoration of every attribute definition.
Creating a deserializer with a comparable behavior did not work, as the #JsonTypeInfo is not compatible in the sense that i can have a #JsonDeserialize implementation that will check for a String event and then delegate to the standard #JsonTypeInfo process. The #JsonTypeInfo standard will check only for the #type and then delegate back to the (subtype) deserializer which is again my wrapper implementation.
The required process is
if input event is string {
parse and return string input
} else {
activate #type parsing delegate;
after #type parsing activate standard BeanDeserializer
(**not** my implementation)
}
Is there another hook i am missing?

Embedded Neo4j delete node and Lucene legacy indexing - node_auto_indexing out of sync issue

I'm trying to delete node with fields in node_auto_indexing.
When I try to delete node using repository.delete(id).
Right after that I'm trying to get deleted Node by its id and I get following exception:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: This index (Index[__rel_types__,Relationship]) has been marked as deleted in this transaction
at org.neo4j.index.impl.lucene.LuceneTransaction$DeletedTxDataBoth.illegalStateException(LuceneTransaction.java:475)
at org.neo4j.index.impl.lucene.LuceneTransaction$DeletedTxDataBoth.removed(LuceneTransaction.java:470)
at org.neo4j.index.impl.lucene.LuceneTransaction.remove(LuceneTransaction.java:112)
at org.neo4j.index.impl.lucene.LuceneXaConnection.remove(LuceneXaConnection.java:116)
at org.neo4j.index.impl.lucene.LuceneIndex.remove(LuceneIndex.java:215)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.typerepresentation.AbstractIndexBasedTypeRepresentationStrategy.remove(AbstractIndexBasedTypeRepresentationStrategy.java:113)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.typerepresentation.AbstractIndexBasedTypeRepresentationStrategy.preEntityRemoval(AbstractIndexBasedTypeRepresentationStrategy.java:100)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.mapping.EntityRemover.removeRelationship(EntityRemover.java:63)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.mapping.EntityRemover.removeNode(EntityRemover.java:51)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.mapping.EntityRemover.removeNodeEntity(EntityRemover.java:45)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.mapping.EntityRemover.remove(EntityRemover.java:85)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.Neo4jTemplate.delete(Neo4jTemplate.java:267)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.repository.AbstractGraphRepository.delete(AbstractGraphRepository.java:276)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.repository.AbstractGraphRepository.delete(AbstractGraphRepository.java:282)
Also, when I'm trying to delete node via Cypher query
#Query("MATCH ()-[r]-(p:Product) WHERE id(p) = {productId} DELETE r, p")
void deleteProduct(#Param("productId") Long productId);
I'm getting another exception after looking this deleted Node by its Id:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: No primary SDN label exists .. (i.e one starting with _)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.typerepresentation.LabelBasedNodeTypeRepresentationStrategy.readAliasFrom(LabelBasedNodeTypeRepresentationStrategy.java:126)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.typerepresentation.LabelBasedNodeTypeRepresentationStrategy.readAliasFrom(LabelBasedNodeTypeRepresentationStrategy.java:39)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.mapping.TRSTypeAliasAccessor.readAliasFrom(TRSTypeAliasAccessor.java:36)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.mapping.TRSTypeAliasAccessor.readAliasFrom(TRSTypeAliasAccessor.java:26)
at org.springframework.data.convert.DefaultTypeMapper.readType(DefaultTypeMapper.java:102)
at org.springframework.data.convert.DefaultTypeMapper.getDefaultedTypeToBeUsed(DefaultTypeMapper.java:165)
at org.springframework.data.convert.DefaultTypeMapper.readType(DefaultTypeMapper.java:142)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.mapping.Neo4jEntityConverterImpl.read(Neo4jEntityConverterImpl.java:78)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.mapping.Neo4jEntityPersister$CachedConverter.read(Neo4jEntityPersister.java:170)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.mapping.Neo4jEntityPersister.createEntityFromState(Neo4jEntityPersister.java:189)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.Neo4jTemplate.createEntityFromState(Neo4jTemplate.java:224)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.repository.AbstractGraphRepository.createEntity(AbstractGraphRepository.java:62)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.repository.AbstractGraphRepository.findOne(AbstractGraphRepository.java:127)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.repository.AbstractGraphRepository.delete(AbstractGraphRepository.java:282)
How to correctly delete node that participates in Lucene Legacy Indexing node_auto_indexing ? How to remove this Node from Lucene index ?
UPDATED:
This is my Neo4jConfig:
#Configuration
#EnableNeo4jRepositories(basePackages = "com.example")
#EnableTransactionManagement
public class Neo4jConfig extends Neo4jConfiguration implements BeanFactoryAware {
#Resource
private Environment environment;
private BeanFactory beanFactory;
public Neo4jConfig() {
setBasePackage("com.example");
}
#Bean(destroyMethod = "shutdown")
public GraphDatabaseService graphDatabaseService() {
GraphDatabaseService graphDb = new GraphDatabaseFactory()
.newEmbeddedDatabaseBuilder("target/example-test-db")
.setConfig(GraphDatabaseSettings.node_keys_indexable, "name,description")
.setConfig(GraphDatabaseSettings.node_auto_indexing, "true")
.newGraphDatabase();
return graphDb;
}
/**
* Hook into the application lifecycle and register listeners that perform
* behaviour across types of entities during this life cycle
*
*/
#Bean
protected ApplicationListener<BeforeSaveEvent<BaseEntity>> beforeSaveEventApplicationListener() {
return new ApplicationListener<BeforeSaveEvent<BaseEntity>>() {
#Override
public void onApplicationEvent(BeforeSaveEvent<BaseEntity> event) {
BaseEntity entity = event.getEntity();
if (entity.getCreateDate() == null) {
entity.setCreateDate(new Date());
} else {
entity.setUpdateDate(new Date());
}
}
};
}
#Override
public void setBeanFactory(BeanFactory beanFactory) throws BeansException {
this.beanFactory = beanFactory;
}
public BeanFactory getBeanFactory() {
return beanFactory;
}
}
Base entity for entities in the project:
public class BaseEntity {
private Date createDate;
private Date updateDate;
public BaseEntity() {
}
public Date getCreateDate() {
return createDate;
}
public void setCreateDate(Date createDate) {
this.createDate = createDate;
}
public Date getUpdateDate() {
return updateDate;
}
public void setUpdateDate(Date updateDate) {
this.updateDate = updateDate;
}
}
and the Vote entity that I tried to delete:
#NodeEntity
public class Vote extends BaseEntity {
private static final String VOTED_ON = "VOTED_ON";
private final static String VOTED_FOR = "VOTED_FOR";
private static final String CREATED_BY = "CREATED_BY";
#GraphId
private Long id;
#RelatedTo(type = VOTED_FOR, direction = Direction.OUTGOING)
private Decision decision;
#RelatedTo(type = VOTED_ON, direction = Direction.OUTGOING)
private Criterion criterion;
#RelatedTo(type = CREATED_BY, direction = Direction.OUTGOING)
private User author;
private double weight;
private String description;
public Vote() {
}
public Vote(Decision decision, Criterion criterion, User author, double weight, String description) {
this.decision = decision;
this.criterion = criterion;
this.author = author;
this.weight = weight;
this.description = description;
}
public Long getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Long id) {
this.id = id;
}
public Decision getDecision() {
return decision;
}
public void setDecision(Decision decision) {
this.decision = decision;
}
public Criterion getCriterion() {
return criterion;
}
public void setCriterion(Criterion criterion) {
this.criterion = criterion;
}
public User getAuthor() {
return author;
}
public void setAuthor(User author) {
this.author = author;
}
public double getWeight() {
return weight;
}
public void setWeight(double weight) {
this.weight = weight;
}
public String getDescription() {
return description;
}
public void setDescription(String description) {
this.description = description;
}
#Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
if (this == o)
return true;
if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass())
return false;
Vote vote = (Vote) o;
if (id == null)
return super.equals(o);
return id.equals(vote.id);
}
#Override
public int hashCode() {
return id != null ? id.hashCode() : super.hashCode();
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return ToStringBuilder.reflectionToString(this, ToStringStyle.SHORT_PREFIX_STYLE);
}
}
Thanks to #MichaelHunger and Neo4j this issue has been fixed in Neo4j 2.2.2 and SDN 3.4.0.M1

orika property expression mapping

Given
classA {
long fahr;
....
and
classB {
long cels;
....
how can I map the following in Orika?
A.fahr <-> (B.cels*9)/5
Do I need customised Mapper or Filter ?
I suggest to use field level converter if both are of different data types but since they are of same data type we have to use a custom converter for entire class.
This is sample converter that suitable for this use case.
import ma.glasnost.orika.BoundMapperFacade;
import ma.glasnost.orika.MapperFactory;
import ma.glasnost.orika.converter.ConverterFactory;
import ma.glasnost.orika.impl.DefaultMapperFactory;
public class EntryClass {
public static void main(String[] args) {
EntryClass ec = new EntryClass();
BoundMapperFacade<A, B> facade = getMapperFactory().getMapperFacade(A.class, B.class);
A fahr = new A(455);
B cels = facade.map(fahr);
System.out.println(cels);
A revFahr = facade.mapReverse(cels);
System.out.println(revFahr);
}
private static MapperFactory getMapperFactory() {
MapperFactory factory = new DefaultMapperFactory.Builder()
.build();
ConverterFactory cfactory = factory.getConverterFactory();
cfactory.registerConverter(new FahrCelsConverter());
factory.classMap(A.class, B.class)
.field("fahr", "cels")
.byDefault()
.register();
return factory;
}
}
public class A {
long fahr;
public A(long fahr) {
this.fahr = fahr;
}
public long getFahr() {
return fahr;
}
public void setFahr(long fahr) {
this.fahr = fahr;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "A [fahr=" + fahr + "]";
}
}
public class B {
long cels;
public B(long cels) {
this.cels = cels;
}
public long getCels() {
return cels;
}
public void setCels(long cels) {
this.cels = cels;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "B [cels=" + cels + "]";
}
}
public class FahrCelsConverter extends BidirectionalConverter<A, B>
{
#Override
public B convertTo(A source, Type<B> destinationType, MappingContext mappingContext) {
if(source != null)
{
return new B((source.fahr - 32) * 5 / 9);
}
return null;
}
#Override
public A convertFrom(B source, Type<A> destinationType, MappingContext mappingContext) {
if(source != null)
{
return new A((source.cels / 5) * 9 + 32);
}
return null;
}
}
It's more suited to use a converter (by id).

Problem with design in OOP (Virtual member call in constructor)

I am trying to achieve something like the following:
class Foo
{
public virtual int Number { get; set; }
public Foo(int n)
{
Number = n; //Virtual member call in constructor
}
public void Do() {
Console.WriteLine(Number);
}
}
class Bar : Foo
{
public override int Number
{
get
{
return x.Val;
}
set
{
x.Val = value;
}
}
Bar(int n) : base(n)
{
X x = new X();
x.Val = n;
}
public void F() {
x.Something(); //changes x.Val
}
}
The reason I am doing this is because I need to propagate the call to Do when called from a variable of type Bar.
Now, I can have objects that either inherit from Foo or Bar, thus Number needs to be the way it is now, ie directly expose the Val property of x. This is because I need to allow for the following code:
Bar b = new Bar(5);
b.F(); //changes the value of Val in x
b.Do(); //Needs to print the correct, modified value
The problem here is obviously in Foo, when assigning n to Number (Virtual member call in constructor) since x from the subclass would not have been initialized yet.
What do you think is a better way to structure such a design?
I can't use this current code because I am calling a virtual member from the constructor, which causes the Object Reference not set to an Instance of an Object exception since x in Number from Bar would not have been yet initialized.
My favorite quote:
Favor composition over inheritance
I would separate underlying data from operations:
interface IMyNumber
{
int Number { get; set; }
void Something();
}
class MyNumber : IMyNumber
{
public int Number { get; set; }
public MyNumber(int n)
{
Number = n;
}
void Something() {... }
}
class MyBoxedNumber : IMyNumber
{
int Number { get { ... } set {... } }
void Something() {... }
}
class Bar
{
private IMyNumber_foo;
Bar(IMyNumber foo)
{
_foo = foo;
}
public void F() {
_foo.Something(); //changes x.Val
}
public void Do() {
Console.WriteLine(...)
}
}