For using the IBM Cloudant database through Bluemix Service, REST APIs are available. The documentation does not mention anything about Rate limits on API usage. Are there any such limits, what error does the API throw if the limit is exceeded?
Yes, there are rate limits based on the selected plan. Refer to this link for details https://console.ng.bluemix.net/catalog/services/cloudant-nosql-db.
Rejected API calls return HTTP code 429 (Too Many Requests)
Related
youtube data api v3 Queries per minute have 1,800,000 limit, but Queries per day have 10000 limit(see attachment), In our opinion, this is quite unreasonable, is it a bug? enter image description here
Not a bug. https://developers.google.com/youtube/v3/guides/quota_and_compliance_audits
Projects that enable the YouTube Data API have a default quota allocation of 10,000 units per day, an amount sufficient for the majority of our API users. You can see your quota usage on the Quotas page in the API Console.
If you would like to request additional quota beyond the default allocation, you must first complete an audit to show that your project is in compliance with the YouTube API Services Terms of Service. This gives YouTube visibility into the intended use cases of large projects and ensures that YouTube's API services are being used in a manner that is free from abuse. Visit this link for additional details on complying with YouTube’s Developer Policies.
Does anyone know API rate limit for Report portal API, I can't seem to find any on it's official documentation or on git repo (https://github.com/reportportal/service-api)
There is no rate limiter in service-api or anywhere else in Report Portal. It consumes as many requests as you send, depending on your hardware.
I need information about API limit of IBM cloud storage object S3 API.I have gone through all the information available on https://ibm-public-cos.github.io/crs-docs/ but unable to any information related to API limit.Please provide details or any reference to get details on this.
There is no enforced limit to the number of API requests made to IBM COS.
Are you talking about number of operations or storage volume? I'm not aware of any limit for either. I do believe a minimum object size of 128kb applies as part of the capacity usage charge though.
Sorry I can't be of more help.
How many request calls can an API integration make per second to the Jet.com Rest APIs?
I could not find anything in their documentation on burst size and leak rate(in requests/sec) .
As per the Jet Developer team , there isn't any limits on the number of API calls made
There is no API calling limits or throttling in jet.com.
In their later updates , it can be possibility that throtlling will be added.
However, jet.com api is now stable but sometimes it takes long time to update in bulk.
Does anyone know where I can find Google API Request Limits for their different services?
On simulating 500+ concurrent users it seems to fail silently fairly often (maybe 1 in 10 loads)
Any ideas?
The information is in their support resources. I am not aware of a central place, but it's all there. Searching the docs for "request limit" should usually do the trick.
The Geocoding API's limits for example can be found here.
Google Maps API Web Services and Google Static Maps API limits were cut effective a few days ago. Starting October 1st 2011 commercial web sites and apps using Google Maps API for free receive:
max of 2,500 calls/day, if modified using Styled Maps feature
max of 25,000 calls/day in total
Fusion tables are preferable to the Google Maps API alone, particularly with respect to rate limits:
Applications using the Google Fusion Tables API can send a maximum of
5 requests per second to the Google Fusion Tables server.
I think they removed the limit recently: can't even find a mention of it in documentation pages where I know for sure that it was mentioned and read about the limit removal somewhere this summer.
Even their new EULA states that their service is not limited but they remain free to limit it however they want at any moment.
500 concurrent users doesn't seem to be that much though, even if limitations where in place; are you sure it's Google what's failing?