The documentation of the Embedding layer (https://www.cntk.ai/pythondocs/layerref.html#embedding) shows that it can be initialized with pretrained embeddings using the weights parameter, but these embeddings are not updated during training.
Is there a way to initialize the Embedding layer with pretrained embeddings and still update them during training?
If not, what's the most efficient way to do batch embeddings look up with one hot vectors?
Yes, just pass the initial values the init argument instead. That will create a learnable parameter initialized with the array you pass in.
Related
I'm reading the official tutorial on save-load in Keras and it seems whether I used save or save_weights methods, then the optimizer parameters are going to be saved at any rate. How can save model's weights only?
model.save('./savedmodel.h5', save_format='h5', include_optimizer=False)
If save_format='tf', whether include_optimizer=False or True, it's useless as I tried.
In Keras, to save model weights, do:
model.save_weights('my_model_weights.h5')
To load model weights:
model.load_weights('my_model_weights.h5')
Also see additional example on saving/loading weights by layer name from here.
I am trying to convert my CNN written with tensorflow layers to use the keras api in tensorflow (I am using the keras api provided by TF 1.x), and am having issue writing a custom loss function, to train the model.
According to this guide, when defining a loss function it expects the arguments (y_true, y_pred)
https://www.tensorflow.org/guide/keras/train_and_evaluate#custom_losses
def basic_loss_function(y_true, y_pred):
return ...
However, in every example I have seen, y_true is somehow directly related to the model (in the simple case it is the output of the network). In my problem, this is not the case. How do implement this if my loss function depends on some training data that is unrelated to the tensors of the model?
To be concrete, here is my problem:
I am trying to learn an image embedding trained on pairs of images. My training data includes image pairs and annotations of matching points between the image pairs (image coordinates). The input feature is only the image pairs, and the network is trained in a siamese configuration.
I am able to implement this successfully with tensorflow layers and train it sucesfully with tensorflow estimators.
My current implementations builds a tf Dataset from a large database of tf Records, where the features is a dictionary containing the images and arrays of matching points. Before I could easily feed these arrays of image coordinates to the loss function, but here it is unclear how to do so.
There is a hack I often use that is to calculate the loss within the model, by means of Lambda layers. (When the loss is independent from the true data, for instance, and the model doesn't really have an output to be compared)
In a functional API model:
def loss_calc(x):
loss_input_1, loss_input_2 = x #arbirtray inputs, you choose
#according to what you gave to the Lambda layer
#here you use some external data that doesn't relate to the samples
externalData = K.constant(external_numpy_data)
#calculate the loss
return the loss
Using the outputs of the model itself (the tensor(s) that are used in your loss)
loss = Lambda(loss_calc)([model_output_1, model_output_2])
Create the model outputting the loss instead of the outputs:
model = Model(inputs, loss)
Create a dummy keras loss function for compilation:
def dummy_loss(y_true, y_pred):
return y_pred #where y_pred is the loss itself, the output of the model above
model.compile(loss = dummy_loss, ....)
Use any dummy array correctly sized regarding number of samples for training, it will be ignored:
model.fit(your_inputs, np.zeros((number_of_samples,)), ...)
Another way of doing it, is using a custom training loop.
This is much more work, though.
Although you're using TF1, you can still turn eager execution on at the very beginning of your code and do stuff like it's done in TF2. (tf.enable_eager_execution())
Follow the tutorial for custom training loops: https://www.tensorflow.org/tutorials/customization/custom_training_walkthrough
Here, you calculate the gradients yourself, of any result regarding whatever you want. This means you don't need to follow Keras standards of training.
Finally, you can use the approach you suggested of model.add_loss.
In this case, you calculate the loss exaclty the same way I did in the first answer. And pass this loss tensor to add_loss.
You can probably compile a model with loss=None then (not sure), because you're going to use other losses, not the standard one.
In this case, your model's output will probably be None too, and you should fit with y=None.
In TensorFlow's offcial documentations, they always pass training=True when calling a Keras model in a training loop, for example, logits = mnist_model(images, training=True).
I tried help(tf.keras.Model.call) and it shows that
Help on function call in module tensorflow.python.keras.engine.network:
call(self, inputs, training=None, mask=None)
Calls the model on new inputs.
In this case `call` just reapplies
all ops in the graph to the new inputs
(e.g. build a new computational graph from the provided inputs).
Arguments:
inputs: A tensor or list of tensors.
training: Boolean or boolean scalar tensor, indicating whether to run
the `Network` in training mode or inference mode.
mask: A mask or list of masks. A mask can be
either a tensor or None (no mask).
Returns:
A tensor if there is a single output, or
a list of tensors if there are more than one outputs.
It says that training is a Boolean or boolean scalar tensor, indicating whether to run the Network in training mode or inference mode. But I didn't find any information about this two modes.
In a nutshell, I don't know what is the influence of this argument. And what if I missed this argument when training?
Some neural network layers behave differently during training and inference, for example Dropout and BatchNormalization layers. For example
During training, dropout will randomly drop out units and correspondingly scale up activations of the remaining units.
During inference, it does nothing (since you usually don't want the randomness of dropping out units here).
The training argument lets the layer know which of the two "paths" it should take. If you set this incorrectly, your network might not behave as expected.
Training indicating whether the layer should behave in training mode or in inference mode.
training=True: The layer will normalize its inputs using the mean and variance of the current batch of inputs.
training=False: The layer will normalize its inputs using the mean and variance of its moving statistics, learned during training.
Usually in inference mode training=False, but in some networks such as pix2pix_cGAN At both times of inference and training, training=True.
Good morning everyone;
I'm trying to implement this model where the neural network's inputs are based on a trainable vocabulary matrix (each row in the matrix represents a word entry in the vocabulary). I'm using keras (tensorflow backend), I was wondering if it's possible to define a trainable variable (without adding a custom layer), such that this variable will be trained as well as the neural network? like a tensorflow variable.
Could you please give a short example of how I can do it?
Thanks in advance.
The neural network's inputs are based on a trainable vocabulary matrix (each row in the matrix represents a word entry in the vocabulary)
This is the definition of a Word Embedding
There is already an embedding layer in Keras, you don't have to reimplement it.
You can find an easy example of how to use it here.
In classify_image.py, the input image is fed with a loaded image in
predictions = sess.run(softmax_tensor,{'DecodeJpeg/contents:0': image_data})
What if I want to add new layers to the inception model and train the whole model again? Are the variables loaded from classify_image_graph_def.pb trainable? I saw that freeze_graph.py used convert_variables_to_constants to produce freezed graph. So can those loaded weights be trained again, are they constants? And how can I connect the input('shuffle_batch:0') to the inception model to the output of tf.train.shuffle_batch?
The model used in classify_image.py has its variables frozen into constants, and doesn't have any gradient ops, so it's not easy to turn it back into something trainable. You can see how we remove one layer and replace it with something trainable here:
https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/tensorflow/examples/image_retraining/retrain.py
It's hard to generalize though. You'd be better off looking at some examples of fine-tuning here:
https://github.com/tensorflow/models/tree/master/inception#how-to-fine-tune-a-pre-trained-model-on-a-new-task