I have a table, flight_schedule, that consists of a bunch of flight segments. Below I have a Terradata SQL query that creates a list of two segment itineraries between Chicago and Denver. i.e. each row has two flights that eventually get the passenger from Chicago to Denver. For example, the first row contains flight information on a leg from Chicago to Omaha and then a later leg from Omaha to Denver. This query works just fine.
SELECT A.flt_num, A.dprt_sta_cd, A.arrv_sta_cd, A.sch_dprt_dtml, A.sch_arrv_dtml,
B.flt_num, B.dprt_sta_cd, B.arrv_sta_cd, B.sch_dprt_dtml, B.sch_arrv_dtml
FROM
flight_schedule A
CROSS JOIN
flight_schedule B
WHERE
A.dprt_sta_cd = 'Chicago' AND
B.arrv_sta_cd = 'Denver' AND
A.arrv_sta_cd = B.dprt_sta_cd AND
A.sch_arrv_dtml < B.sch_dprt_dtml
ORDER BY B.sch_arrv_dtml;
I have another table, flight_seat_inventory, that consists of seats available in different cabins for each flight number. The query below aggregates total available seats for each flight number. This query is also A-OK.
SELECT flt_num, SUM(seat_cnt) as avail_seats
FROM flight_seat_inventory
GROUP BY flt_num;
I want to combine these two queries with a LEFT JOIN, twice, so that each flight has a corresponding avail_seats value. How can I do this?
For added clarity, I think my desired Select statement looks like this:
SELECT A.flt_num, A.dprt_sta_cd, A.arrv_sta_cd, A.sch_dprt_dtml, A.sch_arrv_dtml, C.avail_seats
B.flt_num, B.dprt_sta_cd, B.arrv_sta_cd, B.sch_dprt_dtml, B.sch_arrv_dtml, D.avail_seats
flight_schedule is HUGE, so I suspect it's more efficient to do the LEFT JOIN after the CROSS JOIN. Again, using Teradata SQL.
Thanks!
I needed to declare the second seats query as a temporary table using a WITH command before I did the LEFT JOIN:
WITH tempSeatsTable AS (
SELECT flt_num, SUM(seat_cnt) as avail_seats
FROM flight_seat_inventory
GROUP BY flt_num
)
SELECT
A.flt_num, A.dprt_sta_cd, A.arrv_sta_cd, A.sch_dprt_dtml, A.sch_arrv_dtml, C.avail_seats
B.flt_num, B.dprt_sta_cd, B.arrv_sta_cd, B.sch_dprt_dtml, B.sch_arrv_dtml, D.avail_seats
FROM
flight_schedule A
CROSS JOIN
flight_schedule B
LEFT JOIN
tempSeatsTable C
ON A.flt_num = C.flt_num
LEFT JOIN
tempSeatsTable D
ON B.flt_num = D.flt_num
WHERE
A.dprt_sta_cd = 'Chicago' AND
B.arrv_sta_cd = 'Denver' AND
A.arrv_sta_cd = B.dprt_sta_cd AND
A.sch_arrv_dtml < B.sch_dprt_dtml
ORDER BY B.sch_arrv_dtml;
Related
I'm trying to create a report from four tables: Master, Details, Labor, Costs. Currently I have a working report pulling columns from Jobs, Details, and Costs. Shared key for all tables is JobNumber. I'm looking to get a sum of the costs and a sum of the hours for each job. Here is my code that works with three tables:
SELECT
JC_JobMaster.JobNumber,
JC_JobMaster.JobDescription1 AS Customer_Name,
JC_JobMaster.JobDescription2 AS Work,
JC_JobSortCategories.SortCategory2 AS Work_Type,
JC_JobMaster.CustomerCode,
JC_JobMaster.ContractValue,
SUM(JC_JobBalancesCostDollars.CurrentPeriodAmount*-1) AS Gross_profit,
JC_JobSortCategories.SortCategory1 AS City,
JC_JobSortCategories.SortCategory4 AS Salesman
FROM
JC_JobMaster INNER JOIN
JC_JobSortCategories ON JC_JobMaster.JobNumber = JC_JobSortCategories.JobNumber INNER JOIN
JC_JobBalancesCostDollars ON JC_JobMaster.JobNumber = JC_JobBalancesCostDollars.JobNumber
WHERE
JC_JobMaster.JobNumber between '11566' and '13441' and
JC_JobSortCategories.SortCategory5 = 'AWARDED' and
JC_JobSortCategories.SortCategory2 = 'FPR' and
JC_JobSortCategories.SortCategory1 in ('1')
Group By
JC_JobMaster.JobNumber,
JC_JobMaster.JobDescription1,
JC_JobMaster.JobDescription2,
JC_JobSortCategories.SortCategory2,
JC_JobMaster.CustomerCode,
JC_JobMaster.ContractValue,
JC_JobSortCategories.SortCategory1,
JC_JobSortCategories.SortCategory4
Order by
JC_JobMaster.JobNumber
Everything works fine - this query returns 45 rows with easily-verified data. However, adding in a fourth table using an inner join INNER JOIN JC_JobCostDetailLabourHours ON JC_JobMaster.JobNumber = JC_JobCostDetailLabourHours.JobNumber only returns 7 rows, and the summed column Gross_profit is incorrect. Using a LEFT JOIN as opposed to INNER JOIN gives me the proper 45 rows, but the summed column is still incorrect. The LabourHours and BalancesCostDollars tables have multiple entries for each job number that I'm wanting summed. What am I doing wrong with adding the fourth table, or did I just happen to get the right result by accident with the first summed column?
How to print all readers, where time between last two borrows is more than 2 months?
select
name, surname, max(k1.borrow_date)
from
k_person
join
k_reader using(person_id)
join
k_rent_books k1 using(reader_id)
join
k_rent_books k2 using(reader_id)
where
months_between(add_months((k1.borrow_date),-2),k2.borrow_date) > 2
group by
name, surname, person_id
order by
surname;
But i dont know how to say that compare two last dates.
Thanks for help.
Due to some restrictions with the USING clause (e.g. ORA-25154), I had to switch the join syntax, but here's one option. Basically the way to find the last and second last borrow dates for a reader is as follows:
Join to one copy of the K_RENT_BOOKS (K_RB1) table and finds the row with the latest BORROW_DATE for the current reader (from K_READER).
Next, it joins to a second copy of K_RENT_BOOKS (K_RB2), again for
the current reader and finds the latest BORROW_DATE that is not the
one found in the first copy (K_FB1).
Keep the resulting joined record if the last borrow date is two
months after the 2nd last borrow date.
--
select k_p.name, k_rb1.borrow_date, k_rb2.borrow_date
from k_person k_p
inner join
k_reader k_r
on k_p.person_id = k_r.person_id
inner join
k_rent_books k_rb1
on k_rb1.reader_id = k_r.reader_id
inner join
k_rent_books k_rb2
on k_rb2.reader_id = k_r.reader_id
where k_rb1.borrow_date = (select max(borrow_date)
from k_rent_books k_rb3
where k_rb3.reader_id = k_r.reader_id
)
and k_rb2.borrow_date = (select max(borrow_date)
from k_rent_books k_rb4
where k_rb4.reader_id = k_r.reader_id
and k_rb4.borrow_date <> k_rb1.borrow_date
)
and months_between(k_rb1.borrow_date, k_rb2.borrow_date) > 2
There are other ways of doing this that may be faster (e.g. using a with clause that generates the last and second last borrow dates for all readers) but hopefully this provides a starting point.
I have three tables that need to be joined in order to get monthly inventory data in return.
Table 1: TargetInventory
Table 2: TargetValue
Table 3: TargetWeight
[TargetInventory] does not change after being added the first time.
[TargetValue] is just a small table that includes prices of various types of metal.
[TargetWeight] is updated monthly as part of our inventory process. We INSERT new data, we never UPDATE old data.
Below is the relationship between these tables. (Sorry, I don't have the reputation points to post an image. Brand new here, so hopefully this makes sense.)
(* = UniqueKey)
--TargetValue-- --TargetInventory-- --TargetWeight--
*MaterialID <===| *TargetID <=====| *ID
Material |===> MaterialID |===> TargetID
PricePerOunce Length RecordDate
Density Width Weight
Thickness
DateInInventory
The TargetWeight table contains multiple records for TargetID (since a new one is added every month at inventory). That's good for me to track historical usage, but for the current inventory value, I only need the most recent TargetWeight.Weight to be returned.
I don't know how to do a CROSS APPLY from within another INNER JOIN, so I'm at a loss for how to do this (without switching to mySQL and just doing a LIMIT 1...)
I think it needs to look something like what's below, but I'm not sure how to finish the query.
SELECT
TargetInventory.TargetID AS TargetInventory_TargetID,
TargetInventory.MaterialID AS TargetInventory_MaterialID,
TargetInventory.Length,
TargetInventory.Width,
TargetInventory.Thickness,
TargetValue.MaterialID AS TargetValue_MaterialID,
TargetValue.PricePerOunce,
TargetValue.Density,
TargetWeight.ID,
TargetWeight.TargetID AS TargetWeight_TargetID,
TargetWeight.RecordDate,
TargetWeight.Weight
FROM
(TargetValue
INNER JOIN TargetInventory
ON TargetValue.[MaterialID] = TargetInventory.[MaterialID]
)
CROSS APPLY (
SELECT TOP 1 *
FROM .....
)
The following query works for me in Access 2010. It uses an INNER JOIN on a subquery to take the place of the CROSS APPLY (which Access SQL doesn't support). It assumes that there will be no more than one [TargetWeight] record for a given (TargetID, RecordDate):
SELECT
TargetInventory.TargetID AS TargetInventory_TargetID,
TargetInventory.MaterialID AS TargetInventory_MaterialID,
TargetInventory.Length,
TargetInventory.Width,
TargetInventory.Thickness,
TargetValue.MaterialID AS TargetValue_MaterialID,
TargetValue.PricePerOunce,
TargetValue.Density,
LatestWeight.ID,
LatestWeight.TargetID AS TargetWeight_TargetID,
LatestWeight.RecordDate,
LatestWeight.Weight
FROM
(
TargetValue
INNER JOIN
TargetInventory
ON TargetValue.[MaterialID] = TargetInventory.[MaterialID]
)
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT tw.*
FROM
TargetWeight AS tw
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT TargetID, MAX(RecordDate) AS LatestDate
FROM TargetWeight
GROUP BY TargetID
) AS latest
ON latest.TargetID=tw.TargetID
AND latest.LatestDate=tw.RecordDate
) AS LatestWeight
ON LatestWeight.TargetID = TargetInventory.TargetID
Alternative approach specifically for Access 2010 or later
If the above query bogs down with a large number of rows in [TargetWeight] then another possible solution for Access 2010+ would be to add a Yes/No field named [Current] to the [TargetWeight] table and use the following After Insert data macro to ensure that only the latest record for each [TargetID] is flagged as [Current]:
Once that is done, the query would simply be
SELECT
TargetInventory.TargetID AS TargetInventory_TargetID,
TargetInventory.MaterialID AS TargetInventory_MaterialID,
TargetInventory.Length,
TargetInventory.Width,
TargetInventory.Thickness,
TargetValue.MaterialID AS TargetValue_MaterialID,
TargetValue.PricePerOunce,
TargetValue.Density,
TargetWeight.ID,
TargetWeight.TargetID AS TargetWeight_TargetID,
TargetWeight.RecordDate,
TargetWeight.Weight
FROM
(
TargetValue
INNER JOIN
TargetInventory
ON TargetValue.[MaterialID] = TargetInventory.[MaterialID]
)
INNER JOIN
TargetWeight
ON TargetInventory.TargetID = TargetWeight.TargetID
WHERE TargetWeight.Current = True;
To maximize performance, the [TargetWeight].[TargetID] and [TargetWeight].[Current] fields should be indexed.
SELECT TargetInventory.TargetID AS TargetInventory_TargetID,
TargetInventory.MaterialID AS TargetInventory_MaterialID,
TargetInventory.Length,
TargetInventory.Width,
TargetInventory.Thickness,
TargetValue.MaterialID AS TargetValue_MaterialID,
TargetValue.PricePerOunce,
TargetValue.Density, Weight.ID,
Weight.TargetID AS TargetWeight_TargetID,
Weight.RecordDate,
Weight.Weight
FROM TargetInventory
INNER JOIN TargetValue ON TargetValue.[MaterialID] = TargetInventory.[MaterialID]
CROSS APPLY (
SELECT TOP 1 *
FROM TargetWeight
WHERE TargetID = TargetInventory.TargetID
ORDER BY RecordDate DESC
) AS Weight
I have 2 queries which display 2 different values but the results from one query are unexpected.
Query1:
SELECT SUM(T.amount_reward_user) AS total_grouping
FROM fem_user_cards UC
LEFT JOIN fem_transactions T USING(card_number)
LEFT JOIN fem_company_login FCL
ON T.fem_company_login_id=FCL.fem_company_login_id
WHERE UC.fem_user_login_id=193
AND FCL.grouping<>0 AND T.from_group=1 AND T.authorised=1
GROUP BY UC.fem_user_login_id
The above query gives me the total reward amount for the user 193. Here the condition is the reward amount which i am getting out of this query must be from the group which is evident from T.from_group=1. So this seems to be working correct.
Query2:
SELECT SUM(T.amount_reward_user) AS total_grouping
FROM fem_transactions T
LEFT JOIN fem_company_login FCL
ON T.fem_company_login_id=FCL.fem_company_login_id
WHERE T.fem_user_login_id=193
AND FCL.grouping<>0 AND T.from_group=1 AND T.authorised=1
In this query even though T.from_group=1 it is adding up the reward amount from T.from_group=0 as well. Does anyone know what the problem is?
For example:
The user 193 purchased something in a company A(in the group so T.from_group=1) for $5 and got the reward of $1 and bought another product for $5 from company B(out of group so T.from_group=0) and get a reward of $1 again.
My expected output is: 1
I am getting:
Query1: 1
Query2: 2
I could simply use the query 1 but i have issues with other things when i use that so i need to understand what is going on really!!
My aim is to get the sum of reward amounts from the database. The sum should be of different grouped companies. That is if we have 5 different grouped companies and user is using his moneycard in those 5 companies, I should get 5 different totals. If he used his card in any company which is not in the group the total should not include transaction from this un-grouped company. I have C++ code to feed the database as transactions happens. My fem_transactions table has company_id, amount_reward_user, fem_user_login_id, from_group (this decides if the user has transacted out of the group or from the group), authorized etc..
I want to filter the amount spent by the user 193 in each group separately.
I understood the JOINTS concepts now but i need to know why t.from_group on the second query is ignored ?
The problem is that you have criteria in the Where clause against columns on the right side of the Left Join. In the both queries, this is And FCL.grouping <> 0. This effectively changes the Left Join to an Inner Join since you are in requiring that an FCL.grouping value exist and not be zero (or Null). What you want, I think, is to move that criteria into the On clause:
First query:
Select Sum(T.amount_reward_user) AS total_grouping
From fem_user_cards UC
Left Join fem_transactions T Using(card_number)
Left Join fem_company_login FCL
On FCL.fem_company_login_id = T.fem_company_login_id
And FCL.grouping<>0
Where UC.fem_user_login_id=193
And T.from_group=1
And T.authorised=1
Group By UC.fem_user_login_id
Second query
Select Sum(T.amount_reward_user) AS total_grouping
From fem_transactions T
Left Join fem_company_login FCL
On FCL.fem_company_login_id = T.fem_company_login_id
And FCL.grouping<>0
Where UC.fem_user_login_id=193
And T.from_group=1
And T.authorised=1
What is not clear in all of this is what you are trying to achieve. I.e., why even have the Left Joins in either query if you are not filtering on them. If you do specifically want to filter for rows where there is a fem_company_login value with a grouping value <> 0, then use your original query and change the Left Join to an Inner Join. If you want to filter for people that either have a grouping value <> 0 or no value at all then do something like:
Select Sum(T.amount_reward_user) AS total_grouping
From fem_transactions T
Left Join fem_company_login FCL
On FCL.fem_company_login_id = T.fem_company_login_id
Where UC.fem_user_login_id=193
And T.from_group=1
And T.authorised=1
And ( FCL.PrimaryKeyColumn Is Null Or FCL.grouping <> 0 )
Need help on a query using sql server 2005
I am having two tables
code
chargecode
chargeid
orgid
entry
chargeid
itemNo
rate
I need to list all the chargeids in entry table if it contains multiple entries having different chargeids
which got listed in code table having the same charge code.
data :
code
100,1,100
100,2,100
100,3,100
101,11,100
101,12,100
entry
1,x1,1
1,x2,2
2,x3,2
11,x4,1
11,x5,1
using the above data , it query should list chargeids 1 and 2 and not 11.
I got the way to know how many rows in entry satisfies the criteria, but m failing to get the chargeids
select count (distinct chargeId)
from entry where chargeid in (select chargeid from code where chargecode = (SELECT A.chargecode
from code as A join code as B
ON A.chargecode = B.chargeCode and A.chargetype = B.chargetype and A.orgId = B.orgId AND A.CHARGEID = b.CHARGEid
group by A.chargecode,A.orgid
having count(A.chargecode) > 1)
)
First off: I apologise for my completely inaccurate original answer.
The solution to your problem is a self-join. Self-joins are used when you want to select more than one row from the same table. In our case we want to select two charge IDs that have the same charge code:
SELECT DISTINCT c1.chargeid, c2.chargeid FROM code c1
JOIN code c2 ON c1.chargeid != c2.chargeid AND c1.chargecode = c2.chargecode
JOIN entry e1 ON e1.chargeid = c1.chargeid
JOIN entry e2 ON e2.chargeid = c2.chargeid
WHERE c1.chargeid < c2.chargeid
Explanation of this:
First we pick any two charge IDs from 'code'. The DISTINCT avoids duplicates. We make sure they're two different IDs and that they map to the same chargecode.
Then we join on 'entry' (twice) to make sure they both appear in the entry table.
This approach gives (for your example) the pairs (1,2) and (2,1). So we also insist on an ordering; this cuts to result set down to just (1,2), as you described.