Query is to get whether the user selected multiple choice answer for a question is right or not, if correct then 1 else 0
I have two tables question_answer and user_exam_answer, entries table has the user submitted answer in column submitted_option_id
user_exam_answer table
question_answer
I tried to write a query when user answer (user_exam_answer) matches with the question answer (question_answer) table
select
count(1) as result
from
(select
qa.question_id,
count(qa.correct_option_id) as col1,
count(sa.submited_option_id) as col2
from
question_answer qa
left join
user_exam_answers sa on (sa.question_id = qa.question_id
and sa.submited_option_id = qa.correct_option_id
and sa.exam_id = 'html_001'
and sa.user_id = 'user_123')
group by
qa.question_id
having
count(qa.correct_option_id) = count(sa.submited_option_id)
) as t
But the problem is when:
QA (question_answer.correct_option_id) has 3 entries and SA user_exam_answers.submited_option_id) has 2 entries then the query is correct and returns
QA (question_answer.correct_option_id) has 2 entries and SA (user_exam_answers.submited_option_id) is 3 entries then the query is correct and returns
QA (question_answer.correct_option_id) has 2 entries SA (user_exam_answers.submited_option_id) has 1 entry then the query is correct and returns
but when
QA (question_answer.correct_option_id) has 1 entries and SA (user_exam_answers.submited_option_id) has 2 entries then the query returns the wrong answer
I am looking for a query which holds true for all the four condition
For each question list the expected answers and the submitted answers (you need a FULL OUTER JOIN to do this, a LEFT join is not enough) and count the number of matches. Then compare this count with the count of the expected answers.
select question_id, case when cnt = sum_test then 1 else 0 end as mark
from (
select question_id, count(*) cnt, sum(test) sum_test
from (
select coalesce(q.question_id, s.question_id) as question_id,
correct_option_id,
submitted_option_id,
case when correct_option_id = submitted_option_id then 1 else 0 end as test
from question_answer q full outer join user_exam_answer s
on q.question_id = s.question_id and q.correct_option_id = s.submitted_option_id
) x
group by question_id
) y
You can find a live demo here
it's very unclear what you're trying to do here, but the below should help get you started:
select
sa.user_id,
sa.exam_id,
qa.question_id,
sa.submitted_option_id,
qa.correct_option_id,
case when sa.submitted_option_id = qa.correct_option_id then 1 else 0 end as question_score
from
question_answer qa
LEFT JOIN user_exam_answer sa ON
uea.question_id = qa.question_id
where
sa.exam_id='html_001'
and sa.user_id='user_123'
I'd expect the qa table to also have an exam_id column, but that isn't in your images.
Please try the following...
SELECT user_id,
exam_id,
question_answer.question_id AS question_id,
submited_option_id,
correct_option_id,
CASE
WHEN correct_option_id = submited_option_id THEN
1
ELSE
0
END AS marked_option_id
FROM question_answer
LEFT JOIN user_exam_answer ON question_answer.question_id = user_exam_answer.question_id
ORDER BY user_id,
exam_id,
question_id;
This query performs joins the two tables together using a LEFT JOIN so that a record for an an unanswered question is still returned. It then compares the correct answer to the supplied answer for each record and if they match it returns a value of 1, otherwise it will return a value of 0. The results of this comparison are then included in the output as the field marked_option_id. The resulting output is then sorted for convenience of reading.
If you have any questions or comments, then please feel free to post a Comment accordingly.
Related
Adding back some original info for historical purposes as I thought simplifying would help but it didn't. We have this stored procedure, in this part it is selecting records from table A (calldetail_reporting_agents) and doing a left join on table B (Intx_Participant). Apparently there are duplicate rows in table B being pulled that we DON'T want. Is there any easy way to change this up to only pick the first match on table B? Or will I need to rewrite the whole thing?
SELECT 'Agent Calls' AS CallType,
CallDate,
CallTime,
RemoteNumber,
DialedNumber,
RemoteName,
LocalUserId,
CallDurationSeconds,
Answered,
AnswerSpeed,
InvalidCall,
Intx_Participant.Duration
FROM calldetail_reporting_agents
LEFT JOIN Intx_Participant ON calldetail_reporting_agents.CallID = Intx_Participant.CallIDKey
WHERE DialedNumber IN ( SELECT DialedNumber
FROM #DialedNumbers )
AND ConnectedDate BETWEEN #LocStartDate AND #LocEndDate
AND (#LocQueue IS NULL OR AssignedWorkGroup = #LocQueue)
Simpler version: how to change below to select only first matching row from table B:
SELECT columnA, columnB FROM TableA LEFT JOIN TableB ON someColumn
I changed to this per the first answer and all data seems to look exactly as expected now. Thank you to everyone for the quick and attentive help.
SELECT 'Agent Calls' AS CallType,
CallDate,
CallTime,
RemoteNumber,
DialedNumber,
RemoteName,
LocalUserId,
CallDurationSeconds,
Answered,
AnswerSpeed,
InvalidCall,
Intx_Participant.Duration
FROM calldetail_reporting_agents
OUTER APPLY (SELECT TOP 1
*
FROM Intx_Participant ip
WHERE calldetail_reporting_agents.CallID = ip.CallIDKey
AND calldetail_reporting_agents.RemoteNumber = ip.ConnValue
AND ip.HowEnded = '9'
AND ip.Recorded = '0'
AND ip.Duration > 0
AND ip.Role = '1') Intx_Participant
WHERE DialedNumber IN ( SELECT DialedNumber
FROM #DialedNumbers )
AND ConnectedDate BETWEEN #LocStartDate AND #LocEndDate
AND (#LocQueue IS NULL OR AssignedWorkGroup = #LocQueue)
You can try to OUTER APPLY a subquery getting only one matching row.
...
FROM calldetail_reporting_agents
OUTER APPLY (SELECT TOP 1
*
FROM intx_Participant ip
WHERE ip.callidkey = calldetail_reporting_agents.callid) intx_participant
WHERE ...
You should add an ORDER BY in the subquery. Otherwise it isn't deterministic which row is taken as the first. Or maybe that's not an issue.
I have these three tables:
table_things: [id]
table_location: [id]
[location]
[quantity]
table_reservation: [id]
[quantity]
[location]
[list_id]
Example data:
table_things:
id
1
2
3
table_location
id location quantity
1 100 10
1 101 4
2 100 1
table_reservation
id quantity location list_id
1 2 100 500
1 1 100 0
2 1 100 0
They are connected by [id] being the same in all three tables and [location] being the same in table_loation and table_reservation.
[quantity] in table_location shows how many ([quantity]) things ([id]) are in a certain place ([location]).
[quantity] in table_reservation shows how many ([quantity]) things ([id]) are reserved in a certain place ([location]).
There can be 0 or many rows in table_reservation that correspond to table_location.id = table_reservation_id, so I probably need to use an outer join for that.
I want to create a query that answers the question: How many things ([id]) are in this specific place (WHERE table_location=123), how many of of those things are reserved (table_reservation.[quantity]) and how many of those that are reserved are on a table_reservation.list_id where table_reservation.list_id > 0.
I can't get the aggregate functions right to where the answer contains only the number of lines that are in table_location with the given WHERE clause and at the same time I get the correct number of table_reservation.quantity.
If I do this I get the correct number of lines in the answer:
SELECT table_things.[id],
table_location.[quantity],
SUM(table_reservation.[quantity]
FROM table_location
INNER JOIN table_things ON table_location.[id] = table_things.[id]
RIGHT OUTER JOIN table_reservation ON table_things.location = table_reservation.location
WHERE table_location.location = 100
GROUP BY table_things.[id], table_location[quantity]
But the problem with that query is that I (of course) get an incorrect value for SUM(table_reservation.[quantity]) since it sums up all the corresponding rows in table_reservation and posts the same value on each of the rows in the result.
The second part is trying to get the correct value for the number of table_reservation.[quantity] whose list_id > 0. I tried something like this for that, in the SELECT list:
(SELECT SUM(CASE WHEN table_reservation.list_id > 0 THEN table_reservation.[quantity] ELSE 0 END)) AS test
But that doesn't even parse... I'm just showing it to show my thinking.
Probably an easy SQL problem, but it's been too long since I was doing these kinds of complicated queries.
For your first two questions:
How many things ([id]) are in this specific place (WHERE table_location=123), how many of of those things are reserved (table_reservation.[quantity])
I think you simply need a LEFT OUTER JOIN instead of RIGHT, and an additional join predicate for table_reservation
SELECT l.id,
l.quantity,
Reserved = SUM(ISNULL(r.quantity, 0))
FROM table_location AS l
INNER JOIN table_things AS t
ON t.id = l.ID
LEFT JOIN table_reservation r
ON r.id = t.id
AND r.location = l.location
WHERE l.location = 100
GROUP BY l.id, l.quantity;
N.B I have added ISNULL so that when nothing is reserved you get a result of 0 rather than NULL. You also don't actually need to reference table_things at all, but I am guessing this is a simplified example and you may need other fields from there so have left it in. I have also used aliases to make the query (in my opinion) easier to read.
For your 3rd question:
and how many of those that are reserved are on a table_reservation.list_id where table_reservation.list_id > 0.
Then you can use a conditional aggregate (CASE expression inside your SUM):
SELECT l.id,
l.quantity,
Reserved = SUM(r.quantity),
ReservedWithListOver0 = SUM(CASE WHEN r.list_id > 0 THEN r.[quantity] ELSE 0 END)
FROM table_location AS l
INNER JOIN table_things AS t
ON t.id = l.ID
LEFT JOIN table_reservation r
ON r.id = t.id
AND r.location = l.location
WHERE l.location = 100
GROUP BY l.id, l.quantity;
As a couple of side notes, unless you are doing it for the right reasons (so that different tables are queried depending on who is executing the query), then it is a good idea to always use the schema prefix, i.e. dbo.table_reservation rather than just table_reservation. It is also quite antiquated to prefix your object names with the object type (i.e. dbo.table_things rather than just dbo.things). It is somewhat subject, but this page gives a good example of why it might not be the best idea.
You can use a query like the following:
SELECT tt.[id],
tl.[quantity],
tr.[total_quantity],
tr.[partial_quantity]
FROM table_location AS tl
INNER JOIN table_things AS tt ON tl.[id] = tt.[id]
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT id, location,
SUM(quantity) AS total_quantity,
SUM(CASE WHEN list_id > 0 THEN quantity ELSE 0 END) AS partial_quantity
FROM table_reservation
GROUP BY id, location
) AS tr ON tl.id = tr.id AND tl.location = tr.location
WHERE tl.location = 100
The trick here is to do a LEFT JOIN to an already aggregated version of table table_reservation, so that you get one row per id, location. The derived table uses conditional aggregation to calculate field partial_quantity that contains the quantity where list_id > 0.
Output:
id quantity total_quantity partial_quantity
-----------------------------------------------
1 10 3 2
2 1 1 0
This was a classic case of sitting with a problem for a few hours and getting nowhere and then when you post to stackoverflow, you suddenly come up with the answer. Here's the query that gets me what I want:
SELECT table_things.[id],
table_location.[quantity],
SUM(table_reservation.[quantity],
(SELECT SUM(CASE WHEN table_reservation.list_id > 0 THEN ISNULL(table_reservation.[quantity], 0) ELSE 0 END)) AS test
FROM table_location
INNER JOIN table_things ON table_location.[id] = table_things.[id]
RIGHT OUTER JOIN table_reservation ON table_things.location = table_reservation.location AND table_things.[id] = table_reservation.[id]
WHERE table_location.location = 100
GROUP BY table_things.[id], table_location[quantity]
Edit: After having read GarethD's reply below, I did the changes he suggested (to my real code, not to the query above) which makes the (real) query correct.
I am trying to construct a SQL query for data.stackexchange.com that given a particular Stack Overflow user, will list their number of accepted answers, number of answers with score > 0, and number of answers that have either been accepted AND/OR have score > 0.
Here is the query I have so far, which only counts up accepted answers:
DECLARE #UserId int = ##UserId##
SELECT
Count(a.Id) AS Accepted
FROM
Posts q
INNER JOIN
Posts a ON q.AcceptedAnswerId = a.Id
WHERE
a.OwnerUserId = #UserId
AND
a.PostTypeId = 2
When you run it on my user id (2234742), it shows the following output:
Accepted
70
I am looking for output like the following:
Accepted Score > 0 Accepted or Score > 0
X X X
To edit my existing query, you can go to my existing data.stackexchange.com query page and click "fork query" underneath the query body. The schema will be shown on the right. I am new to SQL, so thank you for the help!
N.B. Remember that Accepted or Score > 0 is not just the sum of the other two columns, because there is overlap!
SELECT
a.id,
sum(case when a.PostTypeId = 2 then 1 end) AS Accepted,
sum(case when a.PostTypeId = someval then 1 end) AS 'score>0',
sum(case when a.PostTypeId = someval then 1 end) AS 'acceptedorscore>0'
FROM Posts q INNER JOIN
Posts a ON q.AcceptedAnswerId = a.Id
WHERE a.OwnerUserId = #UserId
group by a.id, a.PostTypeId
Replace 'someval' with the posttype to get what you need. You need to group by posttype
I have a 2 tables:
Questions table with Question ID
Part Table:
Question ID
Part ID
BAllPartsRequired
The user will select some parts (or may select none) and depending on what was selected certain questions will be displayed.
I want to join the 2 tables for 3 scenerios but do them all in 1 query. I can write each scenerio individually (EDIT I thought I could but scenario 3 I can not get to work where it requires all found in part table to be selected) but can not figure out how to get them all in 1 query (I have done something similar before but cant remember how).
If no parts exist in part table for that question retruen the question
If any part selected exists in part table return question (i.e. user selects 1 part and 5 parts are associated to that question then the question will match and be returned). BAllPartsRequired = false
If user selects parts and ALL of the parts are associated to the question the question is returend but if NOT all parts are selected by user the question is not returend (i.e. user selects 3 parts and there are 4 parts in table then the user will not see the question, but if the user selectes all 4 parts the question will be shown). BAllPartsRequired = true
I am an advanced SQL programmer but this is eluding me and I know I have done this before but how do I get it to work in 1 query, do I do a nested join, a left join, a case on the where statement or something else.
Sample Data:
Question Form Association:
NFormAssociationID NQuestionID FormType
1 1 PAEdit
2 2 PAEdit
3 3 PAEdit
4 4 PAEdit
Question Part Form Association Table:
ID NFormAssociationID PartNumber BAllPartsRequired
1 1 1 0
2 2 2 1
3 2 3 1
Query without the new parts table added:
Select ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY QL.NOrderBy) AS RowNumber,
QL.NQuestionID, QL.FieldName, QL.Question, QL.BRequired, QFL.FormFieldType, QFL.SingleMultipleSM,
QFL.CSSStyle
FROM dbo.QuestionFormAssociation QA WITH (NOLOCK)
INNER JOIN dbo.QuestionLookup QL WITH (NOLOCK) ON QA.NQuestionID = QL.NQuestionID
INNER JOIN dbo.QuestionFieldTypeLookup QFL WITH (NOLOCK) ON QL.NFieldTypeID = QFL.NFieldTypeID
WHERE QA.BActive = 1 AND QL.BActive = 1 AND QFL.BActive=1
AND QA.FormType = 'PAEdit'
ORDER BY QL.NOrderBy
Simple query using new table
Select ID
FROM dbo.QuestionPartFormAssociation
WHERE BAllPartsRequired = 1
AND PartNumber IN ('1', '2') --'1', '2', '3')
It sounds like you are trying to find the eligible questions, based on some criteria.
In this sitatuion, it is best to summarize first at the question level, and then apply logic to those summaries. Here is an example:
select q.questionid
from (select q.questionid,
max(case when qp.questionid is null then 1 else 0 end) as HasNoParts,
sum(case when qp.partid in (<user parts>) then 1 else 0 end) as NumUserParts,
count(qp.questionid) as NumParts,
max(qp.AllPartsRequired) as AreAllPartsRequired
from question q left outer join
questionpart qp
on q.questionid = qp.questionid
group by q.questionid
) q
where HasNoParts = 1 or -- condition 1
AreAllPartsRequired = 0 and NumUserParts > 0 or -- condition 2
AreAllPartsRequired = 1 and NmUserParts = NumParts -- condition 3
I've simplified the table and column names to make the logic clearer.
updated with full answer from OP:
Select ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY QL.NOrderBy) AS RowNumber,
QL.NQuestionID, QL.FieldName, QL.Question, QL.BRequired, QFL.FormFieldType, QFL.SingleMultipleSM,
QFL.CSSStyle
FROM dbo.QuestionFormAssociation QA WITH (NOLOCK)
INNER JOIN dbo.QuestionLookup QL WITH (NOLOCK) ON QA.NQuestionID = QL.NQuestionID
INNER JOIN dbo.QuestionFieldTypeLookup QFL WITH (NOLOCK) ON QL.NFieldTypeID = QFL.NFieldTypeID
INNER JOIN (
select q.NFormAssociationID,
max(case when qp.NFormAssociationID is null then 1 else 0 end) as HasNoParts,
sum(case when qp.PartNumber in ('1','2','3') then 1 else 0 end) as NumUserParts,
count(qp.NFormAssociationID) as NumParts,
qp.BAllPartsRequired
from QuestionFormAssociation q
left outer join QuestionPartFormAssociation qp on q.NFormAssociationID = qp.NFormAssociationID
AND QP.BActive = 1
WHERE Q.FormType = 'PAEdit'
AND Q.BActive = 1
group by q.NFormAssociationID, qp.BAllPartsRequired
) QSUB ON QA.NFormAssociationID = QSUB.NFormAssociationID
WHERE QA.BActive = 1 AND QL.BActive = 1 AND QFL.BActive=1
AND (
QSUB.HasNoParts = 1 -- condition 1
OR (QSUB.BAllPartsRequired = 0 and QSUB.NumUserParts > 0) -- condition 2
OR (QSUB.BAllPartsRequired = 1 and QSUB.NumUserParts = QSUB.NumParts) -- condition 3
)
ORDER BY QL.NOrderBy
I'm trying to get a stored procedure to work using the following syntax:
select count(sl.Item_Number)
as NumOccurrences
from spv3SalesDocument as sd
left outer join spv3saleslineitem as sl on sd.Sales_Doc_Type = sl.Sales_Doc_Type and
sd.Sales_Doc_Num = sl.Sales_Doc_Num
where
sd.Sales_Doc_Type='ORDER' and
sd.Sales_Doc_Num='OREQP0000170' and
sl.Item_Number = 'MCN-USF'
group by
sl.Item_Number
having count (distinct sl.Item_Number) = 0
In this particular case when the criteria is not met the query returns no records and the 'count' is just blank. I need a 0 returned so that I can apply a condition instead of just nothing.
I'm guessing it is a fairly simple fix but beyond my simple brain capacity.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Wally
First, having a specific where clause on sl defeats the purpose of the left outer join -- it bascially turns it into an inner join.
It sounds like you are trying to return 0 if there are no matches. I'm a T-SQL programmer, so I don't know if this will be meaningful in other flavors... and I don't know enough about the context for this query, but it sounds like you are trying to use this query for branching in an IF statement... perhaps this will help you on your way, even if it is not quite what you're looking for...
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM spv3SalesDocument as sd
INNER JOINs pv3saleslineitem as sl on sd.Sales_Doc_Type = sl.Sales_Doc_Type
and sd.Sales_Doc_Num = sl.Sales_Doc_Num
WHERE sd.Sales_Doc_Type='ORDER'
and sd.Sales_Doc_Num='OREQP0000170'
and sl.Item_Number = 'MCN-USF')
BEGIN
-- Do something...
END
I didn't test these but off the top of my head give them a try:
select ISNULL(count(sl.Item_Number), 0) as NumOccurrences
If that one doesn't work, try this one:
select
CASE count(sl.Item_Number)
WHEN NULL THEN 0
WHEN '' THEN 0
ELSE count(sl.Item_Number)
END as NumOccurrences
This combination of group by and having looks pretty suspicious:
group by sl.Item_Number
having count (distinct sl.Item_Number) = 0
I'd expect this having condition to approve only groups were Item_Number is null.
To always return a row, use a union. For example:
select name, count(*) as CustomerCount
from customers
group by
name
having count(*) > 1
union all
select 'No one found!', 0
where not exists
(
select *
from customers
group by
name
having count(*) > 1
)