I am tried to format SQL file with IntelliJ IDEA and got something like this:
INSERT IGNORE INTO SpectralImages
(scanDataID,
imageToolsetID,
imageTypeID,
imageFilename,
imageDSPath,
fileID)
(SELECT
ScanData.scanDataID,
1,
Files.imageTypeID,
Files.fileName,
Files.fileDSPath,
Files.fileID
FROM ((
Files
LEFT JOIN
Samples_Files
ON (
Samples_Files.fileID
=
Files.fileID)) LEFT JOIN
Scans
ON (
Scans.sampleID
=
Samples_Files.sampleID)) JOIN
ScanData
ON (
ScanData.scanID
=
Scans.scanID)
WHERE
Files.imageTypeID
IS
NOT
NULL
AND
Files.fileID
NOT
IN
(SELECT fileID
FROM
SpectralImages)
GROUP BY
scanDataID,
Files.fileID);
Apparently it tries to put each term into separate line. Is this normal?
Are there any other formatting options with more reasonable line wrapping?
IntelliJ IDEA offers a lot of formatting options for SQL, you can disable newlines where needed:
Related
I am currently updating a table using the UPDATE command, whereby a text section is also read from another table using a substring. The command works fine so far. The only problem are the umlauts, which are not taken into account during the update. As I found out, for some reason the substring is rewritten into the format latina1, although the corresponding column of the table (action) has utf8 preset. Enclosed is the code for updating.
SQL:
update vms_vertrag_datei d
inner join vms_vertrag_verlauf v ON d.vertrag = v.vertrag
SET d.nutzer = v.nutzer, d.uploaddatum= v.timestamp
WHERE d.filename in (SELECT DISTINCT SUBSTRING(v.aktion,LOCATE('"',v.aktion)+1,(((LENGTH(v.aktion))-LOCATE('"', REVERSE(v.aktion))-1)-LOCATE('"',v.aktion)))FROM vms_vertrag_verlauf v)
AND v.aktion like 'Datei%hinzugefügt';
Does anyone know how I can now also consider text with umlauts? Am just after longer online research something at despair.
Can someone explain this code line by line? I would like to understand the purpose and effect of each line this code has. This code is from Microsoft and doesn't have the best description of what is going on. I plan to use this code and would like to know where the generic names are as well vs the syntactically correct code. THANKS!!
From Microsoft, looked at their documentation but can't find everything
enter code here
USE DATABASE;
GO
SELECT *
FROM fn_trace_gettable
(drive, default);
GO
SELECT
TE.name AS [DLL_EDIT],
TT.DatabaseName,
TT.DatabaseID,
TT.ApplicationName,
TT.LoginName,
TT.Duration,
TT.Duration,
TT.StartTime,
TT.EndTime
FROM sys.fn_trace_gettable(
CONVERT (VARCHAR(4000),
(
SELECT TOP 1
f.[value]
FROM sys.fn_trace_gettable(NULL) f
WHERE f.property = 2
)), DEFAULT
) TT
JOIN
sys.trace_events TE
ON TT.EventsClass = TE.trace_events_id
ORDER BY TT.StartTime desc;
))
)
Hi I am trying to migrate an access database into postgresql and everything was going well until i tried this view. I am wanting it to create a new column called 'CalculatedHours'. And as Im new to postgresql I am slightly confused. Heres the code that I keep putting into pgAdmin and getting the error...
SELECT "SessionsWithEnrolmentAndGroups"."SessionID",
"Assignments"."Staff",
"SessionsWithEnrolmentAndGroups"."groups",
"SessionsWithEnrolmentAndGroups"."SessionQty",
"SessionsWithEnrolmentAndGroups"."Hours",
"SessionsWithEnrolmentAndGroups"."Weeks",
"Assignments"."Percentage",
"Assignments"."AdditionalHours",
Round((coalesce(("groups"),1)*("SessionQty")*("Hours")*("Weeks")
*("Percentage"))) AS CalculatedHours,
(CalculatedHours)+coalesce(("AdditionalHours"),0) AS "TotalHours"
FROM "SessionsWithEnrolmentAndGroups"
INNER JOIN "Assignments"
ON "SessionsWithEnrolmentAndGroups"."SessionID" = "Assignments"."SessionID";
You cannot access column aliases in the same select where they are defined. I would suggest a subquery:
SELECT t.*,
(CalculatedHours)+coalesce(("AdditionalHours"), 0) AS "TotalHours"
FROM (SELECT eag."SessionID", a, eag."groups", eag."SessionQty",
eag."Hours", eag."Weeks", a."Percentage", a."AdditionalHours",
Round((coalesce(("groups"),1)*("SessionQty")*("Hours")*("Weeks")*("Percentage"))) AS CalculatedHours
FROM "SessionsWithEnrolmentAndGroups" eag INNER JOIN
"Assignments" a
ON eag."SessionID" = a."SessionID"
) t;
Your queries would also be much more readable using table aliases and getting rid of the escape characters (double quotes) unless they are really, really needed.
I am running a SQL query in stored procedure which is like following
SELECT
t1.id,t2.Name
FROM
table1 t1 , table2 t2 ,table2 t3,table4 t4
WHERE
t1.id=t3.t4.id
this query gets executed on SQL server 2008 when its compatible with SQL server 2000 but if we turn OFF the compatibility with SQL server 2000 then this Query gives syntax error which is expected.
Can some one help me to understand why this is happeneing ? thanks in advance
Original query:
SELECT
ConfigID , LocationDesc + '-' + LOBTeamDesc LocLOBTeamSource
FROM Config CONFIG , Location_LOBTeam LOCLOB , Location LOC , LOBTeam LOB, System SRC
WHERE CONFIG.LocationLOBTeamID = LOC.LOB.LocationLOBTeamID
AND CONFIG.SourceSystemID = SRC.SystemID
AND LOCLOB.LocationID = LOC.LocationID
AND LOCLOB.LOBTeamID = LOB.LOBTeamID
AND (GETDATE() BETWEEN CONFIG.effectiveDate AND CONFIG.EndDate
OR CONFIG.EndDate IS NULL)
ORDER BY
LOC.LocationCode
I think that original query, with current standard join syntax applied would be this:
SELECT
ConfigID
, LocationDesc + '-' + LOBTeamDesc LocLOBTeamSource
FROM Config CONFIG
INNER JOIN Location_LOBTeam LOCLOB
ON CONFIG.LocationLOBTeamID = LOCLOB.LocationLOBTeamID
INNER JOIN Location LOC
ON LOCLOB.LocationID = LOC.LocationID
INNER JOIN LOBTeam LOB
ON LOCLOB.LOBTeamID = LOB.LOBTeamID
INNER JOIN [System] SRC
ON CONFIG.SourceSystemID = SRC.SystemID
WHERE (GETDATE() BETWEEN CONFIG.effectiveDate AND CONFIG.EndDate
OR CONFIG.EndDate IS NULL)
ORDER BY
LOC.LocationCode
Perhaps this will help.
+EDIT
"System" as a table name, could that be a problem? Suggest you try it as [System]
+EDIT2
The original is given with this: LOC.LOB.LocationLOBTeamID but that appears to be an error as there is an alias LOCLOB
I think below post from msdn answers this issue Compatibility Levels and Stored Procedures
in the above post the point number 3 under section "Differences Between Compatibility Level 80 and Level 90" states "WHEN binding the column references in the ORDER BY list to the columns defined in the SELECT list, column ambiguities are ignored and column prefixes are sometimes ignored. This can cause the result set to return in an unexpected order."
on my database I am using compatibility level 80 i.e 2000 thats why it runs smoothly with the given syntax but when I remove this compatibility and make it to 100 i.e. 2008/R2 script gives syntax error which is expected
I’m trying to run this SQL using get external.
It works, but when I try to rename the sub-queries or anything for that matter it remove it.
I tried as, as and the name in '', as then the name in "",
and the same with space. What is the right way to do that?
Relevant SQL:
SELECT list_name, app_name,
(SELECT fname + ' ' + lname
FROM dbo.d_agent_define map
WHERE map.agent_id = tac.agent_id) as agent_login,
input, CONVERT(varchar,DATEADD(ss,TAC_BEG_tstamp,'01/01/1970'))
FROM dbo.maps_report_list list
JOIN dbo.report_tac_agent tac ON (tac.list_id = list.list_id)
WHERE input = 'SYS_ERR'
AND app_name = 'CHARLOTT'
AND convert(VARCHAR,DATEADD(ss,day_tstamp,'01/01/1970'),101) = '09/10/2008'
AND list_name LIKE 'NRBAD%'
ORDER BY agent_login,CONVERT(VARCHAR,DATEADD(ss,TAC_BEG_tstamp,'01/01/1970'))
You could get rid of your dbo.d_agent_define subquery and just add in a join to the agent define table.
Would this code work?
select list_name, app_name,
map.fname + ' ' + map.lname as agent_login,
input,
convert(varchar,dateadd(ss,TAC_BEG_tstamp,'01/01/1970')) as tac_seconds
from dbo.maps_report_list list
join dbo.report_tac_agent tac
on (tac.list_id = list.list_id)
join dbo.d_agent_define map
on (map.agent_id = tac.agent_id)
where input = 'SYS_ERR'
and app_name = 'CHARLOTT'
and convert(varchar,dateadd(ss,day_tstamp,'01/01/1970'),101) = '09/10/2008'
and list_name LIKE 'NRBAD%'
order by agent_login,convert(varchar,dateadd(ss,TAC_BEG_tstamp,'01/01/1970'))
Note that I named your dateadd column because it did not have a name. I also tried to keep your convention of how you do a join. There are a few things that I would do different with this query to make it more readable, but I only focused on getting rid of the subquery problem.
I did not do this, but I would recommend that you qualify all of your columns with the table from which you are getting them.
To remove the sub query in the SELECT statement I suggest the following:
SELECT list_name, app_name, map.fname + ' ' + map.lname as agent_login, input, convert(varchar,dateadd(ss, TAC_BEG_tstamp, '01/01/1970))
FROM dbo.maps_report_list inner join
(dbo.report_tac_agent as tac inner join dbo.d_agent_define as map ON (tac.agent_id=map.agent_id)) ON list.list_id = tac.list_id
WHERE input = 'SYS_ERR' and app_name = 'CHARLOTT' and convert(varchar,dateadd(ss,day_tstamp,'01/01/1970'),101) = '09/10/2008'
and list_name LIKE 'NRBAD%' order by agent_login,convert(varchar,dateadd(ss,TAC_BEG_tstamp,'01/01/1970'))
I used parentheses to create the inner join between dbo.report_tac_agent and dbo.d_agent_define first. This is now a set of join data.
The combination of those tables are then joined to your list table, which I am assuming is the driving table here. If I am understand what you are trying to do with your sub select, this should work for you.
As stated by the other poster you should use table names on your columns (e.g. map.fname), it just makes things easy to understand. I didn't in my example because I am note 100% sure which columns go with which tables. Please let me know if this doesn't do it for you and how the data it returns is wrong. That will make it easier to solve in needed.