Create NuGet package for C++/CLI (mixed) assembly - c++-cli

Question

I have created a C++/CLI (mixed) assembly which has a managed wrapper class around some unmanaged C++ code. The managed part targets .NET 4.6.1, I got a file entry.cpp with just this line to do that:
[assembly:System::Runtime::Versioning::TargetFrameworkAttribute(L".NETFramework,Version=v4.6.1", FrameworkDisplayName = L".NET Framework 4.6.1")];
When I now manually include the compiled assembly in a .NET 4.6.1 project I can use the managed class as expected.
This project can be build four ways: x86 or x64 as either debug or release build. It has no managed dependencies.
Now I want one (or if required multiple) NuGet packages which I can upload to my feed and use the wrapper assembly easily in every .NET 4.6.1 compatible project I would like. How do I achieve this?
So far I tried two approaches:
First, I created a .autopkg file which is according to this blog post the way to provide native DLLs. The files section of that file looks like this:
files {
// include: { *.h };
[x86,v120,release] {
symbols: { ..\Release\*.pdb; }
bin: { ..\Release\*.dll; }
};
[x86,v120,debug] {
symbols: { ..\Debug\*.pdb; }
bin: { ..\Debug\*.dll; }
};
};
This process results in three .nupkg files which I can upload to my feed. But when I try to install that package to a .NET 4.6.1 project I get this error message:
Could not install package 'MyCppCliWrapper.redist 1.0.0.2'. You are trying to install this package into a project that targets '.NETFramework,Version=v4.6.1', but the package does not contain any assembly references or content files that are compatible with that framework. For more information, contact the package author.
So I rethought if I should not use the way for managed assembly to create the .nupkg because the assembly has a managed class I want to use from managed code. I created a .nuspec (using nuget spec) and provided the metadata. Then I try to create my package like this:
nuget pack MyCppCliWrapper.nuspec -Prop Configuration=Release -Prop Platform=x86 -Build
But that results in a package which contains the whole project with all source files and temporary files, just like a zip file of that folder.
Obviously there is also missing the meta information about targeted framework.
When I try to use the project file to create the package (like with C# assemblies) this fails too:
Please specify a nuspec, project.json, or project file to use
The C++ project files, .vcxproj, seem to be unsupported by NuGet (I am using the NuGet 3.5.0.1938 command line utility).
Will I need to build manually and provide all files in the files section of the .nuspec? If yes, how would he know from this line which DLL is for which .NET framework plus platform?
<file src="bin\**\*.dll" target="lib" />
I believe Hans Passant is right, this is just a regular managed nuget package but the packager does not handle the .vcxproj files so I made up my own .nuspec:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<package >
<metadata>
...
</metadata>
<files>
<file src="readme.txt" target="" />
<file src="bin\Win32\Release\*.dll" target="lib\net461" />
<file src="bin\Win32\Release\*.pdb" target="lib\net461" />
</files>
</package>
The package generated this ways works.
There is one question remaining: This way, do I have to do two packages, one for 32bit and one for 64bit - or is it possible to include them in one package (which I would prefer) and have the consuming project use one or another depending on the target architecture (any-cpu is mostly 32bit)?

Answer 1

I don't know if this could still help you, but I've managed to pack both x64 and x86 C++ code, and a C# wrapper that was compiled on AnyCPU.
On My C# project, I have two Platforms: "x86" and "x64".
On my Nuget folder, I have the following structure:
\Project
\Project.1.0.nuspec
\build
\x64
\*.dll
\*.pdb
\x86
\*.dll
\*.pdb
\Project.targets
\lib
\net452
\Wrapper.dll
\Wrapper.pdb
Project.nuspec:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<package xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/packaging/2011/08/nuspec.xsd">
<metadata>
<id>Project</id>
<version>1.0</version>
<authors>nilsonneto</authors>
<owners>nilsonneto</owners>
<requireLicenseAcceptance>false</requireLicenseAcceptance>
<description>Example.</description>
<references>
<reference file="Wrapper.dll" />
</references>
</metadata>
<files>
<file src="build\Project.targets" target="build\Project.targets" />
<file src="build\x64\**" target="build\x64" />
<file src="build\x86\**" target="build\x86" />
<file src="lib\net452\Wrapper.dll" target="lib\net452\Wrapper.dll" />
<file src="lib\net452\Wrapper.pdb" target="lib\net452\Wrapper.pdb" />
</files>
</package>
Project.targets:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<ItemGroup>
<NativeLibs Include="$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)\$(Platform)\*.*" />
<Content Include="#(NativeLibs)">
<Link>%(RecursiveDir)%(FileName)%(Extension)</Link>
<CopyToOutputDirectory>PreserveNewest</CopyToOutputDirectory>
</Content>
</ItemGroup>
</Project>
Notice the $(Platform), which is where the name of the Platform being build on Visual Studio will be placed, which is why I separated the C++ DLLs in folders with the same name as the Platforms in Visual Studio.
And according to the documentation (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/create-packages/native-packages), all native DLLs have to be placed in the \build directory.
Native NuGet packages targeting native then provide files in \build, \content, and \tools folders; \lib is not used in this case (NuGet cannot directly add references to a C++ project). A package may also include targets and props files in \build that NuGet will automatically import into projects that consume the package. Those files must be named the same as the package ID with the .targets and/or .props extensions.
So, just adjust the folder names based on the Platforms you support on the .NET project and your set.