Have a SUM(Field_1) not exceed SUM(Field_2) - sql

There might be a better way to accomplish but here is what I have:
Environment - Plex ERP -SQL Query Editor
Back-end - SQL Server 2012
Summary
Parts have a "unit" worth based on manufacturing complexity
Some days we ship part\s. Other days we don't
The part units are summed for each day they are scheduled to ship 'Rel_Units_Calc'
The plant gets credit for 5 units a day (when open) 'Unit_multiplier'
This daily credit is summed for each day 'Unit_Capacity'
In order to prevent an overloading of capacity in a slow month, I need to prevent the plant from getting the 5 unit credit when the SUM(Unit_Capacity) will exceed the SUM(Rel_Units_Calc).
A report will be created that will use a case statement to evaluate if the Rel_Units_Calc > Unit_Capcity, then show red else green.
Detailed Scope
I'm trying to create a sales report that will prevent the sales group from overloading (exceeding the capacity) of the plant. To simplify, lets say we have 3 parts (Part A, B, & C). Part A is simple and worth 1 "Unit". Part B is a little more complex and worth 2 "Units". Part C is the most complex and worth 5 "Units". The plant can process 5 units a day that it is open.
The report will show when a day has been overloaded by showing the color Red and green when days are not overloaded. Any days in red will need to have the sales order moved out.
My approach was to take the units * order quantity to give me the 'Release_Units'. Then I am doing a sum(Release_Units) to show a tally for each day in a field called 'Release_Units_Calc'.
I have another field called 'Unit_Multiplier' that gives the 5 unit per day credit on eligible days (excludes weekends and holidays). Then I am doing a sum(Unit_Multiplier) to show a tally for each day in a field called 'Unit_Capacity'.
The color Red and Green were going to be determined by using a case statement comparing the two columns Release_Units_Calc and Unit_Capacity. When Unit_capacity = Release_Unit then green else red.
This works ok until you look at December when we have a slow down for these parts and then we start banking Unit_Capacity. The Unit_Capacity field continues to accrue the 5 units per day even after it has surpassed the Release_Units_Calc. These parts are not produced in December so think 20 business days * 5 units per day gives us 100 Units on Jan 1 which is not good. Essentially, this would cause the sales group to overwhelm the plant in January as they will have 100 banked units to draw from.
I would like for the Unit_Capacity which again, is a SUM(Unit_Multiplier) to not exceed the Release_Units_Calc which is from SUM(Release_Units).
SQL Below:
This temp table marks the days that should be included for the capacity
SELECT
DISTINCT FDPO.FULL_DATE,
----case statement below to create an include flag. It will exclude weekends unless we have a shipment going out
(CASE WHEN (DATENAME(dw, DATEADD(d,0,FDPO.Full_Date)) NOT IN
('Saturday','Sunday')) THEN 1
WHEN (DATENAME(dw, DATEADD(d,0,FDPO.Full_Date)) IN
('Saturday','Sunday')) AND FDPO.DUE_DATE IS NOT NULL THEN 1
ELSE 0 END) AS 'Include'
INTO #Capacity_Temp1
FROM #FDPO AS FDPO
This temp table uses the include flag to remove the dates that should not accrue capacity and adds a capacity column.
SELECT
CT1.FULL_DATE,
#Unit_Multiplier AS 'Unit_multiplier'
INTO #Capacity_Temp2
FROM #Capacity_Temp1 AS ct1
WHERE ct1.INCLUDE= 1
The temp table below adds the unit multiplier up for each day
SELECT
DISTINCT CT2.FULL_DATE,
CT2.Unit_multiplier,
SUM(CT2.Unit_multiplier) OVER (Order By CT2.FULL_DATE) AS 'Unit_Capacity'
INTO #Unit_Capacity
FROM #Capacity_Temp2 AS CT2
The final display query
SELECT
RUC.FULL_DATE,
RUC.Release_Units,
RUC.Release_Units_Calc,--running talley of the release units
ISNULL(UC.Unit_multiplier,0) AS 'Unit_multiplier',
-- credit units given per day except when closed
UC.Unit_Capacity --running talley of the unit multiplier
FROM #RUC AS RUC
LEFT JOIN #Unit_Capacity AS UC
ON UC.FULL_DATE = RUC.FULL_DATE
The output at present:
╔══════╦═══════════════╦════════════════╦═════════════════╦═══════════════╗
║ DATE ║ Release_Units ║ Rel_Units_Calc ║ Unit_multiplier ║ Unit_Capacity ║
╠══════╬═══════════════╬════════════════╬═════════════════╬═══════════════╣
║ 8/3 ║ 15 ║ 15 ║ 5 ║ 5 ║
║ 8/4 ║ NULL ║ 15 ║ 5 ║ 10 ║
║ 8/5 ║ 20 ║ 50 ║ 5 ║ 15 ║
║ 8/5 ║ 15 ║ 50 ║ 5 ║ 15 ║
║ 8/6 ║ NULL ║ 50 ║ 0 ║ NULL ║
║ 8/7 ║ NULL ║ 50 ║ 5 ║ 20 ║
║ 8/8 ║ NULL ║ 50 ║ 5 ║ 25 ║
║ 8/9 ║ NULL ║ 50 ║ 5 ║ 30 ║
║ 8/10 ║ NULL ║ 50 ║ 5 ║ 35 ║
║ 8/11 ║ NULL ║ 50 ║ 5 ║ 40 ║
║ 8/12 ║ 15 ║ 65 ║ 5 ║ 45 ║
║ 8/13 ║ NULL ║ 65 ║ 0 ║ NULL ║
║ 8/14 ║ NULL ║ 65 ║ 5 ║ 50 ║
║ 8/15 ║ NULL ║ 65 ║ 5 ║ 55 ║
║ 8/16 ║ 10 ║ 75 ║ 5 ║ 60 ║
║ 8/17 ║ NULL ║ 75 ║ 5 ║ 65 ║
║ 8/18 ║ NULL ║ 75 ║ 5 ║ 70 ║
║ 8/19 ║ NULL ║ 75 ║ 0 ║ NULL ║
║ 8/20 ║ NULL ║ 75 ║ 0 ║ NULL ║
║ 8/21 ║ NULL ║ 75 ║ 5 ║ 75 ║
║ 8/22 ║ NULL ║ 75 ║ 5 ║ 80 ║
║ 8/23 ║ NULL ║ 75 ║ 5 ║ 85 ║
║ 8/24 ║ NULL ║ 75 ║ 5 ║ 90 ║
║ 8/25 ║ NULL ║ 75 ║ 5 ║ 95 ║
║ 8/26 ║ 10 ║ 95 ║ 5 ║ 100 ║
║ 8/27 ║ 10 ║ 95 ║ 5 ║ 105 ║
╚══════╩═══════════════╩════════════════╩═════════════════╩═══════════════╝
The problem occurs on 8/22 where we start to exceed the Rel_Units_Calc field. This allows an order to be placed on 8/27 that will not trigger the Red because the Unit_Capacity will be greater than the Rel_Units_Calc.
Sorry for the long post. I'm open to any suggestions if there is a better way to accomplish this.
Thanks in Advance,
Mike

Related

How to Pivot this table on Oracle?

Can you help me figure out how to pivot this table:
╔═══════════╦═════════════╦══════╦════════╦════════╗
║ Big Group ║ Small Group ║ Kids ║ Adults ║ Elders ║
╠═══════════╬═════════════╬══════╬════════╬════════╣
║ 1 ║ 1 ║ 10 ║ 20 ║ 5 ║
║ 1 ║ 2 ║ 15 ║ 10 ║ 10 ║
║ 2 ║ 1 ║ 20 ║ 0 ║ 15 ║
╚═══════════╩═════════════╩══════╩════════╩════════╝
Into something like this?
╔═══════════╦═════════════╦══════╦════════╦════════╦═════════════╦══════╦════════╦════════╗
║ Big Group ║ Small Group ║ Kids ║ Adults ║ Elders ║ Small Group ║ Kids ║ Adults ║ Elders ║
╠═══════════╬═════════════╬══════╬════════╬════════╬═════════════╬══════╬════════╬════════╣
║ 1 ║ 1 ║ 10 ║ 20 ║ 5 ║ 2 ║ 15 ║ 10 ║ 10 ║
║ 2 ║ 1 ║ 20 ║ 0 ║ 15 ║ ║ ║ ║ ║
╚═══════════╩═════════════╩══════╩════════╩════════╩═════════════╩══════╩════════╩════════╝
The number of small groups per Big group is variable, and that's what is being difficult for me to understand how to do it.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks in advance
There is a way but the overhead of using PIVOT is to provide the list of all values which needs to be pivoted.
As you also need each small group to be pivoted we need to create a virtual column between big group and small group to be used in pivot clause as you see below
with table1
as
(select 1 bg
,1 sg,10 kids
,20 adult
from dual
union all
select 1,2,15,25 from dual
union all
select 2,1,20,0 from dual
)
select *
from
(
select t1.*,t1.bg||'_'||t1.sg piv
from table1 t1
)
pivot
(
max(sg) sg,max(kids) kids,max(adult) adult
for piv in ('1_1' as bg1_sg1
,'1_2' as bg2_sg2
,'2_1' as bg2_sg1)
)
order by bg
Demo

SQL Display Inventory Updates

I have a table that displays all the updates of the inventory:
╔══════════════╦════════╦══════════╦═══════╗
║ ItemName ║ Type ║ Quantity ║ Date ║
╠══════════════╬════════╬══════════╬═══════╣
║ BottledWater ║ Add ║ 50 ║ 07/03 ║
║ BottledWater ║ Deduct ║ 20 ║ 07/03 ║
║ Chips ║ Add ║ 30 ║ 07/02 ║
║ BottledWater ║ Deduct ║ 10 ║ 07/02 ║
║ Chips ║ Deduct ║ 20 ║ 07/01 ║
╚══════════════╩════════╩══════════╩═══════╝
I would like to write a query and return a table that would display the total of an items added and deducted stocks, the table would look something like:
╔══════════════╦═══════╦══════════╗
║ ItemName ║ Added ║ Deducted ║
╠══════════════╬═══════╬══════════╣
║ BottledWater ║ 50 ║ 30 ║
║ Chips ║ 30 ║ 20 ║
╚══════════════╩═══════╩══════════╝
Any ideas?
Just use conditional aggregation:
select item,
sum(case when type = 'Add' then quantity else 0 end) as added,
sum(case when type = 'Deduct' then quantity else 0 end) as deducted
from inventory
group by item;
Syntax is slightly off, but this is the pseudocode:
select ItemName, sum(Type==add) as added, sum(Type==deduct) as deducted,
from inventory
group by ItemName

How to scale with numbers table - exploding the memory and the hard disk

I am trying to populate a half fulfilled column with some values for some dates and having NULL for the rest.
The task is a basic fill in the gaps with the value of previous row.
It needs n iterations to fill the entire table.
I am using NUMBERS table to do the iterations and it works for small sample table like the following.
When it is done for 18 mn rows data, it cannot finish the query because it explodes computer resources and runtime is endless. How to scale this?
Or are there any better ways to do it? This solution seemed good for me at first.
'As is' and to be [statusTEST] column as follows:
╔════════════╦═══════════╦════════════╦═════════════════╦═════════════════╗
║ SOZLESMENO ║ tDuration ║ YRMONTH ║ statusTest_AsIs ║ statusTest_ToBE ║
╠════════════╬═══════════╬════════════╬═════════════════╬═════════════════╣
║ 40000001 ║ 0 ║ 2010-01-01 ║ 1 ║ 1 ║
║ 40000001 ║ 1 ║ 2010-02-01 ║ NULL ║ 1 ║
║ 40000001 ║ 2 ║ 2010-03-01 ║ NULL ║ 1 ║
║ 40000001 ║ 3 ║ 2010-04-01 ║ NULL ║ 1 ║
║ 40000001 ║ 4 ║ 2010-05-01 ║ 2 ║ 2 ║
║ 40000001 ║ 5 ║ 2010-06-01 ║ NULL ║ 2 ║
║ 40000001 ║ 6 ║ 2010-07-01 ║ NULL ║ 2 ║
║ 40000001 ║ 7 ║ 2010-08-01 ║ NULL ║ 2 ║
║ 40000001 ║ 8 ║ 2010-09-01 ║ 3 ║ 3 ║
║ 40000001 ║ 9 ║ 2010-10-01 ║ NULL ║ 3 ║
║ 40000001 ║ 10 ║ 2010-11-01 ║ NULL ║ 3 ║
╚════════════╩═══════════╩════════════╩═════════════════╩═════════════════╝
I use the following code with predefined Numbers table of 10,000 rows
--Numbers table defined
SELECT TOP 10000 H = IDENTITY(INT, 0, 1)
INTO dbo.Numbers
FROM master.dbo.syscolumns a
CROSS JOIN master.dbo.syscolumns b;
--Alternating the table H times to get statusTest_toBE column shown above
DECLARE #iteration_limit INT = 60
UPDATE X
SET X.statusTest = (
CASE
WHEN X.statusTest IS NOT NULL THEN X.statusTest
ELSE Y.statusTest
END
)
FROM
[Mainfiles].dbo.x2Skeleton X
CROSS JOIN [Mainfiles].dbo.Numbers3 N
LEFT JOIN [Mainfiles].dbo.x2Skeleton Y
ON (X.SOZLESMENO = Y.SOZLESMENO)
AND (DATEADD(MONTH, - N.H, X.YRMONTH) = Y.YRMONTH)
AND N.H BETWEEN 1 AND #iteration_limit
You can express what you want using window functions. If StatusTest_AsIs is always increasing, you can just use max():
with toupdate as (
select X.*, max(StatusTest_AsIs) over (partition by SOZLESMENO order by YRMONTH) as new_statusTest_ToBE
from [Mainfiles].dbo.x2Skeleton X
)
update toupdate
set statusTest_ToBE = new_statusTest_ToBE
where statusTest_ToBE <> new_statusTest_ToBE;
If the values are not increasing, you can still do this. Getting the previous non-NULL value is a bit tricky, but APPLY is a good way to do it:
with toupdate as (
select X.*, x2.StatusTest_AsIs as new_statusTest_ToBE
from [Mainfiles].dbo.x2Skeleton x cross apply
(select top 1
from [Mainfiles].dbo.x2Skeleton x2
where x2.SOZLESMENO = x.SOZLESMENO and x2.YRMONTH <= YRMONTH and
x2.StatusTest_AsIs is not null
order by YRMONTH desc
) x2
)
update toupdate
set statusTest_ToBE = new_statusTest_ToBE
where statusTest_ToBE <> new_statusTest_ToBE;
For both these queries, but this one in particular, you want an index on [Mainfiles].dbo.x2Skeleton(SOZLESMENO, YRMONTH, StatusTest_AsIs).

Count order of overlapping date ranges in SQL [closed]

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm not sure if the title quite paints the correct picture, but I'll attempt to explain. I have a table with start and end dates, and team members IDs (sort of like projects). I need to determine when they overlap, count the number of overlaps, and determine the order of overlap (sorted by the start date). My dummy data should clarify, but it's the latter of the 3 that I really want. Here is my current table:
╔═════════════╦════════════╦════════════╗
║ Team Member ║ Start Date ║ End Date ║
╠═════════════╬════════════╬════════════╣
║ 1 ║ 01/01/2015 ║ 04/01/2015 ║
║ 1 ║ 04/01/2015 ║ 06/01/2015 ║
║ 1 ║ 06/01/2015 ║ 07/01/2015 ║
║ 2 ║ 04/01/2015 ║ 06/01/2015 ║
║ 2 ║ 06/01/2015 ║ 10/01/2015 ║
║ 3 ║ 01/01/2015 ║ 09/01/2015 ║
║ 3 ║ 11/01/2015 ║ 13/01/2015 ║
╚═════════════╩════════════╩════════════╝
And here is what I want:
╔══════════════╦═════════════╦════════════╦════════════╗
║ OverlapOrder ║ Team Member ║ Start Date ║ End Date ║
╠══════════════╬═════════════╬════════════╬════════════╣
║ 0 ║ 1 ║ 01/01/2015 ║ 04/01/2015 ║
║ 1 ║ 1 ║ 04/01/2015 ║ 06/01/2015 ║
║ 0 ║ 1 ║ 06/01/2015 ║ 07/01/2015 ║
║ 0 ║ 2 ║ 04/01/2015 ║ 06/01/2015 ║
║ 1 ║ 2 ║ 06/01/2015 ║ 10/01/2015 ║
║ 0 ║ 3 ║ 01/01/2015 ║ 09/01/2015 ║
║ 0 ║ 3 ║ 11/01/2015 ║ 13/01/2015 ║
╚══════════════╩═════════════╩════════════╩════════════╝
So you can see that team members shouldn't affect each other's overlap order.
I'm using Access SQL at the moment, but shortly moving to SQL Server, so a solution in either is the goal!
P.S. you'll see that the 2nd and 3rd data row have the same start date. The overlap order between these 2 is arbitrary; they can be either way round.
EDIT: Changed sample dataset so it covers a new highlighted possibility. The OverlapOrder column can go from 0 to however high depending on how many projects overlap.
Assuming you are able to migrate to SQL Server 2005 or above, you can try the below solution which uses CTEs to do something like what you want:
;with cte as
(select *, row_number() over (partition by id order by startdate, enddate) rn
from tbl)
select *, case when (datediff(dd,s.startdate,t.enddate) >= 0) then s.rn - 1 else 0 end
from cte s
left join cte t on s.id = t.id and t.rn = s.rn - 1
You should take this with a pinch of salt however, since this solution might well be engineered specifically to the sample data set. I have not tested it out with different cases yet.
Demo

SQL: Count distinct values from one column based on multiple criteria in other columns

I am trying to do count distinct values based on multiple criteria.
Sample data exercise included below.
Table1
╔════════╦════════╦══════╗
║ Bug ID ║ Status ║ Test ║
╠════════╬════════╬══════╣
║ 1 ║ Open ║ w ║
║ 2 ║ Closed ║ w ║
║ 3 ║ Open ║ w ║
║ 4 ║ Open ║ x ║
║ 4 ║ Open ║ x ║
║ 5 ║ Closed ║ x ║
║ 5 ║ Closed ║ x ║
║ 5 ║ Closed ║ y ║
║ 6 ║ Open ║ z ║
║ 6 ║ Open ║ z ║
║ 6 ║ Open ║ z ║
║ 7 ║ Closed ║ z ║
║ 8 ║ Closed ║ z ║
╚════════╩════════╩══════╝
Desired Query Results
╔══════╦═══════════╦════════════╗
║ Test ║ Open Bugs ║ Total Bugs ║
╠══════╬═══════════╬════════════╣
║ w ║ 2 ║ 3 ║
║ x ║ 1 ║ 2 ║
║ y ║ 0 ║ 1 ║
║ z ║ 1 ║ 3 ║
╚══════╩═══════════╩════════════╝
A given Bug can be found in multiple Tests, multiple times for the same Test(ex: 6), or both (ex: 5).
The following query works fine to accurately deliver 'Total Bugs'
SELECT
Test,
COUNT(DISTINCT Bug ID) AS "Total Bugs"
FROM
Table1
GROUP BY Test
My research has led me to variations on the following query. They miss the distinct bugs and therefore return the incorrect results (shown below the query) for the 'Open Bugs' column
SELECT
Test,
SUM(CASE WHEN Status <> 'Closed' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS "Open Bugs"
FROM
Table1
GROUP BY Test
╔══════╦═══════════╗
║ Test ║ Open Bugs ║
╠══════╬═══════════╣
║ w ║ 2 ║
║ x ║ 2 ║
║ y ║ 0 ║
║ z ║ 3 ║
╚══════╩═══════════╝
Of course my end result must deliver both count columns in one table (rather than using separate queries as I have done for demonstration purposes).
I would like not rely on multiple subqueries because my live example will have more than two columns with counts from the same table but various criteria.
I am working with SQL Server (not sure release).
Any help is greatly appreciated.
You can have a conditional count(distinct) by using this code:
SELECT Test, COUNT(DISTINCT "Bug ID") AS "Total Bugs",
count(distinct (CASE WHEN "Status" <> 'Closed' THEN "Bug ID" END)) as "Open Bugs"
FROM Table1
GROUP BY Test
The case statement checks the condition. When true, it returns the Bug ID. When not present, it defaults to NULL, so the id does not get counted.