What is the difference between IBM MobileFirst versions ? Is it a separate version ?
The MobileFirst Platform Foundation V8.0 release notes include a "What's New" section that describes the changes in 8.0. This version has significant changes from previous versions.
The release notes for previous versions also include a "What's New" section that discusses the changes made in those versions.
I would also suggest you to check the blog here https://mobilefirstplatform.ibmcloud.com/tutorials/en/foundation/8.0/product-overview/release-notes/whats-new/
and blogs under https://mobilefirstplatform.ibmcloud.com/tutorials/en/foundation/8.0/ for detailed tutorials and migration cookbooks.
Related
We are currently using pentaho 7.X, after log 4j vulnerability we need a solution for that. Please let me know if we have any updates in pentaho 7.x after log4j issuse or we need to upgrade to latest version. If we need to upgrade to latest version, what is the steps?
Thanks in advance
By now Hitachi Vantara hasn't published any patch for the Community Edition version, I don't know if they have provided a patch for the Enterprise Edition.
They are going to release the 9.3 version, I don't know if there's an official date. Maybe in the Community Edition of the 9.3 version the log4j libraries will be updated, look for the official release notes when it's published.
I see there are list active version of karate available.
Our team develop tool for reporting (reportportal.io) and our users are asking for support of various versions.
As far as i see, there is no back compatibility between 0.9.2 - 0.9.3 - 0.9.4 - 0.9.5RC5
support and track integrations for each of minor versions is overhead.
Could you please updated on any roadmap, ETA and strategy for version compatibility, so we can focus on 1 certain version.
thank you in advance.
Use 0.9.5.RC5 and the develop branch in GitHub. The plan is to release 0.9.5 final within a month.
I need to build my project with Worklight version 6.1.0.02.20141216-0421, but I didn't find it. Please who has this version ?
If you absolutely must have this specific build, you can find it here if you use Worklight Consumer Edition, or here if you use Worklight Enterprise Edition, if you are an IBM customer with a valid support entitlement.
However, if there isn't a very specific reason that you absolutely must have this specific build, I strongly agree with Idan's answer that you should use the most recent iFix build available on IBM Fix Central. As of right now, the latest build contains fixes for 93 separate APARs that are not contained in the build you are asking about (from more than 2 years ago).
That is an extremely old build and unless this build was an official iFix release - it will no longer exist. So, if you are an IBM customer you can look for this build number in the IBM Fix Central website.
Note however that you should always use the latest available iFix release... and not a build from more than two years ago, especially for production. If you will request official support, you will be told to use the latest build.
i had a titanium project build on sdk version 3.X.
Now the sdk is 5.X... is there any document that outlines what needs to be done to upgrade from 3.X to 5.X (or from 3.4 to 4.x to 5.x?)
I haven't seen any guidelines for direct upgrade from 3.X to 5.X. I would just go through the release notes: http://docs.appcelerator.com/platform/latest/#!/guide/Titanium_SDK_Release_Notes
There seem many, but only a few are major updates. It's not too bad.
We've had to remove i*/native/Frameworks/sqlcipher.framework from our SCM repository due to size limitations.
Thankfully, we have found that the mfp build command re-creates it in local copies, so this works really well.
However, the documentation here doesn't list sqlcipher.framework as ignorable - it states that the entire Frameworks directory should be checked in.
Can the documentation be updated to state sqlcipher.framework should not be checked in?
We've updated our template .gitignore project to allow for this on MFP 7.0, but it would be good to get official confirmation that this is "OK".
I've created a documentation defect to have this corrected in the user documentation topic "Integrating with source control systems" in the Knowledge Center for IBM MobileFirst Platform Foundation 6.3, 7.0 and future releases. Thanks.