I am setting up a kinesis firehose stream and everything works well with the files getting created on s3 which are delimited. But i was wondering if there is a way to specify an extension to this file since the consumer of this file require it to be either a csv or txt. Is there any way of doing this?
Thanks
You can create an s3 trigger to lambda and rename from there.
I was not able to get an extension for the files generated by firehose but I ended up using data pipeline to do this by using the ShellCommandActivity component which allows one to run shell commands on the files in Amazon S3 and write the resulting files to either S3 or any other location that you'd like.
Related
I have configured AWS S3 and a lambda function which triggers when a file is inserted into S3. I have configured an event s3:ObjectCreated:CompleteMultipartUpload in lambda to trigger. When I tested through AWS CLI with large files it worked. But when I upload a smaller file with size less than 5 MB, the event is not triggering the lambda. How can I do this for small size files with only one part?
Anyone please help....
Files less than 5MB cannot be uploaded using multipart upload. Therefore, you can add s3:ObjectCreated:Put event to let your lambda get notified too.
I am looking to create a way where when I upload a file to S3, I would want an original copy and compressed copy that stores in different folders in the same bucket (different bucket works too). I tried to do that with the serverless app repository 'compress'. However, it does not compress images > 4MB
The structure I want to create is:
I upload the file to S3
The original file (with the 100% file size) goes into one folder
A compressed copy is created that goes into another folder in the same bucket
Is there a way to do figure this out? I'm new to AWS
Yes, you can achieve this by doing the following.
Uploaded file to S3 triggers a bucket event notification with a destination of an AWS Lambda. The Lambda reads the file from S3, compresses the file, and then saves the file to another folder in the same bucket
I have got an application that requires to create a compressed file from different objects that are saved on S3. The issue I am facing is I would like to compress objects on the fly without downloading files into a container and do the compression. The reason for that is the size of files can be quite big and I can easily run out of disk space and of course, there will be an extra round trip time of downloading files on disk, compressing them and upload the compressed file to s3 again.
It is worth mentioning that I would like to locate files in the output compressed file in different directories, so when a user decompress the file can see it is stored in different folders.
Since S3 does not have the concept of physical folder structure, I am not sure if this is possible and if there is a better way than download/uploading the files.
NOTE
My issue is not about how to use AWS Lambda to export a set of big files. It is about how I can export files from S3 without downloading objects on a local disk and create a zip file and upload to S3. I would like to simply zip the files on S3 on the fly and most importantly being able to customize the directory structure.
For example,
inputs:
big-file1
big-file2
big-file3
...
output:
big-zip.zip
with the directory structure of:
images/big-file1
images/big-file2
videos/big-file3
...
I have almost the same use case as yours. I have researched it for about 2 months and try with multiple ways but finally I have to use ECS (EC2) for my use case because of the zip file can be huge like 100GB ....
Currently AWS doesn't support a native way to perform compress. I have talked to them and they are considering it a feature but there is no time line given yet.
If your files is about 3 GB in term of size, you can think of Lambda to achieve your requirement.
If your files is more than 4 GB, I believe it is safe to do it with ECS or EC2 and attach more volume if it requires more space/memory for compression.
Thanks,
Yes, there are at least two ways: either using AWS-Lambda or AWS-EC2
EC2
Since aws-cli has support of cp command, you can pipe S3 file to any archiver using unix-pipe, e.g.:
aws s3 cp s3://yours-bucket/huge_file - | gzip | aws s3 cp - s3://yours-bucket/compressed_file
AWS-Lambda
Since maintaining and using EC2 instance just for compressing may be too expensive, you can use Lambda for one-time compressions.
But keep in mind that Lambda has a lifetime limit of 15 minutes. So, if your files really huge try this sequence:
To make sure that file will be compressed, try partial file compression using Lambda
Compressed files could me merged on S3 into one file using Upload Part - Copy
Can csv files from the AWS S3 bucket be configured to go straight into ML or do the files need to land somewhere and then the CSV files have to get ingested using MCLP?
Assuming you have CSV files in the S3 Bucket and that one row in the CSV file is to be inserted as a single XML record...that wasn't clear in your question, but is the most common use case. If your plan is to just pull the files in and persist them as CSV files, there are undocumented XQuery functions that could be used to access the S3 bucket and pull the files in off that. Anyway, the MLCP documents are very helpful in understanding this very versatile and powerful tool.
According to the documentation (https://developer.marklogic.com/products/mlcp) the supported data sources are:
Local filesystem
HDFS
MarkLogic Archive
Another MarkLogic Database
You could potentially mount the S3 Bucket to a local filesystem on EC2 to bypass the need to make the files accessible to MLCP. Google's your friend if that's important. I personally haven't seen a production-stable method for that, but it's been a long time since I've tried.
Regardless, you need to make those files available on a supported source, most likely a filesystem location in this case, where MLCP can be run and can reach the files. I suppose that's what you meant by having the files land somewhere. MLCP can process delimited files in import mode. The documentation is very good for understanding all the options.
I need to access some data during the map stage. It is a static file, from which I need to read some data.
I have uploaded the data file to S3.
How can I access that data while running my job in EMR?
If I just specify the file path as:
s3n://<bucket-name>/path
in the code, will that work ?
Thanks
S3n:// url is for Hadoop to read the s3 files. If you want to read the s3 file in your map program, either you need to use a library that handles s3:// URL format - such as jets3t - https://jets3t.s3.amazonaws.com/toolkit/toolkit.html - or access S3 objects via HTTP.
A quick search for an example program brought up this link.
https://gist.github.com/lucastex/917988
You can also access the S3 object through HTTP or HTTPS. This may need making the object public or configuring additional security. Then you can access it using the HTTP url package supported natively by java.
Another good option is to use s3dist copy as a bootstrap step to copy the S3 file to HDFS before your Map step starts. http://docs.aws.amazon.com/ElasticMapReduce/latest/DeveloperGuide/UsingEMR_s3distcp.html
What I ended up doing:
1) Wrote a small script that copies my file from s3 to the cluster
hadoop fs -copyToLocal s3n://$SOURCE_S3_BUCKET/path/file.txt $DESTINATION_DIR_ON_HOST
2) Created bootstrap step for my EMR Job, that runs the script in 1).
This approach doesn't require to make the S3 data public.