I'm trying to run the following query to update one table from another. The dates and email address work and carry across, but the nested query I'm using to get Subject_1 from a reference table does not. What am I doing wrong?
SELECT
FirstRegistered As SignUpdate,
(SELECT Subj_ClusName FROM tblSubjectLookup INNER JOIN PAD_ApplicantLost2000 ON tblSubjectLookup.Subj_Name=PAD_ApplicantLost2000.raw_subj_interest_1) AS Subject_1,
Email_Address
FROM PAD_ApplicantLost2000
The origin table, PAD_ApplicantLost2000, has a 'raw subject' column which contains, for example, 'Biology'. There is another table, tblSubjectLookup, which has codes for all subjects, so Subj.Name has 'Biology' and 'Subj_ClusName' has 'B1', which is what needs to go in my target table. However, the Subject_1 field in the target table does not populate.
What am I doing wrong?
Why not just use a WHERE clause instead of joining the table again. I also added LIMIT 1 just to make sure only 1 value is returned.
SELECT
FirstRegistered As SignUpdate,
(SELECT Subj_ClusName FROM tblSubjectLookup WHERE tblSubjectLookup.Subj_Name = PAD_ApplicantLost2000.raw_subj_interest_1 LIMIT 1) AS Subject_1,
Email_Address
FROM PAD_ApplicantLost2000
Another, possibly better, way to do it would just be to join the table directly.
SELECT
FirstRegistered As SignUpdate,
Subj_ClusName AS Subject_1,
Email_Address
FROM PAD_ApplicantLost2000
LEFT JOIN tblSubjectLookup ON tblSubjectLookup.Subj_Name = PAD_ApplicantLost2000.raw_subj_interest_1
Related
Let's say I have 3 tables.
table_1
id
fk_table_2
fk_table_3
1
1
1
table_2
id
name
1
"foo"
table_3
id
name
1
"bar"
I'd like to query a row in table_1 but instead of returning the fk_table_2 & fk_table_3, is there a way to return the name associated the the row in their respective tables, without individually selecting fields.
Should return something like this:
id
fk_table_2
fk_table_3
1
"foo"
"bar"
For the moment I have this:
SELECT * FROM table_1
INNER JOIN table_2
ON table_1.fk_table_2 = table_2.id
INNER JOIN table_3
ON table_1.fk_table_3 = table_3.id;
which returns all the data I need, but incorrectly structured.
Can anyone help? Thank you.
Maybe SELECT table_2.*, table_3.* FROM ... does what you want -- if your DBMS supports it -- and is enough to get around your "without individually selecting fields" limitation.
Otherwise, you're saying "I want to individually select fields without individually selecting fields", and that's obviously a contradiction. Why are you subject to such a bizarre restriction, anyhow?
I am trying to create a table that has columns called user_id and top5_foods (binary column). I currently have two tables, one has all of the user_ids and the foods associated with those user_ids and one table that only contains the top5 foods according to a type of calculation to select the top5 foods.
The table that I am trying to create if to have the column of the user_id and if at least one of their favorite foods is in the top_5_food table, put the value of the top5_foods as 1 and if not, 0.
Something like the following:
user_id top5_foods
----------------------
34223 1
43225 0
34323 1
I have tried to use the CASE command but it just duplicated the user_ids and mark 1 or 0 whenever it finds a food that is in the top_5_foods table. But I don't want it to duplicate. Could you please help ?
Thank you very much
If I understand correctly, a left join and aggregation:
select uf.user_id,
(count(t.food_id) > 0) as top5_foods
from user_foods uf left join
top5_foods t
on uf.food_id = t.food_id
group by uf.user_id;
CREATE TABLE student_activestudent AS
(
SELECT *
FROM
student
INNER JOIN
activestudent ON activestudent.studentnumber=student.studentnumber
);
I am expecting a table with 2 columns of studentnumber but I received Duplicate error instead --> Duplicate column name 'studentnumber'
A database table must have unique column names.
When you do select * you will get all columns from all tables and studentnumber exists on both student table and activestudent table. So to solve you problem specify the columns you want instead of *
CREATE TABLE student_activestudent AS
(
SELECT
student.studentnumber,
..Other columns..
FROM
student
INNER JOIN
activestudent ON activestudent.studentnumber=student.studentnumber
);
At the very least, studentnumber is duplicated. In general, I strongly recommend that a view list all the columns explicitly. This protects the view if underlying columns change.
That said, if studentnumber is the only column, then you can do:
CREATE TABLE student_activestudent AS
SELECT *
FROM student s JOIN
activestudent ast
USING (studentnumber);
With using, the * does not repeat the join keys.
You cannot select two tables that have same column's name.
The best way is not to select *
Select by column and if the column is same you can put [as]
Example
SELECT student.studentnumber as stuNumber, activestudent.studentnumber as actstuNumber
I have one table named: ORDERS
this table contains OrderNumber's which belong to the same person and same address lines for that person.
However sometimes the data is inconsistent;
as example looking at the table screenshot: Orders table with bad data to fix -
you all can noticed that orderNumber 1 has a name associated to and addresses line1-2-3-4. sometimes those are all different by some character or even null.
my goal is to update all those 3 lines with one set of data that is already there and set equally all the 3 rows.
to make more clear the result expected should be like this:
enter image description here
i am currently using a MERGE statement to avoid a CURSOR (for loop )
but i am having problems to make it work
here the SQL
MERGE INTO ORDERS O USING
(SELECT
INNER.ORDERNUMBER,
INNER.NAME,
INNER.LINE1,
INNER.LINE2,
INNER.LINE3,
INNER.LINE4
FROM ORDERS INNER
) TEMP
ON( O.ORDERNUMBER = TEMP.ORDERNUMBER )
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE
SET
O.NAME = TEMP.NAME,
O.LINE1 = TEMP.LINE1,
O.LINE2 = TEMP.LINE2,
O.LINE3 = TEMP.LINE3,
O.LINE4 = TEMP.LINE4;
the biggest issues i am facing is to pick a single row out of the 3 randomly - it does not matter whihc of the data - row i pick to update the line/s
as long i make the records exaclty the same for an order number.
i also used ROWNUM =1 but it in multip[le updates will only output one row and update maybe thousand of lines with the same address and name whihch belong to an order number.
order number is the join column to use ...
kind regards
A simple correlated subquery in an update statement should work:
update orders t1
set (t1.name, t1.line1, t1.line2, t1.line3, t1.line4) =
(select t2.name, t2.line1, t2.line2, t2.line3, t2.line4
from orders t2
where t2.OrderNumber = t1.OrderNumber
and rownum < 2)
2 records in above image are from Db, in above table Constraint are (SID and LINE_ITEM_ID),
SID and LINE_ITEM_ID both column are used to find a unique record.
My issues :
I am looking for a query it should fetch the recored from DB depending on conditions
if i search for PART_NUMBER = 'PAU43-IMB-P6'
1. it should fetch one record from DB if search for PART_NUMBER = 'PAU43-IMB-P6', no mater to which SID that item belong to if there is only one recored either under SID =1 or SID = 2.
2. it should fetch one record which is under SID = 2 only, from DB on search for PART_NUMBER = 'PAU43-IMB-P6', if there are 2 items one in SID=1 and other in SID=2.
i am looking for a query which will search for a given part_number depending on Both SID 1 and 2, and it should return value under SID =2 and it can return value under SID=1 only if the there are no records under SID=2 (query has to withstand a load of Million record search).
Thank you
Select *
from Table
where SID||LINE_ITEM_ID = (
select Max(SID)||Max(LINE_ITEM_ID)
from table
where PART_NUMBER = 'PAU43-IMB-P6'
);
If I understand correctly, for each considered LINE_ITEM_ID you want to return only the one with the largest value for SID. This is a common requirement and, as with most things in SQL, can be written in many different ways; the best performing will depend on many factors, not least of which is the SQL product you are using.
Here's one possible approach:
SELECT DISTINCT * -- use a column list
FROM YourTable AS T1
INNER JOIN (
SELECT T2.LINE_ITEM_ID,
MAX(T2.SID) AS max_SID
FROM YourTable AS T2
GROUP
BY T2.LINE_ITEM_ID
) AS DT1 (LINE_ITEM_ID, max_SID)
ON T1.LINE_ITEM_ID = DT1.LINE_ITEM_ID
AND T1.SID = DT1.max_SID;
That said, I don't recall seeing one that relies on the UNION relational operator. You could easily rewrite the above using the INTERSECT relational operator but it would be more verbose.
Well in my case it worked something like this:
select LINE_ITEM_ID,SID,price_1,part_number from (
(select LINE_ITEM_ID,SID,price_1,part_number from Table where SID = 2)
UNION
(select LINE_ITEM_ID,SID,price_1,part_number from Table SID = 1 and line_item_id NOT IN (select LINE_ITEM_ID,SID,price_1,part_number from Table SID = 2)))
This query solved my issue..........