how do I join two tables sql - sql

I have an issue that I'm hoping you can help me with. I am trying to create charting data for performance of an application that I am working on. The first step for me to perform two select statements with my feature turned off and on.
SELECT onSet.testName,
avg(onSet.elapsed) as avgOn,
0 as avgOff
FROM Results onSet
WHERE onSet.pll = 'On'
GROUP BY onSet.testName
union
SELECT offSet1.testName,
0 as avgOn,
avg(offSet1.elapsed) as avgOff
FROM Results offSet1
WHERE offSet1.pll = 'Off'
GROUP BY offSet1.testName
This gives me data that looks like this:
Add,0,11.4160277777777778
Add,11.413625,0
Delete,0,4.5245277777777778
Delete,4.0039861111111111,0
Evidently union is not the correct feature. Since the data needs to look like:
Add,11.413625,11.4160277777777778
Delete,4.0039861111111111,4.5245277777777778
I've been trying to get inner joins to work but I can't get the syntax to work.
Removing the union and trying to put this statement after the select statements also doesn't work. I evidently have the wrong syntax.
inner join xxx ON onSet.testName=offset1.testName
After getting the data to be like this I want to apply one last select statement that will subtract one column from another and give me the difference. So for me it's just one step at a time.
Thanks in advance.
-KAP

I think you can use a single query with conditional aggregation:
SELECT
testName,
AVG(CASE WHEN pll = 'On' THEN elapsed ELSE 0 END) AS avgOn,
AVG(CASE WHEN pll = 'Off' THEN elapsed ELSE 0 END) AS avgOff
FROM Results
GROUP BY testName

I just saw the filemaker tag and have no idea if this work there, but on MySQL I would try something along
SELECT testName, sum(if(pll = 'On',elapsed,0)) as sumOn,
sum(if(pll = 'On',1,0)) as numOn,
sum(if(pll ='Off',elapsed,0)) as sumOff,
sum(if(pll ='Off',1,0)) as numOff,
sumOn/numOn as avgOn,
sumOff/numOff as avgOff
FROM Results
WHERE pll = 'On' or pll='Off'
GROUP BY testName ;
If it works for you then this should be rather efficient as you do not need to join. If not, thumbs pressed that this triggers another idea.
The difficulty you have with the join you envisioned is that the filtering in the WHERE clause is performed after the join was completed. So, you would still not know what records to use to compute the averages. If the above is not implementable with FileMaker then check if nested queries work. You would then
SELECT testName, on.avg as avgOn, off.avg as avgOff
FROM ( SELECT ... FROM Results ...) as on, () as off
JOIN on.testName=off.testName
If that is also not possible then I would look for temporary tables.

OK guys... thanks for the help again. Here is the final answer. The statement below is FileMaker custom function that takes 4 arguments (platform, runID, model and user count. You can see the sql statement is specified. FileMaker executeSQL() function does not support nested select statements, does not support IF statements embedded in select statements (calc functions do of course) and finally does not support the SQL keyword VALUES. FileMaker does support the SQL keyword CASE which is a little more powerful but is a bit wordy. The select statement is in a variable named sql and result is placed in a variable named result. The ExecuteSQL() function works like a printf statement for param text so you can see the swaps do occur.
Let(
[
sql =
"SELECT testName, (sum( CASE WHEN PLL='On' THEN elapsed ELSE 0 END)) as sumOn,
sum( CASE WHEN PLL='On' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as countOn,
sum( CASE WHEN PLL='Off' THEN elapsed ELSE 0 END) as sumOff,
sum( CASE WHEN PLL='Off' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as countOff
FROM Results
WHERE Platform = ?
and RunID = ?
and Model = ?
and UserCnt = ?
GROUP BY testName";
result = ExecuteSQL ( sql ; "" ; ""
; platform
; runID
; model
; userCnt )
];
getAverages ( Result ; "" ; 2 )
)
For those interested the custom function looks like this:
getAverages( result, newList, pos )
Let (
[
curValues = Substitute( GetValue( data; pos ); ","; ¶ );
sumOn = GetValue( curValues; 2 ) ;
countOn = GetValue( curValues; 3 );
sumOff = GetValue( curValues; 4 );
countOff = GetValue( curValues; 5 );
avgOn = sumOn / countOn;
avgOff = sumOff / countOff
newItem = ((avgOff - avgOn) / avgOff ) * 100
];
newList & If ( pos > ValueCount( data); newList;
getAverages( data; If ( not IsEmpty( newList); ¶ ) & newItem; pos + 1 ))
)

Related

Issue With SQL Pivot Function

I have a SQL query where I am trying to replace null results with zero. My code is producing an error
[1]: ORA-00923: FROM keyword not found where expected
I am using an Oracle Database.
Select service_sub_type_descr,
nvl('Single-occupancy',0) as 'Single-occupancy',
nvl('Multi-occupancy',0) as 'Multi-occupancy'
From
(select s.service_sub_type_descr as service_sub_type_descr, ch.claim_id,nvl(ci.item_paid_amt,0) as item_paid_amt
from table_1 ch, table_" ci, table_3 s, table_4 ppd
where ch.claim_id = ci.claim_id and ci.service_type_id = s.service_type_id
and ci.service_sub_type_id = s.service_sub_type_id and ch.policy_no = ppd.policy_no)
Pivot (
count(distinct claim_id), sum(item_paid_amt) as paid_amount For service_sub_type_descr IN ('Single-occupancy', 'Multi-occupancy')
)
This expression:
nvl('Single-occupancy',0) as 'Single-occupancy',
is using an Oracle bespoke function to say: If the value of the string Single-occupancy' is not null then return the number 0.
That logic doesn't really make sense. The string value is never null. And, the return value is sometimes a string and sometimes a number. This should generate a type-conversion error, because the first value cannot be converted to a number.
I think you intend:
coalesce("Single-occupancy", 0) as "Single-occupancy",
The double quotes are used to quote identifiers, so this refers to the column called Single-occupancy.
All that said, fix your data model. Don't have identifiers that need to be quoted. You might not have control in the source data but you definitely have control within your query:
coalesce("Single-occupancy", 0) as Single_occupancy,
EDIT:
Just write the query using conditional aggregation and proper JOINs:
select s.service_sub_type_descr, ch.claim_id,
sum(case when service_sub_type_descr = 'Single-occupancy' then item_paid_amt else 0 end) as single_occupancy,
sum(case when service_sub_type_descr = 'Multi-occupancy' then item_paid_amt else 0 end) as multi_occupancy
from table_1 ch join
table_" ci
on ch.claim_id = ci.claim_id join
table_3 s
on ci.service_type_id = s.service_type_id join
table_4 ppd
on ch.policy_no = ppd.policy_no
group by s.service_sub_type_descr, ch.claim_id;
Much simpler in my opinion.
for column aliases, you have to use double quotes !
don't use
as 'Single-occupancy'
but :
as "Single-occupancy",

Is there a way to return the currently logged on ID from Netezza in a view's SQL, current_sid

I have a SQL statement on Netezza that uses the following SQL to acquire the currently logged on user ID:
SELECT SESSION_USERNAME FROM _V_SESSION_DETAIL WHERE SESSION_ID=current_sid
This works great when I'm executing the SQL in a database client. However, when I implement the above SQL in a view (along with other SQL) the current_sid is replaced with the session ID I happened to have when I created the view. That SQL will then look something like:
SELECT DEFINITION_SCHEMA."_V_SESSION_DETAIL".SESSION_USERNAME FROM DEFINITION_SCHEMA."_V_SESSION_DETAIL" WHERE (DEFINITION_SCHEMA."_V_SESSION_DETAIL".SESSION_ID = 2434740
Is there a way to define a view that will get the currently logged on user's ID, not the ID that was assigned when the view was created?
Seems like Netezza Metadata functions(ex. current_sid) are not supported in with clause and would advice to remove them from with and to include them in the base query .
CREATE
OR REPLACE VIEW ADMIN.VW_PI_HRCHY_EPH AS
WITH CHAR_MASK(CHAR_MASK_CHAR) AS (
SELECT 'xxx'
FROM _V_SESSION_DETAIL LIMIT 1
)
,NUM_MASK(NUM_MASK_NUM) AS (
SELECT - 1
FROM _V_SESSION_DETAIL LIMIT 1
)
,TS_MASK(TS_MASK_TS) AS (
SELECT '1000-01-01 00:00:00'
FROM _V_SESSION_DETAIL LIMIT 1
)
SELECT CASE
WHEN SECURITY_GRP_CNT.COUNT > 0
THEN PI_HRCHY.HRCHY_LINE_ID
ELSE NUM_MASK.NUM_MASK_NUM
END AS HRCHY_LINE_ID
,CASE
WHEN SECURITY_GRP_CNT.COUNT > 0
THEN PI_HRCHY.LOCALE_CD
ELSE CHAR_MASK.CHAR_MASK_CHAR
END AS LOCALE_CD
,CASE
WHEN SECURITY_GRP_CNT.COUNT > 0
THEN PI_HRCHY.MODIFY_TS
ELSE TS_MASK.TS_MASK_TS
END AS MODIFY_TS
FROM (
SELECT COUNT(*) AS count
FROM _V_USERGROUPS
WHERE USERNAME IN (
SELECT SESSION_USERNAME
FROM _V_SESSION_DETAIL
WHERE SESSION_ID = current_sid
)
AND GROUPNAME = 'GROUP_AUTH2READ'
) SECURITY_GRP_CNT
,ADMIN.PI_HRCHY
,CHAR_MASK
,NUM_MASK
,TS_MASK
WHERE (
(PI_HRCHY.HRCHY_TYP_ID = 11)
AND (PI_HRCHY.ACTV_IND = 'Y'::"NCHAR")
);
The solution NzGuy provided solved my problem. As he stated, apparently placing the current_sid contact in the WITH clause of the SQL causes the constant to be evaluated differently than if it were placed outside the WITH. The common table expression defined outside the WITH clause resolved my problem.

SQL SELECT Query Issues

I am having an issue with my SELECT query. I am trying to find items that do not start with "50700" and have an enabled flag of 1, are in category 4 and sub category 4. Below is the query i have but it is not returning any results when i know there are some. Please note TBL1.FIELD1 = ITM_ID, TBL1.FIELD2 = ENABLED, TBL2.FIELD1 = CAT_ID, TBL2.FIELD2 = SUBCAT_ID.
SELECT DB_NAME.dbo.TBL1.FIELD1
, DB_NAME.dbo.TBL1.FIELD2
, DB_NAME.dbo.TBL2.FIELD1
, DB_NAME.dbo.TBL2.FIELD2
FROM DB_NAME.dbo.TBL1
, DB_NAME.dbo.TBL2
WHERE DB_NAME.dbo.TBL1.FIELD1 NOT LIKE '50700%'
AND DB_NAME.dbo.TBL1.FIELD2 = 1
AND DB_NAME.dbo.TBL2.FIELD1 = 4
AND DB_NAME.dbo.TBL2.FIELD2 = 4
You can break the query into different subqueries for debug purpose, this way you can figure out which "AND" condition is not working.
For Example:
Firstly I guess you should try a simple query on TBL1.FIELD1 with the simple query :
select TBL1.FIELD1 from DB_NAME.dbo.TBL1 where DB_NAME.dbo.TBL1.FIELD1 NOT LIKE '50700' ;(*if TBL1.FIELD1 is of String type, else go for TBL1.FIELD1 != 50700 * )
Then if you get results ,try to do "AND" with the TBL1.FIELD2 condition.
select TBL1.FIELD1
from DB_NAME.dbo.TBL1
where DB_NAME.dbo.TBL1.FIELD1 NOT LIKE '50700'
and DB_NAME.dbo.TBL1.FIELD2 =4 ;
This way you can proceed further and debug the query. Hope it helps :)

How to give change working of having function dynamicaly on executing an sql statement?

I'm having a Sql code like as follows
Select a.ItemCode, a.ItemDesc
From fn_BOM_Material_Master('A', #AsOnDate, #RptDate, #BranchID, #CompID)a
Left Outer Join fn_INV_AsOnDate_Stock(#StockDate, #AsOnDate, #RptDate, #BranchID, #CompID, #Finyear)b
On a.ItemCode=b.ItemCode and b.WarehouseCode<>'WAP'
and a.BranchID=b.BranchID and a.CompID=b.COmpID
Where a.ItemNatureCode = 'F' and a.BranchID = #BranchID and a.CompID = #CompID
Group by a.ItemCode, a.ItemDesc
Having sum(b.CBQty)<=0
Here the problem is that im passing an "#ShowZeroStock" value as as bit if the "#ShowZeroStock" value is '1' then Having should not be validated or (i.e: All values from the table should be returned including zero)
So How to change the query based on passed bit value "#ShowZeroStock"
I can Use "If else " condition at the top and remove having in else part, but for a lengthy query i can't do the same.
Is this the logic you want?
Having sum(b.CBQty) <= 0 or #ShowZeroStock = 1

Modify Return Value of SELECT-Statement (TSQL) [Optimizing query]

Problem:
A Database collumn has a Tristate (0,1,2).
Each of the values are used serversidely.
The Clientcode (which cant be changed anymore) is only able to understand '0,1'.
In the Clients view '1' is identic with '2'. So I want to change the SQL Query in the Database to return '1', if the specific value is > 0.
My current Solution is combining 2 Selects (using UNION SELECT) with different WHERE-Clauses and returning '1' or '0' as static values. Now I'm looking for a solution to 'translate' the value within only ONE SELECT statement.
This is my current Solution:
SELECT
dbo.Nachricht.NachrichtID, dbo.Nachricht.Bezeichnung, '1' AS BetrifftKontoeinrichtung,
FROM dbo.Nachricht INNER JOIN dbo.AdditionalData
ON dbo.Nachricht.NachrichtID = dbo.AdditionalData.NachrichtID
WHERE (dbo.Nachricht.NachrichtID in ( 450,439 ))
AND dbo.AdditionalData.BetrifftKontoeinrichtung > 0
UNION SELECT
dbo.Nachricht.NachrichtID, dbo.Nachricht.Bezeichnung, '0' AS BetrifftKontoeinrichtung,
FROM dbo.Nachricht INNER JOIN dbo.AdditionalData
ON dbo.Nachricht.NachrichtID = dbo.AdditionalData.NachrichtID
WHERE (dbo.Nachricht.NachrichtID in ( 450,439 ))
AND dbo.AdditionalData.BetrifftKontoeinrichtung = 0
You can use a case statement, like this:
SELECT
dbo.Nachricht.NachrichtID, dbo.Nachricht.Bezeichnung,
CASE WHEN dbo.AdditionalData.BetrifftKontoeinrichtung = 0
THEN '0' ELSE '1'
END AS BetrifftKontoeinrichtung,
FROM dbo.Nachricht
INNER JOIN dbo.AdditionalData
ON dbo.Nachricht.NachrichtID = dbo.AdditionalData.NachrichtID
WHERE (dbo.Nachricht.NachrichtID in ( 450,439 ))
Looks like you need to use CASE. A decent tutorial here
http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3288921/T-SQL-Programming-Part-5---Using-the-CASE-Function.htm
See the worked example
If you just CAST(CAST(val AS BIT) AS INT) you will get integer 0 for 0 and integer 1 for everything else.