We've created a query in BigQuery that returns SKUs and correlations between them. Something like:
sku_0,sku_1,0.023
sku_0,sku_2,0.482
sku_0,sku_3,0.328
sku_1,sku_0,0.023
sku_1,sku_2,0.848
sku_1,sku_3,0.736
The result has millions of rows and we export it to Google Cloud Storage which results in several compressed files.
These files are downloaded and we have a Python application that loops through them to make some calculations using the correlations.
We tried then to make use of the fact that our first columns of SKUs is already ordered and not have to apply this ordering inside of our application.
But then we just found that the files we get from GCS changes the order in which the skus appear.
It looks like the files are created by several processes reading the results and saving it in different files, which breaks the ordering we wanted to maintain.
As an example, if we have 2 files created, the first file would look something like that:
sku_0,sku_1,0.023
sku_0,sku_3,0.328
sku_1,sku_2,0.0848
And the second file:
sku_0,sku_2,0.482
sku_1,sku_0,0.328
sku_1,sku_3,0.736
This is an example of what it looks like two processes reading the results and each one saving its current row on a specific file which changes the order of the column.
So we looked for some flag that we could use to force the preservation of the ordering but couldn't find any so far.
Is there some way we could use to force the order in these GCS files to be preserved? Or is there some workaround?
Thanks in advance,
As far I know there is no flag to maintain order.
As a workaround you can rethink your data output to use of NESTED type, and make sure that what you want to group together are converted in NESTED rows, and you can export to JSON.
is there some workaround?
As an option - you can move your processing logic from Python to BigQuery, thus eliminating moving data out of BigQuery to GCS.
Related
I built an API in nodejs+express that allows reactjs clients to upload CSV files(maximum size is atmost 1GB) to the server.
I also wrote another API which when given the filename and row numbers in an array (ie array of row numbers ) as input, it selects the rows corresponding to the row numbers, from the previously stored files and writes it to another result file (writeStream).
Then th resultant file is piped back to the client(all via streaming).
Currently as you see I am using files(basically nodejs' read and write streams) to asynchronously manage this.
But I have faced srious latency (only 2 cores are used) and some memory leak (900mb consumption) when I have 15 requests, each supplying about 600 rows to retrieve from files of size approximately 150mb.
I also have planned an alternate design.
Basically, I will store the entire file as a SQL Table with row numbers as primary indexed key.
I will convert the user inputted array of row numbrs to a another table using sql unnest and then join both these tables to get the rows needed.
Then I will supply back the resultant table as a csv file to the client.
Would this architecture be better than the previous architecture?
Any suggestions from devs is highly appreciated.
Thanks.
Use the client to do all the heavy lifting by using the XLSX package for any manipulation of content. Then have API to save information about the transaction. This will remove upload to server and download from the server and help you provide better experience.
Currently, I am working on a single node Hadoop and I wrote a job to output a sorted dataframe with only one partition to one single csv file. And I discovered several outcomes when using repartition differently.
At first, I used orderBy to sort the data and then used repartition to output a CSV file, but the output was sorted in chunks instead of in an overall manner.
Then, I tried to discard repartition function, but the output was only a part of the records. I realized without using repartition spark will output 200 CSV files instead of 1, even though I am working on a one partition dataframe.
Thus, what I did next were placing repartition(1), repartition(1, "column of partition"), repartition(20) function before orderBy. Yet output remained the same with 200 CSV files.
So I used the coalesce(1) function before orderBy, and the problem was fixed.
I do not understand why working on a single partitioned dataframe has to use repartition and coalesce, and how the aforesaid processes affect the output. Grateful if someone can elaborate a little.
Spark has relevant parameters here:
spark.sql.shuffle.partitions and spark.default.parallelism.
When you perform operations like sort in your case, it triggers something called a shuffle operation
https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/rdd-programming-guide.html#shuffle-operations
That will split your dataframe to spark.sql.shuffle.partitions partitions.
I also struggled with the same problem as you do and did not find any elegant solution.
Spark generally doesn’t have a great concept of ordered data, because all your data is split accross multiple partitions. And every time you call an operation that requires a shuffle your ordering will be changed.
For this reason, you’re better off only sorting your data in spark for the operations that really need it.
Forcing your data into a single file will break when the dataset gets larger
As Miroslav points out your data gets shuffled between partitions every time you trigger what’s called a shuffle stage (this is things like grouping or join or window operations)
You can set the number of shuffle partitions in the spark Config - the default is 200
Calling repartition before a group by operation is kind of pointless because spark needs to reparation your data again to execute the groupby
Coalesce operations sometimes get pushed into the shuffle stage by spark. So maybe that’s why it worked. Either that or because you called it after the groupby operation
A good way to understand what’s going on with your query is to start using the spark UI - it’s normally available at http://localhost:4040
More info here https://spark.apache.org/docs/3.0.0-preview/web-ui.html
I have a single parquet file that I have been incrementally been building every day for several months. The file size is around 1.1GB now and when read into memory it approaches my PCs memory limit. So, I would like to split it up into several files base on the year and month combination (i.e. Data_YYYYMM.parquet.snappy) that will all be in a directory.
My current process reads in the daily csv that I need to append, reads in the historical parquet file with pyarrow and converts to pandas, concats the new and historical data in pandas (pd.concat([df_daily_csv, df_historical_parquet])) and then writes back to a single parquet file. Every few weeks the schema of the data can change (i.e. a new column). With my current method this is not an issue since the concat in pandas can handle the different schemas and I overwriting it each time.
By switching to this new setup I am worried about having inconsistent schemas between months and then being unable to read in data over multiple months. I have tried this already and gotten errors due to non matching schemas. I thought might be able to specify this with the schema parameter in pyarrow.parquet.Dataset. From the doc it looks like it takes a type of pyarrow.parquet.Schema. When I try using this I get AttributeError: module 'pyarrow.parquet' has no attribute 'Schema'. I also tried taking the schema of a pyarrow Table (table.schema) and passing that to the schema parameter but got an error msg (sry I forget error right now and cant connect workstation right now so cant reproduce error - I will update with this info when I can).
I've seen some mention of schema normalization in the context of the broader Arrow/Datasets project but I'm not sure if my use case fits what that covers and also the Datasets feature is experimental so I dont want to use it in production.
I feel like this is a pretty common use case and I wonder if I am missing something or if parquet isn't meant for schema changes over time like I'm experiencing. I've considered investigating the schema of the new file and comparing vs historical and then if there is change deserializing, updating schema, and reserializing every file in the dataset but I'm really hoping to avoid that.
So my questions are:
Will using a pyarrow parquet Dataset (or something else in the pyarrow API) allow me to read in all of the data in multiple parquet files even if the schema is different? To be specific, my expectation is that the new column would be appended and the values prior to when this column were available would be null). If so, how do you do this?
If the answer to 1 is no, is there another method or library for handling this?
Some resources I've been going through.
https://arrow.apache.org/docs/python/dataset.html
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2659
https://arrow.apache.org/docs/python/generated/pyarrow.parquet.ParquetDataset.html#pyarrow.parquet.ParquetDataset
I am importing several files from Google Cloud Storage (GCS) through Google DataPrep and store the results in tables of Google BigQuery. The structure on GCS looks something like this:
//source/user/me/datasets/{month}/2017-01-31-file.csv
//source/user/me/datasets/{month}/2017-02-28-file.csv
//source/user/me/datasets/{month}/2017-03-31-file.csv
We can create a dataset with parameters as outlined on this page. This all works fine and I have been able to import it properly.
However, in this BigQuery table (output), I have no means of extracting only rows with for instance a parameter month in it.
How could I therefore add these Dataset Parameters (here: {month}) into my BigQuery table using DataPrep?
While the original answers were true at the time of posting, there was an update rolled out last week that added a number of features not specifically addressed in the release notes—including another solution for this question.
In addition to SOURCEROWNUMBER() (which can now also be expressed as $sourcerownumber), there's now also a source metadata reference called $filepath—which, as you would expect, stores the local path to the file in Cloud Storage.
There are a number of caveats here, such as it not returning a value for BigQuery sources and not being available if you pivot, join, or unnest . . . but in your scenario, you could easily bring it into a column and do any needed matching or dropping using it.
NOTE: If your data source sample was created before this feature, you'll need to create a new sample in order to see it in the interface (instead of just NULL values).
Full notes for these metadata fields are available here:
https://cloud.google.com/dataprep/docs/html/Source-Metadata-References_136155148
There is currently no access to data source location or parameter match values within the flow. Only the data in the dataset is available to you. (except SOURCEROWNUMBER())
Partial Solution
One method I have been using to mimic parameter insertion into the eventual table is to have multiple dataset imports by parameter and then union these before running your transformations into a final table.
For each known parameter search dataset, have a recipe that fills a column with that parameter per dataset and then union the results of each of these.
Obviously, this is only so scalable i.e. it works if you know the set of parameter values that will match. once you get to the granularity of time-stamp in the source file there is no way this is feasible.
In this example just the year value is the filtered parameter.
Longer Solution (An aside)
The alternative to this I eventually skated to was to define dataflow jobs using Dataprep, use these as dataflow templates and then run an orchestration function that ran the dataflow job (not dataprep) and amended the parameters for input AND output via the API. Then there was a transformation BigQuery Job that did the roundup append function.
Worth it if the flow is pretty settled, but not for adhoc; all depends on your scale.
I tried a Hive process,
which generate words frequency rank from
sentences,
I would like to output not multiple files but
one file.
I searched the similar question this web site,
I found mapred.reduce.tasks=1,
but it didn't generate one file but 50 files.
The process l tried has 50 input files and
they are all gzip file.
How do I get one merged file?
50 input files size is so large that I suppose the
reason may be some kind of limit.
in your job use Order By clause with some field.
So that hive will enforce to run only one reducer as a result you are going to end up with one file has created in the HDFS.
hive> Insert into default.target
Select * from default.source
order by id;
For more details regards to order by clause refer to this and this links.
Thank you for your kind answers,
you are really saving me.
I am trying order by,
but it is taking much time,
i am waiting for it.
All I have to do is get one file
to make output file into input of
the next step,
I am also going to try simply cat all files from reducer outputs according to the advice,
if I will do it, I am worried that files are unique and does not have any the same word between files , and whether it is normal gzip file made by catting multiple gzip files.