How to skips scenarios conditionally in Cucumber Java testing?
For different testing environement,different scenarios need to be skipped.
You can assign a tag for the scenarios and exclude those scenario using the tags with cucumber options.
For example,
Feature: Feature 1
#skipforenv2
Scenario: Testing 1
....
#skipforenv1
Scenario: Testing 2
....
Assume if you want to skip scenario "Testing 2" in environment 1 and scenario "Testing 1"in Environment 2 Then,
While running on Environment 1, you can pass the tag argument as ~#skipforenv1 (--tags #skipforenv1). if we use ~ symbol before tag then it will be skipped for that execution.
using command line, `-Dcucumber.options="--tags ~#skipforenv1"`
using runner class, `#CucumberOptions(tags={"~#skipforenv1"}, .....)`
While running on Environment 2, you can pass the tag argument as ~#skipforenv2 (--tags #skipforenv2). Scenario 2 will be skipped.
using command line, -Dcucumber.options="--tags ~#skipforenv2"
using runner class, #CucumberOptions(tags={"~#skipforenv2"}, .....)
Related
In my regression suite I have 600+ test cases. All those tests have #RegressionTest tag. See below, how I am running.
_start = LocalDateTime.now();
//see karate-config.js files for env options
_logger.info("karate.env = " + System.getProperty("karate.env"));
System.setProperty("karate.env", "test");
Results results = Runner.path("classpath:functional/Commercial/").tags("#RegressionTest").reportDir(reportDir).parallel(5);
generateReport(results.getReportDir());
assertEquals(0, results.getFailCount(), results.getErrorMessages());
I am thinking that, I can create 1 test and give it a tag #smokeTest. I want to be able to run that test 1st and only if that test passes then run the entire Regression suite. How can I achieve this functionality? I am using Junit5 and Karate.runner.
I think the easiest thing to do is run one test in JUnit itself, and if that fails, throw an Exception or skip running the actual tests.
So use the Runner two times.
Otherwise consider this not supported directly in Karate but code-contributions are welcome.
Also refer to the answers to this question: How to rerun failed features in karate?
We have few test methods which have switch cases in it based on different functionality. When one of the functionality fails; we get invocation-number parameter in failed testng ex. invocation-number = "0 3 7" based on the failed case. Can we use this to run the single test method in parallel based on the switch cases in it?
I have a test suite with multiple unit tests, and all these unit tests expect specific working directory as they use relative path to load some test data. If unit test executable is executed from some wrong directory, all these unit tests fail.
What's the proper way to make this check in gtest? Preferably so that I get one single failure message instead of having 50 failed unit tests with the same message.
One way is to use fixture and do single time check, but in that case I still get all these 50 unit test failures instead of skipping the rest of the test suite
In the latest release v.1.10.0 gtest provides the new GTEST_SKIP() macro (hooray!!).
It can be used as follows:
TEST(SkipTest, DoesSkip)
{
if (my_condition_to_skip)
GTEST_SKIP();
// ...
}
As far as I know, there is no documentation on this yet except for the unit test of the feature.
As you can see in the unit test, entire fixtures classes can also be skipped. The skipped tests are marked as not failing with a green color. But you still get one output per test:
[----------] 2 tests from Fixture
[ RUN ] Fixture.DoesSkip
[ SKIPPED ] Fixture.DoesSkip (1 ms)
[ RUN ] Fixture.DoesSkip2
[ SKIPPED ] Fixture.DoesSkip2 (0 ms)
[----------] 2 tests from Fixture (12 ms total)
Googletest has built-in filtering feature. Provided that all your tests have common part of the name (e.g. they are in single fixture), you can disable them when running tests:
./foo_test --gtest_filter=-PathDependentTests.*
Or by setting environment variable GTEST_FILTER to the same string
GoogleTest 1.8 docs
Googletest master docs
If you still want a failure but only one instead of fifty then it's probably not the best mechanism unfortunately.
I have suppose 10 test cases in test suite in which 2 test cases are disabled.I want to get those two test cases in test result of jenkins job like pass = 7 ,fail = 1 and disabled/notrun= 2.
By default, TestNG generates report for your test suite and you may refer to index.html file under the test-output folder. If you click on "Ignored Methods" hyperlink, it will show you all the ignored test cases and its class name and count of ignored methods.
All test cases annotated with #Test(enabled = false) will be showing in "Ignored Methods" link.
I have attached a sample image. Refer below.
If your test generates JUnit XML reports, you can use the JUnit plugin to parse these reports after the build (as a post-build action). Then, you can go into your build and click 'Test Result'. You should see a breakdown of how the execution went (including passed, failed, and skipped tests).
I'm using soapUI 3.6.1 and I want to test a SOAP-interface with a test structure like this:
MyWorkspace
MyProject
TestSuite
TestCase Single
TestStep 1
TestCase Loop
Properties #1
Groovy #1
Run TestCase Single
Properties #2
Groovy #2
Run TestCase Single
TestCase Single contains a bunch of requests that should be performed with the same account-id. TestCase Loop is supposed to call TestCase Single using different account-ids. The Properties * are supposed to change the account-id.
MyProject has a property accountId set up with value 1234. This should work as the default value for single testing of the test cases, i.e. TestCase Single.
Properties #1 and Properties #2 have accountId specified with different values.
The intention is to allow TestStep 1 to be executed alone or as part of TestCase Loop.
TestStep 1 has a common SOAP-body where the following is a parameter sent to the web-service:
<accId>${='${#accountId}' != '' ? '${#accountId}' : ${#Project#accountId}}</accId>
Groovy #1 and Groovy #2 look like this:
log.info('Using account ' + (context.expand('${#accountId}') != '' ? context.expand('${#accountId}') : context.expand('${#Project#accountId}')));
My problem now is that the Groovy-script writes the correct value of accountId (i.e., the one inside the loop), but the TestStep 1 always uses the value from the project. I want TestStep 1 to use the value of the loop.
For debugging purposes I also put the following into TestStep 1:
<!--
{#Project#accountId}: ${#Project#accountId}
{#TestSuite#accountId}: ${#TestSuite#accountId}
{#TestRunContext#accountId}: ${#TestRunContext#accountId}
{#TestRun#accountId}: ${#TestRun#accountId}
{#TestCase#accountId}: ${#TestCase#accountId}
{#TestStep#accountId}: ${#TestStep#accountId}
{#MockService#accountId}: ${#MockService#accountId}
{#Global#accountId}: ${#Global#accountId}
{#System#accountId}: ${#System#accountId}
{#Env#accountId}: ${#Env#accountId}
{#accountId}: ${#accountId}
context.accountId: ${=context.accountId}
modelItem.accountId: ${=modelItem.accountId}
request.accountId: ${=request.accountId}
context.expand(): ${=context.expand('${#accountId}')}
-->
I traced the network traffic with Wireshark and noticed that only ${#Project#accountId} returned a value.
What am I doing wrong here? How do I need to code the <accId>-element to send the correct value to the remote host?
Now I revisited this issue and I think I found the best possible solution, even though I don't understand why my initial attempt didn't work.
I changed the structure to this:
MyWorkspace
MyProject
TestSuite
TestCase Single
TestStep 1
TestCase Loop
Groovy #1
Run TestCase Single
Groovy #2
Run TestCase Single
In other words I got rid of the Properties and moved the logic into the Groovies:
context.getTestCase().getTestSuite().setPropertyValue("accountId_loop", "1720");
and the appropriate line in TestStep 1:
<accId>${='${#TestSuite#accountId_loop}' != '' ? '${#TestSuite#accountId_loop}' : ${#MyProject#accountId}}</accId>