For a milling machine I need to connect magnetic linear sensors which output a quadrature signal in order to read the position of 4 axes. The professional digital readouts are rather expensive. After some searching I tried to use an Arduino board and Yuri's digital readout Android software. I kept having issues with the bluetooth connection between my tablet and the Arduino failing.
I've since settled on a four axis serial to USB box, sold by a company which is involved the precision measurement industry. Now my issue is that the software supplied by the vendor for the converter box is only offered for Microsoft Windows. I'd like to run a Raspberry Pi 3 as my readout instead of dedicating a laptop.
I'm reading that running x86 on ARM is possible via QEMU or a paid software option. I'd rather not have to run WINE or a full Windows installation. I think it's possible to make this work in Linux on a Pi3 with a little bit of code. Where I think I will have the most trouble is that the Windows software requires some manner of special code to 'authenticate' the USB box.
Internally the box has a PIC18F45K22 8-bit RISC chip and a MC74HC86A XOR chip. I suspect the latter is used to combine the signals of the four axes before output. The USB to serial chip is a common FTDI FT232RL which I can see connects as ttyUSB0. Running 'screen' against that device has produced no output.
The specification of the microcontroller indicates that it is re-programmable with 1024 bytes of EEPROM. Among the other code they've flashed to the chip, would they have programmed in the 'authentication' code mentioned earlier? Short of de-compiling the Windows program, can I interrogate the device across USB without ruining it?
The microcontroller manufacturer site seems to have reasonable documentation and even code samples. Assuming the flashed code isn't obfuscated, could I download the contents of the EEPROM? From there I suspect I could see what commands are required to initialize the box. I could either remove the 'authentication' or re-write the program in its' entirety and flash it.
Related
I have a microcontroller STM32F051 and I want to program it. I looked for IDE that I would be able to use and I found TRUESTUDIO that I'm using. I wanted to know how should I do to send the program I made into the microcontroller. Do I need any specific programmer (like an electronic device for Microchip Pics) ? When I clic the button debug, I get an error
"Error in initializing ST-Link device. Reason: Failed to connect to device. Please check power and cabling to target."
I'm not sure if I misunderstood something. I download the software and I selected my specific version of microcontroller, but it seems that it doesn't recognize it...
Yes, no matter what the mcu you will need some interface, be it as simple as a usb connector tied to the chip, or a debug header using some other device or electronics. For an stm32 chip many of the discovery boards and the nucleo boards (in particular the ones with a breakaway end, you dont have to break it off, just remove some jumpers to use it on other devices (not necessarily ST devices)). These parts also have a serial bootloader inside that you cant change so it is always there, and can sometimes use one of the nucleo stlink debuggers (do some research as to ones that offer a virtual uart, not all of them do, cheaper than the dedicated stlink dongles) or say an ftdi usb breakout board (under $2 on ebay).
There are numerous options for programming these parts as in writing software, can just use gnu tools and roll your own drivers (pretty easy the documentation is pretty good), get one of the ST libraries that they offer (for free) or if you have a Nucleo you might be able to use mbed or arduino to develop.
We really need to know more about the board you have this part on, is it just a breakout board or as asked in the comments did you buy a nucleo board or a discovery board? Are you running linux, windows or mac or other or are flexible on what host?
I am working on Xilinx Spartan 3E platform, using this development board:
http://www.xilinx.com/products/boards-and-kits/HW-SPAR3E-SK-US-G.htm
My program operates on certain data and then provides output. I wish to transfer the input signals externally. The input data is a stream of 8-bit signals.
So, how do I send the input signals from my laptop to the FPGA via USB? Does Xilinx support this or is there standard software to do this?
Thanks.
It sounds like you are describing a uart more than a native USB interface. You can get a USB to logic level serial adapter that will let you easily transfer data to and from a Pc at up to 921.6k baud. A uart/serial port is easy to implement in the Fpga and PCs are easy to use with serial ports.
Here is the cable:
http://www.ftdichip.com/Products/Cables/USBTTLSerial.htm
If you have a development card it is very possible this type of interface is present.
On the software side you can use your programming language of choice as if it was interfacing with a seal port or use a terminal program like hyper terminal or Download teraterm http://ttssh2.sourceforge.jp/
Updated response:
100Hz is not a hard interface to make. At that rate you should use the serial interface if at all possible. The board you referenced has 2 full RS-232 connections. At that point you only need a way to connect that to your computer. If you have a PC with RS-232 connectors you only need a cable if you have a newer computer without you need a RS-232 to USB translator cable (like this one: http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=768-1014-ND or google rs232 usb). This will give you a virtual com port on the pc to interface with the previously mentioned terminal programs or your custom software.
Update 2:
on the resource tab of the development board page you linked to there are several UART based fpga designs that you should be able to use as a starting point.
i.e. the "PicoBlaze Processor SPI Flash Programmer".
That board doesn't provide easy access to the USB interface from the FPGA as far as I can tell. It's just for configuration and debug.
Some of the newer boards and tools do allow something called hardware-in-the-loop testing where the simulator can upload data to the FPGA, wait it to calculate the results and then pull the data back. This is relatively common when using Xilinx's System Generator product as the simulations can be really long.
But I think with that board you'd be better off using the on board RS232 port to get data to and from the board. You will have to build the infrastructure to do it yourself though.
This may also give you some ideas:
http://www.1pin-interface.com/
I'm looking to control a mains powered light from a simple relay switch connected via USB to the computer.
The relay switch isn't even a USB device, it's just a simple switch that requires the USB voltage to turn it on. When the voltage drops below a threshold, the switch will turn the light off.
My problem is that I can't control the power output of a USB port. I'm happy to do it using any language on Windows or Linux (but preferably Java because I'm used to it).
Unfortunately, in most cases you cannot control the power supply to the USB port. The power supply is usually hardwired through, and not switchable in software. You can send a reset to a USB device, but that won't work in your case.
There are a number of projects on instructables that do similar to what you describe, but unfortunately they seem to either be quite complicated or require expensive parts.
EDIT: There is actually a product currently in the news which would do want you want, but it doesn't appear to be shipping yet: http://www.pwrusb.com/
EDIT (again): Apparently you can do this with some usb hubs. This post sugggests the Linksys USB2HUB4 is one that works.
EDIT (and again): Apparently there are a number of similar questions, but there don't seem to be any more useful answers:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/405269/custom-usb-device-that-disables-power-to-usb-devices-plugged-into-it
Power off an USB device in software on Windows
Is there software or code to alter USB power output
Can I write a program that swiches USB on/off
Most of the USB to Serial or USB to RS232 $10 converters support hardware handshaking. Use one of those as a single channel digital io.
Connect your transistor that will drive the relay to DTR on the converter board and command DTR ON/OFF with the converters driver.
A 2N7002 is a good transistor to use (FET actually) since it will work from 3V and doesnt need any resistors anywhere.
Here is a complete solution.
It uses an Arduino board, with a USB connection, (and Uno for example) to control the relay and combines this with pfod (Protocol for Operation Discovery) www.pfod.com.au which will let you control the board/relay from either the Arduino IDE SerialMonitor, or a terminal window (TeraTerm) or a Java program. The message protocol encloses commands in { }, think simplified html for micros, and provides numerous screens, menus, sliders, text and numeric inputs, etc. A detailed protocol spec is available
See Garage Door Remote for a detailed example, with full Arduino code and an example of controlling the relay from TeraTerm as well as the Arduino IDE SerialMonitor.
There is also an Android app, pfodApp, which will do general purpose control via bluetooth, or wifi/internet with 128 bit security. The pfodApp does all the Android stuff, you only need to code some simple strings in your Arduino code to get any menu system you want. See www.pfod.com.au for numerous examples.
You need a USB-GPIO microcontroller:
Adafruit FT232H (about $15)
Arduino Nano ATmega328 (about $7)
See this answer
I would suggest placing a separate Raspberry Pi unit with a wake-on-lan feature activated so you can ping it off and on.
You could do it by combining these two products from Pololu, for about $25:
Micro Maestro (assembled)
Basic SPDT Relay Carrier with 5VDC Relay (Assembled)
The Maestro is mainly a servo controller but you can set any of its channels to be simple digital outputs instead. The output can be controlled from the Maestro Control Center software or you can write your own software. A digital output from a Maestro is suitable to turn on the relay on the relay carrier. The relay could be powered from USB through the Maestro; I think it draws about 100 mA of current so that probably will not be a problem for most USB ports, though it would not be USB-compliant because the total current drawn by the Maestro and the relay would be over 100 mA. You could supply your own power source for the relay if you are worried about that.
I am new to the locating hardware side of embedded programming and so after being completely overwhelmed with all the choices out there (pc104, custom boards, a zillion option for each board, volume discounts, devel kits, ahhh!!) I am asking here for some direction.
Basically, I must find a new motherboard and (most likely) re-implement the program logic. Rewriting this in C/C++/Java/C#/Pascal/BASIC is not a problem for me. so my real problem is finding the hardware. This motherboard will have several other devices attached to it. Here is a summary of what I need to do:
Required:
2 RS232 serial ports (one used all the time for primary UI, the second one not continuous)
1 modem (9600+ baud ok) [Modem will be in simultaneous use with only one of the serial port devices, so interrupt sharing with one serial port is OK, but not both]
Minimum permanent/long term storage: Whatever O/S requires + 1 MB (executable) + 512 KB (Data files)
RAM: Minimal, whatever the O/S requires plus maybe 1MB for executable.
Nice to have:
USB port(s)
Ethernet network port
Wireless network
Implementation languages (any O/S I will adapt to):
First choice Java/C# (Mono ok)
Second choice is C/Pascal
Third is BASIC
Ok, given all this, I am having a lot of trouble finding hardware that will support this that is low in cost. Every manufacturer site I visit has a lot of options, and it's difficult to see if their offering will even satisfy my must-have requirements (for example they sometimes list 3 "serial ports", but it appears that only one of the three is RS232, for example, and don't mention what the other two are). The #1 constraint is cost, #2 is size.
Can anyone help me with this? This little task has left me thinking I should have gone for EE and not CS :-).
EDIT: A bit of background: This is a system currently in production, but the original programmer passed away, and the current hardware manufacturer cannot find hardware to run the (currently) DOS system, so I need to reimplement this in a modern platform. I can only change the programming and the motherboard hardware.
I suggest buying a cheap Atom Mini-ITX board, some of which come with multi - 4+ RS232 ports.
But with Serial->USB converters, this isn't really an issue. Just get an Atom. And if you have code, port your software to Linux.
Here is a link to a Jetway Mini-Itx board, and a link to a 4 port RS232 expansion module for it. ~$170 total, some extra for memory, a disk, and a case and PSU. $250-$300 total.
Now here is an Intel Atom Board at $69 to which you could add flash storage instead of drives, and USB-serial converters for any data collection you need to do.
PC104 has a lot of value in maximizing the space used in 19" or 23" rackmount configurations - if you're not in that space, PC104 is a waste of your time and money, IMHO.
The BeagleBoard should have everything you need for $200 or so - it can run Linux so use whatever programming language you like.
A 'modern' system will run DOS so long as it is x86, I suggest that you look at an industrial PC board from a supplier such as Advantech, your existing system may well run unchanged if it adheres to PC/DOS/BIOS standards.
That said if your original system runs on DOS, the chances are that you do not need the horsepower of a modern x86 system, and can save money by using a microcontroller board using something fairly ubiquitous such as an ARM. Also if DOS was the OS, then you most likely do not need an OS at all, and could develop the system "bare-metal". The resources necessary just to support Linux are probably far greater than your existing application and OS together, and for little or no benefit unless you intend on extending the capability of the system considerably.
There are a number of resources available (free and commercial) for implementing a file system and USB on a bare-metal system or a system using a simple real-time kernel such as FreeRTOS or eCOS which have far smaller footprints than Linux.
The Windows embedded site ( http://www.microsoft.com/windowsembedded/en-us/default.mspx )
has a lot of resources and links to hardware partners, distributors and development kits. There's even a "Spark" incubation project ( http://www.microsoft.com/windowsembedded/en-us/community/spark/default.mspx )
What's also really nice about using windows ce is that it now supports Silverlight as a development environment.
I've used the jetway boards / daughter cards that Chris mentioned with success for various projects from embedded control, my home router, my HTPC front end.
You didn't mention what the actual application was but if you need something more industrial due to temperature or moisture constraints i've found http://www.logicsupply.com/ to be a good resource for mini-itx systems that can take a beating.
A tip for these board is that given your minimal storage requirements, don't use a hard drive. Use an IDE adapter for a compact flash card as the system storage or an SD card. No moving parts is usually a big plus in these applications. They also usually offer models with DC power input so you can use a laptop like or wall wart external supply which minimizes its final size.
This http://www.fit-pc.com/web/ is another option in the very small atom PC market, you'd likely need to use some USB converters to get to your desired connectivity.
The beagle board Paul mentioned is also a good choice, there are daughter cards for that as well that will add whatever ports you need and it has an on board SD card reader for whatever storage you need. This is also a substantially lower power option vs the atom systems.
There are a ton of single board computers that would fit your needs. When searching you'll normally find that they don't keep many interface connectors on the processor board itself but rather you need to look at the stackable daughter cards they offer which would provide whatever connections you need (RS-232, etc.). This is often why you see just "serial port" in the description as the final physical layer for the serial port will be defined on the daughter card.
There are a ton of arm based development boards you could also use, to many to list, these are similar to the beagle board. Googling for "System on module" is a good way to find many options. These again are usually a module with the processor/ram/flash on 1 card and then offer various carrier boards which the module plugs into which will provide the various forms of connectivity you need.
In terms of development, the atom boards will likely be the easiest if your more familiar with x86 development. ARM is strongly supported under linux though so there is little difficulty in getting these up and running.
Personally i would avoid windows for a headless design like your discussing, i rarely see a windows based embedded device that isn't just bad.
Take at look at one of the boards in the Arduino line, in particular the Arduino Mega. Very flexible boards at a low cost, and the Mega has enough I/O ports to do what you need it to do. There is no on-chip modem, but you can connect to something like a Phillips PCD3312C over the I2C connector or you can find an Arduino add-on board (called a "shield") to give you modem functionality (or Bluetooth, ethernet, etc etc). Also, these are very easy to connect to an external memory device (like a flash drive or an SD card) so you should have plenty of storage space.
For something more PC-like, look for an existing device that is powered by a VIA EPIA board. There are lot of devices out there that use these (set-top boxes, edge routers, network security devices etc) that you can buy and re-program. For example, I found a device that was supposed to be a network security device. It came with the EPIA board, RAM, a hard drive, and a power supply. All I had to do was format the hard drive, install Linux (Debian had all necessary drivers already included), and I had a complete mini-computer ready to go. It only cost me around $45 too (bought brand new, unopened on ebay).
Update: The particular device I found was an EdgeSecure i10 from Ingrian Networks.
I have a device that came with an AC power adapter where the connector is a mini USB plug. The device however doesn't seem to power itself from a computer's USB port (using a standard USB-mini USB cable) unless a specific driver is installed. The driver is only available for Windows. I would like to charge the device from USB plugs on different platforms.
My question is: why isn't power getting to the device without the driver? Is a driver always required for a USB port to start giving power? Or is it this device that's specifically made not to take a charge unless some software routine triggers it to do so?
I guess my question can be summarized as: Is power not present on the USB cable or is it present but the device ignoring it. If the answer is the former, I'll be trying to figure out how to write software that will enable the voltage to always be present.
Thanks
Why isn't power getting to the device without the driver?
USB ports are always powered when the computer is on and the USB control software hasn't detected current overdraw.
Is a driver always required for a USB port to start giving power?
No, the USB port is always required to start off providing power to the device, otherwise the device could never initiate a connection.
Or is it this device that's specifically made not to take a charge unless some software routine triggers it to do so?
This can be complex. To meet the USB spec a device cannot pull more than a few mA until it's registered with the computer.
However, nearly every computer allows the USB port to pull the full 500mA (and more) before it'll shut the power off.
The device you're charging is being nice by not pulling any significant power until the computer gives permission.
Writing software won't help, the device has to register with the USB bus, which will best be done with the driver.
However, the plug in charger doesn't do that. It likely has shorted the two data lines of the USB plug together, which signals the USB device that it's not connected to a computer and can pull the full 500mA without waiting.
Take a USB extension cable, cut off the jacket, and short the data lines (green and yellow, sometimes) together on the end going to the USB device, and leave them cut without touching anything on the end going to the PC, and leave the read and black power wires connected through.
It might work. If not, take the wall charger apart and find out what it's doing with each of the four USB wires, and see if you can duplicate that.
This might be helpful if you are targeting a linux system.
This seems to be platform-specific. In Linux, USB ports are always energized, while on Windows they don't. Thumbdrives with LEDs turn off when unmounted in windows, but in Linux they stay lit. My cellphone's manual says that it can't be charged by a PC, but I regularly do on my linux machine, I guess that's because they don't have a driver and windows won't power up without one.
Have you tried plugging it into a 'dumb' USB port - like the one on a car charger? Those ports are pure power and don't create a USB network. I think.
Unless you have the hardware specs from the manufacturer, I think you are out of luck. You could try reverse engineering the driver to see what it does, but I'd expect it would be cheaper and easier just to buy one with cross platform drivers or charges without the driver.