I have installed Kurento in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS Server. And configured with public stun server. The tutorials given by kurento are working fine.
But I need a android app, to have one2one video call.
There are few example in github.
But none of them are working for me in android studio.
https://github.com/billyriantono/kurento-android-client
which is based on
https://github.com/MaxMaes/WebRTCTest
Both are not working, as they are based on old Kurento versions.
Is there any recent working example for kurento one2one call in android?
Related
I'm troubleshooting an issue on our website which I can only reproduce using an Android phone or Android emulator, not using a browser's built-in emulator. On my environment (cloud VM), the only emulator that works is BlueStacks. I am running the website locally from Visual Studio (ASP.NET Core) on port 7086. However, I can't connect to it from the emulator. I have tried connecting to 10.0.2.2:7086, but I get ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT. The only answers I can find on StackOverflow indicate that this should work, so I'm not sure what else to try. Thanks!
I am not able to compile the WebRTCTest application in the antmedia github repository. This is the application I am trying to compile.
I need to test live stream performance over webRTC. The setup is running Linux OS and I am using gstreamer to capture the video frames.
Following is the use case:
Stream live video frames being captured from the camera over to antmedia using WebRTC protocol. However, I tried Compiling the WebRTCTest application given in the above link, but I got a lot of compilation issues mainly due to the header file names in the webRTC code source.
How can I publish the video frames being captured from the camera to antmedia via webRTC?
Also does antmedia provide any webRTC based SDK for linux platform (C language based)?
Actually WebRTCTest has not been supported for more than 1 year. But there is another WebRTC Test Tool that is developed by Ant Media team to test Ant Media Server. It is java based and publishes video files. You can still use it on Linux and publish your web cam with small changes.
https://gitlab.com/Ant-Media/webrtc-test
you should use https://resources.antmedia.io/docs/load-testing as a testing tool.
But if you need to publish or play only with gstreamer , I have wrote a gstreamer program in C which uses webrtc to send and receive stream from and to ant media server https://github.com/USAMAWIZARD/AntMedia-Gstreamer-Webrtc. It is tested with AMS version Enterprise Edition 2.5.1
We have develop a cross platform app with mobilefirst studio 7.0 and test it on production environment.
It was fine before we upgrade our project with mobilefirst studio 7.1.0.00-201510120-1525 and test it on clean staging server (7.1.0.0 20151012-1525).
It seems that the push notification functionality dedicated on mobilefirst 7.0 did not work properly on production server of mobilefirst platform version 7.1. The source code and configuration file of our mobilefirst push notifcation adapter and configuration files are here.
Inorder to fix the issue, we refer to official push notification tutorial which was documented here.
Surprisingly, although the source project in official tutorial looks fine on development server, it still not work on production server either.
We have test this project using iphone5s with ios 8.4 and HTC 816h phone with android 4.4.2, both of them fail to register push notification service after we login to the HybridEventSource sample application and tap the “Subscribe Notification” button.
The Mobilefirst server logs down internal server error message during the registration process of client devices.
I am wondering how to let the push notification mechanism work again on mobilefirst 7.1?
Either a valid push notification sample code of mobilefirst 7.1 or any fix pack which we do not know is welcomed.
Since we did not authenticate users via mobilefirst server, and devices were connected through vpn to server,
we prefer to have a solution which does not depends on particular mobilefirst server side authentication mechanism.
The server log message generated during this test is in this file.
The log file generated while we run EventSourceNotification app as xcode project is in this file.
For detail system log from ios device, please refer to device log file
And the Log message generated by HTC 816h android 4.4.2 phone is here
Information about our server environment:
Operating system : centos 5.8 linux
Java development kit : Oracle jdk 1.8 update 65 x86-64
Application server : Apache tomcat server 7.0.63
Worklight environment database : oracle database 11g.
Apple push notification service certificate : sandbox version
Well that's kinda suspicious, isn't it?
Since we did not authenticate users via mobilefirst server, and devices were connected through vpn to server, we prefer to have a solution which does not depends on particular mobilefirst server side authentication mechanism.
You are using the push mechanism provided by MFPF but you do not want to go through MFPF? You are required to go through MFPF if you want to use the push mechanism provided by MFPF... What did you mean by the above?
That said, did your DBA examine mf7-1-EventSourceNotifications-catalina.out.log? There are quite a few Oracle-related exceptions there that you should look at.
If you are still unable to resolve it I suggest to open a PMR instead so that the development team will be able to further investigate.
I need to compare the current app version with the latest app version deployed on worklight server from both android and ios app.
Did some research and found the link below but the mentioned api only returns current app version.
Can we get the app version and IP address info using worklight api?
Is there any way the mobile client can retrieve the latest app version?
I'm using Worklight version 5.0.6
Thanks in advance.
As written in the comments:
The way you're trying to do this is not the right one IMO.
with the Remote Disable feature as it is now you can block any environment and a specific version of it that you'd like, as long as it is deployed to the Worklight Server.
For the feature to work, you do not need to know what is the latest version; simply go to the console and disable the app version that is installed on the the device. You can customize this remote disable dialog and/or its behavior, see this blog post: How to Create a Customized Remote Disable Behavior.
The written in the blog post is supported in the latest Worklight versions: 5.0.6.2, 6.0.0.2 and 6.1.0.1.
I'm working on an app that captures a webcam stream and records it via a Red5 server. On my local installation (Red5 version 1, Mac OSX) everything runs perfectly however using the same version of Red5 on Ubuntu (our server enviroment) the video recording is truncated. A 2 min recording turns out to be just over 1 minute, however on the Mac its exactly the expected time.
Could it be as as simple as a config issue or is the 1.0 version of Red5 not stable on Ubuntu?
It seems this is a bug with the current version of Red5. Downgrading to version 0.8 solved this issue.
This is not an OS issue but an issue with how Red5 handles recording over slow connections.
You have Mac OSX installed locally and when recording to local there is no bandwidth limit. As soon as you use the Ubuntu server, you're streaming (uploading) the audio and video data to a remote server and inherently you have some bandwidth limitations. If you go over these limits the resulting .flv file can have all sorts of issues.
Different Red5 versions have different issues with the recording process. These issues are well documented here: Recording issues with Red5 .
The best Red5 version for recording is a patched 1.0.2 version available in this blog post: Recording high quality (HD) video over slow connections with Red5 is now possible
The patch has also been applied to Red5's source code on GitHub and it will be available in the next official build as well (1.0.3).