I'm using VB .NET to create a planning, and I got a little problem with events.
In the main form, I put a panel in which I add programatically rows and boxes in those rows. I have inside the form a TextBox and the panel that contains all the boxes. I want to change a the text of the TextBox when I click on a box, so I use the AddHandler statement but it doesn't work. I tried to debug it and I realised that it actually calls the sub and inside it, I can see the changes it makes (TextBox.Text becomes what I want), but when it exits the sub, it is like nothing has changed.
I don't know if I was clear enough.
Thanks
Here is a simplified code (I removed all the graphics functions to resize the controls...)
Public Class frmPrinc
Public actEditing As Object
Private Class boxAct
Inherits Label
Public act As Integer
Public Sub New(ByVal a As Integer)
act = a
AddHandler Me.Click, AddressOf clickBox
End Sub
Private Sub clickBox(sender As Object, e As EventArgs)
Dim boxact As boxAct = DirectCast(sender, boxAct)
frmPrinc.actEditing = boxact
boxact.Text = "Clicked"
End Sub
End Class
Private Sub showPlanning()
pan_plan.Controls.Clear()
Dim plan As New Control ' Control that will be used as a row
For i As Integer = 0 To 10
plan.Controls.Add(New boxAct(i))
Next
Panel1.Controls.Add(plan)
End Sub
End Class
When I run that, the text of the box changes but actEditing is still Nothing...
Instead of boxAct trying to directly update frmPrinc of the current "box" being clicked, it should instead raise a Custom Event that frmPrinc subscribes to. frmPrinc can use that information as it then sees fit. Below I've added the custom event and raise it in class boxAct. The form subscribes to that event using AddHandler when each instance of boxAct is created. All together, this looks something like:
Public Class frmPrinc
Public actEditing As boxAct
Public Class boxAct
Inherits Label
Public act As Integer
Public Event BoxClicked(ByVal box As boxAct)
Public Sub New(ByVal a As Integer)
act = a
End Sub
Private Sub boxAct_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles Me.Click
Me.Text = "Clicked"
RaiseEvent BoxClicked(Me)
End Sub
End Class
Private Sub showPlanning()
pan_plan.Controls.Clear()
Dim plan As New Control ' Control that will be used as a row
For i As Integer = 0 To 10
Dim box As New boxAct(i)
AddHandler box.BoxClicked, AddressOf box_BoxClicked
plan.Controls.Add(box)
Next
Panel1.Controls.Add(plan)
End Sub
Private Sub box_BoxClicked(box As boxAct)
actEditing = box
Debug.Print("Box Clicked: " & actEditing.act)
End Sub
End Class
From the comments:
Thanks man, it worked! I'd like to know though why I need to make such
a structure to raise a simple event that modifies the main form...
Just to not do the same mistake again – Algor Frile
This a design decision everyone must make: "Loosely Coupled" vs. "Tightly Coupled". The approach I gave above falls into the Loosely Coupled category. The main benefit to a loosely coupled solution is re-usability. In your specific case, we have Class boxAct being reused multiple times, albeit all within the same form. But what if that wasn't the case? What if you wanted to use boxAct on multiple forms (or even have multiple "groups" of them)? With your original approach, you had this line:
frmPrinc.actEditing = boxact
which means that if wanted to use Class boxAct with a different form you'd have to make a copy of Class boxAct, give it a new name, and then manually change that one line to reference the new form:
Public Class boxAct2
Private Sub clickBox(sender As Object, e As EventArgs)
Dim boxact As boxAct = DirectCast(sender, boxAct)
frmSomeOtherForm.actEditing = boxact
boxact.Text = "Clicked"
End Sub
End Class
This shows the disadvantage of the Tightly Coupled approach, which uses references to specifics types (the Form in this case) to communicate. The Tightly coupled approach might be initially easier to implement when you're coding fast and furious, but then it suffers from re-usability down the line. There are scenarios in which a tightly coupled solution make sense, but only you can make that decision; those scenarios usually involve some kind of "sub-control" that will only ever get used within some kind of custom container/control and will never be used on its own somewhere else.
Conversely, with the loosely coupled approach, if we wanted to re-use Class boxAct in a different form, then no changes to it would be required at all (though at that point you'd probably not want it declared within your original Form!). In the new form you'd simply add a handler for the BoxClicked() event and then do what you need to do. Each form would receive the events for its respective instances of boxAct.
Final thoughts...your original approach could actually work, but most likely was failing at this line (same as above):
frmPrinc.actEditing = boxact
Here you were referencing to frmPrinc using what is known as the Default Instance of that form. This would have worked if frmPrinc was the "Startup Object" for your application. I'm guessing it wasn't, however, and you were creating an instance of frmPrinc from somewhere else. To make the original approach work you would have had to pass a reference to your ACTUAL instance of frmPrinc into Class boxAct (usually via the Constructor in tightly coupled solutions).
Related
I want to fire an event in another class.
And my problem is I don't know how to make it.
I'm trying to use Inherits statement to my Form and add my class name to it, and it works as I hope:
Public Class Frm_Main_Copy
Inherits ToolStripMenuApp
'I have a ToolStripMenu that has declared before on my class and it sounds like this:
'Public Shared WithEvents Cat000x86_64App As ToolStripMenuItem
...
Private Sub IsClicked(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs) Handles Cat000x86_64App.Click
End Sub
End Class
but the designer form messed up(returns a fatal error) and I should delete the Inherits statement, and the others.
Tried to act as form designer script(Trying to put this code to my class):
Friend WithEvents BlahBlah As RadioButton 'For example
It didn't worked,
Declaring a variable for my class and It didn't worked too
Searched on the Internet and it seems likely more complicated than I thought...
Anyone can help? Any help is appreciated.
A form is not a form unless it inherits, either directly or indirectly, the Form class. You cannot inherit any type that is not itself a form and expect your type to be a form. With that code, if ToolStripMenuApp is not a form then Frm_Main_Copy is not a form either, hence no form designer.
If what you're actually saying is that you have an instance of that ToolStripMenuApp that contains a TooStripMenuItem whose Click event you want to handle in Frm_Main_Copy then the first step is to not declare Cat000x86_64App as Shared. Frm_Main_Copy needs to declare a method capable of handling that event:
Private Sub IsClicked(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs)
'...
End Sub
Note that there is no Handles clause because there's no WithEvents variable in that class whose event you are handling.
Next, Frm_Main_Copy must have access to the appropriate instance of ToolStripMenuApp. It's impossible for us to say how best to do that based on the information provided but it might be as simple as this:
Dim tsma As New ToolStripMenuApp
You then register your method as a handler for the appropriate event:
AddHandler tsma.Cat000x86_64App.Click, AddressOf IsClicked
If you use AddHandler, make sure to use RemoveHandler when you're done with either object. I suggest that you do some reading based on this information.
I'm relatively new to Windows Forms development and my first real application has reached a point where a lot of code starts to build up in my main Form file, so I decided to restructure my project using the MVC pattern.
One major problem I have is dealing with the different control events of the form. I have several buttons, textfields, comboboxes and also a tabcontroll element which again contains different input elements and so far, every procedure for handling clicks, updates and other changes is defined in my main class.
For example:
Private Sub btnOk_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles btnOk.Click
some code...
End Sub
So my question is: what would be the best way to handle these events outside of my main form? I'm more familiar with building GUIs in Java where you can use ActionListeners to achieve this but I have found nothing similar for my work with Windows Forms.
To subscribe to a Control event outside of your main form class, make your control public, so you can access from another class). This can be done using the Modifier property at design-time. Then, use the AddHandler keyword to subscribe to any event programmatically.
After researching a bit more, I found that there is probably not THE correct answer to this problem but I found 2 approaches which provide a solution in the way I was looking for. In both cases, I use a controller class which is responsible for handling any user interaction from my main form.
The first approach makes use of what DmitryBabich suggested, adding a handler to the object and referencing it to a method of my controller class:
in Form1:
Dim ctrl as new Controller(Me)
AddHandler Button1.Click, AddressOf ctrl.doSomething
Controller class:
Public Class Controller
Private myForm As Form1
Public Sub New(ByVal f As Form1)
myForm = f
End Sub
Public Sub doSomething(sender As Object, e As EventArgs)
MsgBox("Button clicked.")
End Sub
End Class
For an example this simple it is not necessary to pass an instance of Form1 over to the controller but if for example I'd like to access the values of other control elements as well, I can address them by using this instance of Form1.
For example:
Public Sub doSomething(sender As Object, e As EventArgs)
MsgBox("You clicked the button, by the way: The value of TextField1 is " & myForm.TextField1.text)
End Sub
The other approach is almost identical except that here the controller knows all the relevant user control objects of the form and can handle their events directly, meaning that in the main form I have to do nothing more than create an instance of the controller. In the controller however, I have to assign every user control I want to access to its own variable as soon as the main form is loaded:
in Form1:
Dim ctrl as new Controller(Me)
Controller class:
Public Class Controller
WithEvents myForm As Form1
WithEvents button1 As Button
WithEvents button2 As Button
Public Sub New(ByVal f As Form1)
myForm = f
End Sub
Public Sub formLoad() Handles myForm.Load
button1 = myForm.Button1
button2 = myForm.Button2
End Sub
Private Sub b1Click() Handles button1.Click
MsgBox("You clicked button1!")
End Sub
Private Sub b2Click() Handles button2.Click
MsgBox("Button #2 was clicked!")
End Sub
End Class
To start with I have a fairly unique situation in that I am dealing with large amounts of data - multiple series of about 500,000 points each. The typical plot time is about 1s which is perfectly adequate.
The chart is created 'WithEvents' in code and the plot time doesn't change.
However, when I add the sub with the handler for the click event ..
Private Sub Chart_Main_Click(ByVal sender As Object, _
ByVal e As MouseEventArgs) Handles Chart_Main.Click
Dim y As Integer = Chart_Main.ChartAreas(0).AxisX.PixelPositionToValue(e.X)
'MsgBox(y)
End Sub
the plot time blows out to 3min. Even having no code in the sub, the result is the same. There is no reference to the click event in any of the code so I am at a loss as to why this is occurring. I suspect it has something to do with the number of points being added but not knowing the cause is frustrating.
Is anyone able to explain what is going on?
Ok, i don't know if the explanation in the comments was sufficient, so here some example code...
Also i wanted to try this myself!
Essencially, what you do is take control on when you want Windows to check the events.
For that, i suggested two wrappers on AddHandler and RemoveHandler that can safely be called from worker threads.
So, what you have to do, is:
Initialize the Handler in the constructor
Call RemoveClickHandler on your control, each time you want it to be left alone by the EventHandler
But don't forget to reinitialize the handler afterwards via AddClickHandler
Also, your handler method should not have the 'Handles' keyword anymore...
Public Class MainForm
Public Sub New()
' This call is required by the designer.
InitializeComponent()
m_pPictureClickHandler = New MouseEventHandler(AddressOf hndPictureClick)
AddClickHandler(pbxFirst, m_pPictureClickHandler)
End Sub
' Have a persistent local instance of the delegate (for convinience)
Private m_pPictureClickHandler As MouseEventHandler
Public Sub AddClickHandler(obj As Control, target As [Delegate])
If Me.InvokeRequired Then
Me.Invoke(New Action(Of Control, [Delegate])(AddressOf AddClickHandler), obj, target)
Else
AddHandler obj.MouseClick, target
End If
End Sub
Public Sub RemoveClickHandler(obj As Control, target As [Delegate])
If Me.InvokeRequired Then
Me.Invoke(New Action(Of Control, [Delegate])(AddressOf RemoveClickHandler), obj, target)
Else
RemoveHandler obj.MouseClick, target
End If
End Sub
' Here your Plot is done
Public Sub LockedPlot()
RemoveClickHandler(pbxFirst, m_pPictureClickHandler)
' do something on your handler free control ...
AddClickHandler(pbxFirst, m_pPictureClickHandler)
End Sub
' This is your handler (note without a 'Handles' keyword)
Private Sub hndPictureClick(sender As Object, e As MouseEventArgs)
' do something with the click
MessageBox.Show(String.Format("Yeah! You clicked at: {0}x{1}", e.X.ToString(), e.Y.ToString()))
End Sub
End Class
I suppose an even better design would be to create a child class of your chart that has an LPC style method called, say 'SafePlot', with folowing features:
It accepts a pointer (delegate) to a procedure
It will remove all the event handler before invoking the procedure
Finally it would reinitialize the handlers on it's own after the job is done.
It may require a collection to all handler refering to it's events.
-> For that reason i'd let the class manage the handlers entiraly...
Alternativly you could put the 'SafePlot' idea in your main class. then you could manage the event handler there... but that is disputable
Well i can think of a few other ways to do this, but i'm cutting the brainstorming now!
If interested in one of these design solutions, give me a poke.
I have created a Form with Objects like Progressbar and Button.
I have also created Public library code outside my Form
I want to modify the Progressbar Control or the Button's Text from a Sub that is written in a library (I try to pass my Form as a parameter):
Public Shared Sub ModifyItems(ByRef _WhichForm As Form)
_WhichForm.MyProgressBar1.visible = True
End sub
Unfortunately, the code Is not recognizing the Progressbar name MyProgressBar1
Is there a way to modify the Progressbar Control on the Form directly in a Sub or Function that is written in a class library, not directly in the Form Code ?
This type of approach would generally fall under the umbrella of "bad practice". Having objects modifying each others members directly introduces tight coupling that makes for difficult code to extend, debug, and maintain.
Rather than trying to modify something from within the library, better to think in terms of notifying that something within the library has changed. You could, for example, raise an event within the library. Form1 could then listen for that event and make any changes to its components that are appropriate. This way Form1 is solely responsible for modifying its components and the library is solely responsible for announcing changes to its internal state.
To give a good example - if, say, you were to change your Form's progress bar component (maybe you find a better one out there) you suddenly introduce a breaking change into your library.
To use an event you might do something like :
Public Class MyLibrary
Event OnSomethingHappened()
Private Sub SomethingHappened()
RaiseEvent OnSomethingHappened()
End Sub
End Class
And then in your form :
Public Class Form1
Private WithEvents _myLibrary as New MyLibrary
Private Sub LibraryDidSomething() Handles _myLibrary.OnSomethingHappened
MyProgressBar1.Visible = True
End Sub
End Class
This nicely decouples any dependence on Form1 - the library exists as a self-contained entity and doesn't care who listens to its events.
If you want to do this with a shared class you can also use shared events - these must be connected programmatically as :
Public Class MyLibrary
Shared Event OnSomething()
Public Shared Sub DoSomething()
RaiseEvent OnSomething()
End Sub
End Class
in the form :
Public Class Form1
Private Sub Form1_Load(sender As System.Object, e As System.EventArgs) _
Handles MyBase.Load
AddHandler MyLibrary.OnSomethingHappened, AddressOf LibDidSomething
End Sub
Private Sub Form1_FormClosed(sender As System.Object, e As _
System.Windows.Forms.FormClosedEventArgs) Handles MyBase.FormClosed
RemoveHandler MyLibrary.OnSomethingHappened, AddressOf LibDidSomething
End Sub
Private Sub LibDidSomething()
MyProgressBar1.Visible = True
End Sub
End Class
When programmatically adding events you must take care to remove them before disposing of the objects that have subscribed to them. In this case I have added the handler when the form loads and have removed it when the form closes. If you fail to remove an added handler then the form would not be garbage collected and this would cause a memory leak.
See here for more reading : Raising Events and Responding to Events (MSDN)
I'm having trouble wrapping my head around Events and their Handlers in general. I was working from some sample code that used them, and I can't understand why use an event rather than simply using a sub. I'm absolutely sure I'm missing the bigger picture here.
Abbreviated code example:
Public Class MenuEntry
Public Event selected as EventHandler(of EventArgs)
Protected Friend Overridable Sub onSelectEntry(e as EventArgs)
RaiseEvent selected(Me, e)
End Sub
End Class
Public Class Menu
Private menuSelect as New inputAction(Keys.Enter)
Private menuEntry as New List(of MenuEntry)
'keeps track of which menu item we're currently on
Private _selectedEntry as Integer
Public Sub Update()
If menuSelect.evaluate Then
onSelectEntry(_selectedEntry)
End If
Protected Overridable Sub onSelectEntry(ByVal entryIndex as Integer)
menuEntry(entryIndex).onSelectEntry(New EventArgs())
End Sub
End Sub
End Class
Public Class OptionsMenu
Inherits Menu
Private arbitraryOne as Integer
Private arbitraryTwo as Integer
Public Sub New()
Dim entryOne as New MenuEntry(String)
Dim entryTwo as New MenuEntry(String)
AddHandler entryOne.selected, AddressOf entryOneSelected
AddHandler entryTwo.selected, AddressOf entryTwoSelected
MenuEntry.add(entryOne)
MenuEntry.add(entryTwo)
End Sub
Private Sub entryOneSelected(ByVal entryIndex as Integer)
arbitraryOne += 1
End Sub
Private Sub entryTwoSelected(ByVal entryIndex as Integer)
arbitraryTwo += 1
End Sub
End Class
And I was right, I was missing the bigger picture. Writing out all the code in the same place helped me to see exactly what was going on. Hopefully I'm correct:
The Event allows a class to say 'Do something when this happens' in a very ambiguous way, leaving the class which created the Object to define a Handler; what that action should be. That Handler can, and very likely will, be unique to each instance of the class.
It seems to me that this would likely be achievable (on a basic level) through indexing and enumeration, but that would get messy and become a lot of code to write rather quickly. This is probably a much more flexible and extensible way of handling things.
I'm going to post this anyway, in the hopes that I'll get someone to tell me whether I am correct in my observations or totally off base, and that it helps someone else who is having trouble with this concept as they dip their toes into OOP and event driven objects.
Being able to have arbitrary code being run when the event is raised is an important aspect. But there's a much bigger benefit, it strongly reduces the coupling between classes. Note that your MenuEntry class has no reference to the Menu class at all. You can completely redesign the Menu class and not have a need to make any changes at all in the MenuEntry class. That makes code highly composable.
The technical term is the Observer Pattern. The Gang of Four book is essential reading for programmers.
Yes, your observations are correct. Events are used to let all interested parties know that something has occurred and, if they are interested, they can then perform some additional actions that are not necessarily intrinsic to the class that raised the event.