Using AEC(webrtc) instead of AECM(webrtc) - webrtc

I used aecm(webrtc) on my ARM-based embedded device for voice communication. Now, I'm trying to change aecm to aec for double-talk echo cancellation.
It's simple in aecm:
WebRtcAecm_Create()->WebRtcAecm_Init()->WebRtcAecm_BufferFarend()->WebRtcAecm_Process().
And all data(near, far, out) formats are 16bit signed short. However, just changing functions from WebRtcAecm_* to WebRtcAec_* and signed-short data to float(divided by 32768) didn't work.
I tried to find some examples in audio_processing unittest, but couldn't find any. What am I missing?

WebRTC AEC just compare Farend Buffer and NearBuffer extracted from Mic and remove Echo in NearBuffer based on Farend. So Echo you want to clear must exist in Farend Buffer, then AEC could remove it. Please check your device latency, Basically Farend Buffer only maintain 128m/s length.

Related

writing on rfid-Tag and locking block using CoE with IO-Link Master (ifm al1330)

i have got the following issues.
I want to Read/Write on a Rfid-Tag and lock this block afterwards.
I have the following hardware:
AL1330, IFM Io-link Master https://www.ifm.com/mounting/80284123DE.pdf
DTI513, IFM IO-Link Rfid-REader/Writer https://www.ifm.com/mounting/11458695DE.pdf
Beckhoff, PLC CX5230
Rfid-Tag, ICode Slix, https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/SL2S2002_SL2S2102.pdf
I can read the Uid, can write and Read Data Bytes on the RFID.
I fail to lock the Block afterwards. I tried various ways with CoE Communication.
I divide the Problem into 3 steps:
Step 1:
Craft the CMD responsible for the Lock on the Tag.
This is specified in the responsible Norm
this are the Flags
This leads me for example to this Command
Step2 : Calculating the CRC
-For the CRC in the Norm there is one Example (CRC Iso/IEC 13239)
0x22 0x20 0x01 0x23 0x45 0x67 0x89 0xab 0x04 0xe0 0x0b
this command shall lead to CRC BAE3.
My Oscat Lib Block Basic.CRC_Gen with this Parameter returns this value
Same as http://www.sunshine2k.de/coding/javascript/crc/crc_js.html
With more testing, the crc calucaltions differ, and i do not know why and how,
and which one is correct.
Edit:
- More testing and i recognized, the Oscat Library FB Basic.CRC_Gen
fills any Input, shorter than 4 bytes, with 0x00.
- there should be the workaround, to use addressed commands with the optional Uid.
Step3:
Writing the Command with the appended CRC to Tag via CoE
- i use the Beckhoff FBs to access CoE
I can acces the different IDs with Subids and get Results,
so this works
i found the IO-Acyclic Command, which i think is the right one, to issue commands to
the tag
the docu in the AL1330 shows this
I tried a lot of different stuff, but cannot make it happen.
Problem is, i am not sure, if the CMD is correct or not, the CRC is wrong or how to make the Acyclic Command to work.
I tried for days and found no solution.
So i would be very glad for tips and hints in the right direction.
Thanks
I hope i do not violate any rules

STM32F407VET FatFs f_close returns FR_DISK_ERR

I am interfacing SD card(16Gb Sandisk ultra micro SD) to STM32F407 micro-controller with SDIO protocol using chan FatFS library. When I try to write data into existing file, f_write returns FR_OK and returns numbers of written bytes(this value is equal to number of bytes to write), but f_close() returns FR_DISK_ERR, and in the end the file is empty.
With more experiment i found that if i format the micro SD card using 64Kb unit allocation size and the existing file with some text in it then i am able to write 64Kb data to file but f_close() returns FR_DISK_ERR, and in the end the file is not empty. I am able to see the data in Windows 10 OS.
If the existing file has no text in this then i am getting an empty file even though f_write is returning FR_OK but f_close is returning FR_DISK_ERR.
In short when I try to use f_write on a text file i created from my PC I can overwrite the content of that file till 64Kb. But i can't get it to work with an empty file i created with f_open
I came across a similar post with the same issue
TMS320F2812 FatFs f_write returns FR_DISK_ERR
I tried the solutions given in the above post but it didn't work. Since i have 192K RAM in my controller, i guess its sufficient enough for this FatFs module to work. My stack size is around 13Kb and Heap size 4Kb which is too much for this application. SD card is given 3.3V supply voltage.
I went little deep in code to see where the error is occurring and found that i am getting SD_ILLEGAL_CMD error while setting block size for card. Inside f_close(ff.c file)->f_sync(ff.c file)->move_window(ff.c file)->disk_read(diskio.c file)->SD_ReadBlock(sdcard.c file) is returning SD_ILLEGAL_CMD error while setting block size for card.
Any solutions are appreciated. If more information is required please feel free to ask, i will update with more information.
Chan FatFs Version - R0.07e

check FCS ethernet frame CRC-32 online tools

I'm trying to check the FCS of an ethernet frame thanks to tools on different website.
I first used this website:
http://depa.usst.edu.cn/chenjq/www2/software/crc/CRC_Javascript/CRCcalculation.htm and find the next FCS : 0xD4C3C62F (the frame below)
Then, I tried this one : http://www.scadacore.com/field-applications/programming-calculators/online-checksum-calculator/ and I found the correct CRC : 0x7AD56BB3 but nothing of the different kind of CRC-32 (normal, reversed...) correspond to the CRC find on the first website.
Is there any link between algorithms?
Thank you!
Here is the hexadecimal frame (no start of frame) :
000AE6F005A3001234567890080045000030B3FE0000801172BA0A0000030A00000204000400001C894D000102030405060708090A0B0C0D0E0F10111213
Beware of online CRC calculators.
The Ethernet CRC of your string is actually 0xb36bd57a. It is stored in reverse order in the stream, which is why you wrote it incorrectly as 0x7AD56BB3.
There are many CRC definitions, including many 32-bit CRC definitions. See the RevEng catalog for examples. The one you want happens to be called "CRC-32", with this definition.
The "CCITT-32" (a name I have not seen before) being calculated in your first link is some other definition. It does not even appear in the RevEng catalog.
A more descriptive and clear update to #Mark Adler's answer (I am new here so I can't edit or comment)
The CRC you are searching for is called CRC-32/ISO-HDLC.
You can check the following online calculator and check the one named "CRC-32":
https://crccalc.com/
Each CRC32 algorithm has its own parameters for its generation, like polynomial, init,...etc
The IEEE802.3 standard defined the CRC32 algorithm parameters for the FCS field to have the polynomial(0x04c11db7), init/xorIn(0xffffffff), xorout(0xffffffff)

Demodulating GFSK

I'm trying to demodulate a GFSK signal coming from an nRF24L01+ transceiver chip (hooked up to my Arduino). I've followed this guide so far:
https://www.bitcraze.io/2015/06/sniffing-crazyflies-radio-with-hackrf-blue/#comment-38046
..and managed to manually demodulate a package (the address and the message I sent 'martijn' are clearly recoverable):
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9CJ42CGPiF2TWoyelRmWldZcU0
However, now I want to receive packets and decode them as they come in. Someone already made a decoder for this job, but somehow it fails to find my nRF24 packets:
https://wiki.bitcraze.io/misc:hacks:hackrf
My Arduino code for sending the packets is as followed:
#include <SPI.h>
#include <nRF24L01.h>
#include <RF24.h>
#include <RF24_config.h>
RF24 radio(9,10);
const uint64_t pipe = 0xe7e7e7e7e7;
char package[] = "martijn";
void setup() {
Serial.begin(9600);
radio.begin();
radio.setDataRate(RF24_1MBPS);
radio.setChannel(95);
radio.openWritingPipe(pipe);
radio.enableDynamicPayloads();
radio.setAutoAck(true);
radio.powerUp();
}
void loop() {
radio.write(&package, strlen(package));
delay(1);
}
Basically I just want to use GNU Radio Companion to obtain the nRF24 packets, and send their binary data into a file. I'm fine with writing my own decoder. However, I have no clue on how to get this binary data from the incoming signals.
(The comments at the bitcraze site are also mine)
I've be very happy if someone could help me (or even point me in the right direction). Thanks in advance!
After the Quadrature Demod you have to use a Clock recovery block. The M&M Clock Recovery of GNU Radio should do the job. This block will dramatically increase the performance of the decoding.
However you have to take care some parameters that this block requires. The most important is the 'omega'. 'Omega' roughly speaking corresponds to the number of samples per symbol. For example, if your GFSK baudrate is 9600 and your incoming signal from the hardware is 96000, each symbol corresponds to 10 samples. The omega can be any float number. Note however, that clock recovery does not work for large omega values. So try to keep the omega up to 8.0. To do that, either adjust properly the hardware sampling rate or do some resampling.
After the Clock Recover just use a 'Binary Slicer' block. This will convert the floats to bits of 0's and 1's. Using the Pack K bits block you can convert the bit stream into byte stream, that can easily saved to file with a 'File Sink'.
Here is a good step-by-step tutorial for an FSK receiver. GFSK adds only a Gaussian filter so the procedure is quite the same for both of them.

how to perform floating point calculation in tmote sky (contiki)

I have the following code snippet:
#include "contiki.h"
#include <stdio.h> /* For printf() */
PROCESS(calc_process, "calc process");
AUTOSTART_PROCESSES(&calc_process);
PROCESS_THREAD(calc_process, ev, data)
{
double dec=13.2, res=0, div=3.2;
PROCESS_BEGIN();
res=dec+div;
printf("%f",res);
PROCESS_END();
}
After uploading the above code in Tmote sky platform using the command
make TARGET=sky calc.upload, the program will be loaded to the mote (there is no error). Then login to the mote using make login TARGET=sky, the following output is displayed....
OUPUT:
**Rime started with address 4.0
MAC 04:00:00:00:00:00:00:00 Contiki 2.7 started. Node id is set to 4.
CSMA ContikiMAC, channel check rate 8 Hz, radio channel 26
Starting 'calc process'
%f**
How can I get the correct value?
Thanks
It is not floating point calculation support that you need - you have that already. What is missing is floating point support within printf(). That is to say that res will be calculated correctly, but printf() does not support its display.
Because it requires a relatively large amount of code, many microcontroller targeted libraries omit floating point support in stdio. There may be a library build option to include floating point support - refer to the library documentation.
You might do well to ask a question about the specific calculation necessary, and how it might be done using integer or fixed point arithmetic. Alternatively you might write your own floating point display as described here: How to print floating point value using putchar? for example.