I have a localized string that looks something like this in English:
"
5 Mile(s)
5,252 Step(s)
"
My app is localized both in left-to-right and right-to-left languages so I don't want to make assumptions either about the ordering of the step(s) or about the formatting of the number (e.g. 5,252 can be 5.252 depending on user locale). So I need to account for possibilities that can include things like
Step(s) 5.252
as well as what's above.
A few other caveats
All I know is that if the Step(s) line is in there, it will be on its own line (hence in my regex I require \n at each end of the string)
No guarantee that the Mile(s) information will be in the string at all, let alone whether it will be before or after Step(s)
Here's my attempt at pattern extraction:
NSString *patternString = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"\\n(([0-9,\\.]*)\s*%#|%#\s*([0-9,\\.]*))\\n",
NSLocalizedString(#"Step(s)",nil), NSLocalizedString(#"Step(s)",nil)];
There appear to be two problems with this:
XCode is indicating Unknown escape sequence '\s' for the second \s in the pattern string above
No matches are being found even for strings like the following:
0.2 Mile(s)
1,482 Step(s)
Ideally I would extract the 1,482 out of this string in a way that is localization friendly. How should I modify my regex?
as far as the regex, perhaps this approach might work - it simply matches (with named groups) each couplet of numbers in sequence, with the assumption the first is miles and the second is steps. Decimals in the . or , form are optional:
(?<miles>\d+(?:[.,]\d+)?).*?(?<steps>\d+(?:[.,]\d+)?)
(and i think it should be \\s) - i'm not an ios guy, but if you can use a regex literal it would be way more readable.
regular expression demo
First I'd like to ask - Why is Mile(s) mentioned in the question at all?
And now to my two bits - you could simply use a positive look-ahead:
^(?=.*Step\(s\))[^\d]*(\d+(?:[.,]\d+)?)
It makes sure the expected word is present on the line, and then captures the number on it, allowing for localized, optional, decimal separator and decimals. This way it doesn't matter if the numer is before, or after, the "word".
It doesn't take localization of the "word" into account, but that you seem to have handled by yourself ;)
See it here at regex101.
Your regex is close, although in Obj-C you need to double-escape the \s and (s):
^(([0-9,.]*)\\s*%#|%#\\s*([0-9,.]*))$
In your NSLocalizedString you likely also need to escape the parentheses enclosing (s):
NSString *patternString = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"^(([\\d,.]+)\\s%#|%#\\s([\\d,.]+))$",
NSLocalizedString(#"Step\\(s\\)",nil), NSLocalizedString(#"Step\\(s\\)",nil)];
If you don't escape (s) then the regex engine is probably going to interpret it as a capture group.
Looking at NSLog you can see what the pattern actually reads like:
NSLog(#"patternString: %#", patternString);
Output:
patternString: ^(([\d,.]+)\sStep\(s\)|Step\(s\)\s([\d,.]+))$
Since you mentioned the Mile(s) part may not be in the string at all I'm assuming it isn't relevant to the regular expression. As I understand from the question, you just need to capture the number of steps and nothing else. On this basis, here's a modified version of your existing regex:
NSString *patternString =
[NSString stringWithFormat:#"^(?:([0-9,.]*)\\s*%#|%#\\s*([0-9,.]*))$",
NSLocalizedString(#"Step\\(s\\)",nil), NSLocalizedString(#"Step\\(s\\)",nil)];
Demo:
https://www.regex101.com/r/Q6ff1b/1
This is based on the following tips/modifications:
Use the m (= UREGEX_MULTILINE) flag option when creating the regex to specify that ^ and $ match the start and end of each line. This is more sophisticated than using \n as it will also handle the start and end of the string where this might not be present. See here.
Always use a double backslash (\\) for regex escaping - otherwise NSString will interpret the single backslash to be escaping the next character and convert it before it gets to the regex.
Literal parentheses need to be escaped - e.g. Step\\(s\\) instead of Step(s).
Characters within a character class (i.e. anything within the [] square brackets) don't need to be escaped - so it would be . rather than \\. - the latter.
If you are using (x|y|...) as a choice and don't need it to be a capturing group, use ?: after the first parenthesis to ensure it doesn't get captured - i.e. (?:x|y|...).
Related
Hi may i know what does the below query means?
REGEXP_REPLACE(number,'[^'' ''-/0-9:-#A-Z''[''-`a-z{-~]', 'xy') ext_number
part 1
In terms of explaining what the function function call is doing:
It is a function call to analyse an input string 'number' with a regex (2nd argument) and replace any parts of the string which match a specific string. As for the name after the parenthesis I am not sure, but the documentation for the function is here
part 2
Sorry to be writing a question within an answer here but I cannot respond in comments yet (not enough rep)
Does this regex work? Unless sql uses different syntax this would appear to be a non-functional regex. There are some red flags, e.g:
The entire regex is wrapped in square parenthesis, indicating a set of characters but seems to predominantly hold an expression
There is a range indicator between a single quote and a character (invalid range: if a dash was required in the match it should be escaped with a '\' (backslash))
One set of square brackets is never closed
After some minor tweaks this regex is valid syntax:
^'' ''\-\/0-9:-#A-Z''[''-a-z{-~]`, but does not match anything I can think of, it is important to know what string is being examined/what the context is for the program in order to identify what the regex might be attempting to do
It seems like it is meant to replaces all ASCII control characters in the column or variable number with xy.
[] encloses a class of characters. Any character in that class matches. [^] negates that, hence all characters match, that are not in the class.
- is a range operator, e.g. a-z means all characters from a to z, like abc...xyz.
It seams like characters enclosed in ' should be escaped (The second ' is to escape the ' in the string itself.) At least this would make some sense. (But for none of the DBMS I found having a regexp_replace() function (Postgres, Oracle, DB2, MariaDB, MySQL), I found something in the docs, that would indicate this escape mechanism. They all use \, but maybe I missed something? Unfortunately you didn't tag which DBMS you're actually using!)
Now if you take an ASCII table you'll see, that the ranges in the expression make up all printable characters (counting space as printable) in groups from space to /, 0 to 9, : to #, etc.. Actually it might have been shorter to express it as '' ''-~, space to ~.
Given the negation, all these don't match. The ones left are from NUL to US and DEL. These match and get replaced by xy one by one.
I have a little regex problem (don't we all sometimes).
The few pieces of code are from Objective C but regex expressions are still the same I believe.
I have two functions called
NSString * CRLocalizedString(NSString *key)
NSString * CRLocalizedArgString(NSString *key, ...)
These are scattered around my project for localisation.
Now I want to find them all.
Well go to directory, parse all files, etc
All fine there.
The regexes I use on the files are
[NSRegularExpression regularExpressionWithPattern:#"CRLocalizedString\\(#\\\"[^)]+\\\"\\)" options:0 error:&error];
[NSRegularExpression regularExpressionWithPattern:#"CRLocalizedArgString\\([^)]+\\)" options:0 error:&error];
And this works perfect except that my terminates character is an ).
The problem occurs with function calls like this
CRLocalizedString(#"Happy =), o so happy =D");
CRLocalizedArgString(#"Filter (%i)", 0.75f);
The regex ends the string at "Filter (%i" and at "Happy =)".
And this is where my regex knowledge ends and I do not now what to do anymore.
I thought using ");" as an end but this isn't always the case.
So I was hoping someone here knew something for me (complete different things then regex are also allowed of course)
Kind regards
Saren
Let's write your first regex without the extra level of C escapes:
CRLocalizedString\(#\"[^)]+\"\)
You don't have to escape a " for a regex, so let's get rid of those extra backslashes:
CRLocalizedString\(#"[^)]+"\)
So, you want to match a quoted string using "[^)]+". But that doesn't match every quoted string.
What is a quoted string? It's a ", followed by any number of string atoms, followed by another ". What is a string atom? It's any character except " or \, or a \ followed by any character. So here's a regex for a quoted string:
"([^"\\]|\\.)*"
Sticking that back into your first regex, we get this:
CRLocalizedString\(#"([^"\\]|\\.)*"\)
Here's a link to a regex tester demonstrating that regex.
Quoting it in an Objective-C string literal gives us this:
#"CRLocalizedString\\(#\"([^\"\\\\]|\\\\.)*\"\\)"
It is impossible to write a regex to match calls to CRLocalizedArgString in the general case, because such calls can take arbitrary expressions as arguments, and regexes cannot match arbitrary expressions (because they can contain arbitrary levels of nested parentheses, which regexes cannot match).
You could just hope that there are no parentheses in the argument list, and use this regex:
CRLocalizedArgString\(#"([^"\\]|\\.)*"[^)]*\)
Here's a link to a regex tester demonstrating that regex.
Quoting it in an Objective-C string literal gives us this:
#"CRLocalizedArgString\\(#\"([^\"\\\\]|\\\\.)*\"[^)]*\\)"
I created a regex expression and tested with a string in Rexpal.
Then, i tested it in Objective-C with the same string and i get no result.
NSRegularExpression *regex = [NSRegularExpression regularExpressionWithPattern:#"^Page(\\d+| \\d+)(:| :|)$" options:NSRegularExpressionCaseInsensitive error:®Error];
As you can see, i did add another '\' char before the 'd', but i get no result at all.
If i change the regex expression from "^Page(\d+| \d+)(:| :|)$" to "Page(\d+| \d+)(:| :|)", i get way too many results. It's like my 'AND' statements were understoud as 'OR' statements. Anybody got an idea of what is happening?
EDIT :
For the regex expression "^page(\d+| \d+)(:| :|)$" for the string "page 15 :", will return me with 3 solutions "page 15 :", "15", and ":". I only want the first one. Like i said, it's like my AND is transformed in a OR/AND. I would like the number and the semi-colon (or not like my regex says) to always be attached to 'page'
Turn on multi-line option. then anchors ^$ will mean begining and end of line.
Instead, by default, ^$ mean begin/end of entire string.
In RxPal you can see Match at line-breaks (m) option is checked.
edit
If you are getting too much sub-expression data, then you should replace the
context into cluster groups. (..) -> (?: ..).
This is an 'extended' context.
If you can't do that, then just go with the data in group 0, which is the entire match, and ignore the rest. Not sure how to do this.
As pointed out by sln (he solved that issue), you don't match anything in C because you have to turn multiline option on (with m), and you do match in regexpal because it is on.
Regarding your regex, it could be improved with ^(Page\s*\d+\s*:?\s*)$. The question mark means that the preceding character doesn't have to be here, the \s matches any whitespace-type character (whitespace, tab, etc).
Regarding your selecting issue, parenthesis in regex are what catches variables. So if you do (Page( \d+|\d+)) you'll have two different variables. What you wanted was (Page(?: \d+|\d+)), since (?: ) counts as parenthesis not assigning any value. But | aren't usually used when a simple ? does the trick.
Alright, I'm trying to write some code that removes words that contain an apostrophe from an NSString. To do this, I've decided to use regular expressions, and I wrote one, that I tested using this website: http://rubular.com/r/YTV90BcgoQ
Here, the expression is: \S*'+\S
As shown on the website, the words containing an apostrophe are matched. But for some reason, in the application I'm writing, using this code:
sourceString = [sourceString stringByReplacingOccurrencesOfRegex:#"\S*'+\S" withString:#""];
Doesn't return any positive result. By NSLogging the 'sourceString', I notice that words like 'Don't' and 'Doesn't' are still present in the output.
It doesn't seem like my expression is the problem, but maybe RegexKitLite doesn't accept certain types of expressions? If someone knows what's going on here, please enlighten me !
Literal NSStrings use \ as an escape character so that you can put things like newlines \n into them. Regexes also use backslashes as an escape character for character classes like \S. When your literal string gets run through the compiler, the backslashes are treated as escape characters, and don't make it to the regex pattern.
Therefore, you need to escape the backslashes themselves in your literal NSString, in order to end up with backslashes in the string that is used as the pattern: #"\\S*'+\\S".
You should have seen a compiler warning about "Unknown escape sequence" -- don't ignore those warnings!
I'm trying to implement stuff similar to spell check, but I need to get the word that is limited by a space. EX: "HI HOW R U", I need to collect HI, HOW and so on as they type. i.e. After user hits HI and space I need to collect HI and do a spell check.
Check the documentation for NSString Here. You want the message componentsSepeparatedByString:.
I don't know objective-C, but I'm fairly sure it'll have a Regexp library - although it'd be straightforward to code it without one.
Regexp: \b([^\s])*\b
\b = word boundary (whitespace, comma, dot, exclamation-mark, etc.)
\s = whitespace character
[...] = character set
[^...] = negated character set (any character(s) EXCEPT ...)
() = grouping construct
* = zero or more times
So the suggested expression would start matching at any word boundary, then match every subsequent character that is not a whitespace character, then match a word boundary.
Your stated case is so simple you may just want to look for spaces (one char at a time) and get the substring, but RegExp is very widely used across a range of languages and platforms, and so it's fairly easy to find an expression when you need to - and one often does for common stuff like checking if zip codes, phone numbers, email addresses and so on are syntactically correct. So it's worth learning in any case. :)