I want to use transfer learning with Google's Inception network for an image recognition problem. I am using retrain.py from the TensorFlow example source for inspiration.
In retrain.py, the Inception graph is loaded and a feed dict is used to feed the new images into the model's input layer. However, I have my data serialized in TFRecord files and have been using an input pipeline to feed in my inputs, as demonstrated here.
So I have a tensor images which returns my input data in batches when run. But how can I feed these images into Inception? I can't use a feed dict since my inputs are tensors, not NumPy arrays. My two ideas are
1) simply call sess.run() on each batch to convert it to a NumPy array, and then use a feed dict to pass it to Inception.
2) replace the input node in the Inception graph with my own batch input tensor
I think (1) would work, but it seems a little inelegant. (2) seems more natural to me, but I can't do exactly that because TensorFlow graphs can only be appended to and not otherwise modified.
Is there a better approach?
You can implement option (2), replacing the input node, but you will need to modify retrain.py to do so. The tf.import_graph_def() function supports a limited form of modification to the imported graph, by remapping tensors in the imported graph to existing tensors in the target graph.
This line in retrain.py calls tf.import_graph_def() to import the Inception model, where jpeg_data_tensor becomes the tensor that you feed with input data:
bottleneck_tensor, jpeg_data_tensor, resized_input_tensor = (
tf.import_graph_def(graph_def, name='', return_elements=[
BOTTLENECK_TENSOR_NAME, JPEG_DATA_TENSOR_NAME,
RESIZED_INPUT_TENSOR_NAME]))
Instead of retrieving jpeg_data_tensor from the imported graph, you can remap it to an input pipeline that you construct yourself:
# Output of a training pipeline, returning a `tf.string` tensor containing
# a JPEG-encoded image.
jpeg_data_tensor = ...
bottleneck_tensor, resized_input_tensor = (
tf.import_graph_def(
graph_def,
input_map={JPEG_DATA_TENSOR_NAME: jpeg_data_tensor},
return_elements=[BOTTLENECK_TENSOR_NAME, RESIZED_INPUT_TENSOR_NAME]))
Wherever you previously fed jpeg_data_tensor, you no longer need to need it, because the inputs will be read from the input pipeline you constructed. (Note that you might need to handle resized_input_tensor as well... I'm not intimately familiar with retrain.py, so some restructuring might be necessary.)
Related
I have trained a custom neural network with the function:
tf.estimator.train_and_evaluate
After correct training, it contains the following files:
checkpoint
events.out.tfevents.1538489166.ti
model.ckpt-0.data-00000-of-00002
model.ckpt-0.index
model.ckpt-10.data-00000-of-00002
model.ckpt-10.index eval
graph.pbtxt
model.ckpt-0.data-00001-of-00002
model.ckpt-0.meta
model.ckpt-10.data-00001-of-00002
model.ckpt-10.meta
Now I need to export the weights and biases of every layer, into a raw data structure, e.g. an array, numpy.
I have read multiple pages on TensorFlow, and on other topics, but neither can find this question. The first thing I would assume to put the fils together into graph.pd with the freeze.py as suggested here:
Tensorflow: How to convert .meta, .data and .index model files into one graph.pb file
But then still the main question is unsolved.
If you wish to evaluate tensors alone, you can check out this question. But if you wish to e.g. deploy your network, you can take a look at TensorFlow serving, which is probably the most performant one right now. Or if you want to export this network to other frameworks and use them there, you can actually use ONNX for this purpose.
If saving weights and biases in a numpy array is your strict requirement, you can follow this example:
# In a TF shell, define all requirements and call the model function
y = model(x, is_training=False, reuse=tf.AUTO_REUSE) # For example
Once you call this function, you can see all the variables in the graph by running
tf.global_variables()
You need to restore all these variables from the latest checkpoint (say ckpt_dir) and then execute each of these variables to get the latest values.
checkpoint = tf.train.latest_checkpoint('./model_dir/')
fine_tune = tf.contrib.slim.assign_from_checkpoint_fn(checkpoint,
tf.global_variables(),
ignore_missing_vars=True)
sess = tf.Session()
sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
gv = sess.run(tf.global_variables())
Now gv will be a list of all the values of your variables (weights and biases); You can access any individual component via indexing - gv[5] etc. Or you can convert the entire thing into an array and save using numpy.
np.save('my_weights', np.array(gv))
This will save all your weights and biases in your current working directory as a numpy array - 'my_weights.npy'.
Hope this helps.
I have a network with weights filled by manual tf.assign, and now I want to save the network with the weight values but without the placeholder inputs. It seems tf.train.Saver works only when I have the feed_dict available, and tf.train.export_meta_graph only saves the network structure. I tried pickle and dill but they both have errors. Are there any better solutions for this kind of saving?
Placeholders convert the input data into Tensors so I guess they are an important part of the Graph and I don't understand why you don't want to include them.
Even if you use tf.assign, you can freeze the graph, which means combining the structure with the weights. What freezing does is to convert Tensorflow variables into constants.
You have to save the structure of your graph:
gdef = g.as_graph_def()
tf.train.write_graph(gdef,".","graph.pb",False)
Then save the weights (after training)
saver.save(sess, 'tmp/my-weights')
And freeze the graph according to the tutorial in https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/tree/master/tensorflow/contrib/lite
After that, you can use the Graph.
If the input data is in numpy array format, then we can declare a placeholder in the graph and feed the placeholder with the numpy array data. However, if the input data is already in Tensor format (this is the case when we load jpg files using tf.image.decode_jpeg), then we can't feed a Tensor to a placeholder. In this case, should we use non trainable TF Variables as placeholders, and feed the Tensor to these Variables by tf.assign?
Figured it out. You can simply feed batches of Tensors to the model. The model probably has a line that looks similar to op = optimizer.minimize(loss). Then, each time sess.run(op) is called, the model will be trained on the batch provided to it. Also, each time sess.run(op) is called, we should have a different batch if we use tf.train.batch to provide the batch.
I'm new to TensorFlow and am getting a bit tripped up on the mechanics of reading data. I set up a TensorFlow graph on the mnist data, but I'd like to modify it so that I can run one program to train it + save the model out, and run another to load said graph, make predictions, and compute test accuracy.
Where I'm getting confused is how to bypass the original I/O system in the training graph and "inject" an image to predict or an (image, label) tuple of test data for accuracy testing. To read the training data, I'm using this code:
_, input_data = util.read_examples(
paths_to_files,
batch_size,
shuffle=shuffle,
num_epochs=None)
feature_map = {
'label': tf.FixedLenFeature(
shape=[], dtype=tf.int64, default_value=[-1]),
'image': tf.FixedLenFeature(
shape=[NUM_PIXELS * NUM_PIXELS], dtype=tf.int64),
}
example = tf.parse_example(input_data, features=feature_map)
I then feed example to a convolution layer, etc. and generate the output.
Now imagine that I train my graph with that code specifying the input, save out the graph and weights, and then restore the graph and weights in another script for prediction -- I'd like to take (say) 10 images and feed them to the graph to generate predictions. How do I "inject" those 10 images so that the predictions come out the other end?
I played around with feed dictionaries and placeholders, but I'm not sure if they're the right things for me to use... it seems like they rely on having data in memory, as opposed to reading from a queue of test data, for example.
Thanks!
A feed dictionary with placeholders would make sense if you wanted to perform a small number of inferences/evaluations (i.e. enough to fit in memory) - e.g. if you were serving a simple model or running small eval loops.
If you specifically want to infer or evaluate large batches then you should use the same approach you've used for training, but with a different path to your test/eval/live data. e.g.
_, eval_data = util.read_examples(
paths_to_files, # CHANGE THIS BIT
batch_size,
shuffle=shuffle,
num_epochs=None)
You can use this as a normal python variable and set up successive, dependent steps to use this as a provided variable. e.g.
def get_example(data):
return tf.parse_example(data, features=feature_map)
sess.run([get_example(path_to_your_data)])
I gather from this question and its answer [ feeding image data in tensorflow for transfer learning ] that adding a new op to the imported graph will help, but it isn't clear to me if the resulting graph will handle both png and jpeg inputs automatically, and at the same time.
The answer to the above question suggests the following:
png_data = tf.placeholder(tf.string, shape=[])
decoded_png = tf.image.decode_png(png_data, channels=3)
# ...
graph_def = ...
softmax_tensor = tf.import_graph_def(
graph_def,
input_map={'DecodeJpeg:0': decoded_png},
return_elements=['softmax:0'])
sess.run(softmax_tensor, {png_data: ...})
Does this mean that a PNG input must be passed in as
sess.run(softmax_tensor, {png_data: image_array})
And a JPEG input must be given to the graph as
sess.run(softmax_tensor, {'DecodeJpeg:0': image_array})
Would the second statement work after the graph has been modified and an op added at the bottom?
The answers in the previous question center around switching the graph from taking JPEGs to PNGs. With the network as specified, there's no way for it to handle both.
You have a few options if you need to deal with both types.
Handle the decoding yourself, either with PIL, or TensorFlow, and feed the decoded image bytes into the graph at the output of the existing decode node.
If you're happy feeding the network, then do a two-step operation where you re-plumb the input to read from a variable, and create two new nodes that write decoded output to that variable.
sess.run(feed_jpeg, feed_dict={in_jpg: my_jpg})
sess.run(the_network)
or
sess.run(feed_png, feed_dict={in_png: my_png})
sess.run(the_network)
Create a more complex conditional input path where you can feed a flag value that tells it what data type it is, and uses TF conditionals to only pull on the specified decode node.
Write a new op that dispatches to either decode_png or decode_jpeg as necessary, based upon the format string at the start of the data.
I'm hoping we'll expose some string comparison ops so that you could write (4) in pure TensorFlow, but I don't have a timeline for any of that.