I would like to generate a centered figure legend for subplot(s), for which there is a single label. For my actual use case, the number of subplot(s) is greater than or equal to one; it's possible to have a 2x2 grid of subplots and I would like to use the figure-legend instead of using ax.legend(...) since the same single label entry will apply to each/every subplot.
As a brief and simplified example, consider the code just below:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = np.arange(10)
y = np.sin(x)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.plot(x, y, color='orange', label='$f(x) = sin(x)$')
fig.subplots_adjust(bottom=0.15)
fig.legend(mode='expand', loc='lower center')
plt.show()
plt.close(fig)
This code will generate the figure seen below:
I would like to use the mode='expand' kwarg to make the legend span the entire width of the subplot(s); however, doing so prevents the label from being centered. As an example, removing this kwarg from the code outputs the following figure.
Is there a way to use both mode='expand' and also have the label be centered (since there is only one label)?
EDIT:
I've tried using the bbox_to_anchor kwargs (as suggested in the docs) as an alternative to mode='expand', but this doesn't work either. One can switch out the fig.legend(...) line for the line below to test for yourself.
fig.legend(loc='lower center', bbox_to_anchor=(0, 0, 1, 0.5))
The handles and labels are flush against the left side of the legend. There is no mechanism to allow for aligning them.
A workaround could be to use 3 columns of legend handles and fill the first and third with a transparent handle.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = np.arange(10)
y = np.sin(x)
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
fig.subplots_adjust(bottom=0.15)
line, = ax.plot(x, y, color='orange', label='$f(x) = sin(x)$')
proxy = plt.Rectangle((0,0),1,1, alpha=0)
fig.legend(handles=[proxy, line, proxy], mode='expand', loc='lower center', ncol=3)
plt.show()
I'm trying to create a plot using pyplot that has a discontinuous x-axis. The usual way this is drawn is that the axis will have something like this:
(values)----//----(later values)
where the // indicates that you're skipping everything between (values) and (later values).
I haven't been able to find any examples of this, so I'm wondering if it's even possible. I know you can join data over a discontinuity for, eg, financial data, but I'd like to make the jump in the axis more explicit. At the moment I'm just using subplots but I'd really like to have everything end up on the same graph in the end.
Paul's answer is a perfectly fine method of doing this.
However, if you don't want to make a custom transform, you can just use two subplots to create the same effect.
Rather than put together an example from scratch, there's an excellent example of this written by Paul Ivanov in the matplotlib examples (It's only in the current git tip, as it was only committed a few months ago. It's not on the webpage yet.).
This is just a simple modification of this example to have a discontinuous x-axis instead of the y-axis. (Which is why I'm making this post a CW)
Basically, you just do something like this:
import matplotlib.pylab as plt
import numpy as np
# If you're not familiar with np.r_, don't worry too much about this. It's just
# a series with points from 0 to 1 spaced at 0.1, and 9 to 10 with the same spacing.
x = np.r_[0:1:0.1, 9:10:0.1]
y = np.sin(x)
fig,(ax,ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2, sharey=True)
# plot the same data on both axes
ax.plot(x, y, 'bo')
ax2.plot(x, y, 'bo')
# zoom-in / limit the view to different portions of the data
ax.set_xlim(0,1) # most of the data
ax2.set_xlim(9,10) # outliers only
# hide the spines between ax and ax2
ax.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
ax2.spines['left'].set_visible(False)
ax.yaxis.tick_left()
ax.tick_params(labeltop='off') # don't put tick labels at the top
ax2.yaxis.tick_right()
# Make the spacing between the two axes a bit smaller
plt.subplots_adjust(wspace=0.15)
plt.show()
To add the broken axis lines // effect, we can do this (again, modified from Paul Ivanov's example):
import matplotlib.pylab as plt
import numpy as np
# If you're not familiar with np.r_, don't worry too much about this. It's just
# a series with points from 0 to 1 spaced at 0.1, and 9 to 10 with the same spacing.
x = np.r_[0:1:0.1, 9:10:0.1]
y = np.sin(x)
fig,(ax,ax2) = plt.subplots(1, 2, sharey=True)
# plot the same data on both axes
ax.plot(x, y, 'bo')
ax2.plot(x, y, 'bo')
# zoom-in / limit the view to different portions of the data
ax.set_xlim(0,1) # most of the data
ax2.set_xlim(9,10) # outliers only
# hide the spines between ax and ax2
ax.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
ax2.spines['left'].set_visible(False)
ax.yaxis.tick_left()
ax.tick_params(labeltop='off') # don't put tick labels at the top
ax2.yaxis.tick_right()
# Make the spacing between the two axes a bit smaller
plt.subplots_adjust(wspace=0.15)
# This looks pretty good, and was fairly painless, but you can get that
# cut-out diagonal lines look with just a bit more work. The important
# thing to know here is that in axes coordinates, which are always
# between 0-1, spine endpoints are at these locations (0,0), (0,1),
# (1,0), and (1,1). Thus, we just need to put the diagonals in the
# appropriate corners of each of our axes, and so long as we use the
# right transform and disable clipping.
d = .015 # how big to make the diagonal lines in axes coordinates
# arguments to pass plot, just so we don't keep repeating them
kwargs = dict(transform=ax.transAxes, color='k', clip_on=False)
ax.plot((1-d,1+d),(-d,+d), **kwargs) # top-left diagonal
ax.plot((1-d,1+d),(1-d,1+d), **kwargs) # bottom-left diagonal
kwargs.update(transform=ax2.transAxes) # switch to the bottom axes
ax2.plot((-d,d),(-d,+d), **kwargs) # top-right diagonal
ax2.plot((-d,d),(1-d,1+d), **kwargs) # bottom-right diagonal
# What's cool about this is that now if we vary the distance between
# ax and ax2 via f.subplots_adjust(hspace=...) or plt.subplot_tool(),
# the diagonal lines will move accordingly, and stay right at the tips
# of the spines they are 'breaking'
plt.show()
I see many suggestions for this feature but no indication that it's been implemented. Here is a workable solution for the time-being. It applies a step-function transform to the x-axis. It's a lot of code, but it's fairly simple since most of it is boilerplate custom scale stuff. I have not added any graphics to indicate the location of the break, since that is a matter of style. Good luck finishing the job.
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
from matplotlib import scale as mscale
from matplotlib import transforms as mtransforms
import numpy as np
def CustomScaleFactory(l, u):
class CustomScale(mscale.ScaleBase):
name = 'custom'
def __init__(self, axis, **kwargs):
mscale.ScaleBase.__init__(self)
self.thresh = None #thresh
def get_transform(self):
return self.CustomTransform(self.thresh)
def set_default_locators_and_formatters(self, axis):
pass
class CustomTransform(mtransforms.Transform):
input_dims = 1
output_dims = 1
is_separable = True
lower = l
upper = u
def __init__(self, thresh):
mtransforms.Transform.__init__(self)
self.thresh = thresh
def transform(self, a):
aa = a.copy()
aa[a>self.lower] = a[a>self.lower]-(self.upper-self.lower)
aa[(a>self.lower)&(a<self.upper)] = self.lower
return aa
def inverted(self):
return CustomScale.InvertedCustomTransform(self.thresh)
class InvertedCustomTransform(mtransforms.Transform):
input_dims = 1
output_dims = 1
is_separable = True
lower = l
upper = u
def __init__(self, thresh):
mtransforms.Transform.__init__(self)
self.thresh = thresh
def transform(self, a):
aa = a.copy()
aa[a>self.lower] = a[a>self.lower]+(self.upper-self.lower)
return aa
def inverted(self):
return CustomScale.CustomTransform(self.thresh)
return CustomScale
mscale.register_scale(CustomScaleFactory(1.12, 8.88))
x = np.concatenate((np.linspace(0,1,10), np.linspace(9,10,10)))
xticks = np.concatenate((np.linspace(0,1,6), np.linspace(9,10,6)))
y = np.sin(x)
plt.plot(x, y, '.')
ax = plt.gca()
ax.set_xscale('custom')
ax.set_xticks(xticks)
plt.show()
Check the brokenaxes package:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from brokenaxes import brokenaxes
import numpy as np
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(5,2))
bax = brokenaxes(
xlims=((0, .1), (.4, .7)),
ylims=((-1, .7), (.79, 1)),
hspace=.05
)
x = np.linspace(0, 1, 100)
bax.plot(x, np.sin(10 * x), label='sin')
bax.plot(x, np.cos(10 * x), label='cos')
bax.legend(loc=3)
bax.set_xlabel('time')
bax.set_ylabel('value')
A very simple hack is to
scatter plot rectangles over the axes' spines and
draw the "//" as text at that position.
Worked like a charm for me:
# FAKE BROKEN AXES
# plot a white rectangle on the x-axis-spine to "break" it
xpos = 10 # x position of the "break"
ypos = plt.gca().get_ylim()[0] # y position of the "break"
plt.scatter(xpos, ypos, color='white', marker='s', s=80, clip_on=False, zorder=100)
# draw "//" on the same place as text
plt.text(xpos, ymin-0.125, r'//', fontsize=label_size, zorder=101, horizontalalignment='center', verticalalignment='center')
Example Plot:
For those interested, I've expanded upon #Paul's answer and added it to the matplotlib wrapper proplot. It can do axis "jumps", "speedups", and "slowdowns".
There is no way currently to add "crosses" that indicate the discrete jump like in Joe's answer, but I plan to add this in the future. I also plan to add a default "tick locator" that sets sensible default tick locations depending on the CutoffScale arguments.
Adressing Frederick Nord's question how to enable parallel orientation of the diagonal "breaking" lines when using a gridspec with ratios unequal 1:1, the following changes based on the proposals of Paul Ivanov and Joe Kingtons may be helpful. Width ratio can be varied using variables n and m.
import matplotlib.pylab as plt
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.gridspec as gridspec
x = np.r_[0:1:0.1, 9:10:0.1]
y = np.sin(x)
n = 5; m = 1;
gs = gridspec.GridSpec(1,2, width_ratios = [n,m])
plt.figure(figsize=(10,8))
ax = plt.subplot(gs[0,0])
ax2 = plt.subplot(gs[0,1], sharey = ax)
plt.setp(ax2.get_yticklabels(), visible=False)
plt.subplots_adjust(wspace = 0.1)
ax.plot(x, y, 'bo')
ax2.plot(x, y, 'bo')
ax.set_xlim(0,1)
ax2.set_xlim(10,8)
# hide the spines between ax and ax2
ax.spines['right'].set_visible(False)
ax2.spines['left'].set_visible(False)
ax.yaxis.tick_left()
ax.tick_params(labeltop='off') # don't put tick labels at the top
ax2.yaxis.tick_right()
d = .015 # how big to make the diagonal lines in axes coordinates
# arguments to pass plot, just so we don't keep repeating them
kwargs = dict(transform=ax.transAxes, color='k', clip_on=False)
on = (n+m)/n; om = (n+m)/m;
ax.plot((1-d*on,1+d*on),(-d,d), **kwargs) # bottom-left diagonal
ax.plot((1-d*on,1+d*on),(1-d,1+d), **kwargs) # top-left diagonal
kwargs.update(transform=ax2.transAxes) # switch to the bottom axes
ax2.plot((-d*om,d*om),(-d,d), **kwargs) # bottom-right diagonal
ax2.plot((-d*om,d*om),(1-d,1+d), **kwargs) # top-right diagonal
plt.show()
This is a hacky but pretty solution for x-axis breaks.
The solution is based on https://matplotlib.org/stable/gallery/subplots_axes_and_figures/broken_axis.html, which gets rid of the problem with positioning the break above the spine, solved by How can I plot points so they appear over top of the spines with matplotlib?
from matplotlib.patches import Rectangle
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def axis_break(axis, xpos=[0.1, 0.125], slant=1.5):
d = slant # proportion of vertical to horizontal extent of the slanted line
anchor = (xpos[0], -1)
w = xpos[1] - xpos[0]
h = 1
kwargs = dict(marker=[(-1, -d), (1, d)], markersize=12, zorder=3,
linestyle="none", color='k', mec='k', mew=1, clip_on=False)
axis.add_patch(Rectangle(
anchor, w, h, fill=True, color="white",
transform=axis.transAxes, clip_on=False, zorder=3)
)
axis.plot(xpos, [0, 0], transform=axis.transAxes, **kwargs)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1,1)
plt.plot(np.arange(10))
axis_break(ax, xpos=[0.1, 0.12], slant=1.5)
axis_break(ax, xpos=[0.3, 0.31], slant=-10)
if you want to replace an axis label, this would do the trick:
from matplotlib import ticker
def replace_pos_with_label(fig, pos, label, axis):
fig.canvas.draw() # this is needed to set up the x-ticks
labs = axis.get_xticklabels()
labels = []
locs = []
for text in labs:
x = text._x
lab = text._text
if x == pos:
lab = label
labels.append(lab)
locs.append(x)
axis.xaxis.set_major_locator(ticker.FixedLocator(locs))
axis.set_xticklabels(labels)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1,1)
plt.plot(np.arange(10))
replace_pos_with_label(fig, 0, "-10", axis=ax)
replace_pos_with_label(fig, 6, "$10^{4}$", axis=ax)
axis_break(ax, xpos=[0.1, 0.12], slant=2)
I am trying to plot some data with a discrete color bar. I was following the example given (https://gist.github.com/jakevdp/91077b0cae40f8f8244a) but the issue is this example does not work 1-1 with different spacing. For example, the spacing in the example in the link is for only increasing by 1 but my data is increasing by 0.5. You can see the output from the code I have.. Any help with this would be appreciated. I know I am missing something key here but cant figure it out.
import matplotlib.pylab as plt
import numpy as np
def discrete_cmap(N, base_cmap=None):
"""Create an N-bin discrete colormap from the specified input map"""
# Note that if base_cmap is a string or None, you can simply do
# return plt.cm.get_cmap(base_cmap, N)
# The following works for string, None, or a colormap instance:
base = plt.cm.get_cmap(base_cmap)
color_list = base(np.linspace(0, 1, N))
cmap_name = base.name + str(N)
return base.from_list(cmap_name, color_list, N)
num=11
x = np.random.randn(40)
y = np.random.randn(40)
c = np.random.randint(num, size=40)
plt.figure(figsize=(10,7.5))
plt.scatter(x, y, c=c, s=50, cmap=discrete_cmap(num, 'jet'))
plt.colorbar(ticks=np.arange(0,5.5,0.5))
plt.clim(-0.5, num - 0.5)
plt.show()
Not sure what version of matplotlib/pyplot introduced this, but plt.get_cmap now supports an int argument specifying the number of colors you want to get, for discrete colormaps.
This automatically results in the colorbar being discrete.
By the way, pandas has an even better handling of the colorbar.
import numpy as np
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
plt.style.use('ggplot')
# remove if not using Jupyter/IPython
%matplotlib inline
# choose number of clusters and number of points in each cluster
n_clusters = 5
n_samples = 20
# there are fancier ways to do this
clusters = np.array([k for k in range(n_clusters) for i in range(n_samples)])
# generate the coordinates of the center
# of each cluster by shuffling a range of values
clusters_x = np.arange(n_clusters)
clusters_y = np.arange(n_clusters)
np.random.shuffle(clusters_x)
np.random.shuffle(clusters_y)
# get dicts like cluster -> center coordinate
x_dict = dict(enumerate(clusters_x))
y_dict = dict(enumerate(clusters_y))
# get coordinates of cluster center for each point
x = np.array(list(x_dict[k] for k in clusters)).astype(float)
y = np.array(list(y_dict[k] for k in clusters)).astype(float)
# add noise
x += np.random.normal(scale=0.5, size=n_clusters*n_samples)
y += np.random.normal(scale=0.5, size=n_clusters*n_samples)
### Finally, plot
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(12,8))
# get discrete colormap
cmap = plt.get_cmap('viridis', n_clusters)
# scatter points
scatter = ax.scatter(x, y, c=clusters, cmap=cmap)
# scatter cluster centers
ax.scatter(clusters_x, clusters_y, c='red')
# add colorbar
cbar = plt.colorbar(scatter)
# set ticks locations (not very elegant, but it works):
# - shift by 0.5
# - scale so that the last value is at the center of the last color
tick_locs = (np.arange(n_clusters) + 0.5)*(n_clusters-1)/n_clusters
cbar.set_ticks(tick_locs)
# set tick labels (as before)
cbar.set_ticklabels(np.arange(n_clusters))
Ok so this is the hack I found for my own question. I am sure there is a better way to do this but this works for what I am doing. Feel free to suggest a better way to do this.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pylab as plt
def discrete_cmap(N, base_cmap=None):
"""Create an N-bin discrete colormap from the specified input map"""
# Note that if base_cmap is a string or None, you can simply do
# return plt.cm.get_cmap(base_cmap, N)
# The following works for string, None, or a colormap instance:
base = plt.cm.get_cmap(base_cmap)
color_list = base(np.linspace(0, 1, N))
cmap_name = base.name + str(N)
return base.from_list(cmap_name, color_list, N)
num=11
plt.figure(figsize=(10,7.5))
x = np.random.randn(40)
y = np.random.randn(40)
c = np.random.randint(num, size=40)
plt.scatter(x, y, c=c, s=50, cmap=discrete_cmap(num, 'jet'))
cbar=plt.colorbar(ticks=range(num))
plt.clim(-0.5, num - 0.5)
cbar.ax.set_yticklabels(np.arange(0.0,5.5,0.5))
plt.show()
For some reason I cannot upload the image associated with the code above. I get an error when uploading so not sure how to show the final example. But simply I set the color bar axes for tick labels for a vertical color bar and passed in the labels I want and it produced the correct output.
I have found minor graphical issues while using the spanselector, cursor and fill_between widgets, which I would like to share with you.
All of them, can be experienced in this code (which I took from the matplolib example)
"""
The SpanSelector is a mouse widget to select a xmin/xmax range and plot the
detail view of the selected region in the lower axes
"""
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.widgets import SpanSelector
import matplotlib.widgets as widgets
Fig = plt.figure(figsize=(8,6))
Fig.set_facecolor('w')
Fig.set
Ax = Fig.add_subplot(211)
x = np.arange(0.0, 5.0, 0.01)
y = np.sin(2*np.pi*x) + 0.5*np.random.randn(len(x))
Ax.plot(x, y, '-')
Ax.set_ylim(-2,2)
Ax.set_title('Press left mouse button and drag to test')
RegionIndices = []
ax2 = Fig.add_subplot(212)
line2, = ax2.plot(x, y, '-')
def onselect(xmin, xmax):
if len(RegionIndices) == 2:
Ax.fill_between(x[:], 0.0, y[:],facecolor='White',alpha=1)
del RegionIndices[:]
indmin, indmax = np.searchsorted(x, (xmin, xmax))
indmax = min(len(x)-1, indmax)
Ax.fill_between(x[indmin:indmax], 0.0, y[indmin:indmax],facecolor='Blue',alpha=0.30)
thisx = x[indmin:indmax]
thisy = y[indmin:indmax]
line2.set_data(thisx, thisy)
ax2.set_xlim(thisx[0], thisx[-1])
ax2.set_ylim(thisy.min(), thisy.max())
Fig.canvas.draw()
RegionIndices.append(xmin)
RegionIndices.append(xmax)
# set useblit True on gtkagg for enhanced performance
span = SpanSelector(Ax, onselect, 'horizontal', useblit = True,rectprops=dict(alpha=0.5, facecolor='purple') )
cursor = widgets.Cursor(Ax, color="red", linewidth = 1, useblit = True)
plt.show()
I wonder if there is some way to avoid these two small issues:
1) You can see that when you select a region the spanselector box (purple) glitches. In this code the effect is barely noticeable but on plots with many lines is quite annoying (I have tried all the trueblit combinations to not effect)
2) In this code when you select a region, the area in the upper plot between the line and the horizontal axis is filled in blue. When you select a new region the old area is filled in white (to clear it) and the new one is filled with blue again. However, when I do that the line plotted, as well as, the horizontal axis, become thicker... Is there a way to clear such a region (generated with fill_between) without this happening... Or is it necessary to replot the graph? Initially, I am against doing this since I have a well structured code and importing all the data again into the spanselector method seems a bit messy... Which is the right way in python to delete selected regions of a plot?
Any advice would be most welcome