I have tried Denny Britz's code on TensorFlow CNN Text Classification. Currently, the code is fixated on the number of text classifications as provided by the existing model of TensorFlow. For example, the model has 8 types of classifications. But I wish to increase/decrease the number of classifications. Is there a way to make it work?
Related
Im working on a binary classificaton project, and im using VAE (variational autoencoder) to handle the imbalance between the 2 classes by generating new samples for the minority class.
the first class (majority class) contains 20000 samples, and the second one (minority class) contains 500 samples.
After training VAE model on the minority class, i generated new samples for this class and add them to the training set, then i trained two classification models, a model on trained on the imbalanced data (only training set) and the second one trained with training set + data generated by VAE). The problem is the first model is giving results better than the second(f1-score, Roc auc...), and i thought that maybe the problem was because of the limited amount of data that the VAE was trained on.
Any help please.
Though 500 training Images are not good enough to generate diversified images from a VAE, you can still try producing some. It's better to take mean of latents of 10 different images (or even more) and pass it through the decoder ( if you're already doing this, ignore it. If you're doing some other method, try this).
If it's still not working, then, I suggest you to build a Conditional VAE on your entire dataset. In conditional VAE, you train VAE using the labels so that your models learns not only reconstruction but also what class of image it is reconstructing. This helps you to generate an Image of any particular class.
I have five classes and I want to compare four of them against one and the same class. This isn't a One vs Rest classifier, as for each output I want to score them against one base class.
The four outputs should be: base class vs classA, base class vs classB, etc.
I could do this by having multiple binary classification tasks, but that's wasting computation time if the first layers are BERT preprocessing + pretrained BERT layers, and the only differences between the four classifiers are the last few layers of BERT (finetuned ones) and the Dense layer.
So why not merge the graphs for more performance?
My inputs are four different datasets, each annotated with true/false for each class.
As I understand it, I can re-use most of the pipeline (BERT preprocessing and the first layers of BERT), as those have shared weights. I should then be able to train the last few layers of BERT and the Dense layer on top differently depending on the branch of the classifier (maybe using something like keras.switch?).
I have tried many alternative options including multi-class and multi-label classifiers, with actual and generated (eg, machine-annotated) labels in the case of multiple input labels, different activation and loss functions, but none of the results were acceptable to me (none were as good as the four separate models).
Is there a solution for merging the four different models for more performance, or am I stuck with using 4x binary classifiers?
When you train DNN for specific task it will be (in vast majority of cases) be better than the more general model that can handle several task simultaneously. Saying that, based on my experience the properly trained general model produces very similar results to the original binary ones. Anyways, here couple of suggestions for training strategies (assuming your training datasets for each task are completely different):
Weak supervision approach
Train your binary classifiers, and label your datasets using them (i.e. label with binary classifier trained on dataset 2 datasets [1,3,4]). Then train your joint model as multilabel task using all the newly labeled datasets (don't forget to randomize samples before feeding them to trainer ;) ). Here you will need to experiment if you will use threshold and set a label to 0/1 or use the scores of the binary classifiers.
Create custom loss function that will not penalize if no information provided for certain class. So when your will introduce sample from (say) dataset 2, your loss will be calculated only for the 2nd class.
Of course you can apply both simultaneously. For example, if you know that binary classifier produces scores that are polarized (most results are near 0 or 1), you can use weak labels, and automatically label your data with scores. Now during the second stage penalize loss such that for score x' = 4(x-0.5)^2 (note that you get logits from the model, so you will need to apply sigmoid function). This way you will increase contribution of the samples binary classifier is confident about, and reduce that of less certain ones.
As for releasing last layers of BERT, usually unfreezing upper 3-6 layers is enough. Releasing more layers improves results very little and increases time and memory requirements.
I have created text classification model(.pb) using tensorflow. Prediction is good.
Is it possible to check the sentence using for prediction is already used to train the model or not. I need to retrain the model when new sentence is given to model to predict.
I did some research and couldn't find a way to get the train data only with the pb file because that file only stores the features and not the actual train data(obviously),but if you have the dataset,then you can easily verify duh....
I don't think you can ever find the exact train data with only the trained model,cause the model only contains the features and not the actual train data
Tensorflow is fairly new to me and the way i would have the loss calculated on the mnist dataset was using the softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits function.
This function worked on that dataset due to the label input being a single label on each image
What im trying to do is to train a CNN on the mscoco dataset which has multiple labels on the same image with 80 classes total.
Is there a function that makes that possible?
My label input is currently somewhat a modified onehot representation, meaning that for each image i have a list of 80 elements having 0 for categories not in the image and 1 for categories present in an image
I.e. an image with a human and a dog would have a list of [0,1,0,0,1] assuming i have 5 classes with dogs and humans being in index 1 and 4
For multi-label classification problem, you can use the sigmoid function available in tensorflow (tf.nn.sigmoid_cross_entropy_with_logits). It would take the onehot encoded label input along with the final logits layer as its input.
I am working on image tagging and annotation problem, simply an image may contain multiple objects. I want to train inception-v4 for multi-label classification. My training data will be an image and a vector of length equals the number of classes and has 1 in each index if the object exists in the image. For example, If I have four classes (Person, car, tree, buildings). If an image contains a person and car. Then my vector will be (1, 1, 0, 0).
What changes do I need to make to train inception-v4 for the tagging and annotation problem?
Do I only need to change the input format and change the loss function from softmax to sigmoid_cross_entropy_with_logits in the inception-v4 architecture?
https://github.com/tensorflow/models/blob/master/slim/nets/inception_v4.py
Thank you in advance.
If you'd like to retrain a model to output different labels, check out the image_retraining example: https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/r1.1/tensorflow/examples/image_retraining/retrain.py
In that example, we retrain the standard inception v3 model to recognize flowers instead of the standard ImageNet categories.