I want to create a mathematical calculator in objective-C. I need it to run
through a command line. The user will enter an equation like 4 + 2 * 12 etc. The output should calculate the 2 and 12 first because they are times by. How would I create a command line program that creates output based on mathematical order or precedence. for example solving whats in the brackets first then anything that is multiplied and or divided by etc etc.
there are multiple programs available online for this here is just one http://www.wikihow.com/Make-a-Command-Prompt-Calculator, in the CMD line you can specify precedence by simply using parenthesis like the following C:> set /a ((2*12)+4) obviously replacing hard coded values with that passed to a variable.
Related
yy and p should copy and paste 1 line of text.
But I have to go back and delete the original line.
:2,5m10
should move lines from 2 to 5 to line 10. however I need to enable :set number
to see what lines I am moving
I would like to move just 1 line of text, sort of like yy+p and not use :2,3m10
to move just one line.
Is there something like mm+p ?
so it copies the current line into buffer and deletes the line and you p paste it where you want ?
:3m . moves line 3 to your current line.
Above line does the function I want. Can I set a key mapping so
that "mm" replaces ":3m." ? I find it easier to type. TIA
What you're describing is the default behaviour when using dd -it deletes a
line into the buffer and p will paste it.
So dd and p works.
If you're new to vim, then it might seem a little strange that 'yanking' (with
y) and 'deleting' (with d) both copy to the buffer, given the 'cut', 'copy'
and 'paste' behaviours of most other editors.
You can read more about it with :help change.txt and in particular :help registers.
Also, since you say you need to enable :set number, I wonder if you've come
across :set relativenumber? This is very useful - in the example below, the
numbers would look this way if the your cursor was on the line with
'demonstrate':
3 This is just
2 a small
1 example to
0 demonstrate
1 how relative
2 numbers can
3 be useful
Thus if you wanted to move the line 'a small' below the line with 'numbers
can', you could use the relative line numbers to know that 2k would put the
cursor on the line you want, where you'd hit dd, then you'd have this
situation (the deleted line is now in the buffer:
1 This is just
0 example to
1 demonstrate
2 how relative
3 numbers can
4 be useful
Then you can do 3j to move to the 'numbers can' line, and hit p. So
relative numbers are a nice way to move quickly to lines you can see. Also,
just for completeness, you can use relative numbers in a similar way on the
command line::-2m+3 (although I know this isn't what you're after). You can
even set both relative number and set number at the same time, in which case
it's like in the example above, only you have the absolute line number
displayed on the current line instead of a zero.
I’m trying to write code. I’m very new to Python, and i’m using an interpreter on Visual Studio Code. I’m trying to write multiple lines of code, but the \ isn’t working, or i’m doing it wrong. Example:
print(‘hi’) \
print(‘hello’) \
I would expect it to work, but it comes up as syntax error the next time I press enter. Is that because I’m doing it wrong? Otherwise, how would I enter many lines of code. Keep in mind i’m using an interpreter.
Separate your statements using a semicolon(;), if you want multiple "simple statements" on one line. If you want to know more about simple statements, check out the documentation:
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/simple_stmts.html#simple-statements
The backslash(\) is used in the case of logical lines i.e expressions. For example:
5 + 3 \
* 4 - 6
This would work fine because it is an 'expression' and returns a value. The same doesn't work for 'statements'.
This link, I hope, will clear your doubts on the matter:
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#explicit-line-joining
I've got a program, which compute a several variables and then these variables are writing in to the output file.
Is it possilbe, that when my program can't get a correct results for my formula, it does'nt terminate?
To clarify what I do, here is part of my code, where the variable of my interest are compute:
dx=x(1,i)-x(nk,i)
dy=y(1,i)-y(nk,i)
dz=z(1,i)-z(nk,i)
call PBC(dx,dy,dz)
r2i=dx*dx+dy*dy+dz*dz
r2=r2+r2i
r2g0=0.0d0
r2gx=0.0d0
dx=x(1,i)-x(2,i)
call PBC(dx,dy,dz)
rspani=dsqrt(dx*dx)
do ii=1,nk-1
rx=x(ii,i)
ry=y(ii,i)
rz=z(ii,i)
do jj=ii+1,nk
dx=x(jj,i)-rx
dy=y(jj,i)-ry
dz=z(jj,i)-rz
call PBC(dx,dy,dz)
r21=dx*dx+dy*dy+dz*dz
r21x=dx*dx
r2g=r2g+r21
r2gx=r2gx+r21x
r2g0=r2g0+r21
rh=rh+1.0d0/dsqrt(r21)
rh1=rh1+1.0d0
ir21=dnint(dsqrt(r21)/dr)
p(ir21)=p(ir21)+2.0D0
dxs=dsqrt(r21x)
if(dxs.gt.rspani) rspani=dxs
end do
and then in to the output I just write these variables:
write(12,870)r2i,sqrt(r2i),r2g0,r2gx/(nk*nk)
870 FORMAT(3(f15.7,3x),f15.7)
The x, y, z are actully generate via a random number generator.
The problem is that my output contains, correct values for lets say 457 lines, and then a one line is just "*********" when I use mc viewer and then the output continues with correct values, but let's say 12 steps form do cycle which compute these variables is missing.
So my questions are basic:
Is it possible, that my program can't get a correct numbers, and that's why the result is not writing in to the program?
or
Could it this been caused due to wrong output formating or something related with formating?
Thank you for any suggestion
********* is almost certainly the result of trying to write a number too large for the field specified in a format string.
For example, a field specified as f15.7 will take 1 spot for the decimal point, 1 spot for a leading sign (- will always be printed if required, + may be printed if options are set), 7 for the fractional digits, leaving 6 digits for the whole part of the number. There may therefore be cases where the program won't fit the number into the field and will print 15 *s instead.
Programs compiled with an up to date Fortran compiler will write a string such as NaN or -Inf if they encounter a floating-point number which represents one of the IEEE special values
I am trying to read a file into my code.
there are 2 subroutines, one which writes a file and the other which reads it.
the writing part was:
write(*,*)'entered refile, shall make file'
ileunitA=int(presentstep)
write(fname,1012)ileunitA
1012 format('DATA_',i6.6,'.dat')
write(fnam,1112)index
1112 format('pp',i3.3)
open(UNIT=ileunitA,FILE=fname)
!variables from module global
write(ileunita,*)u,v,w,pc,p,p0,rho1,gam,con
write(ileunita,*)aip,aim,ajp,ajm,akp,akm,ap,ap0
write(ileunita,*) scon,smomu,smomv,smomw
...
The reading part was as follows(in another subroutine):
ileunita=25;
open(unit=ILEUNITA,file='DATA_010500.dat')
!variables from module global
read(ileunita,*)u,v,w,pc,p,p0,rho1,gam,con
read(ileunita,*)aip,aim,ajp,ajm,akp,akm,ap,ap0
read(ileunita,*) scon,smomu,smomv,smomw
...
When I run the code, it shows the following error:
At line 3682 of file bub2.f90 (unit = 25, file = 'DATA_000001.dat')
Fortran runtime error: Bad repeat count in item 1 of list input
Can anyone help me figure out what could be the problem? And what is 'repeat count'. What is a 'bad' repeat count? Thanks
Guessing a little (you could show the text in the problematic line in your question...), but you are using list directed input (and output) with the * as the second specifier in the read (and write) statements. List directed input allows multiple fields that have the same value to be represented using the syntax r*c, where r is a numeric repeat count and c is the value to be repeated.
If any of your output items generate a field that contains a * then that could be confusing the processing of input.
(It is permissible (though rare) for a processor to represent multiple output fields that have the same value using a repeat count, for example WRITE (unit,*) 23, 23, 23, 23 could result in an input file that contains the text 4*23.)
List directed input also has some other features, such as the handling of delimiter characters, the / character causing input processing to terminate and the possibility and handling of null values. Some of these features may surprise those not familiar with the rules (which are inspired by typical short cuts taken when input was submitted via punched cards), which why it is often better to avoid list directed input and output and use an explicit format instead.
If any of your data fields are of type character you should consider using a non-default DELIM mode to avoid any special characters within the character variable value from confusing the input processing.
I need to write some data to file in Fortran 90. How should I use WRITE (*,*) input to have the values grouped in columns? WRITE always puts a new line after each call, that's the problem.
code example:
open (unit = 4, file = 'generated_trajectories1.dat', form='formatted')
do time_nr=0, N
write (4,*) dble(time_nr)*dt, initial_traj(time_nr)
end do
And now the point is to have it written in separate columns.
You can use implied DO loops to write values as single records. Compare the following two examples:
integer :: i
do i=1,10
write(*,'(2I4)') i, 2*i
end do
It produces:
1 2
2 4
3 6
...
Using implied DO loops it can rewritten as:
integer :: i
write(*, '(10(2I4))') (i, 2*i, i=1,10)
This one produces:
1 2 2 4 3 6 ...
If the number of elements is not fixed at compile time, you can either use the <n> extension (not supported by gfortran):
write(*, '(<n>(2I4))') (i, 2*i, i=1,n)
It takes the number of repetitions of the (2I4) edit descriptor from the value of the variable n. In GNU Fortran you can first create the appropriate edit descriptor using internal files:
character(len=20) :: myfmt
write(myfmt, '("(",I0,"(2I4))")') n
write(*, fmt=myfmt) (i, 2*i, i=1,n)
Of course, it also works with list directed output (that is output with format of *):
write(*, *) (i, 2*i, i=1,10)
This really depends on what data you are trying to write to file (i.e. whether you have a scalar within a loop or an array...). Can you include a description of this in your question?
If your are trying to write a scalar multiple times to the same row then try using non-advancing I/O, passing the keyword argument advance="no" to the write statement, e.g.
integer :: x
do x = 1,10
write(*, fmt='(i4,1x)', advance="no") x
end do
However, be aware of a suprise with non-advancing I/O.
The answer depends on your answer to Chris's question. If you want a single line, then you will have to use non-advancing IO as described by Chris. Without this, with multiple formatted write statement you will always get multiple lines.
Also, you will likely need to use formatted IO instead of list-directed (*) IO. The rules are loose for list-directed IO. Different compilers may produce different output. With many output items, line breaks are likely to keep the output lines from being too long.
Here a format that should work if all of your variables are reals:
write (4, '( *(2X, ES14.6) )', advance="no" )
how about the good old $ edit descriptor:
write(*, fmt='(i4,$)') x
remember to do a write(*,*) after your loop...