Did exactly as tutorial says. Totally copy and pasted then ran in firefox but doesn't render. One thing quick start doesn't address is where to put the html files that we create in the tutorial. DO we put them in the src folder or the main folder? Tried both doesn't work anyway . They have no file structure at the end to show. I'm sure I will get the comments of show your code but that is not what I am asking. I am asking what the file structure should look like.
They have created a cli experience which totally rocks for beginners.
Check it out. It will probably get you much further much faster.
Related
And if so, how? :) I tried doing simply for example
"~/scripts/src/*.js"
but no luck. It would save me quite a lot of work if I could do that, or even
"~/scripts/src/**/*.js"
You can but it doesn't currently support the correct/nice globbing patterns that you describe. For example, you can include a folder with a filter with this syntax: #{ Smidge.RequiresJs("~/Js/Stuff*js"); } ... so include the Stuff folder for *.js files (see https://github.com/Shazwazza/Smidge/wiki/declarations#view-based-declarations)
This is the task that needs to be completed to make this work nicely https://github.com/Shazwazza/Smidge/issues/47 Hopefully i can find some time to get that done soon.
So here's whats up,
I am a Bench Technician for an IT company. I find myself repeating the same task over and over when preforming system reloads. I want to write an application where I have all the programs for a reload in one spot, and call them by a button click event. I have tried adding them into the Resources and calling them by Environment.CurrentDirectory+"\Path" to no avail, I get " System cannot find the file specified. When the path is hard coded it works like a charm, but this will obviously not do as it needs to be able to move to any system. I am looking for a way to add the exe's I need and a generic way to call the path. I am not looking for handouts here, I have done my homework on this one and still not found a solution, If I could get someone to -point me in the right direction, it would be awesome.
Since what you have already tried is much saner and easier for the average user to work with than having the files embedded in another executable, I'll explain that method.
CurrentDirectory is where your executable is executed from, Like this:
C:\MyDir> MyOtherDir\MyProgram.exe
CurrentDirectory refers to C:\MyDir in this example.
What you need is the application directory; and according to top answer of this question the most reliable way to get that is using AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory
EDIT: Also consider using Path.DirectorySeparatorChar instead of \.
Note: Before asking i searched some on embedding but couldn't get exactly what i wanted.
I have a resume file in the pdf format that i would like to display in my website without storing anywhere like google or other but on my own. I have static website [which i made using Jekyll] lets say https://www.example.com and what i actually need is to display my resume accessible in the following link https://www.example.com/resume
Some of them have long permalinks and i actually hate them. (Just saying)
Upload the PDF into the website's / or assets/ directory.
To make a link for HTML:
CV
To make a link for Markdown:
[CV](<PATH>/cv.pdf)
On Chrome, this has been around for a long time and plagues webdevs to this day. There seem to be no plans to change that anytime soon because that's just the way it was built. Chrome behaves slightly different when not online, so offline/local-testing will not always produce expected result.
My answer to you, for this question, is a suggestion. In order to make it cross-browser compatible, your mode of implementation should be:
Modal or,
Lightbox
Whether or not you are using a SSG should not matter here. Look for a bootstrap or material implementation.
On the client-side, it is possible with extension. I reckon this isn't helpful to you; but I'm including this information for future readers.
I'm trying to get DOH testing working for my company's upcoming platform, but I can't figure out the right combination of paths. Our file structure looks like this:
/dojo15
/release
/dojo
/dojo
dojo.js
dojoExt.js
/dojo
dojo.js
/util
/doh
/js
mainLib.js
/tests
base.js
This was created by our contractors, so unfortunately there are some things I have to figure out as I'm going along.
The "release" directory is what is used on our pages.
The "util" directory doesn't exist in our release directory. (I'd like to avoid having to make a copy of it there.)
I'm not entirely sure what they did with dojoExt.js there, but it seems to be required. I was able to make a simple "hello world" sort of test, but once I did dojo.require(js.mainLib), I got an error that dojo.behavior.add is not a method. So it seems to be they made a stripped-down dojo.js and put other required code in dojoExt.js.
My guess is that DOH is using the dojo in dojo15/dojo, but I need to include dojo15/release/dojo/dojo/dojoExt.js. I've tried every combination of dojoUrl, testModule, registerModulePath I can think of...also saw "boot" and "path" from other SE questions, even though I can't see in runner.html where they would even be used, but I tried throwing them in to see if they'd magically help anyway.
At the moment I don't really have the option to move code around, so I'm hoping to work this out with files where they currently are.
Did you try the bits I suggested over at a related question? We use the bits I detailed there to pull together a completely custom layout of dojo + util. Take a look at both boot and dojoUrl. I think it's runner.js that does most of the cunning stuff, rather than runner.html.
Is the problem that you can't arrange for dojoExt.js to get loaded? How does your other code arrange for it to get loaded? Is tests/base.js your test module?
The project I'm working on requires me to adapt the size of the elements on screen according to per-user setting. We're using Twitter bootstrap, so my first idea was to toy with the #basefont value, and it seems to do the trick.
However, I don't know how to access the user setting from the .less file. I tried using erb with .less.erb, but it looks like I don't have access to any code in my application.
Is there a way to get the value I'm looking for from the .less file, or - even better - a proper way to do this ?
Thanks for your time.
EDIT
Since I need to get the value at runtime, the way I tried won't work anyway, though I'm still interested on an answer. The only way I see to do what I want is to add a class according to the user setting. Again, I'd be glad to have alternatives.
I opted for css3 transform (and vendors implementation) property. It does the job, but seems to hit the GPU quite a lot. So still open to other answers. :)