How is it possible to render a rectangle with the background color of selections in GTK+3. I cannot find any API to do that:
static gboolean draw_callback (GtkWidget *widget, cairo_t *cr, gpointer data)
{
auto state=reinterpret_cast<State*>(data);
auto width = gtk_widget_get_allocated_width (widget);
auto height = gtk_widget_get_allocated_height (widget);
auto context = gtk_widget_get_style_context (widget);
gtk_render_background(context,cr,0,0,width,height);
cairo_rectangle(cr,0,height*(1.0 - state->max),width,height*(state->max - state->min));
cairo_set_source_rgb(cr, 0.05,0.6,0.15); //What color should be used here?
cairo_fill (cr);
cairo_set_source_rgb(cr,0.01,0.3,0.07); //And here
auto mid=height*(1.0 - 0.5*(state->min + state->max));
cairo_move_to(cr,0, mid);
cairo_line_to(cr,width,mid);
cairo_stroke(cr);
return FALSE;
}
Use gtk_render_frame() and gtk_render_background(), and set up the GtkStyleContext you obtain from the GtkWidget instance with the CSS state you want to replicate.
If you want to adhere to the theme, then you cannot draw yourself; and CSS does not have "colors": each CSS state can have multiple layers that include images, gradients, and complex blend modes.
Well, here is my hack:
ColorRGBA get_ambient_color(GtkWidget* widget)
{
auto surface=cairo_image_surface_create(CAIRO_FORMAT_ARGB32,4,4);
auto cr=cairo_create(surface);
while(widge!=NULL)
{
auto context=gtk_widget_get_style_context(widget));
gtk_render_background(context,cr,0,0,1,1);
cairo_surface_flush(surface);
auto content=cairo_image_surface_get_data(surface);
if(content[3]==255)
{
auto ret=ColorRGBA{content[2]/255.0f,content[1]/255.0f,content[0]/255.0f,content[3]/255.0f};
cairo_destroy(cr);
cairo_surface_destroy(surface);
return ret;
}
// Surface is not opaque yet. Continue to parent container.
widget_handle=gtk_widget_get_parent(GTK_WIDGET(widget_handle));
}
cairo_destroy(cr);
cairo_surface_destroy(surface);
return ColorRGBA{1.0f,1.0f,1.0f,1.0f};
}
It seams that I have failed to convince people, why you need the ambient colour, so here are two use-cases:
Determine if we are using a dark/light theme. For some applications, this is sufficient. Querying the state only works if the theme supports dark/light modes. This proves the actual result.
Use as input colour for simulating global illumination. The shading of widgets should be affected by the ambient, hence the name. Another good name would be get_average_background. Themers: please don't use gradients with high contrast.
Case 1: A plot
Now you say that the colour of cursors and function graphs should be themable. That is simply not possible: The user of this plot widget can add as many curves and cursors as he wishes, and the easiest way to differentiate them is to use distinct colours.
What about curve and cursor lightness? If the background is dark, then the curve should be light and vice versa. And what background should be chosen? Ideally, something close the the background of the parent widget, but if the theme is regular, white for light, and black for dark would work. Do you notice that the curves are darker in the second figure?
Case 2: A checkbox that looks like a metallic toggle switch button
With the following technique, I have created a switch that looks exactly as if it were rendered through the Cycles path tracer. This is implemented in Gtk+2, but the algorithm is the same.
The two input images
The code
GtkAllocation alloc;
gtk_widget_get_allocation(widget,&alloc);
auto width=alloc.width;
auto context=CairoContext( gdk_cairo_create(gtk_widget_get_window(widget)) );
auto w_in=cairo_image_surface_get_width(light);
auto h_in=cairo_image_surface_get_height(light);
// Render direct lighting
auto surf_temp=CairoSurface( cairo_image_surface_create(CAIRO_FORMAT_ARGB32,w_in,h_in) );
auto context_temp=CairoContext( cairo_create(surf_temp) );
cairo_set_source_surface(context_temp,light,0,0);
cairo_set_operator(context_temp,CAIRO_OPERATOR_OVER);
cairo_paint(context_temp);
//Render ambient reflections
auto surf_temp_2=CairoSurface( cairo_image_surface_create(CAIRO_FORMAT_ARGB32,w_in,h_in) );
auto context_temp_2=CairoContext( cairo_create(surf_temp_2) );
cairo_set_source_surface(context_temp_2,background,0,0);
cairo_set_operator(context_temp_2,CAIRO_OPERATOR_OVER);
cairo_paint(context_temp_2);
cairo_set_operator(context_temp_2,CAIRO_OPERATOR_MULTIPLY);
//Multiply reflections with the background color
cairo_set_source_rgb(context_temp_2, color_bg.r, color_bg.g, color_bg.b);
cairo_rectangle(context_temp_2, 0, 0, w_in, h_in);
cairo_mask_surface(context_temp_2,surf_temp,0,0);
//Add the results
cairo_set_source_surface(context_temp,surf_temp_2,0,0);
cairo_set_operator(context_temp,CAIRO_OPERATOR_ADD);
cairo_mask_surface(context_temp,surf_temp,0,0);
//Scale and move things into place
auto s=static_cast<double>(width)/static_cast<double>(w_in);
cairo_translate(context,alloc.x,alloc.y);
cairo_scale(context,s,s);
cairo_set_source_surface(context,surf_temp,0,0);
cairo_set_operator(context,CAIRO_OPERATOR_OVER);
cairo_paint(context);
Thoughts
The first example boils down to a light/dark query which is currently missing. Maybe querying colours is not required for this to work, but then there has to be an API controlling the shape and blending mode when rendering the background. For example, to render the ambient reflection, I use multiply rather than over. Also, gtk_render_background appears to be a no-op, since GtkDrawingArea has zero opacity (that's why I needed the loop). To be useful, it must use the background as it appears on screen, not the background of the current widget.
Related
Say you have a UICollectionView with a normal custom UICollectionViewLayout.
So that is >>> NOT <<< a flow layout - it's a normal custom layout.
Custom layouts are trivial, in the prepare call you simply walk down the data and lay out each rectangle. So say it's a vertical scrolling collection...
override func prepare() {
cache = []
var y: CGFloat = 0
let k = collectionView?.numberOfItems(inSection: 0) ?? 0
// or indeed, just get that direct from your data
for i in 0 ..< k {
// say you have three cell types ...
let h = ... depending on the cell type, say 100, 200 or 300
let f = CGRect(
origin: CGPoint(x: 0, y: y ),
size: CGSize(width: screen width, height: h)
)
y += thatHeight
y += your gap between cells
cache.append( .. that one)
}
}
In the example the cell height is just fixed for each of the say three cell types - all no problem.
Handling dynamic cell heights if you are using a flow layout is well-explored and indeed relatively simple. (Example, also see many explanations on the www.)
However, what if you want dynamic cell heights with a (NON-flow) completely normal everyday UICollectionViewLayout?
Where's the estimatedItemSize ?
As far as I can tell, there is NO estimatedItemSize concept in UICollectionViewLayout?
So what the heck do you do?
You could naively just - in the code above - simply calculate the final heights of each cell one way or the other (so for example calculating the height of any text blocks, etc). But that seems perfectly inefficient: nothing at all of the collection view, can be drawn, until the entire 100s of cell sizes are calculated. You would not at all be using any of iOS's dynamic heights power and nothing would be just-in-time.
I guess, you could program an entire just-in-time system from scratch. (So, something like .. make the table size actually only 1, calculate manually that height, send it along to the collection view; calculate item 2 height, send that along, and so on.) But that's pretty lame.
Is there any way to achieve dynamic height cells with a custom UICollectionViewLayout - NOT a flow layout?
(Again, of course obviously you could just do it manually, so in the code above calculate all at once all 1000 heights, and you're done, but that would be pretty lame.)
Like I say above the first puzzle is, where the hell is the "estimated size" concept in (normal, non-flow) UICollectionViewLayout?
Just a warning: custom layouts are FAR from trivial, they may deserve a research paper on their own ;)
You can implement size estimation and dynamic sizing in your own layouts. Actually, estimated sizes are nothing special; rather, dynamic sizes are. Because custom layouts give you a total control of everything, however, this involves many steps. You will need to implement three methods in your layout subclass and one method in your cells.
First, you need to implement preferredLayoutAttributesFitting(_:) in your cells (or, more generally, reusable views subclass). Here you can use whatever calculations you want. Chances are that you will use auto layout with your cells: if so, you will need to add all cell's subviews to its contentView, constrain them to the edges and then call systemLayoutSizeFitting(_:withHorizontalFittingPriority:verticalFittingPriority:) within this "preferred attributes" method. For example, if you want your cell to resize vertically, while being constrained horizontally, you would write:
override func preferredLayoutAttributesFitting(_ layoutAttributes: UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes) -> UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes {
// Ensures that cell expands horizontally while adjusting itself vertically.
let preferredSize = systemLayoutSizeFitting(layoutAttributes.size, withHorizontalFittingPriority: .required, verticalFittingPriority: .fittingSizeLevel)
layoutAttributes.size = preferredSize
return layoutAttributes
}
After the cell is asked for its preferred attributes, the shouldInvalidateLayout(forPreferredLayoutAttributes:withOriginalAttributes:) on the layout object will be called. What's important, you can't just simply type return true, since the system will reask the cell indefinitely. This is actually very clever, since many cells may react to each other's changes, so it's the layout who ultimately decides if it's done satisfying the cells' wishes. Usually, for resizing, you would write something like this:
override func shouldInvalidateLayout(forPreferredLayoutAttributes preferredAttributes: UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes, withOriginalAttributes originalAttributes: UICollectionViewLayoutAttributes) -> Bool {
if preferredAttributes.size.height.rounded() != originalAttributes.size.height.rounded() {
return true
}
return false
}
Just after that, invalidationContext(forPreferredLayoutAttributes:withOriginalAttributes:) will be called. You usually would want to customize the context class to store the information specific to your layout. One important, rather unintuitive, caveat though is that you should not call context.invalidateItems(at:) because this will cause the layout to invalidate only those items among the provided index paths that are actually visible. Just skip this method, so the layout will requery the visible rectangle.
However! You need to thoroughly think if you need to set contentOffsetAdjustment and contentSizeAdjustment: if something resizes, your collection view as a whole probably will shrink or expand. If you do not account for those, you will have jump-reloads when scrolling.
Lastly, invalidateLayout(with:) will be called. This is the step that's intended for you to actually adjust your sections/rows heights, move something that's been affected by the resizing cell etc. If you override, you will need to call super.
PS: This is really a hard topic, I just scratched the surface. You can look here how complicated it gets (but this repo is also a very rich learning tool).
My CAMetalLayer background color is black, even if i'm assigning new color as the backgroundColor property.
Am i missing something? Thanks!
Link to the original project :
https://github.com/audiokit/MetalParticles
This project takes a rather unconventional approach to clearing the drawable's texture each frame: it replaces the textures contents with an array of zeros that is the same size as the texture (width * height * 4). Subsequently, it encodes some compute work that actually draws the particles. This is almost certainly not the most efficient way to achieve this effect, but if you want to make the smallest change that could possibly work (as opposed to experimenting with making the code as efficient as possible), Just fill the blankBitmapRawData array with your desired clear color (near line 82 of ParticleLab.swift).
I have gone through your code and can not see a place where you are setting background Color.
The metal layer is added as a sublayer to it, so you have to set it explicitly.
Add this line at the end of your init method in ParticialLab class and see if it works.
self.backgroundColor = UIColor.redColor().CGColor
I found that self.isOpaque = false was needed on the layer.
http://i.stack.imgur.com/kcOxx.jpg
Look at the picture, I want to achieve something like this in OGRE, but I have no idea about this.
I am trying to make a SLG game with OGRE now, and the first step is to show the mesh.
I am a Chinese student and it's... My English grade is not good, and in my country I can only find a little doc about OGRE. The internet is filled with Unity3D... I thank for everybody who has read my question.
One way
Add to your object's .material script one more pass.
material myMaterial
{
technique
{
pass solidPass
{
// sets your object's colour, texture etc.
// ... leave what you have here
polygon_mode solid // sets to render the object as a solid
}
pass wireframePass
{
diffuse 0 0 0 1.0 // the colour of the wireframe (white)
polygon_mode wireframe // sets to render the object as a wireframe
}
}
}
This of course renders the object twice, but I assume it's just for debugging purposes and the lines are quite slim, also the object overlaps the wireframe at some parts.
The usual way
Add another texture_unit to the object's .material script that contains thin white squares of size the same as in the UV mapping (which you can export with most modelling software) with a transparent background
Make sure the .material script has alpha enabled in the pass you created
scene_blend alpha_blend
scene_blend_op add
This lets you choose what kind of lines you want.
Source:
Also check the OGRE Manual under Material Scripts. It goes much more in depth about the material script itself
I have a circle-shaped dynamic body and I need to resize it during the game (It appears like a point, then it grows to a circle and after that it starts moving). How should I do that?
I have an idea - it's to use some animation (Circle has the same radius, but due to animation it looks like the circle grows), but I'm not sure if it's right way or not. (Besides I don't know how to realize it)
For scaling circle, if you are using sprite just scale it sprite.setScale(float), if your sprite is attached to Box2d Circle-shape then get the Body's shape and set the radius
Shape shape = body.getFixture().getShape;
shape.setRadius(radiusValue);
and if you are using ShapeRenderer just multiply the points of ShapeRenderer.
I assume that you are talking about a Box2D body.
It is not possible to change a circle-shaped fixture with Box2D. Box2D is a rigid body simulator. What you would have to do is destroy the fixture and replace it with a smaller/bigger version of the circle. But this will cause a lot of problems, since you cannot destroy a fixture when there is still a contact for example.
It would be better to keep the circle the same size and just simulate a change in size with an animation of a texture on top.
If you cannot simulate that, then maybe try the following approach: Have several versions of that circle in different sizes and keep them on top of each other. Implement a ContactFilter which will only cause contacts for the one circle which is currently "active".
Inside any Object class with box2d, I use the following for dynamic resizing:
public void resize(float newradius) {
this.body.destroyFixture(this.fixture);
fixtureDef.density = (float) (this.mass/(Math.PI*newradius*newradius));
this.radius = newradius;
CircleShape circle = new CircleShape();
circle.setRadius(newradius);
this.fixtureDef.shape = circle;
circle.dispose();
this.fixture = body.createFixture(fixtureDef);
this.fixture.setUserData(this);
}
You can also see the following topic: How to change size after it has been created
Little description:
I get an image from my scanner using Capture Core Framework and background color is gray. So I want to do white background.
I'm looking for best way to remove this color. I looked at Image Core Filters. And as I understood I should use those ones, but I couldn't find included/ready filterfor this task. So, Do I have to write it myself?
It means to remove color I should write my own filter and apply it to my images? Right? Thank you.
UPD: I develop for Mac os
Why not just simply change the brightness of your image? If this gray background color value is fixed then you can increase the brightness a little bit, as a preprocess step, until you're satisfied.
A filter isn't quite the right tool for the job here. Filters apply a colour-shifting algorithm, pixel by pixel, to all of the pixels in an image.
This would be appropriate in your case if there was something completely unique about the pixels that you want to turn to white. For example, if the background you wish to eliminate was in a very narrow colour range that did not occur in any other part of the image. This is the technique used in greenscreen/bluescreen filming, which only works if that green or blue colour does not occur anywhere in the image regions you want to keep.
But - as you say in one of your comments - you cannot do this as that grey level you want to get rid of will not be unique to the background, so any filter you apply that would pick out those pixes may also affect pixels in the scanned subjectmatter.
What you really need is a way to select a region of interest and apply a filter to that region alone. You could use openCV for this. In fact it has a function that can achieve your result in one go:
http://docs.opencv.org/modules/imgproc/doc/miscellaneous_transformations.html?highlight=floodfill#int
floodFill(InputOutputArray image, //image to process
Point seedPoint, //starting pixel
Scalar newVal, //New value of the repainted domain pixels
Rect* rect, //optional output param (you won't need it)
Scalar loDiff, //max lower brightness/colour diff to select
Scalar upDiff, //max upper brightness/colour diff to select
int flags) //you want FLOODFILL_FIXED_RANGE
This function starts from a seedPoint, which should be any pixel that you can guarantee will be a part of the background grey you want to eliminate. (0,0) might work for you. It then interrogates neighbouring pixels, including them in the ROI array if they are sufficiently similar. The resulting array is a connected region. If your background grey uniformly falls between loDiff and upDiff - and your subject scan has a defined edge which does NOT fall into this range, you will get your result - selection and remapping of all background pixels to newVal (white).