I tried the following code
batch_size= 128
c1 = tf.zeros([128,32,32,16])
c2 = tf.zeros([128,32,32,16])
c3 = tf.zeros([128,32,32,16])
c = tf.stack([c1, c2, c3], 4) (size: [128, 32, 32, 16, 3])
alpha = tf.zeros([128,3,1])
M = tf.matmul(c,alpha)
And it makes error at tf.matmul.
What I want is just a linear combination alpha[0]*c1 + alpha[1]*c2 + alpha[2]*c3 at each sample. When batch size is 1, this code will be fine, but when it is not how can I do it?
Should I reshape c1,c2,c3?
I think this code works; verified it.
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
batch_size= 128
c1 = tf.ones([128,32,32,16])
c2 = tf.ones([128,32,32,16])
c3 = tf.ones([128,32,32,16])
c = tf.stack([c1, c2, c3], 4)
alpha = tf.zeros([1,3])
for j in range(127):
z = alpha[j] + 1
z = tf.expand_dims(z,0)
alpha = tf.concat([alpha,z],0)
M = tf.einsum('aijkl,al->aijk',c,alpha)
print('')
with tf.Session() as sess:
_alpha = sess.run(alpha)
_M = sess.run(M)
print('')
Related
I'm training a simple feed forward conv neural network on the cifar10 dataset. After running a few epochs, I want to increase the kernel count in the 2nd conv layer from 16 to some number k.
How do I do this while keeping the trained weights for the other kernels and layers in the model intact?
def conv_layer(inp, fltrs):
inp = Conv2D(filters = fltrs, kernel_size = 3, strides = 1, padding = 'valid')(inp)
inp = BatchNormalization()(inp)
inp = Dropout(0.25)(inp)
inp = Activation('relu')(inp)
return inp
inp = Input(shape = (32, 32, 3))
x0 = conv_layer(inp, 8)
x1 = conv_layer(x0, 16)
x2 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size= 2, strides=None, padding='valid', data_format=None)(x1)
x3 = conv_layer(x2, 32)
x4 = conv_layer(x3, 48)
x5 = conv_layer(x4, 64)
x6 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size= 2, strides=None, padding='valid', data_format=None)(x5)
x7 = Flatten()(x6)
x8 = Dense(512)(x7)
x9 = BatchNormalization()(x8)
x10 = Dropout(0.25)(x9)
x11 = Activation('relu')(x10)
x12 = Dense(num_classes, activation='softmax')(x11)
model = Model(inputs = [inp], outputs = [x12])
I am trying to train a name generation LSTM network. I am not using pre-defined tensorflow cells (like tf.contrib.rnn.BasicLSTMCell, etc). I have created LSTM cell myself. But the error is not reducing beyond a limit. It only decreases 30% from what it is initially (when random weights were used in forward propagation) and then it starts increasing. Also, the gradients and weights become very small after few thousand training steps.
I think the reason for non-convergence can be one of two:
1. The design of tensorflow graph i have created OR
2. The loss function i used.
I am feeding one hot vectors of each character of the word for each time-step of the network. The code i have used for graph generation and loss function is as follows. Tx is the number of time steps in RNN, n_x,n_a,n_y are length of the input vectors, LSTM cell vector and output vector respectively.
Will be great if someone can help me in identifying what i am doing wrong here.
n_x = vocab_size
n_y = vocab_size
n_a = 100
Tx = 50
Ty = Tx
with open("trainingnames_file.txt") as f:
examples = f.readlines()
examples = [x.lower().strip() for x in examples]
X0 = [[char_to_ix[x1] for x1 in list(x)] for x in examples]
X1 = np.array([np.concatenate([np.array(x), np.zeros([Tx-len(x)])]) for x in X0], dtype=np.int32).T
Y0 = [(x[1:] + [char_to_ix["\n"]]) for x in X0]
Y1 = np.array([np.concatenate([np.array(y), np.zeros([Ty-len(y)])]) for y in Y0], dtype=np.int32).T
m = len(X0)
Wf = tf.get_variable(name="Wf", shape = [n_a,(n_a+n_x)])
Wu = tf.get_variable(name="Wu", shape = [n_a,(n_a+n_x)])
Wc = tf.get_variable(name="Wc", shape = [n_a,(n_a+n_x)])
Wo = tf.get_variable(name="Wo", shape = [n_a,(n_a+n_x)])
Wy = tf.get_variable(name="Wy", shape = [n_y,n_a])
bf = tf.get_variable(name="bf", shape = [n_a,1])
bu = tf.get_variable(name="bu", shape = [n_a,1])
bc = tf.get_variable(name="bc", shape = [n_a,1])
bo = tf.get_variable(name="bo", shape = [n_a,1])
by = tf.get_variable(name="by", shape = [n_y,1])
X_input = tf.placeholder(dtype = tf.int32, shape = [Tx,None])
Y_input = tf.placeholder(dtype = tf.int32, shape = [Ty,None])
X = tf.one_hot(X_input, axis = 0, depth = n_x)
Y = tf.one_hot(Y_input, axis = 0, depth = n_y)
X.shape
a_prev = tf.zeros(shape = [n_a,m])
c_prev = tf.zeros(shape = [n_a,m])
a_all = []
c_all = []
for i in range(Tx):
ac = tf.concat([a_prev,tf.squeeze(tf.slice(input_=X,begin=[0,i,0],size=[n_x,1,m]))], axis=0)
ct = tf.tanh(tf.matmul(Wc,ac) + bc)
tug = tf.sigmoid(tf.matmul(Wu,ac) + bu)
tfg = tf.sigmoid(tf.matmul(Wf,ac) + bf)
tog = tf.sigmoid(tf.matmul(Wo,ac) + bo)
c = tf.multiply(tug,ct) + tf.multiply(tfg,c_prev)
a = tf.multiply(tog,tf.tanh(c))
y = tf.nn.softmax(tf.matmul(Wy,a) + by, axis = 0)
a_all.append(a)
c_all.append(c)
a_prev = a
c_prev = c
y_ex = tf.expand_dims(y,axis=1)
if i == 0:
y_all = y_ex
else:
y_all = tf.concat([y_all,y_ex], axis=1)
loss = tf.reduce_mean(tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits_v2(labels=Y,logits=y_all,dim=0))
opt = tf.train.AdamOptimizer()
train = opt.minimize(loss)
init = tf.global_variables_initializer()
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(init)
o = sess.run(loss, feed_dict = {X_input:X1,Y_input:Y1})
print(o.shape)
print(o)
sess.run(train, feed_dict = {X_input:X1,Y_input:Y1})
o = sess.run(loss, feed_dict = {X_input:X1,Y_input:Y1})
print(o)
I am trying to evaluate a condition on each element of a vector y so that I get a vector whose i’th element tells me whether y[i]satisfies the condition. Is there any way to do this without using loops? So far, I have tried the following:
dim = 3
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape = [dim])
y = tf.log(x)
tf1 = tf.constant(1)
tf0 = tf.constant(0)
x_0 = tf.tile([x[0]], [dim])
delta = tf.cond(tf.equal(y,x_0), tf1, tf0))
sess = tf.Session()
a = np.ones((1,3))
print(sess.run(delta, feed_dict={x:a}))
For a given input x, I want delta[i] to be 1 if y[i] = x[0] and 0 otherwise.
I get error
shape must be of equal rank but are 0 and 1 for 'Select_2' (op: 'select') with input shapes [3], [],[]
I am new to TensorFlow, any help would be appreciated!
Seems like that you have error because you are trying to compare tensors with different shape.
That's working code:
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
dim = 3
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(1, dim), name='ktf')
y = tf.log(x)
delta = tf.cast(tf.equal(y, x[0]), dtype=tf.int32)
sess = tf.Session()
a = np.ones((1, 3))
print(sess.run(delta, feed_dict={x: a}))
For you case, there is no need to use tf.cond, you can use tf.equal that does this without the loops, and because of the broadcasting there is no need to tile it. Just use:
dim = 3
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape = [dim])
y = tf.log(x)
delta = tf.cast(tf.equal(y,x[0]),tf.float32) # or integer type
sess = tf.Session()
a = np.ones((1,3))
print(sess.run(delta, feed_dict={x:a}))
I'm learning TensorFlow and tired to apply on mnist database.
My question is (see attached image) :
what could cause such output for accuracy (improving and then degrading!) & Loss (almost constant!)
the accuracy isn't that great just hovering around 10%
Despite:
5 layer network (incl. output layer), with 200/10/60/30/10 neurons respectively
Is the network not learning ? despite 0.1 learning rate (which is quite high I believe)
Full code: https://github.com/vibhorj/tf > mnist-2.py
1) here's how the layers are defined:
K,L,M,N=200,100,60,30
""" Layer 1 """
with tf.name_scope('L1'):
w1 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([28*28,K],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w1')
b1 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([K],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b1')
""" Layer 2 """
with tf.name_scope('L2'):
w2 = tf.Variable(initial_value =tf.truncated_normal([K,L],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w2')
b2 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([L],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b2')
""" Layer 3 """
with tf.name_scope('L3'):
w3 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([L,M],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w3')
b3 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([M],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b3')
""" Layer 4 """
with tf.name_scope('L4'):
w4 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([M,N],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w4')
b4 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([N],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b4')
""" Layer output """
with tf.name_scope('L_out'):
w_out = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([N,10],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w_out')
b_out = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([10],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b_out')
2) loss function
Y1 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(X,w1),b1), name='Y1')
Y2 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(Y1,w2),b2), name='Y2')
Y3 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(Y2,w3),b3), name='Y3')
Y4 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(Y3,w4),b4), name='Y4')
Y_pred_logits = tf.add(tf.matmul(Y4, w_out),b_out,name='logits')
Y_pred_prob = tf.nn.softmax(Y_pred_logits, name='probs')
error = -tf.matmul(Y
, tf.reshape(tf.log(Y_pred_prob),[10,-1]), name ='err')
loss = tf.reduce_mean(error, name = 'loss')
3) optimization function
opt = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.1)
grads_and_vars = opt.compute_gradients(loss)
ctr = tf.Variable(0.0, name='ctr')
z = opt.apply_gradients(grads_and_vars, global_step=ctr)
4) Tensorboard code:
evt_file = tf.summary.FileWriter('/Users/vibhorj/python/-tf/g_mnist')
evt_file.add_graph(tf.get_default_graph())
s1 = tf.summary.scalar(name='accuracy', tensor=accuracy)
s2 = tf.summary.scalar(name='loss', tensor=loss)
m1 = tf.summary.merge([s1,s2])
5) run the session (test data is mnist.test.images & mnist.test.labels
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(tf.variables_initializer(tf.global_variables()))
for i in range(300):
""" calc. accuracy on test data - TENSORBOARD before iteration beings """
summary = sess.run(m1, feed_dict=test_data)
evt_file.add_summary(summary, sess.run(ctr))
evt_file.flush()
""" fetch train data """
a_train, b_train = mnist.train.next_batch(batch_size=100)
train_data = {X: a_train , Y: b_train}
""" train """
sess.run(z, feed_dict = train_data)
Appreciate your time to provide any insight into it. I'm completely clueless hwo to proceed further (even tried initializing w & b with random_normal, played with learning rates [0.1,0.01, 0.001])
Cheers!
Please consider
Initializing biases to zeros
Using ReLU units instead of sigmoid - avoid saturation
Using Adam optimizer - faster learning
I feel that your network is quite large. You could do with a smaller network.
K,L,M,N=200,100,60,30
""" Layer 1 """
with tf.name_scope('L1'):
w1 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([28*28,K],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w1')
b1 = tf.zeros([K])#tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([K],mean=0,stddev=0.01), name = 'b1')
""" Layer 2 """
with tf.name_scope('L2'):
w2 = tf.Variable(initial_value =tf.truncated_normal([K,L],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w2')
b2 = tf.zeros([L])#tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([L],mean=0,stddev=0.01), name = 'b2')
""" Layer 3 """
with tf.name_scope('L3'):
w3 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([L,M],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w3')
b3 = tf.zeros([M]) #tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([M],mean=0,stddev=0.01), name = 'b3')
""" Layer 4 """
with tf.name_scope('L4'):
w4 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([M,N],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w4')
b4 = tf.zeros([N])#tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([N],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b4')
""" Layer output """
with tf.name_scope('L_out'):
w_out = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([N,10],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w_out')
b_out = tf.zeros([10])#tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([10],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b_out')
Y1 = tf.nn.relu(tf.add(tf.matmul(X,w1),b1), name='Y1')
Y2 = tf.nn.relu(tf.add(tf.matmul(Y1,w2),b2), name='Y2')
Y3 = tf.nn.relu(tf.add(tf.matmul(Y2,w3),b3), name='Y3')
Y4 = tf.nn.relu(tf.add(tf.matmul(Y3,w4),b4), name='Y4')
Y_pred_logits = tf.add(tf.matmul(Y4, w_out),b_out,name='logits')
loss = tf.reduce_mean(tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=Y, logits=Y_pred_logits, name='xentropy'))
opt = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01)
grads_and_vars = opt.compute_gradients(loss)
ctr = tf.Variable(0.0, name='ctr', trainable=False)
train_op = opt.minimize(loss, global_step=ctr)
for v in tf.trainable_variables():
print v.op.name
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(tf.variables_initializer(tf.global_variables()))
for i in range(3000):
""" calc. accuracy on test data - TENSORBOARD before iteration beings """
#summary = sess.run(m1, feed_dict=test_data)
#evt_file.add_summary(summary, sess.run(ctr))
#evt_file.flush()
""" fetch train data """
a_train, b_train = mnist.train.next_batch(batch_size=100)
train_data = {X: a_train , Y: b_train}
""" train """
l = sess.run(loss, feed_dict = train_data)
print l
sess.run(train_op, feed_dict = train_data)
I have 19 input integer features. Output and labels is 1 or 0. I examine MNIST example from tensorflow website.
My code is here :
validation_images, validation_labels, train_images, train_labels = ld.read_data_set()
print "\n"
print len(train_images[0])
print len(train_labels)
import tensorflow as tf
sess = tf.InteractiveSession()
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=[None, 19])
y_ = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=[None, 2])
W = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([19,2]))
b = tf.Variable(tf.zeros([2]))
sess.run(tf.initialize_all_variables())
y = tf.nn.softmax(tf.matmul(x,W) + b)
cross_entropy = tf.reduce_mean(-tf.reduce_sum(y_ * tf.log(y), reduction_indices=[1]))
train_step = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.5).minimize(cross_entropy)
start = 0
batch_1 = 50
end = 100
for i in range(1000):
#batch = mnist.train.next_batch(50)
x1 = train_images[start:end]
y1 = train_labels[start:end]
start = start + batch_1
end = end + batch_1
x1 = np.reshape(x1, (-1, 19))
y1 = np.reshape(y1, (-1, 2))
train_step.run(feed_dict={x: x1[0], y_: y1[0]})
I run upper code, I get an error. The compiler says that
% (np_val.shape, subfeed_t.name, str(subfeed_t.get_shape())))
ValueError: Cannot feed value of shape (19,) for Tensor u'Placeholder:0', which has shape '(?, 19)'
How can I handle this error?
Try
train_step.run(feed_dict={x: x1, y_: y1})
You can reshape your feed's value by the following code:
x1 = np.column_stack((x1))
x1 = np.transpose(x1) # if necessary
Thus, the shape of the input value will be (1, 19) instead of (19,)