I have my portlet with CRUD-operations (different bundles, services, etc.).
I want to implement custom actions in permission for this portlet.
I create default.xml file:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<resource-action-mapping>
<portlet-resource>
<portlet-name>com.mypackage.MyPortlet</portlet-name>
<permissions>
<supports>
<action-key>STACKOVERFLOW_ACTION</action-key>
</supports>
</permissions>
</portlet-resource>
</resource-action-mapping>
And create portlet.properties:
include-and-override=portlet-ext.properties
resource.actions.configs=resource-actions/default.xml
The questions is - why do I have nothing in control panel besides default actions life "ADD_TO_PAGE", etc? What am I doing wrong?
UPD:
This varient doesn't work too. =(
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE resource-action-mapping PUBLIC "-//Liferay//DTD Resource Action Mapping 7.0.0//EN" "http://www.liferay.com/dtd/liferay-resource-action-mapping_7_0_0.dtd">
<resource-action-mapping>
<model-resource>
<model-name>mypackage.web.portlet.MyPortlet</model-name>
<portlet-ref>
<portlet-name>mypackage_web_portlet_MyPortlet</portlet-name>
</portlet-ref>
<root>true</root>
<weight>1</weight>
<permissions>
<supports>
<action-key>VIEW_TEST</action-key>
</supports>
<site-member-defaults>
<action-key>SUBSCRIBE_TEST</action-key>
</site-member-defaults>
<guest-defaults />
<guest-unsupported>
<action-key>ADD_ENTRY_TEST</action-key>
<action-key>PERMISSIONS_TEST</action-key>
<action-key>SUBSCRIBE_TEST</action-key>
</guest-unsupported>
</permissions>
</model-resource>
You should use the <model-resource> block rather than <portlet-resource>: Portlet-Resource is handled by Liferay (and uses the predefined vocabulary) while your portlet or service introduces its own datatypes, on which you can define your own permissions.
Related
I have created a custom Solr search index for a specific Data Template as I expect to maintain tons of items created based on that template. As you would guess I organised my items into Sitecore Item Buckets for better performance and also I could configure my Sitecore front-end to utilise that custom Solr search index. Now I would like to optimise the search across my Item Buckets in Content Editor, but it seems that Sitecore takes the master index over any custom indexes. How can I configure Sitecore to use my custom index?
Once you have created your custom Solr index you should also have created a corresponding config file as per one of the example files provided by Sitecore. For instance, for Master DB you can use Sitecore.ContentSearch.Solr.Index.Master.config.example as a config template and simply add a patch:before="*[1]" attribute to your custom index definition as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<configuration xmlns:patch="http://www.sitecore.net/xmlconfig/">
<sitecore>
<contentSearch>
<configuration type="Sitecore.ContentSearch.ContentSearchConfiguration, Sitecore.ContentSearch">
<indexes hint="list:AddIndex">
<index patch:before="*[1]" id="my_sitecore_custom_master_index" type="Sitecore.ContentSearch.SolrProvider.SolrSearchIndex, Sitecore.ContentSearch.SolrProvider">
<param desc="name">$(id)</param>
<param desc="core">$(id)</param>
<param desc="propertyStore" ref="contentSearch/indexConfigurations/databasePropertyStore" param1="$(id)" />
<configuration ref="contentSearch/indexConfigurations/defaultSolrIndexConfiguration" />
<strategies hint="list:AddStrategy">
<strategy ref="contentSearch/indexConfigurations/indexUpdateStrategies/syncMaster" />
</strategies>
<locations hint="list:AddCrawler">
<crawler type="Sitecore.ContentSearch.SitecoreItemCrawler, Sitecore.ContentSearch">
<Database>master</Database>
<Root>/sitecore</Root>
</crawler>
</locations>
<enableItemLanguageFallback>false</enableItemLanguageFallback>
<enableFieldLanguageFallback>false</enableFieldLanguageFallback>
</index>
</indexes>
</configuration>
</contentSearch>
</sitecore>
</configuration>
Now Sitecore will load my_sitecore_custom_master_index index configuration as first priority and utilise it while processing any search queries for your custom items instead of the default Sitecore one.
I need your help.
I read whole internet about Registration-Free COM/DLLs but my problem is more complex.
I'm preparing an application in VB.NET which will be used in an environment in which users don't have admin rights, so I can't simpy install it or register COM. This COM is a LogParser library designed by microsoft.
DLL also doesn't have to be embeded - would be nice, but it may be also extracted from exe during startup - i'm ok with this approach
Generally in a main form i've got a button which invokes another form by:
LogParser_Form.Show()
This another Form 'Imports MSUtil', which is a Interop.MSUtil.dll and which is embeeded to exe by Fody Costura add-on.
Form contains also a class which has multiple declarations of variables defined in COM, eg:
Dim IISW3CLOG As New COMIISW3CInputContextClass
(there is more than one)
But this dll refers somewhere to bigger: LogParser.dll which is acutally a COM component which requires registration, so my LogParser_Form doesn't appear when button is clicked, but it throws an exception that COM component is not found...
Unfortunately Fody Costura or Ilmerge don't work for the COM...
I tried multiple tricks wich manifest files, etc, but no luck...
You are my last hope - please help me... How to embed this COM to exe without registering it?
I suppose that properly used manifest files may help, but I didn't find a way to successfully use it ...
Getting Registration-Free COM to work can be tricky, but works when configured properly. The key issue is creating manifests, which document all required dependencies. In your case, you'll need two manifests:
Client manifest for your application
Server manifest for the LogParser library. This part requires a tool for analyzing type libraries, such as the OLE/COM Object Viewer (oleview.exe). It allows looking into the embedded type library inside LogParser.dll.
Let's take the (slightly modified) C# example, which is documented in the LogParser help file. The client is named "logqryclient.exe" in this case, and the Runtime Callable Wrapper has been created via the type library importer (tlbimp).
using System;
using Interop.MSUtil;
namespace logqryclient
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
try
{
// Instantiate the LogQuery object
ILogQuery oLogQuery = new LogQueryClassClass();
// Create the query
string query = #"SELECT TOP 50 SourceName, EventID, Message FROM System";
// Execute the query
ILogRecordset oRecordSet = oLogQuery.Execute(query, null);
// Browse the recordset
for (; !oRecordSet.atEnd(); oRecordSet.moveNext())
{
ILogRecord rec = oRecordSet.getRecord();
Console.WriteLine(rec.toNativeString(","));
}
// Close the recordset
oRecordSet.close();
}
catch (System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException exc)
{
Console.WriteLine("Unexpected error: " + exc.Message);
}
}
}
}
To use this code without registering the COM classes, you'll first need to place the LogParser.dll into the same directory as the client executable.
Next, you'll need to create an accompanying server manifest (named "LogParser.manifest" here). This documents all necessary classes and marshalling information for the interfaces (required for thread switching). As mentioned earlier, you'll need a type library analyzer to gain access to the class and interface identifiers.
In the above case, you'll need identifiers for:
ILogQuery interface & LogQueryClass class
ILogRecordset interface
ILogRecord interface
Hence, the server manifest could look as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<assembly xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1" manifestVersion="1.0">
<assemblyIdentity type="win32" name="LogParser" version="1.0.0.0" />
<file name = "LogParser.dll">
<!-- LogQueryClass -->
<comClass
clsid="{8CFEBA94-3FC2-45CA-B9A5-9EDACF704F66}"
threadingModel = "Apartment" />
<!-- Embedded type library -->
<typelib
tlbid="{A7E75D86-41CD-4B6E-B4BD-CC2ED34B3FB0}"
version="1.0"
helpdir=""/>
</file>
<!-- Marshalling information for interfaces -->
<comInterfaceExternalProxyStub
name="ILogQuery"
iid="{3BDE06BC-89E4-42FD-BE64-832A5F33D7D3}"
proxyStubClsid32="{00020424-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}"
baseInterface="{00000000-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}"
tlbid = "{A7E75D86-41CD-4B6E-B4BD-CC2ED34B3FB0}" />
<comInterfaceExternalProxyStub
name="ILogRecordset"
iid="{C9452B1B-093C-4842-ABD1-F81410926874}"
proxyStubClsid32="{00020424-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}"
baseInterface="{00000000-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}"
tlbid = "{A7E75D86-41CD-4B6E-B4BD-CC2ED34B3FB0}" />
<comInterfaceExternalProxyStub
name="ILogRecord"
iid="{185FFF88-E24A-4984-9621-AA41BEAE8513}"
proxyStubClsid32="{00020424-0000-0000-c000-000000000046}"
baseInterface="{00000000-0000-0000-c000-000000000046}"
tlbid = "{A7E75D86-41CD-4B6E-B4BD-CC2ED34B3FB0}" />
</assembly>
To allow the client to find the server manifest and ultimately the LogParser library, embed the following client manifest into the "logqryclient.exe" client:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<assembly xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1" manifestVersion="1.0">
<assemblyIdentity
type = "win32"
name = "logqryclient"
version = "1.0.0.0" />
<dependency>
<dependentAssembly>
<assemblyIdentity
type="win32"
name="LogParser"
version="1.0.0.0" />
</dependentAssembly>
</dependency>
</assembly>
Now, all required information is located in the manifests, so that you can run the code in registration-free configuration.
We want to add community members (as author) to a community activity.
We see that both on prem and in Connections Cloud, that we get a 403 error.
I have reproduced this using the SBT playground (https://greenhouse.lotus.com/sbt/SBTPlayground.nsf/Explorer.xsp#)
This is the XML that we post:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app" xmlns:snx="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn">
<id>test1234</id>
<contributor>
<name>Test User/name>
<snx:userid>TestID</snx:userid>
<snx:role>member</snx:role>
<snx:userState>active</snx:userState>
</contributor>
<title>Test User</title>
<updated>2016-03-04T09:25:17Z</updated>
<summary type="text">Member profile for Test User</summary>
<category scheme="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn/type" term="person"> </category>
<snx:role component="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn/activities">member</snx:role>
</entry>
To the Endpoint for activities: https://apps.na.collabserv.com/activities/service/atom2/acl?activityUuid=a750558c-d555-474d-8fcf-c3577276e9af
When we work "on-prem" we don't get error when we add community owners to the activity. Only when we (try to) add community members this 403 error occurs.
When we perform the action through the UI, there are no issues
We finaly have managed to add community members (not owners) to community_activity programmatically in IBM Connections.
When creating a community activity, Ibm Connections adds groups (as role) to community activities. If you want to add a specific member to your activity as an editor/reader, then you have to tell IBM Connections what role you want to give the other members from the group.
Can you try with below api and I am also attaching sample body you should be posting.
API : https://apps.na.collabserv.com/communities/service/atom/community/members?communityUuid=
Body
<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:snx="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn">
<contributor>
<email>mkataria#in.ibm.com</email>
<snx:userid xmlns:snx="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn">202432348</snx:userid>
<snx:userState xmlns:snx="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn">active</snx:userState>
<snx:isExternal xmlns:snx="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn">false</snx:isExternal>
<name>Manish Kataria</name>
</contributor>
<snx:role xmlns:snx="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn" component="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn/communities">owner</snx:role>
<category term="person" scheme="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn/type"></category>
<category term="business-owner" scheme="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn/type"></category>
<snx:orgId xmlns:snx="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn">186</snx:orgId></entry>
Make sure content type is application/atom+xml
Sorry I missed the activity part, can you try below and share the exact error you get if any.
API : /activities/service/atom2/acl?activityUuid=
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:snx="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn">
<contributor>
<email>abc#org.com</email>
</contributor>
<category scheme="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn/type" term="person" />
<snx:role component="http://www.ibm.com/xmlns/prod/sn/activities">member</snx:role>
</entry>
I am attempting to implement LDAP authentication, along with the required permissions.
<internalSecurity>
<cache type="inMemoryCache" duration="60" mode="sliding" />
<audit>
<xmlFileAudit location="D:\Logs\CCNet_Audit.xml"/>
</audit>
<auditReader type="xmlFileAuditReader" location="D:\Logs\CCNet_Audit.xml"/>
<users>
<ldapUser name="*username*" domain="*localdomain*"/>
</users>
<permissions>
<rolePermission name="Admin" forceBuild="Allow" sendMessage="Allow" startProject="Allow" changeProject="Allow" viewSecurity="Allow" modifySecurity="Allow" viewProject="Allow" viewConfiguration="Allow" >
<users>
<userName name="*username*"/>
</users>
</rolePermission>
</permissions>
Inside my project I have the following XML:
<project name="TestProject" description="TestProject" queue="Q7">
<security type="defaultProjectSecurity" defaultRight="Deny">
<permissions>
<rolePermission name="Admin" ref="Admin"/>
</permissions>
</security>
My log at (D:\Logs\CCNet_Audit.xml) is saying that I am "Denied"
<event><dateTime>2015-08-17T09:30:41.7973762-04:00</dateTime><user>*username*</user><type>Login</type><outcome>Deny</outcome></event>
and the project is unavailable within CC Tray.
My username is correct and I have the domain correct within the configuration (I just don't want to share it).
One thing I have noticed is that There seems to be a case issue within the username that Cruise Control is getting c-Joe.smith versus the english "normalization" of c-Joe.Smith . . . and yes I have tried it both ways.
Any help?
Try setting defaultRight="Allow" for your admin group.
<rolePermission name="Admin" defaultRight="Allow" forceBuild="Allow" sendMessage="Allow" startProject="Allow" changeProject="Allow" viewSecurity="Allow" modifySecurity="Allow" viewProject="Allow" viewConfiguration="Allow" >
<users>
<userName name="*username*"/>
</users>
</rolePermission>
I am using the XMLUpdate to update an xml formatted file in MSBuild. It updates fine but adds <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> at the top after update. Here is my statement that updates
<Import Project="C:\Program Files\MSBuild\MSBuildCommunityTasks\MSBuild.Community.Tasks.Targets" />
<XmlUpdate XmlFileName="$(AppName).alx" Xpath="/loader/application/version" Value="$(AppVersion)" />
Is it possible to update without the xml element at the top?
Thanks
Ponnu
The <?xml ...> is more of a descriptor than a real XML element. It describes your document and, for example defines the encoding. It won't interfere with your existing elements. I think it is even a standard feature of a XML document (but I don't have the specs handy)