So I'm creating my own ivy repository. I have went through the tutorial for building the repository and the basic task of installing one module works flawlessly. Of course, there we have examples of installing one module. Actually the ant task install can do only one module at the time. Since I'd like to store everything that's in the cache in the repository, it would be quite tedious to do that by running one module at the time...
Other then writing some kind of a build.xml generator that would have install task for each of the module I need/have, is there an easier way to do this? If there is some trick to use some kind of meta ivy.xml that has all the dependencies I need installed, that would also be ok.
In addition if I run install on one module with transitive=true, for example module M, in my repo I have M's jar,sources,javadoc and everything, but for M's dependencies - only the jars. How would I install sources,javadocs,etc of transitively dependent modules?
Related
I want to use ivy 2.2.0 jar instead of installing ivy on my machine because when anyone import my project from svn its giving errors for jars which I have added to Ivy library.
I added ivy.xml to build path through option add ivy library. how I can configure it through build.xml instead of add ivy library option..
You want to use Ivy without the ivy.jar file? This is not possible.
However, you can make it easier for your users. Ant can automatically download Ivy for you the first time it is used. For the following times, just add Ivy itself as a dependency of your project, so you can easily roll out updates of Ivy, for example.
For the bootstrapping (getting Ivy with plain Ant) see this answer to another SO question.
I have a project that's using the Play framework, and the corporate standard is that all projects should be built by Hudson. However, I cannot find out how to do this, as Hudson does not follow any Java standards, and requires the framework installed at the computer it runs on. I have tried to build the project with Maven (if I had managed this, adding it to Hudson should be quite simple), but I have failed to make it work. I tried the Play Maven module, but Maven claims it does not find the external repo that is listed (http://nexus.infin-it.fr/content/groups/public). This might be because I am behind a firewall. I also tried the recipe listed here, but the local maven build fails because it is unable to find org.playframework:play:1.1:jar.
Has anyone done this and can provide a howto?
It can be done without installing the Play framework on the Hudson server, but it is quite complicated:
Put the play libraries (play.jar and its dependencies) in a Maven repository
Create a pom.xml for your project, configured with:
theses libraries as dependencies
your project specific dependencies (project lib directory)
the java sources folder of your project (in the maven-compiler-plugin): "app"
If your project is simple (no module dependencies), this pom allows you to build the play project java sources using Maven.
If your project has module dependencies, you will have to add the dependencies jar in your pom dependencies.
To do that, you will have to create jar files from the modules if they don't have packaged jars (to get the "CRUD" class of the CRUD module for example).
You can find some help on this page I wrote :
http://blog.infin-it.fr/2010/12/15/play-framework-integration-continue-retour-dexperience/
Even if it's in French, I put my Ant stuff and the Play's pom I wrote.
At work we managed to integrate our Play applications with Bamboo.
It should not be difficult with my files.
Just looked at the repository, that you linked (http://nexus.infin-it.fr/content/groups/public). And guess what, I found the play-1.1.jar. However, the artifact ID is: org.play:play:1.1:jar and not org.playframework
In theory, you could put the full Play zip on your build or in in your repository, and then use Hudson to kick off an Ant script to download Play to the Hudson agent, unzip it, and then run commands on it. It's a little clunky, but it should work.
I recently started to use Maven2 in one of my Java web application projects. Now I had many issues with it, some times project fails to build for no apparent reason and then it suddenly starts to work when nothing was done at all to project. Or some times our project members must delete project from their harddrive and download project again from SVN. There seems to be many very odd bugs in Maven in eclipse, but there some issues I would like know if it is possible to solve this issues.
1) I have understood that Maven2 should be able to get dependencies for added jars, but when I add a new dependency in Eclipse, it fails when I build it, it says dependecies are missing. How can I make maven to download those missing dependecies automatically?
2) I have Tuckey UrlRewrite Filter in use, but public repositories have only old version of this dependecy, so when I use this old version (3.1 when I need 3.2). How can I include this to project? We have many programmers in this project, so setting up local repository would mean that all our programmers would have to install that local repository.
Now I had many issues with it, some times project fails to build for no apparent reason and then it suddenly starts to work when nothing was done at all to project. (...)
Ok and what is the point of this free rant? I use Maven and my builds are 100% reproducible, there are well known practices to follow to achieve this. Maybe you're just not following them. Anyway if you're not happy with it, what can I say, don't use it.
I have understood that Maven2 should be able to get dependencies for added jars, but when I add a new dependency in Eclipse, it fails when I build it, it says dependencies are missing. How can I make maven to download those missing dependencies automatically?
I think you misunderstood, Eclipse won't guess what Maven coordinates to add if you don't provide the required informations for them. Dependencies must be declared in the POM, either by editing the POM manually or by using m2eclipse wizards.
And if this is what you did (and if I misunderstood the question) then please provide the <dependency> declaration and the exact error trace.
I have Tuckey UrlRewrite Filter in use, but public repositories have only old version of this dependecy, so when I use this old version (3.1 when I need 3.2). How can I include this to project? We have many programmers in this project, so setting up local repository would mean that all our programmers would have to install that local repository.
This question has already been asked several times, see for example Maven, how to add additional libs not available in repo where I suggest two possible solutions (use a corporate repository like Nexus or a "file-based" repository, the former suggestion being the preferred one for a long term solution).
We have been trying to migrate our multi-module projects to maven. I have been struggling with the maven install plugin bug "http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2971". I have written a Java program which can find and replace the expressions using my settings.xml and POM in my local repository view.
As a result all of my parent POM's are having a additional phase in the build process. What i'm doing is that i have attached a goal which will run my Java program during "validate" phase.
I think this is a not a good idea instead i would have asked individuals to run the program on their local repository on their own.
What i'm asking here is that the best way to work around the "install" plugin issue (MNG-2971).
I searched through the net but i could not locate such work around.
Well, I didn't try it because I'm not using properties from the settings.xml but the issue has a work around in the comments.
I am installing to Maven repository our internal files using mvn install:install command. All Jars installed in such way have version name added automatically as a suffix. Since we have many batch scripts with the Jars names it is very inconvenient for us. How this auto-renaming can be switched off?
You can't. Dependency resolution in Maven works because Maven has conventions and the naming of artifacts is one of them. So you can't turn off the way maven install artifacts (and you actually don't want to).
The common way to handle scripts (bat/sh) is to put them in your source tree (e.g. in src/main/bin) and to create a distribution of your project with the assembly plugin. When building your assembly, you can rename artifacts, filter distribution files, etc. That would be the right place to do such kind of things.
it's tempting to want to remove the version number, but I'd recommend keeping it on if at all possible.
Instead of removing the version numbers, maybe you could use Maven's resource filtering capability to manage your batch scripts? Maven can manage your batch scripts by replacing placeholders such as ${project.version} inside the bat script with the current version number from the pom.xml. That way you can ensure that the batch script is running the correct (expected) version of the code.
You could probably force maven to deploy a jar without a version, but if you do so, you lose some of the main benefits of having Maven manage your build in the first place, imo. For example, just yesterday I was asked to maintain a java project not managed by maven with a bunch of non-versioned jar files inside a lib directory. There's no way to know where any of the jars came from.
It might be a little bit of a headache up front, but if you're using maven, you might as well jump in 100% (again, from my experience).