is it possible to implement following concept with WSO2 ESB:
http listener for webservices with a method to be called (SOAP)
java routine to process message
same routine to put message to MQ queue Q1
same routine to get answer message from MQ queue Q2
return with processed answered message to webservice caller
or it's better to go with J2EE server and handle messaging part fully through java code?
Regards, Nikola
Well now usecase is much more clear so that we can go ahead and implement it. There are two ways of doing this.
First Approach
Write a Proxy(HTTP to JMS) service which accepts HTTP requests and
place it in JMS Q1 using the jms sender.
Then write another proxy (JMS to JMS), which picks the messages from
JMS Q1, process it and place it in JMS Q2.
Finally create another proxy (JMS to HTTP) to get the message from
JMS Q2 and send it back to the client using the respond mediator.
Second Approach
Create a proxy service (HTTP to JMS) and use store mediator to store the message into JMS Q1.
Create a Forwarding Message Processor to listen to Q1 and pick the message, process it, place it in Q2.
Then create another forwarding message processor to listen to Q2, and send it back to the client using a reply sequence in the message processor.
Choose which ever the way you like and let me know how it goes.
You can use ESB to implement this. But your usecase is not that clear to me. Appreciate if you can explain your usecase in functional perspective. Anyway you have HTTP(S)/JMS listeners and senders with ESB . You can't listen to a SOAP web service using ESB. What you can do is listen to HTTP traffic. Create a proxy that listens to HTTP traffic and send the message to JMS queue Q1 ussing JMS end point. Then write a JMS listener proxy to listen to the answers in Q2. Once it is received you can call the endpoint web service using send or call mediator. This is how I understood your usecase. I have no idea on transformation of data in Q1 and place it in to Q2 due to wired requirements specified above. It looks simple HTTP to JMS switching usecase to me.
Related
I have a requirement where in (RabbitMQ)server sends the request to the client and client executes the operation and sends the response back to the server.
I would like to know which mechanism to use for this Topic, PubSub, Routing...
Can we create the bi-directional connection like server-client similar to xmpp in rabbit mq, if yes how can we do?
thanks
Lokesh
You can use a Spring AMQP asynchronous consumer with a MessageListenerAdapter to invoke a POJO. See the reference documentation.
If you want more control; use a simple MessageListener and send the reply with a RabbitTemplate.
This test case shows an end-to-end configuration (client side and server side). The client side automatically takes care of setting the correlationId.
I have a javascript client which invokes an asynchronous web service with the callback in apache tomcat server. Webservice places the request to xmpp server and returns. I have another receiver component which receives the message from the xmpp server process it and puts back the response in another xmpp receiver queue. Now I would like to know of by connecting Apache Camel to the receiver queue, how can I notify the client callback. Do we have any option in apache camel to do this.
Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this.
thanks
Lokesh
I want to achieve the following:
Expose WCF endpoint to client from which they request a long-running operation.
Map the inbound request to a NServiceBus Message.
Publish the message to the bus for processing.
Send a reply to the client acking that their request has been received and we will begin processing it.
Bus works the message through a handler.
Can you help me with some examples here please?
Thanks in advance
You can check out the WcfIntegration sample that comes with NSB to see how to expose an endpoint via WCF. To hand off the message, you can simply call Bus.Send() to another endpoint to do processing, then use the Bus.Return() that is in the sample. From there, the other endpoint can look just like the Server part of the FullDuplex sample without the Bus.Reply() logic.
Awhile ago I created some example code that is similar to this, although it used a traditional ASMX web service and not a WCF one, but that is really just an implementation detail.
Check out NServiceBus External WebService Example on GitHub.
I have a wcf service and handle a lot of client (server document generation). This service should receive a lot of request and should be handle in queue. It also have a callback. (callback will return successfully generated document). I am still using PIA and will implement OpenXML in the future.
Is it wcf msmq is the way to implement this?
Is there any samples might be related? Previously its running in local machine but now want to change it as a so called "Server generated"
WCF MSMQ doesn't support callback directly - it supports only one-way operations. But for example this article discuss how to add this support. With default configuration you can send message back to original sender but it is not a callback. To support responses every client will have to expose queue and pass address of its queue as part of the request to be able to receive the message from the service. More about responses in MSMQ is in MSDN magazine.
I have a windows service that picks up messages from various MSMQs. The service picks up the messages from the queues, and then executes a specific workflow based on the queue the message came in from. Is it possible to configure a WCF service to accept a message from an endpoint and place it in a queue? I would like for the service to have multiple endpoints, and depending on which endpoint received the message, the message would be placed in a different queue. I have seen things about netMsmqBinding but so far I haven't been able to determine if this is meant for the use I am thinking about.
Any help is appreciated,
Mike
Am I getting this correctly - you want to have
a WCF service exposed to the outside world using multiple endpoints
depending on which endpoint the message comes into the WCF service, it should put those messages into separate MSMQ queues?
You can definitely have a WCF service that will expose any number of endpoints to the outside and that would drop incoming messages into an MSMQ queue. I'm just not sure whether you'll be able inside the WCF service method to know which endpoint the request came in on..... typically, the WCF service class doesn't know anything about where the request came from (and typically doesn't need to know...).
I see a few approaches to this:
have multiple services, one for each (type of) endpoint; they can share all their code and everything, but if you separate this into separate service classes, then each service class would inherently know what endpoint it serves, and thus could know what MSMQ queue to put the info into
find a way to send some header information along with the message that somehow tells you where to put the messages
in WCF 4.0, you might be able to do something with the new WCF Routing Service.... not quite sure how that would work, however - since it would also require some kind of "hint" to know which endpoint it was called on and how to route the incoming message
The way I was able to go about this was by creating a custom ServiceHost class that I could pass a configuration name to. This is an alternative to the default implementation that uses the Service Implementation type name to locate the configuration. This allowed me to run multiple instances of the same implementation on the same machine. In addition to that, inside the custom service class I added a custom MessageInspector that would attach itself to every endpoint to listen for messages. I then use the IDispatchMessageInspector.AfterReceiveRequest() method to take the incoming message and then place it into a queue that I define inside my configuration. A little complicated, but it works perfectly for our scenario.
net.msmq bindings allow a WCF client to write directly to an MSMQ queue, even if the queue-reading WCF service is not live -- it doesn't even have to exist. net.msmq bindings also allows automagic reading from queues. No use of MessageQueue to write to, or read from, a queue.