Dropbox shutdown webhooks for an user - dropbox

I have dropbox webhooks. When a user make a change, this webhook sends me a json with the list of users that have changes.
If some user in my platform, that has the drobox active, doesn't pay the quota so it's "inactive", there's a way to stop receiving his webhooks?
The only solution that I've thought is to store the inactive users and ignore when his id is equals to the id on the json, but that's quite ineficient because if I have 1000 users inactive that's a huge amount of webhooks to ignore.

No, it's not possible to exclude users that are over quota from webhook notifications. We'll consider it a feature request.

Related

Inconsistent webhook delivery of Twitter Account Activity API

I have successfully set up a DM bot with the Account Activity API. Everything works very well, except that sometimes the message sent to the bot (through the Twitter's web interface or mobile application) doesn’t fire a webhook to my server. The messages could be quick replies responses or plain text.
The reason is obviously not a downtime of my server since I tried to make a conversation between 2 webhook registered users (so my server receive the webhooks for both users) and for the same message sent, I have successfully received the webhook of the sender (the user) but not for the recipient (the bot).
As the bot isn’t in production yet, the reason is not an overload of messages. There is currently only 2 users that make conversations. From my experience, around 10% of messages are "lost".
I'm using the free (sandbox) Account Activity API tier, but as I understand the only differences between the free and paid versions are a higher number of subscriptions (I'm fine with 15) and the “Retries” feature. Regarding this feature, it is specified that “The Account Activity API provides a retry feature when the client’s web app does not return a ‘success’ 200 response for an account activity webhook event.”
It clearly states that the event failure concerns the client’s side, not the Twitter side. Considering this issue (my server doesn't receive the webhook at all), there is no guarantee that every event will be delivered even if in a paid plan.
This is a big inconvenience for bots since a button can only be clicked once, so the user must retry the conversation from the beginning (besides the fact that the bot "doesn't work"...)
So my questions are :
Is anyone here experience this issue ?
Is this a “bug or a feature” of the free Account Activity API ? I mean, at random the free tier doesn't fire the webhook on purpose (even if it's not specified in the docs) ?
Is there a way to see or measure the webhook failures Twitter side, via the dashboard for instance ?
A guess is that the events could be more accurate if the account is verified (with a blue badge) or hit a followers number threshold ? The treatment could be different due to the potential surge of events, so they are monitored with more ressources, thus more reliable ?
I already create a topic in the official Twitter forum and there is at least one other person in the same case, but no official answer from Twitter so far.
Thanks a lot !
BR,
Simon
I've got an official answer from Twitter :
Unfortunately it is not possible to achieve 100% delivery rate when there is only 1 delivery attempt for an event, which is why we have retries (and even then, retries are not a guarantee either). Things can go wrong; maybe internal issues in Twitter Data Centers, routing issues in the internet, hosting issues at your webhook, etc.
So from the time being, it seems that there's not way to have a 100% success delivery when you build a bot on Twitter.
Full answer can be read here.

Telegram Super Group Moderation

I'm looking for a telegram bot that will allow the admins or group moderators to first approve a message before the message is released to the greater group. Admins or moderators should be able to either approve or decline a message sent by a user of a group that way to keep control of messages and content of the group ?
Telegram is not made use of this, I think this is impossible.
You can try allow any message in group, and if admin approved, bot forward it to channel.
What about scrabbling the message posted by the users so when user sends message to group other users can't read it but only admins can read it and have to type password to open and read message ?

Can the instagram api pull likes and comments from an account that I do not manage

I want to pull likes and comments from any account that I specify. Can this be done with the Instagram API or do you have to have the accounts permissions to pull this info.
Essentially I want to be able to analyze this data without having log in credentials for the account.
Thanks!
Following the June 2016 changes to the API, you will need to invite the other users to be "Sandbox Users" of your API client. And even then, the access will be limited to their last 20 posts. Here's a quick explanation of the new Instagram API rules.
TL;DR
Sandbox users are other Instagram users that you “invite” to your
client. The main reason to do this is so that your app will then be
able to “see” their last twenty posts in addition to your own. In
other words, when they accept the invitation, they show up on the tiny
desert island where your app lives.
So you don't need their actual login credentials, but they do need to accept your invitation in order for it to work. The only other alternative is getting your app through the submission process to "go live" but there are very few use cases which they will accept anymore.

Send message to th all of bots users (telegram api)

how to send Send message to the all of bots users?
There is no way to sned message to all ?
what is the method name ?
From Official API FAQ:
How can I message all of my bot's subscribers at once?
Unfortunately, at this moment we don't have methods for sending bulk messages, e.g. notifications. We may add something along these lines in the future. (...)
Obviously, if you store users chat_id, you can send individual message to all users (I use this method).
Navid wants to send message to all subscribers via bot.
If subscribers are more than 100 persons bot will very slow to sending all messages and may doesn't send messages to all.
Navid's question was how we can send message without this problem?
you can send with curl_multi_exec
Currently, a developer would need to implement a special broadcasting function that would send the message to each active user at the time adding a small delay to avoid hitting the rate limit of 30 messages per second (see https://core.telegram.org/bots/faq#how-can-i-message-all-of-my-bot-39s-subscribers-at-once). This would mean that a very popular bot with say 10K active users cannot give timely notification as the last user would get the message about 5 minutes after the first user.
Here is a feature request to ask to add a method in the Bot API to broadcast a message to all its active users at once. You can upvote this feature request. https://bugs.telegram.org/c/8463

Can the PayPal API track inbound payments in real time?

I'm planning to create a web application that allows a user to track donation amounts to their PayPal account that are posting in real time towards a goal.
I need to know...
A. If it's possible
B. If the path I'm using is the best path
c. What is the best path is b isn't.
The flow would work like this.
1) User visits site and enters their PayPal Email address / password / goal donation amount. I'd then be able to make api calls on behalf of this user.
2) I'd use the API call and make a webhook on this users account for when donations come in (The webhooks only say it can fire when sales come in, but maybe donations count as a sale?)
3) I'd have a function on my website ready to accept the post data and update the tracker.
So if the tracker starts out saying 0/300 (user entered 300 for goal amount at the start), then a 15 dollar donation comes in it will update to 15/300, and if another donation for 5 dollars comes in it will say 20/300 etc...
Thanks for any suggestions / help!
Instead of using the user's PayPal email address and password, PayPal has something called a client id and client secret. These work like passwords to make API calls and allot safer than asking for the real email address and password from your user. If you revise your #1, then it is certainly possible to make API calls and receive webhooks just like you described.
Link to PayPal Authentication & Headers: https://developer.paypal.com/docs/api/#authentication--headers
Link to PayPal Notifications for managing webhooks: https://developer.paypal.com/docs/api/#notifications