Is it possible to notify an application running on a Google Compute VM when the VM migrates to different hardware?
I'm a developer for an application (HMMER) that makes heavy use of vector instructions (SSE/AVX/AVX-512). The version I'm working on probes its hardware at startup to determine which vector instructions are available and picks the best set.
We've been looking at running our program on Google Compute and other cloud engines, and one concern is that, if a VM migrates from one physical machine to another while running our program, the new machine might support different instructions, causing our program to either crash or execute more slowly than it could.
Is there a way to notify applications running on a Google Compute VM when the VM migrates? The only relevant information I've found is that you can set a VM to perform a shutdown/reboot sequence when it migrates, which would kill any currently-executing programs but would at least let the user know that they needed to restart the program.
We ensure that your VM instances never live migrate between physical machines in a way that would cause your programs to crash the way you describe.
However, for your use case you probably want to specify a minimum CPU platform version. You can use this to ensure that e.g. your instance has the new Skylake AVX instructions available. See the documentation on Specifying the Minimum CPU Platform for further details.
As per the Live Migration docs:
Live migration does not change any attributes or properties of the VM
itself. The live migration process just transfers a running VM from
one host machine to another. All VM properties and attributes remain
unchanged, including things like internal and external IP addresses,
instance metadata, block storage data and volumes, OS and application
state, network settings, network connections, and so on.
Google does provide few controls to set the instance availability policies which also lets you control aspects of live migration. Here they also mention what you can look for to determine when live migration has taken place.
Live migrate
By default, standard instances are set to live migrate, where Google
Compute Engine automatically migrates your instance away from an
infrastructure maintenance event, and your instance remains running
during the migration. Your instance might experience a short period of
decreased performance, although generally most instances should not
notice any difference. This is ideal for instances that require
constant uptime, and can tolerate a short period of decreased
performance.
When Google Compute Engine migrates your instance, it reports a system
event that is published to the list of zone operations. You can review
this event by performing a gcloud compute operations list --zones ZONE
request or by viewing the list of operations in the Google Cloud
Platform Console, or through an API request. The event will appear
with the following text:
compute.instances.migrateOnHostMaintenance
In addition, you can detect directly on the VM when a maintenance event is about to happen.
Getting Live Migration Notices
The metadata server provides information about an instance's
scheduling options and settings, through the scheduling/
directory and the maintenance-event attribute. You can use these
attributes to learn about a virtual machine instance's scheduling
options, and use this metadata to notify you when a maintenance event
is about to happen through the maintenance-event attribute. By
default, all virtual machine instances are set to live migrate so the
metadata server will receive maintenance event notices before a VM
instance is live migrated. If you opted to have your VM instance
terminated during maintenance, then Compute Engine will automatically
terminate and optionally restart your VM instance if the
automaticRestart attribute is set. To learn more about maintenance
events and instance behavior during the events, read about scheduling
options and settings.
You can learn when a maintenance event will happen by querying the
maintenance-event attribute periodically. The value of this
attribute will change 60 seconds before a maintenance event starts,
giving your application code a way to trigger any tasks you want to
perform prior to a maintenance event, such as backing up data or
updating logs. Compute Engine also offers a sample Python script
to demonstrate how to check for maintenance event notices.
You can use the maintenance-event attribute with the waiting for
updates feature to notify your scripts and applications when a
maintenance event is about to start and end. This lets you automate
any actions that you might want to run before or after the event. The
following Python sample provides an example of how you might implement
these two features together.
You can also choose to terminate and optionally restart your instance.
Terminate and (optionally) restart
If you do not want your instance to live migrate, you can choose to
terminate and optionally restart your instance. With this option,
Google Compute Engine will signal your instance to shut down, wait for
a short period of time for your instance to shut down cleanly,
terminate the instance, and restart it away from the maintenance
event. This option is ideal for instances that demand constant,
maximum performance, and your overall application is built to handle
instance failures or reboots.
Look at the Setting availability policies section for more details on how to configure this.
If you use an instance with a GPU or a preemptible instance be aware that live migration is not supported:
Live migration and GPUs
Instances with GPUs attached cannot be live migrated. They must be set
to terminate and optionally restart. Compute Engine offers a 60 minute
notice before a VM instance with a GPU attached is terminated. To
learn more about these maintenance event notices, read Getting live
migration notices.
To learn more about handling host maintenance with GPUs, read
Handling host maintenance on the GPUs documentation.
Live migration for preemptible instances
You cannot configure a preemptible instances to live migrate. The
maintenance behavior for preemptible instances is always set to
TERMINATE by default, and you cannot change this option. It is also
not possible to set the automatic restart option for preemptible
instances.
As Ramesh mentioned, you can specify the minimum CPU platform to ensure you are only migrated to an instance which has at least the minimum CPU platform you specified. At a high level it looks like:
In summary, when you specify a minimum CPU platform:
Compute Engine always uses the minimum CPU platform where available.
If the minimum CPU platform is not available or the minimum CPU platform is older than the zone default, and a newer CPU platform is
available for the same price, Compute Engine uses the newer platform.
If the minimum CPU platform is not available in the specified zone and there are no newer platforms available without extra cost, the
server returns a 400 error indicating that the CPU is unavailable.
Related
I am running managed Instance groups whose overall c.p.u is always below 30% but if i check instances individually then i found some are running at 70 above and others are running as low as 15 percent.
Keep in mind that Managed Instance Groups don't take into account individual instances as whether a machine should be removed from the pool or not. GCP's MIGs keep a running average of the last 10 minutes of activity of all instances in the group and use that metric to determine scaling decisions. You can find more details here.
Identifying instances with lower CPU usage than the group doesn't seem like the right goal here, instead I would suggest focusing on why some machines have 15% usage and others have 70%. How is work distributed to your instances, are you using the correct strategies for load balancing for your workload?
Maybe your applications have specific endpoints that cause large amounts of CPU usage while the majority of them are basic CRUD operations, having one machine generating a report and displaying higher usage is fine. If all instances render HTML pages from templates and return the results one machine performing much less work than the others is a distribution issue. Maybe you're using a RPS algorithm when you want a CPU utilization one.
In your use case, the best option is to create an Alert notification that will alert you when an instance goes over the desired CPU usage. Once you receive the notification, you will then be able to manually delete the VM instance. As it is part of the Managed Instance group, the VM instance will automatically recreate.
I have attached an article on how to create an Alert notification here.
There is no metric within Stackdriver that will call the GCE API to delete a VM instance .
There is currently no such automation in place. It should't be too difficult to implement it yourself though. You can write a small script that would run on all your machines (started from Cron or something) that monitors CPU usage. If it decides it is too low, the instance can delete itself from the MIG (you can use e.g. gcloud compute instance-groups managed delete-instances --instances ).
I have a cloudbees enterprise instance that I use for performance and automated UI testing.
The free instance (which is limited in memory) cannot support the memory or request per second that we have for testing.
I would like to have the instance automatically hibernated when I am not using it but have it wake up when requests come in. I would configure a jenkins job to wake the app up (by issuing a request) before kicking off my sauce lab based selenium jobs.
My question is how do I configure automatic hibernation? The control panel has minimum of one instance which I guess means that the one instance stays up.
You are right - currently automatic hibernation is only for free applications. When an application is hibernated (vs stopped) then it will be automatically woken whenever someone needs to access it.
What you could do for this is to have a job set your application to hibernated, say once a day, (or at certain time of the day when you know it won't be needed). When it is needed again - you won't need to do anything - simply accessing it will cause it to be activated (woken) again - so your test script can just insure that is the case (and ideally, after a test run, set it to hibernated again).
It really depends how often the app is needed - if you can work out what points it isn't needed and trigger the hibernate off that (eg after a test run) then that is ideal (you minimise cost).
I've been trying to find out ways to improve our nservicebus code performance. I searched and stumbled on these profiles that you can set upon running/installing the nservicebus host.
Currently we're running the nservicebus host as-is, and I read that by default we are using the "Lite" version of the available profiles. I've also learnt from this link:
http://docs.particular.net/nservicebus/hosting/nservicebus-host/profiles
that there are Integrated and Production profiles. The documentation does not say much - has anyone tried the Production profiles and noticed an improvement in nservicebus performance? Specifically affecting the speed in consuming messages from the queues?
One major difference between the NSB profiles is how they handle storage of subscriptions.
The lite, integration and production profiles allow NSB to configure how reliable it is. For example, the lite profile uses in-memory subscription storage for all pub/sub registrations. This is a concern because in order to register a subscriber in the lite profile, the publisher has to already be running (so the publisher can store the subscriber list in memory). What this means is that if the publisher crashes for any reason (or is taken offline), all the subscription information is lost (until each subscriber is restarted).
So, the lite profile is good if you are running on a developer machine and want to quickly test how your services interact. However, it is just not suitable to other environments.
The integration profile stores subscription information on a local queue. This can be good for simple environments (like QA etc.). However, in a highly distributed environment holding the subscription information in a database is best, hence the production profile.
So, to answer your question, I don't think that by changing profiles you will see a performance gain. If anything, changing from the lite profile to one of the other profiles is likely to decrease performance (because you incur the cost of accessing queue or database storage).
Unless you tuned the logging yourself, we've seen large improvements based on reduced logging. The performance from reading off the queues is same all around. Since the queues are local, you won't gain much from the transport. I would take a look at tuning your handlers and the underlying infrastructure. You may want to check out tuning MSMQ and look at the disk you are using etc. Another spot would be to look at how distributed transactions are working assuming you are using a remote database that requires them.
Another option to increase processing time is to increase the number of threads consuming the queue. This will require a license. If a license is not an option you can have multiple instances of a single threaded endpoint running. This requires you shard your work based on message type or something else.
Continuing up the scale you can then get into using the Distributor to load balance work. Again this will require a license, but you'll be able to add more nodes as necessary. All of the opportunities above also apply to this topology.
Since I don't have root rights on the machines in a compute pool, and thus cannot adapt the load parameters of atd for batch, I'm looking for an alternative way to do job scheduling. Since the machines are used by multiple users, it should be able to take the load into account. Optionally, I'm looking for a way to do this for all the machines it the pool, I.e. there is one central queue with jobs that need to be ran, and a script that distributes them (over ssh) over the machines that are under a certain load. Any ideas?
First: go talk to the system administrators of the compute pool. Enterprise wide job schedulers have become a rather common component in infrastructures these days. Typically, these schedulers do not take into account system load though.
If the above doesn't lead to a good solution, you should carefully consider what load your jobs will impose on the machine: your jobs could be stressing the cpu more, consume large amounts of memory, generate lots of network or disk IO activity. Consequently, determining whether your job should start may depend on a lot of measurement, some of which you would not be able to do as an ordinary user (depends a bit on the kind of OS you are running, and how tight security is). In any case: you would only be able to take into account the load at the job's start up. Obviously, if every user would do this, you're back at square one in no time...
It might be a better idea to see with your system administrator if they have some sort of resource controls in place (e.g. projects in Solaris) through which they can make sure your batches are not tearing down the nodes in the compute pool. Next, write your batch jobs in such a way that they can cope with the OS declining requests for resources.
EDIT: As for the distributed nature: queueing up the jobs and having clients on all nodes point to the same queue, consuming as much as they can in the context of the resource controls...
I am new to weblogic server. I am using work manager. I want to know what is work manager and why we need it. What is the difference between normal request with out work manager and with work manager !!
I think the documentation is rather good on this subject.
WebLogic Server prioritizes work and allocates threads based on an
execution model that takes into
account administrator-defined
parameters and actual run-time
performance and throughput.
Administrators can configure a set of
scheduling guidelines and associate
them with one or more applications, or
with particular application
components. For example, you can
associate one set of scheduling
guidelines for one application, and
another set of guidelines for other
application. At run-time, WebLogic
Server uses these guidelines to assign
pending work and enqueued requests to
execution threads.
Essentially, with work managers you can attach a scheduling policy to an application to e.g. make sure that a specific application gets a fair share of the available computing resources under a heavy load situation. Or you might want to restict the maximum number of threads that will be allocated to an application to prevent a buggy/untested application to bring the whole application server to its knees. (But surely all apps have been tested not to do anything like that.... ;) )
Outside of modifying the default allocation algorithms, the Work Manager is also useful if you are using a Foreign JMS Provider (such as IBM MQ) and need to process more than 16 messages at a time.