I want to create a table with "WITH CHECK OPTION" - sql

create table STAFF
(StaffID TINYINT IDENTITY NOT NULL,
fName varchar(20) NOT NULL,
lname varchar(20) NOT NULL,
Phone varchar(10) NOT NULL,
Gender char(01),
DoB date NOT NULL,
Mentor TINYINT,
Payment_ID TINYINT NOT NULL,
constraint staff_pk primary key (StaffID),
constraint staff_fk foreign key (Payment_ID) references PAYMENT(Payment_ID),
constraint mentor_fk foreign key (Mentor) references staff(StaffID)
For the Gender column I want to insert ONLY 'M','F','O' characters only.
How can I do with this the "WITH CHECK OPTION"

I don't think you want with check option. You want a check constraint:
alter table staff
add constraint chk_staff_gender check (gender in ('M', 'F', 'O'));
(You can put this in the create table statement as well.)
with check option is an option on views that ensures that data remains consistent even when the data in underlying tables changes (see here) .

add , constraint gender_chk check (Gender in ('M','F','O'))
the with check option is on by default.
create table STAFF
(StaffID TINYINT IDENTITY NOT NULL,
fName varchar(20) NOT NULL,
lname varchar(20) NOT NULL,
Phone varchar(10) NOT NULL,
Gender char(01),
DoB date NOT NULL,
Mentor TINYINT,
Payment_ID TINYINT NOT NULL,
constraint staff_pk primary key (StaffID)
constraint staff_fk foreign key (Payment_ID) references PAYMENT(Payment_ID),
constraint mentor_fk foreign key (Mentor) references staff(StaffID)
, constraint gender_chk check (Gender in ('M','F','O'))
)
From the MSDN Documentation for ALTER TABLE (emphasis added):
WITH CHECK | WITH NOCHECK
Specifies whether the data in the table is or is not validated against a newly added or re-enabled FOREIGN KEY or CHECK constraint. If not specified, WITH CHECK is assumed for new constraints, and WITH NOCHECK is assumed for re-enabled constraints.
If you do not want to verify new CHECK or FOREIGN KEY constraints against existing data, use WITH NOCHECK. We do not recommend doing this, except in rare cases. The new constraint will be evaluated in all later data updates. Any constraint violations that are suppressed by WITH NOCHECK when the constraint is added may cause future updates to fail if they update rows with data that does not comply with the constraint.
The query optimizer does not consider constraints that are defined WITH NOCHECK. Such constraints are ignored until they are re-enabled by using ALTER TABLE table WITH CHECK CHECK CONSTRAINT ALL.

You are refering to check constraint
create table STAFF
(StaffID TINYINT IDENTITY NOT NULL,
fName varchar(20) NOT NULL,
lname varchar(20) NOT NULL,
Phone varchar(10) NOT NULL,
Gender char(01) NOT NULL,
DoB date NOT NULL,
Mentor TINYINT,
Payment_ID TINYINT NOT NULL,
constraint staff_pk primary key (StaffID),
constraint staff_fk foreign key (Payment_ID) references PAYMENT(Payment_ID),
constraint mentor_fk foreign key (Mentor) references staff(StaffID),
constraint Gender_ck check (Gender in ('M','F','O'))
)
"WITH CHECK OPTION" is an optional clause for of a view definition
Any attempt to update/insert a record, through the view, that cannot be selected by the view, will raise an error.

Related

create a foreign key on a primary key of another table

CREATE TABLE public.impiegato(
CF varchar NOT NULL,
codice_reparto int4 NOT NULL,
mansione varchar NULL,
CONSTRAINT impiegato_pkey PRIMARY KEY (CF),
CONSTRAINT impiegato_fkey FOREIGN KEY (codice_reparto) REFERENCES reparto(codice),
);
CREATE TABLE public.reparto(
codice int4 NOT NULL,
nome varchar NULL,
cf_responsabile varchar NULL,
nome_responsabile varchar NULL UNIQUE,
CONSTRAINT reparto_pkey PRIMARY KEY (codice),
CONSTRAINT reparto_cf_responsabile_fkey FOREIGN KEY (cf_responsabile) REFERENCES impiegato(CF)
);
When i run the sql code it tells me that the impiegato table doesn't exist. Can I run a foreign key on a primary key of another table?
The referenced table must exists when a foreign key is declared.
Since in your case the two tables reference each other, it's not possible to solve this by simply creating the right one first.
You have to create the first one (any of them) first without the foreign key constraint, create the second on and then add the foreign key constraint to the first one.
Something along the lines of:
CREATE TABLE public.impiegato
(cf varchar
NOT NULL,
codice_reparto int4
NOT NULL,
mansione varchar
NULL,
CONSTRAINT impiegato_pkey
PRIMARY KEY (cf));
CREATE TABLE public.reparto
(codice int4
NOT NULL,
nome varchar
NULL,
cf_responsabile varchar
NULL,
nome_responsabile varchar
NULL
UNIQUE,
CONSTRAINT reparto_pkey
PRIMARY KEY (codice),
CONSTRAINT reparto_cf_responsabile_fkey
FOREIGN KEY (cf_responsabile)
REFERENCES impiegato
(cf));
ALTER TABLE public.impiegato
ADD CONSTRAINT impiegato_fkey
FOREIGN KEY (codice_reparto)
REFERENCES reparto
(codice);
Unfortunately, you didn't tag your DBMS. From some details I guessed it might be Postgres and the code above hence is Postgres code. If you don't use Postgres, you might need to adapt the ALTER TABLE statement, they can differ between DBMS.

ERROR: violates foreign key constraint, key is not present in parent table (but it is??)

I know this question has been asked many times, but none of the answers have solved my issue.
I am creating a database for a uni assignment, using PostgreSQL through pgadmin 4, and I have a table named "staff" populated with staff members with a primary key of "staffid". I then have another table named "client_international", which includes a foreign key of "staffid" which relates to the staff tables primary key.
When trying to insert into the client table, I am getting the following error:
ERROR: insert or update on table "client_international" violates foreign key constraint "intclient_staff_fkey"
DETAIL: Key (staffid)=(100000024) is not present in table "staff".
SQL state: 23503
I am certain that that '100000024' key is in the staff table.. yet I still get the error. Any suggestions? Below I will paste the code I used to create the staff and client tables, in case anyone notices an error in them.
Staff table:
CREATE SEQUENCE staff_seq
start 100000000
increment 1;
CREATE TABLE staff
(
staffid integer default nextval('staff_seq'),
firstname varchar(20) NOT NULL,
lastname varchar(20) NOT NULL,
"position" varchar(20) NOT NULL,
mobile varchar(20) NOT NULL,
email varchar(100) NOT NULL,
"location" integer NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT staff_pkey PRIMARY KEY (staffid)
);
Client table:
CREATE SEQUENCE client_seq
start 200000000
increment 1;
CREATE TABLE client
(
clientid integer default nextval('client_seq'),
company varchar(100) NOT NULL,
sector varchar(100) NOT NULL,
pointofcontact varchar(20) NOT NULL,
mobile varchar(20) NOT NULL,
email varchar(100) NOT NULL,
approvalstatus boolean default (false),
"location" integer NOT NULL,
staffid integer NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT client_pkey PRIMARY KEY (clientid)
);
CREATE TABLE client_international
(
CONSTRAINT client_international_pkey PRIMARY KEY (clientid)
) INHERITS ("client");
ALTER TABLE client
ADD CONSTRAINT client_location_fkey FOREIGN KEY ("location") REFERENCES "location" (locationid),
ADD CONSTRAINT client_staff_fkey FOREIGN KEY (staffid) REFERENCES staff (staffid);
ALTER TABLE client_international
ADD CONSTRAINT intclient_location_fkey FOREIGN KEY ("location") REFERENCES "location" (locationid),
ADD CONSTRAINT intclient_staff_fkey FOREIGN KEY (staffid) REFERENCES staff (staffid);
I get the error when running the following statements:
INSERT INTO client_international(company, sector, pointofcontact, mobile, email, approvalstatus, "location", staffid)
VALUES ('Moores Dogs', 'Border Patrol', 'Carol Moore', '07911 653453', 'jenkinsj#k9solutions.co.uk', 'false', '500000001', '100000024');
Here's a screenshot of the entry in the staff table, showing that it's definitely in there:
Foreign keys aren't "inherited".
Quote from the manual
A serious limitation of the inheritance feature is that [...] foreign key constraints only apply to single tables, not to their inheritance children. This is true on both the referencing and referenced sides of a foreign key constraint.
(emphasis mine)
So what you are trying to do, simply isn't supported.

Oracle Missing expression

I only have this error now.. I cant seem to see where it is too long (ERROR at bottom of page)
CREATE TABLE Menu_Item_Ingredient
(
Menu_Item_Number Number(5,0)CONSTRAINT NN_MenuItemIngredient_MenuItemNumber Not null,
CONSTRAINT FK_MenuItemIngredient_MenuItemNumber Foreign Key(Menu_Item_Number) References Bill_Item(Menu_item_Number),
Ingredient_Number Number(5,0) CONSTRAINT NN_MenuItemIngredient_IngredientNumber Not null,
CONSTRAINT FK_MenuItemIngredient_IngredientNumber Foreign Key(Ingredient_Number) References Ingredient(Ingredient_Number),
Quantity_Needed Number(5,2) DEFAULT 0 CONSTRAINT NN_MenuItemIngredient_QuantityNeeded Not null
CONSTRAINT CK_MenuItemIngredient_QuantityNeeded CHECK(Quantity_Needed >= 0),
CONSTRAINT PK_BillItem_Ingredient Primary key(Menu_Item_Number,Ingredient_Number)
)
Error report -
SQL Error: ORA-00972: identifier is too long
00972. 00000 - "identifier is too long"
*Cause: An identifier with more than 30 characters was specified.
*Action: Specify at most 30 characters.
Do something below. In your query, a comma is missing when you are declaring discount column in bill_item table.
CREATE TABLE Bill_Item3
(
Bill_Number NUMBER(6,0) CONSTRAINT NN_BillItem_BillNumber NOT NULL,
Menu_Item_Number NUMBER(5,0) CONSTRAINT NN_BillItem_MenuItemNumber NOT NULL,
Discount NUMBER(5,2) CONSTRAINT N_BillItem_Discount NULL,
--colum Discount format '%'00.00,
Quaintity_Sold NUMBER(3,0)CONSTRAINT NN_BillItem_QuaintitySold NOT NULL,
Selling_Price NUMBER(6,2) default 0 CONSTRAINT NN_BillItem_SellingPrice NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT CK_BillItem_SellingPrice CHECK (Selling_Price >= 0 ),
CONSTRAINT PK_Bill_MenuItem PRIMARY KEY (Bill_Number,Menu_Item_Number),
CONSTRAINT FK_BillItem_Bill FOREIGN KEY (Bill_Number) REFERENCES bill (Bill_Number),
CONSTRAINT FK_BillItem_MenuItemNumber FOREIGN KEY (Menu_Item_Number) REFERENCES Menu_Item_Ingredient(Menu_Item_Number),
CONSTRAINT CK_BillItem_Discount CHECK (Discount BETWEEN 0 AND 100)
);
Your problem is with the constraints,
A foreign key constraint will be used to give reference to a column in another table, in your queries you have given constraints like below -
"CONSTRAINT FK_BillItem_Bill Foreign key (Bill_Number) References Primary(Bill_Number), what are you trying to do with this?
The syntax you need to use should be -
CONSTRAINT constraint_name FOREIGN KEY (column_in_current_table) REFERENCES Other_Table_Name(column_name_you_want_to_refer_in_other_table)
As far as I've seen, this will not work, you cannot use DEFAULT in a check constraint.
constraint CK_BillItem_SellingPrice check (Selling_Price >= 0 OR DEFAULT = 0)
If you want to enforce a DEFAULT constraint, you have to use something as below -
CREATE TABLE Persons (
ID int NOT NULL,
LastName varchar(255) NOT NULL,
FirstName varchar(255),
Age int,
City varchar(255) DEFAULT 'Sandnes'
);
Your final table can be as follows -
CREATE TABLE Bill_Item
(
Bill_Number Number(6,0) constraint NN_BillItem_BillNumber not null,
--CONSTRAINT FK_BillItem_Bill Foreign key (Bill_Number) References Primary(Bill_Number),
Menu_Item_Number Number(5,0) CONSTRAINT NN_BillItem_MenuItemNumber Not null,
--CONSTRAINT FK_BillItem_MenuItemNumber Foreign Key (Menu_Item_Number) References Primary(Menu_Item_Number),
Discount Number(5,2) CONSTRAINT N_BillItem_Discount Null
CONSTRAINT CK_BillItem_Discount Check (Discount BETWEEN 0 and 100),
--colum Discount format '%'00.00,
Quaintity_Sold Number(3,0)CONSTRAINT NN_BillItem_QuaintitySold not null,
Selling_Price Number(6,2) DEFAULT 0.0 CONSTRAINT NN_BillItem_SellingPrice not null, -- You can remove "DEFAULT 0.0" if you do not want to default your Selling_Price to 0.0
constraint CK_BillItem_SellingPrice check (Selling_Price >= 0),
CONSTRAINT PK_Bill_MenuItem Primary key (Bill_Number,Menu_Item_Number)
);
All of your other tables also have the same issue, remove the DEFAULT from check constraint as I did in the above example, and specify "Default" constraint at the column definition itself.
Also, create the table which will be referenced in other tables first, for example, your second table "Bill" has a foreign key constraint which is referencing to "Waiter" table, so you have to create "Waiter" table first.
If you are still having concerns let me know.

Oracle: Many to Many: Requires two Foreign Key Constraints?

Im very new to SQL and i tried to create a many to many relationship:
CREATE TABLE HOUSE_USER
(
USER_ID NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
USER_EMAIL VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
USER_PASSWORD VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT USER_PK PRIMARY KEY(USER_ID),
CONSTRAINT PROFILE_FK FOREIGN KEY(PROFILE_ID) REFERENCES HOUSE_PROFILE(PROFILE_ID)
);
CREATE TABLE HOUSE_USER_GROUPE
(
USER_GROUPE_ID NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
USER_GROUPE_NAME VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT USER_GROUPE_PK PRIMARY KEY(USER_GROUPE_ID)
);
CREATE TABLE HOUSE_USER_USER_GROUPE
(
USER_ID NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
USER_GROUPE_ID NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT USER_USER_GROUPE_PK PRIMARY KEY(USER_ID, USER_GROUPE_ID),
CONSTRAINT USER_FK FOREIGN KEY(USER_ID) REFERENCES HOUSE_USER(USER_ID),
CONSTRAINT USER_GROUPE_FK FOREIGN KEY(USER_GROUPE_ID) REFERENCES HOUSE_USER_GROUPE(USER_GROUPE_ID)
);
I need to ask now if these two constraints:
CONSTRAINT USER_FK FOREIGN KEY(USER_ID) REFERENCES HOUSE_USER(USER_ID),
CONSTRAINT USER_GROUPE_FK FOREIGN KEY(USER_GROUPE_ID) REFERENCES
are neccessary or not. I ask because i have another many to many relationship:
CREATE TABLE HOUSE_USER_GROUPE
(
USER_GROUPE_ID NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
USER_GROUPE_NAME VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT USER_GROUPE_PK PRIMARY KEY(USER_GROUPE_ID)
);
CREATE TABLE HOUSE_ACCESSR
(
ACCESSR_ID NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
ACCESSR_NAME VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT ACCESSR_PK PRIMARY KEY(ACCESSR_ID)
);
CREATE TABLE HOUSE_USER_GROUPE_ACCESR
(
USER_GROUPE_ID NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
ACCESSR_ID NUMBER(10) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT USER_GROUPE_ACCESSR_PK PRIMARY KEY(USER_GROUPE_ID, ACCESSR_ID),
CONSTRAINT USER_GROUPE_FK FOREIGN KEY(USER_GROUPE_ID) REFERENCES HOUSE_USER_GROUPE(USER_GROUPE_ID),
CONSTRAINT ACCESSR_FK FOREIGN KEY(ACCESSR_ID) REFERENCES HOUSE_ACCESSR(ACCESSR_ID)
);
I cant create the second many to many table because i already used the constraint:
CONSTRAINT USER_GROUPE_FK FOREIGN KEY(USER_GROUPE_ID) REFERENCES HOUSE_USER_GROUPE(USER_GROUPE_ID),
I could just rename it but because of that error:
ORA-02264: name already used by an existing constraint
I just was wondering if these constraints are mandatory.
Yes, you should create the foreign key constrain on both tables.
The foreign key constraints are there to maintain referential integrity; ensuring that you can't insert values that don't exist in the parent table.
If you don't add the constraint to HOUSE_USER_GROUPE_ACCESR then you don't get that protection in that table. And you should want that protection everywhere.
Your only apparent mistake is that the constraint names are identical to each other. I traditionally either include No Name (letting Oracle decide on the name, because I never refer to the constraint by name) or use a format something like fk_<table>_<field>.
You need to do the constraints.. create the second constraints with another name.

Error Defining Foreign Key

I have the following two database tables defined:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Classrooms] (
[ID] INT IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL,
[SystemAccount_ID] INT NOT NULL,
[ClassroomName] VARCHAR (30) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Table] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ([ID]),
CONSTRAINT [FK_Classrooms_SystemAccount] FOREIGN KEY ([SystemAccount_ID]) REFERENCES [dbo].[SystemAccounts] ([ID])
);
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Students] (
[ID] INT IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL,
[SystemAccount_ID] INT NOT NULL,
[Classroom_ID] INT NULL,
[PhotoID] INT NULL,
[FirstName] VARCHAR (20) NOT NULL,
[LastName] VARCHAR (40) NOT NULL,
[NewsTemplate] TINYINT NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Students] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ([ID] ASC),
CONSTRAINT [FK_Students_Classrooms] FOREIGN KEY ([Classroom_ID]) REFERENCES [dbo].[Classrooms] ([ID]),
CONSTRAINT [FK_Students_SystemAccounts] FOREIGN KEY ([SystemAccount_ID]) REFERENCES [dbo].[SystemAccounts] ([ID])
);
Data model details:
Students belong to zero or one classroom via Classroom_ID FK
Students belong to one System Account via SystemAccount_ID FK
Classrooms belong to one System Account via SystemAccount_ID FK (implying a system account can have zero or more Classrooms)
What I'm attempting to do is enforce when students are added to a classroom (by setting the Classroom_ID key in the Students table) that the classroom belongs to the same system account as the student. I could easily enforce this at the business logic layer but then I'd be requiring every programmer to remember to do this. So ideally, I'd be able to do this at the data layer as a constraint.
I tried adding a FK constraint to the Students table:
CONSTRAINT [FK_Students_ToTable] FOREIGN KEY ([SystemAccount_ID]) REFERENCES [Classrooms]([SystemAccount_ID])
Which results in the following error compliments of SQL Server:
Update cannot proceed due to validation errors.
Please correct the following errors and try again.
SQL71516 :: The referenced table '[dbo].[Classrooms]' contains no primary or candidate keys that match the referencing column list in the foreign key. If the referenced column is a computed column, it should be persisted.
I've tried a few different things but my SQL mojo isn't powerful enough to hack past this one. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Add a UNIQUE constraint on the combination of the two columns in Classrooms:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Classrooms] (
[ID] INT IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL,
[SystemAccount_ID] INT NOT NULL,
[ClassroomName] VARCHAR (30) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Table]
PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ([ID]),
CONSTRAINT [FK_Classrooms_SystemAccount]
FOREIGN KEY ([SystemAccount_ID])
REFERENCES [dbo].[SystemAccounts] ([ID]),
CONSTRAINT [UQ_Classrooms_ID_SystemAccount_ID]
UNIQUE ([SystemAccount_ID], [ID])
);
Then, in the Students table, combine the two FOREIGN KEY constraints into one, or in your case (because Classroom_ID isnullable), change the FK to Classroom to use the combination of the two columns:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Students] (
[ID] INT IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL,
[SystemAccount_ID] INT NOT NULL,
[Classroom_ID] INT NULL,
[PhotoID] INT NULL,
[FirstName] VARCHAR (20) NOT NULL,
[LastName] VARCHAR (40) NOT NULL,
[NewsTemplate] TINYINT NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Students]
PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ([ID] ASC),
CONSTRAINT [FK_Students_Classrooms]
FOREIGN KEY ([SystemAccount_ID], [Classroom_ID])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Classrooms] ([SystemAccount_ID], [ID]),
CONSTRAINT [FK_Students_SystemAccounts] -- this wouldn't be needed if
FOREIGN KEY ([SystemAccount_ID]) -- Classrooms_ID was NOT NULL
REFERENCES [dbo].[SystemAccounts] ([ID])
);