Following is the sequence in my code:
1. GetSdrRepositoryInfo
2. ReserveSdrRepository
3. GetSdr command in iteration where every GetSDR command response gives next record ID to be inquired.
However, GetSDR command in some server and for some record IDs throws "Reservation Canceled or Invalid Reservation ID". Please help in how to overcome this exception and what should be the next step.
There is nothing inherently "wrong" with getting an "Reservation Canceled" or "Invalid Reservation ID" error. As other software on the system may be using the SDR, it is possible for the service processor to return such an error. You should simply retrieve a new reservation id and retry the Get SDR request.
If you are getting the error repeatedly on the same record ID, then there is likely a bug/error with your motherboard. You should contact the vendor to fix their firmware.
Related
Hello everyone and thanks for reading this problem.
I have a solution in C# using the zkemkeeper dll to get the records from some access control devices. When I "ping" them, there isn't any problem, but when I try to connect to them (Using my solution or the standalone demo to get attendance) I get the "-307" error with the "Unable to connect message". That's not very clear and I would really aprecciate if someone can explain what this error is (please!!!!). I would really like to understand these errors myself, so, where can I find all the definition of these errors?
In short:
1.- What is the problem regarding the "-307" error?
2.- Is there any place where all these errors are documented?
Thanks in advance!!
enter image description here
maybe you should check your device, you can ping them
Attention
The dwErrorCode parameter specifies the error code. The values are described as follows:
During connection, the following error codes may be returned:
0 Connected successfully
-1 Failed to invoke the interface
-2 Failed to initialize
-3 Failed to initialize parameters
-5 Data mode read error
-6 Wrong password
-7 Reply error
-8 Receive timeout
-307 Connection timeout
In invoking other interfaces, the following error codes may be returned:
-201 Device is busy
-199 New Mode
-103 device send back error of face version error
-102 face template version error, like 8.0 face template send to 7.0 device
-101 malloc memory failed
-100 Not supported or the data does not exist
-10 The length of transmitted data is incorrect
-5 Data already exists
-4 Insufficient space
-3 Wrong size
-2 File read/write error
-1 The SDK is not initialized and needs to be reconnected
0 Data not found or duplicate data
1 Correct operation
4 Parameter error
101 Buffer allocation error
102 repeat invoking
Underlying error codes:
-12001 Socket creation timeout (connection timeout)
-12002 Insufficient memory
-12003 Wrong Socket version
-12004 Not TCP protocol
-12005 Waiting timeout
-12006 Data transmission timeout
-12007 Data reading timeout
-12008 Failed to read Socket
-13009 Waiting event error
-13010 Exceeded retry attempts
-13011 Wrong reply ID
-13012 Checksum error
-13013 Waiting event timeout
-13014 DIRTY_DATA
-13015 Buffer size too small
-13016 Wrong data length
-13017 Invalid data read1
-13018 Invalid data read2
-13019 Invalid data read3
-13020 Data loss
-13021 Memory initialization error
-15001 Invoking return value of status key issued by SetShortkey interface repeatedly
-15002 Invoking return value of description issued by SetShortkey interface repeatedly
-15003 The two level menu is not opened in the device, and the data need not be issued
getdevicedata and setdevicedata invocation error codes
-15100 Error occurs in obtaining table structure
-15101 The condition field does not exist in the table structure
-15102 Inconsistency in the total number of fields
-15103 Inconsistency in sorting fields
-15104 Memory allocation error
-15105 Data parsing error
-15106 Data overflow as the transmitted data exceeds 4M
-15108 Invalid options
-15113 Data parsing error: table ID not found
-15114 A data exception is returned as the number of fields is smaller than or equal to 0
-15115 A data exception is returned as the total number of table fields is inconsistent with the
total number of fields of the data
Firmware error codes:
2000 Return OK to execute
-2001 Return Fail to execute command
-2002 Return Data
-2003 Regstered event occorred
-2004 Return REPEAT Command
-2005 Return UNAUTH Command
0xffff Return Unknown Command
-4999 Device parameter read error
-4998 Device parameter write error
-4997 The length of the data sent by the software to the device is incorrect
228
229
-4996 A parameter error exists in the data sent by the software to the device
-4995 Failed to add data to the database
-4994 Failed to update the database
-4993 Failed to read data from the database
-4992 Failed to delete data in the database
-4991 Data not found in the database
-4990 The data amount in the database reaches the limit
-4989 Failed to allocate memory to a session
-4988 Insufficient space in the memory allocated to a session
-4987 The memory allocated to a session overflows
-4986 File does not exist
-4985 File read failure
-4984 File write failure
-4983 Failed to calculate the hash value
-4982 Failed to allocate memory
Note
This interface is applicable to the new architecture firmware.
We are trying to replicate data from AlloyDB to Bigquery using Datastream.
We Get "An unknown error occurred. Please try again. If the error persists, contact Google support."
In the Datastream console --> objects list, we see all source tables with Object Status "Failed" and Backfill status "Completed".
In Bigquery we see only a subset of the tables (not all the "Completed" objects were synced).
In the Logs Explorer I can see this error on BQ:
I also see this error: error: {
code: 11
message: "Unsupported primary key column either does not exist or is a pseudocolumn at [1:401]"
}
The column referred in the error is of type enum.
The desired situation is having all the AlloyDB tables replicated into Bigquery.
The error message is not very informative...
What does it mean?
What would be the best way to go about troubleshooting this?
We're actively working on making these error messages be more informative, and improvements are continuously being rolled out as we identify more edge cases. Assuming you followed all the steps in the documentation, then you may need to open a ticket with support for further investigation. If a support ticket isn't an option, you can still report the issue using the public issue tracker
I just had this same issue but connecting to a PostgreSQL in AWS RDS:
Beginning with Postgres 10, passwords are encrypted using SCRAM-SHA-256 in PostgreSQL. Google DataStream still expects MD5 password encryption, or it will generate an "unknown error" in the logs and fail the backfills.
You'll need to update your postgresql.conf (or RDS Cluster Parameter Group if you're using AWS like me):
password_encryption = 'MD5'
Restart the database and make sure the parameter has changed with:
SHOW password_encryption;
Reset the password of your users:
ALTER USER "{username}" with password '{password}';
More info from the PostgreSQL docs: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/auth-password.html
I have a Splunk search which returns several logs of the same exception, one for each ID number (from a batch process). I have no problem extracting the field from the log with reg-ex and can build a single alert for each ID number easily.
Slack Message: "Reference number $result.extractedField$ has failed processing."
Since the error happens in batches, sending out an alert for every reference ID that failed would clutter up my Slack channel very quickly. Is it possible to collect all of the extracted fields and set the alert to send only one message? Like this...
Slack Message: "Reference numbers $result.listOfExtractedFields$ have failed to process."
To have a consolidated alert you need consolidated search results. Do that like this:
index=the_index_youre_searching "the class where the error occurs" "the exception you're looking for"
| stats values(*) as * by referenceID
Be sure to select the "Once" Trigger Condition in the alert setup.
I have a transformation where i call a REST client to post to an API. The API is expected to return a Reference number, which i use to log and use it for other functionalities.
An exception occurred and i received a status code 200 but the response was "Object reference not set to an instance of an object." which is not a number. The next step after Rest client expects a number but since the response is a text fails. (Rest client 2 to Modified Javascript 2 in the image)
In this scenario is it possible to have an intermediate step which checks if the response is a number else should not allow to go to next step?
Also, a related question. this transformation is run for each record from previous transformation. If the if condition fails, then it should continue with the next record.
There are multiple options.
One of the simplest ones is to insert a Select Values step to convert the field to a number and then add a Error handling hop connected to a Dummy step.
Rows that fail the data type conversion cause errors and are then sent through the error handling hop to the dummy step and will not be sent to the javascript step.
I have implemented a loop job in pentaho kettle. This job has "Simple evaluation" entry that checks if it should rerun the previous transformation or not based on a condition. The variable used in condition, is being set using "Set variable" step in previous transformation. The problem is that first time job runs perfectly, but when server is restarted, job stuck and throws error:
Unexpected error occurred while launching entry.
This error comes for both transformation and "Simple evaluation", and then job stuck in loop forever.
So I have two questions here:
Why does this error occur?
If an error occurs, transformation should stop but it is forwarding the flow to "Simple evaluation" and vice versa.
Below is the image of job :