Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration - npm

I've started using webpack2 (to be precise, v2.3.2) and after re-creating my config I keep running into an issue I can't seem to solve I get (sorry in advance for ugly dump):
ERROR in ./src/main.js
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'components/DoISuportIt' in '[absolute path to my repo]/src'
resolve 'components/DoISuportIt' in '[absolute path to my repo]/src'
Parsed request is a module
using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src)
Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
aliased with mapping 'components': '[absolute path to my repo]/src/components' to '[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt'
using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src)
Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
after using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src)
using description file: [absolute path to my repo]/package.json (relative path: ./src/components/DoISuportIt)
as directory
[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt doesn't exist
no extension
Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt doesn't exist
.js
Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.js doesn't exist
.jsx
Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.jsx doesn't exist
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt]
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt]
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.js]
[[absolute path to my repo]/src/components/DoISuportIt.jsx]
package.json
{
"version": "1.0.0",
"main": "./src/main.js",
"scripts": {
"build": "webpack --progress --display-error-details"
},
"devDependencies": {
...
},
"dependencies": {
...
}
}
In terms of the browser field it's complaining about, the documentation I've been able to find on this is: package-browser-field-spec. There is also webpack documentation for it, but it seems to have it turned on by default: aliasFields: ["browser"]. I tried adding a browser field to my package.json but that didn't seem to do any good.
webpack.config.js
import path from 'path';
const source = path.resolve(__dirname, 'src');
export default {
context: __dirname,
entry: './src/main.js',
output: {
path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
filename: '[name].js',
},
resolve: {
alias: {
components: path.resolve(__dirname, 'src/components'),
},
extensions: ['.js', '.jsx'],
},
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.(js|jsx)$/,
include: source,
use: {
loader: 'babel-loader',
query: {
cacheDirectory: true,
},
},
},
{
test: /\.css$/,
include: source,
use: [
{ loader: 'style-loader' },
{
loader: 'css-loader',
query: {
importLoader: 1,
localIdentName: '[path]___[name]__[local]___[hash:base64:5]',
modules: true,
},
},
],
},
],
},
};
src/main.js
import DoISuportIt from 'components/DoISuportIt';
src/components/DoISuportIt/index.jsx
export default function() { ... }
For completeness, .babelrc
{
"presets": [
"latest",
"react"
],
"plugins": [
"react-css-modules"
],
"env": {
"production": {
"compact": true,
"comments": false,
"minified": true
}
},
"sourceMaps": true
}
What am I doing wrong/missing?

Turned out to be an issue with Webpack just not resolving an import - talk about horrible horrible error messages :(
// I Had to change:
import DoISuportIt from 'components/DoISuportIt';
// to (notice the missing `./`)
import DoISuportIt from './components/DoISuportIt';

Just for record, because I had similiar problem, and maybe this answer will help someone: in my case I was using library which was using .js files and I didn't had such extension in webpack resolve extensions. Adding proper extension fixed problem:
module.exports = {
(...)
resolve: {
extensions: ['.ts', '.js'],
}
}

I'm building a React server-side renderer and found this can also occur when building a separate server config from scratch. If you're seeing this error, try the following:
Make sure your entry value is properly pathed relative to your context value. Mine was missing the preceeding ./ before the entry file name.
Make sure you have your resolve value included. Your imports on anything in node_modules will default to looking in your context folder, otherwise.
Example:
const serverConfig = {
name: 'server',
context: path.join(__dirname, 'src'),
entry: {serverEntry: ['./server-entry.js']},
output: {
path: path.join(__dirname, 'public'),
filename: 'server.js',
publicPath: 'public/',
libraryTarget: 'commonjs2'
},
module: {
rules: [/*...*/]
},
resolveLoader: {
modules: [
path.join(__dirname, 'node_modules')
]
},
resolve: {
modules: [
path.join(__dirname, 'node_modules')
]
}
};

I encountered this error in a TypeScript project. In my webpack.config.js file I was only resolving TypeScript files i.e.
resolve: {
extensions: [".ts"],
}
However I noticed that the node_module which was causing the error:
Field 'browser' doesn't contain a valid alias configuration
did not have any ".ts" files (which is understandable as the module has been converted to vanilla JS. Doh!).
So to fix the issue I updated the resolve declaration to:
resolve: {
extensions: [".ts", ".js"],
}

I had the same issue, but mine was because of wrong casing in path:
// Wrong - uppercase C in /pathCoordinate/
./path/pathCoordinate/pathCoordinateForm.component
// Correct - lowercase c in /pathcoordinate/
./path/pathcoordinate/pathCoordinateForm.component

Add this to your package.json:
"browser": {
"[module-name]": false
},

Changed my entry to
entry: path.resolve(__dirname, './src/js/index.js'),
and it worked.

This also occurs when the webpack.config.js is simply missing (dockerignore 🤦‍♂️)

In my case it was a package that was installed as a dependency in package.json with a relative path like this:
"dependencies": {
...
"phoenix_html": "file:../deps/phoenix_html"
},
and imported in js/app.js with import "phoenix_html"
This had worked but after an update of node, npm, etc... it failed with the above error-message.
Changing the import line to import "../../deps/phoenix_html" fixed it.

My case was rather embarrassing: I added a typescript binding for a JS library without adding the library itself.
So if you do:
npm install --save #types/lucene
Don't forget to do:
npm install --save lucene
Kinda obvious, but I just totally forgot and that cost me quite some time.

In my case, to the very end of the webpack.config.js, where I should exports the config, there was a typo: export(should be exports), which led to failure with loading webpack.config.js at all.
const path = require('path');
const config = {
mode: 'development',
entry: "./lib/components/Index.js",
output: {
path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'public'),
filename: 'bundle.js'
},
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.js$/,
loader: 'babel-loader',
exclude: path.resolve(__dirname, "node_modules")
}
]
}
}
// pay attention to "export!s!" here
module.exports = config;

I had aliases into tsconfig.json:
{
"compilerOptions": {
"paths": {
"#store/*": ["./src/store/*"]
}
},
}
So I solved this issue by adding aliases to webpack.config also:
module.exports = {
//...
resolve: {
alias: {
'#store': path.resolve(__dirname, '../src/store'),
},
},
};

I got same problem and fixed with adding file extension.
// Old:
import RadioInput from './components/RadioInput'
// New:
import RadioInput from './components/RadioInput.vue'
Also, if you still want to use without extensions, you can add this webpack config: (Thanx for #matthew-herbst for the info)
module.exports = {
//...
resolve: {
extensions: ['.js', '.json', '.wasm'], // Add your extensions here.
},
};

For anyone building an ionic app and trying to upload it. Make sure you added at least one platform to the app. Otherwise you will get this error.

In my experience, this error was as a result of improper naming of aliases in Webpack.
In that I had an alias named redux and webpack tried looking for the redux that comes with the redux package in my alias path.
To fix this, I had to rename the alias to something different like Redux.

In my case, it was due to a broken symlink when trying to npm link a custom angular library to consuming app. After running npm link #authoring/canvas
"#authoring/canvas": "path/to/ui-authoring-canvas/dist"
It appear everything was OK but the module still couldn't be found:
When I corrected the import statement to something that the editor could find Link:
import {CirclePackComponent} from '#authoring/canvas/lib/circle-pack/circle-pack.component';
I received this which is mention in the overflow thread:
To fix this I had to:
cd /usr/local/lib/node_modules/packageName
cd ..
rm -rf packageName
In the root directory of the library, run:
a) rm -rf dist
b) npm run build
c) cd dist
d) npm link
In the consuming app, update the package.json with:
"packageName": "file:/path/to/local/node_module/packageName""
In the root directory of the consuming app run npm link packageName

In my case (lolz),
I was importing a local package (that I was developing, and building with rollup) via NPM/Yarn link, into another package I was developing. The imported package was a load of React components, and was configured to have a peerDependency of react and react-dom.
The consuming package was being built with Webpack and obviously wasn't correctly feeding the installed react and react-dom libraries into my local dependency as it was compiling it.
I adjusted my webpack configuration to indicate it should alias those peer dependencies to the correct dependencies in the consuming package:
/* ... */
resolve: {
extensions: [/* make sure you have them all correct here, as per other answers */],
alias: {
react: path.resolve('./node_modules/react'),
'react-dom': path.resolve('./node_modules/react-dom')
}
},
/* ... */
Obviously you need to import path in the webpack.config.js file in order to use the methods seen above.
A more detailed explanation can be found in this article

My case was similar to #witheng's answer.
At some point, I noticed some casing error in some file names in my development environment. For example the file name was
type.ts
and I renamed it to
Type.ts
In my Mac dev environment this didn't register as a change in git so this change didn't go to source control.
In the Linux-based build machine where the filenames are case-sensitive it wasn't able to find the file with different casing.
To avoid issues like this in the future, I ran this command in the repo:
git config core.ignorecase false

In my case, I imported library files like:
import { MyFile } from "my-library/public-api";
After I removed the public-api from the import everything worked fine:
import { MyFile } from "my-library";
MyFile is exported in the public-api file in the library.

In my case,
I have mistakenly removed a library ("mini-create-react-context") from package.json. I added that back, and did yarn install and build the app and it start working properly. So please take a look at your package.json file once.

In my case I had accidentally imported this package while trying to use process.env:
import * as process from 'process';
Removing it fixed the problem.

For everyone with Ionic:
Updating to the latest #ionic/app-scripts version gave a better error message.
npm install #ionic/app-scripts#latest --save-dev
It was a wrong path for styleUrls in a component to a non-existing file.
Strangely it gave no error in development.

In my situation, I did not have an export at the bottom of my webpack.config.js file. Simply adding
export default Config;
solved it.

In my case, it is due to a case-sensitivity typo in import path. For example,
Should be:
import Dashboard from './Dashboard/dashboard';
Instead of:
import Dashboard from './Dashboard/Dashboard';

In my case I was using invalid templateUrl.By correcting it problem solved.
#Component({
selector: 'app-edit-feather-object',
templateUrl: ''
})

I am using single-spa, and encountered this issue with the error
Module not found: Error: Can't resolve '/builds/**/**/src\main.single-spa.ts' in /builds/**/**'
I eventually figured out that in angular.json build options "main" was set to src\\main.single-spa.ts. Changing it to src/main.single-spa.ts fixed it.

Had the same issue with angular was importing
import { Injectable } from "#angular/core/core";
changed it to
import { Injectable } from "#angular/core";

I was getting this error when running a GitHub action. The issue was because I'd listed the package as a peer dependency instead of a dependency.
Since I'm using Rollup, the solution was to install the package both as a peer dependency and a dev dependency, and use rollup-plugin-peer-deps-external to remove the dev dependency from the final build.

For me the issue was, I was importing
.ts files into .js files
changing them to ts as well solved the issue.

In my case, I had a mixture of enum and interface in the index.d.ts file.
I extracted enums into another file and the issue resolved.

Related

Loader is required to be configured to import images using Vite?

I have a vue project which uses Vite in place of Webpack, and when I try to use import x from './src/assets/my/path/to/image.png' to resolve an image to compile-time URL, I am greeted by the following error message:
✘ [ERROR] No loader is configured for ".png" files: src/assets/my/path/to/image.png
The entire project is pretty close to the scaffold project given by npm init vue#latest (using vue3) so my vite.config.js is pretty basic:
export default defineConfig({
plugins: [vue(), VitePWA({})],
resolve: {
alias: {
"#": fileURLToPath(new URL("./src", import.meta.url)),
},
},
build: {
manifest: true,
polyfillModulePreload: true,
}
});
What am I missing? How can I configure this? I can't find anything in Vite documentation about loaders.
I had a quite similar issue with my project that I couldn't really solve. The issue seemed that only initially loaded png files were added. Because I am new to Vite, my efforts with the vite.config.js were fruitless.
Instead, I found a different solution to import the assets (import img from '/path/to/img.png' ) in respective js files directly instead of vite.config.js. Since I used these assets for replacement images for toggling buttons, it was a quick fix. Maybe it helps you, too.

Is it possible to configure Vite to build for use inside Android app (CORS error)

Scenario
I'm using Vue2 with Vue CLI as the bundling tool, now I want to migrate Vue CLI to Vite to enhance the development experience, and the migration process is somewhat successful (thanks to this guide).
Problem
Due to a specific reason, I need to keep the production build accessible statically, without any local server required (the web app should run simply by opening up the index.html file on my machine). And with this, I encounter the problem due to the fact that Vite bundles my code in ESM format that has to be served through some server to resolve CORS policy (error screenshot below). And hence the question: Is it possible to configure Vite to build in plain JS rather than ESM?
Any help is appreciated. Thank you.
Attachments
My vite.config.js as below if it helps:
import path from "path";
import { defineConfig } from "vite";
import { createVuePlugin } from "vite-plugin-vue2";
export default defineConfig({
base: "",
css: {
preprocessorOptions: {
scss: {
additionalData: `
#use "sass:math";
#import "#/scss/utils.scss";`,
},
},
},
plugins: [createVuePlugin()],
resolve: {
extensions: [".mjs", ".js", ".ts", ".jsx", ".tsx", ".json", ".vue"]
alias: {
"#": path.resolve(__dirname, "./src"),
},
},
});

rollup esm and umd builds, with typescript plugin and declarations, not possible?

I want to use rollup to make two builds of my library, an UMD version as well as a never ESM version
Earlier my configuration when using the non official plugin rollup-plugin-typescript2 looked like this:
import typescript from 'rollup-plugin-typescript2'
import pkg from '../package.json'
export default {
input: 'src/index.ts',
output: [
{
file: pkg.main,
format: 'umd',
name: pkg.name,
sourcemap: true
},
{
file: pkg.module,
format: 'esm',
sourcemap: true
},
],
plugins: [
typescript({
tsconfig: "src/tsconfig.json",
useTsconfigDeclarationDir: true
}),
],
}
And in my package json I have:
(...)
"scripts": {
"build": "rollup -c ./scripts/dist.js",
},
"main": "dist/index.js",
"module": "dist/index.esm.js",
"files": [
"dist"
],
(...)
And in my tsconfig.json I have:
(...)
"compilerOptions": {
"rootDir": "./src",
"outDir": "./dist",
"declaration": true,
"declarationDir": "./dist/#types/chrisweb-utilities",
(...)
The resulat was "created dist/index.js, dist/index.esm.js in 2.6s" ... all good
The files that got created where the following:
/dist
|-#types
|-index.d.ts
|-index.js
|-index.esm.js
|-index.esm.js.map
|-index.js.map
Today I tried to use the official plugin #rollup/plugin-typescript instead (because I use that one in other projects where I only do a single ESM build and it works without a problem and I wanted to use the same plugins through out all of my projects)
I had a first error because of the configuration propery only rollup-plugin-typescript2 understands:
"(!) Plugin typescript: #rollup/plugin-typescript TS5023: Unknown compiler option 'useTsconfigDeclarationDir'."
So I removed it, which fixed that problem ...
But I got another error: "[!] (plugin typescript) Error: #rollup/plugin-typescript: 'dir' must be used when 'outDir' is specified."
So I added dir to my configuration, which then looked like this:
import typescript from '#rollup/plugin-typescript';
import pkg from '../package.json'
export default {
input: 'src/index.ts',
output: [
{
file: pkg.main,
format: 'umd',
name: pkg.name,
sourcemap: true,
dir: "dist",
},
{
file: pkg.module,
format: 'esm',
sourcemap: true,
dir: "dist",
},
],
plugins: [
typescript({
tsconfig: "tsconfig.json",
}),
],
}
Nope, next error shows up: "[!] Error: You must set either "output.file" for a single-file build or "output.dir" when generating multiple chunks."
Actually I don't even want to generate chunks, I'm fine with a single file, but I remove dir I'm back to the previous error. So next thing I tried was to keep "dir" and instead remove "file"
This worked, or at least I got a success message: "created dist, dist in 2.6s" but the problem now is that instead of having two builds I just have a single one "dist/index.js", the first build for UMD gets owerwritten by the second one for ESM.
I thought ok one last try, lets output the UMD version in a subfolder of /dist and the ESM version in another one, so I changed my config to this:
(...)
output: [
{
format: 'umd',
name: pkg.name,
sourcemap: true,
dir: "dist/umd",
},
{
format: 'esm',
sourcemap: true,
dir: "dist/esm",
},
],
(...)
This failed too :( this time with this error: "[!] (plugin typescript) Error: #rollup/plugin-typescript: 'outDir' must be located inside 'dir'." So my outDir is "./dist" which yes is not in dir: "dist/umd" anymore, I only have one outDir in tsconfig, so it can't be in each rollup output.dir, or do I miss something here?
Oh and I actually also tried something else, remember that earlier error where rollup told me that "'dir' must be used when 'outDir' is specified", so I removed outDir from tsconfig.json and hey another rollup error (at this point I think I got all possible rollup errors ;) ) which was the following: "[!] (plugin typescript) Error: #rollup/plugin-typescript: 'dir' must be used when 'declarationDir' is specified."
So I also commented out "declarationDir" in the tsconfig ... no more error, but this is not really the solution as now I don't have typescript type definition files getting generated.
I went back and forth and tried all combinations for hours, but no luck so far...
So I'm stuck and was wondering if someone can help me out? Maybe you had this or a similar problem? Either I'm missing something or this a bug in which case I will open a ticket in a few days.

VueJS build started throwing Error: Conflict: Multiple assets emit to the same filename

My app used to work fine until I updated VueJS this morning. Now when I build, it shows the following error:
Error: Conflict: Multiple assets emit to the same filename img/default-contractor-logo.0346290f.svg
There's only one file like this in the repo.
Here's my vue.config.js:
module.exports = {
baseUrl: '/my/',
outputDir: 'dist/my',
css: {
loaderOptions: {
sass: {
data: `
#import "#/scss/_variables.scss";
#import "#/scss/_mixins.scss";
#import "#/scss/_fonts.scss";
`
}
}
},
devServer: {
disableHostCheck: true
}
};
I tried webpack fixes recommended in similar cases, but non helped.
I had the same error when importing SVG files using dynamically generated path in the require statement:
const url = require("../assets/svg/#{value}");
<img src={{url}} />
In this case file-loader processes all SVG files and saves them to the output path. My file-loader options were:
{
loader: "file-loader",
options: { name: "[name].[ext]" }
}
The folders structure has duplicate file names, something like this:
assets
|__ one
|____ file.svg
|__ two
|____ file.svg
In this case file-loader saves both file.svg files to the same output file: build/assets/file.svg - hence the warning.
I managed to fix it by adding [path] to the name option:
{
loader: "file-loader",
options: { name: "[path][name].[ext]" }
}
The answer by #ischenkodv is definitely correct, but because of my inexperience with webpack, I needed a little more context to use the information to fix the problem.
For the benefit of anyone else in the same situation, I'm adding the following details which I hope will be useful.
This section of the Vue.js documentation was particularly helpul:
VueJS - Modifying Options of a Loader
For the TL;DR fix, here is the relevant chunk of my vue.config.js:
// vue.config.js
module.exports = {
// ---snip---
chainWebpack: config =>
{
config.module
.rule('svg')
.test(/\.svg$/)
.use('file-loader')
.tap(options =>
{
return { name: "[path][name].[ext]" };
});
}
// ---snip---
};
In my project it was the flag-icon-css NPM package that was causing the Multiple assets emit to the same filename conflict errors. The above update to the vue.config.js file resolved the problem for me.
I suspect that the regular expression in the test could be tightened up to target just the items in the flag-icon-css package rather than matching all SVG files, but I haven't bothered since it's not causing any adverse effects so far.

How do I resolve import with absolute path?

What do I need to setup in brunch-config.js to be able to resolve absolute path from project's root folder? i.e
import { helper } from '/imports/utilities/helper'
The reason being is I have a legacy React app and it imports local files by using relative path. While I'm trying to use brunch, I need to figure out a way to setup brunch so that it understands the path without having to change the code.
I tried to use npm alias but not sure how it works
npm: {
aliases: {
'/imports': 'imports/**'
}
}
Found the solution with babel-plugin-module-resolver package.
Since all my codes are under /imports dir, in brunch-config.js I setup an alias based on their documentation:
plugins: {
babel: {
plugins: [
...,
["module-resolver", {
"root": ["./imports"],
"alias": {
"/imports": ([, path]) => `./imports${path}`,
}
}]
],
presets: [
...
],
}
},
That way, if I do import Screen from '/imports/components/screens' it will resolve the file under ./imports/components/screens
You can set the alias in .babelrc too but you might want to use regex instead.