While upgrading my Artifactory server (free OSS version) from the version 5.2.0 to the latest 5.4.5, I was hit by an ARTIFACTORY_PID problem.
After migrating from 5.3.2 to 5.4.0, the Artifactory server did not want to start anymore complaining about
PID file /var/opt/jfrog/run/artifactory.pid not readable (yet?) after start.
I found the only way around it is to remove the line export CATALINA_PID=$ARTIFACTORY_PID from the setenv.sh of the tomcat.
Note that upgrade from 5.2.0 to 5.3.2 went smoothly.
However, after upgrading from 5.4.0 to the latest 5.4.5 this trick does not work anymore. Now I get an error:
Job for artifactory.service failed because a configured resource limit was exceeded. See "systemctl status artifactory.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details.
And when executing service artifactory status, I get:
● artifactory.service - Setup Systemd script for Artifactory in Tomcat Servlet Engine
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/artifactory.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled)
Active: activating (auto-restart) (Result: resources) since Tue 2017-07-25 09:40:10 CEST; 4s ago
Process: 31912 ExecStart=/opt/jfrog/artifactory/bin/artifactoryManage.sh start (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Jul 25 09:40:10 linux systemd[1]: Failed to start Setup Systemd script for Artifactory in Tomcat Servlet Engine.
Jul 25 09:40:10 linux systemd[1]: Unit artifactory.service entered failed state.
Jul 25 09:40:10 linux systemd[1]: artifactory.service failed.
In fact Artifactory is now running showing version 5.4.5, but I am not happy about all those errors above.
Plus I am a bit failing to understand the purpose of CATALINA_PID and/or ARTIFACTORY_PID. Why the tomcat was failing on the startup because of this file? What was wrong with the permissions? I think I did no extra actions before.
The only difference that before it was installed from an official downloaded rpm. But now using an official remote yum repo.
If I try to create an empty /var/opt/jfrog/run/artifactory.pid file, while Artifactory is running, it gets deleted. Who is deleting this file and why? Is it a standard tomcat behavior?
OS: CentOS 7, up to date.
In my case (in a slow virtual machine) the error message from the command artifactoryManage.sh start was:
ERROR: Artifactory Tomcat server did not start in 60 seconds. Please check the logs
The log file told that the only problem was slowness (/var/opt/jfrog/artifactory/logs/artifactory.log):
### Artifactory successfully started (64.802 seconds) ###
The problem was solved by adding a longer timeout to the service definition at /etc/systemd/system/artifactory.service:
[Service]
Environment=START_TMO=120
After editing the service definition, as you know, systemctl daemon-reload was needed.
Run this script:
/opt/jfrog/artifactory/bin/artifactoryManage.sh start
It will show the exact error to you.
In my case it was java version not updated. So I updated to java 1.8.
Related
I've got a plain vanilla install of ignite 2.14, with the binaries downloaded from https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi (exact link https://dlcdn.apache.org/ignite/2.14.0/apache-ignite-2.14.0-bin.zip). I'm on Windows 10, IGNITE_HOME is not set in the PATH (this is optional), and Ignite's using this java runtime:
OpenJDK Runtime Environment 1.8.0_201-2-redhat-b09 Oracle Corporation
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 25.201-b09
I start an ignite node using the default configuration provided in the downloaded zip apache-ignite-2.14.0-bin.zip :
ignite.bat ..\config\default-config.xml
This starts fine. Following the instructions at https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/tools/control-script I can check the state and see I've got a single node cluster in state ACTIVE (the default-config.xml must not have native persistence enabled, so the cluster goes to ACTIVE state automatically).
I can then set the state to INACTIVE like so:
control.bat --set-state INACTIVE
This works fine. However if I set the state to active again like so:
control.bat --set-state ACTIVE
I get the error pasted below and the cluster stays in the INACTIVE state. I first came across this error when using Ignite in embedded server mode, but I can still reproduce it with a fresh out-of-the-box ignite install (not using embedded). I'm surprised that a plain vanilla install just calling a couple of basic commands falls over like this. Any idea what's happening?
This is the error:
C:\temp\apache-ignite-2.14.0-bin\bin>control.bat --set-state ACTIVE
Nov 17, 2022 4:27:17 PM
org.apache.ignite.internal.client.impl.connection.GridClientNioTcpConnection
INFO: Client TCP connection established: /127.0.0.1:11211 Nov
17, 2022 4:27:17 PM
org.apache.ignite.internal.client.impl.connection.GridClientNioTcpConnection
close INFO: Client TCP connection closed: /127.0.0.1:11211 Nov 17,
2022 4:27:17 PM org.apache.ignite.internal.client.util.GridClientUtils
shutdownNow WARNING: Runnable tasks outlived thread pool executor
service [owner=GridClientConnectionManager,
tasks=[java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask#6d7b4f4c]]
Control utility [ver. 2.14.0#20220929-sha1:951e8deb] 2022 Copyright(C)
Apache Software Foundation User: info Time: 2022-11-17T16:27:16.344
null suppressed:
Command [SET-STATE] finished with code: 4 Error stack trace: class
org.apache.ignite.internal.client.GridClientException: null
suppressed:
at org.apache.ignite.internal.client.impl.connection.GridClientNioTcpConnection.handleClientResponse(GridClientNioTcpConnection.java:632)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.client.impl.connection.GridClientNioTcpConnection.handleResponse(GridClientNioTcpConnection.java:563)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.client.impl.connection.GridClientConnectionManagerAdapter$NioListener.onMessage(GridClientConnectionManagerAdapter.java:691)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.nio.GridNioFilterChain$TailFilter.onMessageReceived(GridNioFilterChain.java:279)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.nio.GridNioFilterAdapter.proceedMessageReceived(GridNioFilterAdapter.java:109)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.nio.GridNioCodecFilter.onMessageReceived(GridNioCodecFilter.java:116)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.nio.GridNioFilterAdapter.proceedMessageReceived(GridNioFilterAdapter.java:109)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.nio.GridNioServer$HeadFilter.onMessageReceived(GridNioServer.java:3734)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.nio.GridNioFilterChain.onMessageReceived(GridNioFilterChain.java:175)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.nio.GridNioServer$ByteBufferNioClientWorker.processRead(GridNioServer.java:1211)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.nio.GridNioServer$AbstractNioClientWorker.processSelectedKeysOptimized(GridNioServer.java:2508)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.nio.GridNioServer$AbstractNioClientWorker.bodyInternal(GridNioServer.java:2273)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.nio.GridNioServer$AbstractNioClientWorker.body(GridNioServer.java:1910)
at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:125)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Control utility has completed execution at: 2022-11-17T16:27:17.642
Execution time: 1298 ms Press any key to continue . . .
It's a known issue, which is, unfortunately, not fixed yet.
As a workaround, you can execute the command with the autoconfirmation flag --yes, as shown below:
control.bat --set-state ACTIVE --yes
After a VM shutdown, GraphDB Workbench would not start.
I have installed GraphDB on a cloud-hosted VM. Incidentally, the machine was shut down without stopping GraphDB. When trying to start it again, the Workbench would not start and the following message is displayed in the error log.
[ERROR] 2019-06-19 12:12:00,299 [Thread-10 | c.o.t.s.i.PluginManager]
Problem shutting down literals-index java.lang.RuntimeException:
com.ontotext.trree.transactions.TransactionException: Failed to
created journal file: /home/peio/graphdb-se-8.10.1/data/repositor
ies/bgnews/storage/literals-index/numerics.index.precommit
As Damyan suggested, delete literals-index in the storage folder and it will be rebuilt on start-up.
I tried to install the Stanbol version from branch "release-0.12" from github.
On my system I have:
Apache Maven 3.0.5
Maven home: /usr/share/maven
Java version: 1.7.0_55, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-i386/jre
When I start the command:
mvn install
I get the following error for the Apache Stanbol Integration Tests => error-log
The first lines of the error are:
06.08.2014 15:47:02.025 *INFO * [main] Setting org.osgi.service.http.port=8765
06.08.2014 15:47:02.026 *INFO * [main] Starting launcher ...
06.08.2014 15:47:02.030 *INFO * [main] HTTP server port: 8765
15:47:03,614 INFO StanbolTestBase:163 - Got HttpHostConnectException at
http://localhost:8765/ - will retry
When I skiped the test I also got no response from the server...
I already tried it with java-version 1.6, but there I got the error:
[WARNING] Rule 0: org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.RequireJavaVersion failed
with message:
Java 7 or higher is required to compile this module
Has someone an idea what I made wrong (does it need some further software requirements)? Or how can I get the server running correctly?
The integration test starts a Stanbol Server (actually the full launcher) in its own JVM. The tests waits for up to 180 seconds for this server to start. During that time the test resends some test requests to check if the server is up and running.
Based on the provided log this period starts at about "15:47" so the test should wait until about "15:50" before it gives up.
Because of the line
^C15:48:42,236 INFO StanbolTestBase:146 - Got 404 at http://localhost:8765/entityhub - will retry
in the log my guess is that the build process was manually canceled with ^C before the server was fully started.
The server side logs of the test run are available at target/launchdir/stanbol/logs/error.log. If the integration tests do fail one will usually find the reason in this log file.
I have encountered a problem with running Jboss as service on Fedora. Here is the log I have after using command: systemctl status jboss-as.service
Here is the log I have been receiving:
jboss-as.service - SYSV: JBoss AS Standalone
Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/jboss-as)
Active: failed (Result: resources) since Thu 2014-01-16 09:31:54 CET; 46min ago
Process: 501 ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/jboss-as start (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Jan 16 09:31:22 servername.domain systemd[1]: Starting SYSV: JBoss AS Standalone...
Jan 16 09:31:23 servername.domain jboss-as[501]: Starting jboss-as: chown: missing operand after ‘/var/run/jboss-as’
Jan 16 09:31:23 servername.domain jboss-as[501]: Try 'chown --help' for more information.
Jan 16 09:31:54 servername.domain jboss-as[501]: [ OK ]
Jan 16 09:31:54 servername.domain systemd[1]: PID file /var/run/jboss-as/jboss-as-standalone.pid not readable (yet?) after start.
Jan 16 09:31:54 servername.domain systemd[1]: Failed to start SYSV: JBoss AS Standalone.
Jan 16 09:31:54 servername.domain systemd[1]: Unit jboss-as.service entered failed state.
First, I tried to find a solution for the chown: missin operand after ... problem and found something: here but it did not help. And also, I was looking for the answer for the PID file problem but it does not even exist in in the location: var/run/jboss-as/
This is because the startup script uses the variable $JBOSS_USER but it is not defined inside the script.
Please put in the file /etc/jboss-as/jboss-as.conf the following line:
JBOSS_USER=root
(change the root with other dedicated linux user e.g. jboss-as)
It looks like the service startup script expects to be able to write to the /var/run/jboss-as directory but doesn't have permissions to do so.
In your place I'd ensure that this directory is owned by the user that runs JBoss and that it is writable.
Check that there aren't other errors (particularly missing or incorrect paths) in your /etc/rc.d/init.d/jboss-as file (I assume you copied it from the jboss install folder to create a startup script.
I had the same issue until I fixed a completely unrelated link in that script, then it went away.
In Centos 7, if you straight way copying the jboss-as-standalone.sh in /etc/rc.d/init.d/, ensure JBOSS_CONF and JBOSS_HOME path is correct.
For me, it was with systemd. When I set the service y put wrong the PID File.
Example:
In the service was like
/var/run/jboss-as/jboss-as-standalone.pid
But in the script was like
/var/run/jboss-as/jboss-as.pid
I am setting up a GlassFish cluster following the guide at http://javadude.wordpress.com/2011/04/25/glassfish-3-1-clustering-tutorial/. I started from fresh installs of GlassFish 3.1.1. I also have the same architecture as in the guide: two nodes with one instance each. The DAS is on node1.
I've tried starting from scratch several times and am able to create the cluster, nodes and instances without issue. I also have the DAS communicating with node2 via SSH. However, each time when I get to the point where I attempt to start instance2 it fails:
$ ./asadmin start-local-instance --node node1 --sync normal instance2
Previous synchronization failed at Feb 23, 2012 2:41:53 PM
Will perform full synchronization.
Removing all cached state for instance instance2.
CLI802 Synchronization failed for directory config, caused by:
javax.xml.bind.JAXBException
- with linked exception:
[java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.sun.xml.bind.v2.ContextFactory]
Command start-local-instance failed.
I spent the day Googling and searching GlassFish's Jira, but couldn't find a solution to this issue. I'd very much appreciate any ideas you have on how to solve this problem.
My operating system is CentOS 5.7 and my Java version is 1.6.0_20
Unfortunately my instance directory is empty, I'm assuming because it never started. So there is no log file. I set AS_DEBUG=true but it gives no stack trace. The last debug lines before the error are
Removing all cached state for instance instance2.
Removing: /usr/local/glassfish3_1_1/glassfish/nodes/blade-50/instance2/config
Removing: /usr/local/glassfish3_1_1/glassfish/nodes/blade-50/instance2/applications
Removing: /usr/local/glassfish3_1_1/glassfish/nodes/blade-50/instance2/generated
Removing: /usr/local/glassfish3_1_1/glassfish/nodes/blade-50/instance2/lib
Removing: /usr/local/glassfish3_1_1/glassfish/nodes/blade-50/instance2/docroot
Got exception: javax.xml.bind.JAXBException
Acting on a tip from a user in the Glassfish forum, I learned that Java 1.6.0_20 is an older release of Java that is not supported by Glassfish 3.1.1. I worked with a sysadmin to get Java 1.6.0_31 installed on both nodes of the cluster and that did the trick--both instances start up without errors.