I am using the latest adal.js to query data from MicroSoft Dynamics CRM. The code gets into an infinite loop when renewing the token.
Additionally after loging into microsoft and being redirected back to my page the adaljs tries to refresh the token.
Note - this is javascript in an ASP.NET MVC web app. It is not using angular js.
This is also similar to the SO question Adal & Adal-Angular - refresh token infinite loop
var endpoints = {
orgUri: "https://<tenant>.crm6.dynamics.com/"
};
var config = {
clientId: 'XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX',
tenant: '<tenant>.onmicrosoft.com',
redirectUri: 'http://localhost:53290/home/AuthenticatedByCrm/',
endpoints: endpoints,
cacheLocation: 'localStorage'
};
var x = new AuthenticationContext(config);
var isCallback = x.isCallback(window.location.hash);
if (isCallback) {
x.handleWindowCallback();
x.acquireToken(endpoints.orgUri, retrieveAccounts);
} else {
x.login();
}
function retrieveAccounts(error, token) {
// Handle ADAL Errors.
if (error || !token) {
alert('ADAL error occurred: ' + error);
return;
}
var req = new XMLHttpRequest();
req.open("GET", encodeURI(organizationURI + "/api/data/v8.0/accounts?$select=name,address1_city&$top=10"), true);
//Set Bearer token
req.setRequestHeader("Authorization", "Bearer " + token);
req.setRequestHeader("Accept", "application/json");
req.setRequestHeader("Content-Type", "application/json; charset=utf-8");
req.setRequestHeader("OData-MaxVersion", "4.0");
req.setRequestHeader("OData-Version", "4.0");
req.onreadystatechange = function () {
if (this.readyState == 4 /* complete */) {
req.onreadystatechange = null;
if (this.status == 200) {
var accounts = JSON.parse(this.response).value;
//renderAccounts(accounts);
}
else {
var error = JSON.parse(this.response).error;
console.log(error.message);
//errorMessage.textContent = error.message;
}
}
};
req.send();
}
The Active Directory Authentication Library (ADAL) for JavaScript helps you to use Azure AD for handling authentication in your single page applications. This library is optimized for working together with AngularJS.
Based on the investigation, this issue is caused by the handleWindowCallback. The response not able to run into the branch for if ((requestInfo.requestType === this.REQUEST_TYPE.RENEW_TOKEN) && window.parent && (window.parent !== window)) since it is not used in the Angular enviroment.
To integrate Azure AD with MVC application, I suggest that you using the Active Directory Authentication Library. And you can refer the code sample here.
Update
if (isCallback) {
// x.handleWindowCallback();
var requestInfo=x.getRequestInfo(window.location.hash);
//get the token provided resource. to get the id_token, we need to pass the client id
var token = x.getCachedToken("{clientId}")
x.saveTokenFromHash(requestInfo);
} else {
x.login();
}
Related
Trying to allow a CLI I'm developing to "login" via web browser and obtain an access token for the user's account, similar to how gcloud and github's CLIs do it. I realize it'll be using the OAuth Authorization Code flow.
But what about the client_secret?
I've found out that github cli just doesn't care about exposing it, and it's right there in the source code: https://github.com/cli/cli/blob/6a8deb1f5a9f2aa0ace2eb154523f3b9f23a05ae/internal/authflow/flow.go#L25-L26
Why is this not a problem? or is it?
I'm not yet using OAuth for the cli's login
STANDARDS
The CLI app is a native public client and should use authorization code flow + PKCE rather than a fixed client secret. It should also follow the flow from
RFC8252 and receive the browser response using a local HTTP (loopback) URI.
THIS IMPLEMENTATION
Looks like the github code here uses a client secret and does not use PKCE. You may have to provide a client secret if using this library, but it cannot be kept secret from users. Any user could easily view it, eg with an HTTP proxy tool.
CODE
If the infrastructure enables you to follow the standards, aim for something similar to this Node.js code.
* The OAuth flow for a console app
*/
export async function login(): Promise<string> {
// Set up the authorization request
const codeVerifier = generateRandomString();
const codeChallenge = generateHash(codeVerifier);
const state = generateRandomString();
const authorizationUrl = buildAuthorizationUrl(state, codeChallenge);
return new Promise<string>((resolve, reject) => {
let server: Http.Server | null = null;
const callback = async (request: Http.IncomingMessage, response: Http.ServerResponse) => {
if (server != null) {
// Complete the incoming HTTP request when a login response is received
response.write('Login completed for the console client ...');
response.end();
server.close();
server = null;
try {
// Swap the code for tokens
const accessToken = await redeemCodeForAccessToken(request.url!, state, codeVerifier);
resolve(accessToken);
} catch (e: any) {
reject(e);
}
}
}
// Start an HTTP server and listen for the authorization response on a loopback URL, according to RFC8252
server = Http.createServer(callback);
server.listen(loopbackPort);
// Open the system browser to begin authentication
Opener(authorizationUrl);
});
}
/*
* Build a code flow URL for a native console app
*/
function buildAuthorizationUrl(state: string, codeChallenge: string): string {
let url = authorizationEndpoint;
url += `?client_id=${encodeURIComponent(clientId)}`;
url += `&redirect_uri=${encodeURIComponent(redirectUri)}`;
url += '&response_type=code';
url += `&scope=${scope}`;
url += `&state=${encodeURIComponent(state)}`;
url += `&code_challenge=${encodeURIComponent(codeChallenge)}`;
url += '&code_challenge_method=S256';
return url;
}
/*
* Swap the code for tokens using PKCE and return the access token
*/
async function redeemCodeForAccessToken(responseUrl: string, requestState: string, codeVerifier: string): Promise<string> {
const [code, responseState] = getLoginResult(responseUrl);
if (responseState !== requestState) {
throw new Error('An invalid authorization response state was received');
}
let body = 'grant_type=authorization_code';
body += `&client_id=${encodeURIComponent(clientId)}`;
body += `&redirect_uri=${encodeURIComponent(redirectUri)}`;
body += `&code=${encodeURIComponent(code)}`;
body += `&code_verifier=${encodeURIComponent(codeVerifier)}`;
const options = {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'
},
body,
};
const response = await fetch(tokenEndpoint, options);
if (response.status >= 400) {
const details = await response.text();
throw new Error(`Problem encountered redeeming the code for tokens: ${response.status}, ${details}`);
}
const data = await response.json();
return data.access_token;
}
We have a ASP.Net Core application that authenticates against a standalone Identity Server 4. The ASP.Net Core app implements a few SignalR Hubs and is working fine when we use the self hosted SignalR Service. When we try to use the Azure SignalR Service, it always returns 401 in the negotiation requests. The response header also states that
"Bearer error="invalid_token", error_description="The signature key
was not found"
I thought the JWT-Configuration is correct because it works in the self hosted mode but it looks like, our ASP.Net Core application needs information about the signature key (certificate) that our identity server uses to sign the tokens. So I tried to use the same method like our identity server, to create the certificate and resolve it. Without luck :-(
This is what our JWT-Configuration looks like right now:
services.AddAuthentication("Bearer")
.AddJwtBearer("Bearer", options => {
var appSettings = Configuration.Get<AppSettingsModel>();
options.Authority = appSettings.Authority;
options.RefreshOnIssuerKeyNotFound = true;
if (environment.IsDevelopment()) {
options.RequireHttpsMetadata = false;
}
options.TokenValidationParameters = new Microsoft.IdentityModel.Tokens.TokenValidationParameters {
ValidateAudience = false,
IssuerSigningKey = new X509SecurityKey(getSigningCredential()),
IssuerSigningKeyResolver = (string token, SecurityToken securityToken, string kid, TokenValidationParameters validationParameters) =>
new List<X509SecurityKey> { new X509SecurityKey(getSigningCredential()) }
};
options.Events = new JwtBearerEvents {
OnMessageReceived = context => {
var accessToken = "";
var headerToken = context.Request.Headers[HeaderNames.Authorization].ToString().Replace("Bearer ", "");
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(headerToken) && headerToken.Length > 0) {
accessToken = headerToken;
}
var queryStringToken = context.Request.Query["access_token"];
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(queryStringToken) && queryStringToken.ToString().Length > 0) {
accessToken = queryStringToken;
}
// If the request is for our hub...
var path = context.HttpContext.Request.Path;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(accessToken) && path.StartsWithSegments("/hubs")) {
context.Token = accessToken;
}
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
};
});
Update:
We also have a extended the signalR.DefaultHttpClient in our Angular Client and after playing around a bit, I noticed the application is working fine without it:
export class CustomSignalRHttpClientService extends signalR.DefaultHttpClient {
userSubscription: any;
token: string = "";
constructor(private authService: AuthorizeService) {
super(console); // the base class wants a signalR.ILogger
this.userSubscription = this.authService.accessToken$.subscribe(token => {
this.token = token
});
}
public async send(
request: signalR.HttpRequest
): Promise<signalR.HttpResponse> {
let authHeaders = {
Authorization: `Bearer ${this.token}`
};
request.headers = { ...request.headers, ...authHeaders };
try {
const response = await super.send(request);
return response;
} catch (er) {
if (er instanceof signalR.HttpError) {
const error = er as signalR.HttpError;
if (error.statusCode == 401) {
console.log('customSignalRHttpClient -> 401 -> TokenRefresh')
//token expired - trying a refresh via refresh token
this.token = await this.authService.getAccessToken().toPromise();
authHeaders = {
Authorization: `Bearer ${this.token}`
};
request.headers = { ...request.headers, ...authHeaders };
}
} else {
throw er;
}
}
//re try the request
return super.send(request);
}
}
The problem is, when the token expires while the application is not open (computer is in sleep mode e.g.), the negotiaton process is failing again.
I finally found and solved the problem. The difference of the authentication between "self hosted" and "Azure SignalR Service" is in the negotiation process.
Self Hosted:
SignalR-Javascript client authenticates against our own webserver with
the same token that our Javascript (Angular) app uses. It sends the
token with the negotiation request and all coming requests of the
signalR Http-Client.
Azure SignalR Service:
SignalR-Javascript client sends a negotiation request to our own
webserver and receives a new token for all coming requests against the
Azure SignalR Service.
So our problem was in the CustomSignalRHttpClientService. We changed the Authentication header to our own API-Token for all requests, including the requests against the Azure SignalR Service -> Bad Idea.
So we learned that the Azure SignalR Service is using it's own token. That also means the token can invalidate independently with our own token. So we have to handle 401 Statuscodes in a different way.
This is our new CustomSignalRHttpClientService:
export class CustomSignalRHttpClientService extends signalR.DefaultHttpClient {
userSubscription: any;
token: string = "";
constructor(private authService: AuthorizeService, #Inject(ENV) private env: IEnvironment, private router: Router,) {
super(console); // the base class wants a signalR.ILogger
this.userSubscription = this.authService.accessToken$.subscribe(token => {
this.token = token
});
}
public async send(
request: signalR.HttpRequest
): Promise<signalR.HttpResponse> {
if (!request.url.startsWith(this.env.apiUrl)) {
return super.send(request);
}
try {
const response = await super.send(request);
return response;
} catch (er) {
if (er instanceof signalR.HttpError) {
const error = er as signalR.HttpError;
if (error.statusCode == 401 && !this.router.url.toLowerCase().includes('onboarding')) {
this.router.navigate([ApplicationPaths.Login], {
queryParams: {
[QueryParameterNames.ReturnUrl]: this.router.url
}
});
}
} else {
throw er;
}
}
//re try the request
return super.send(request);
}
}
Our login-Route handles the token refresh (if required). But it could also happen, that our own api-token is still valid, but the Azure SignalR Service token is not. Therefore we handle some reconnection logic inside the service that creates the SignalR Connections like this:
this.router.events.pipe(
filter(event => event instanceof NavigationEnd)
).subscribe(async (page: NavigationEnd) => {
if (page.url.toLocaleLowerCase().includes(ApplicationPaths.Login)) {
await this.restartAllConnections();
}
});
hope this helps somebody
i am working on web site with razor pages. part of the site should be accessed only by registred users. decided to go with firebase authentification (now with login and password ).
created everything necessary in firebase.
created backend code for user registration - works well.
created area which requires authorisation
services.AddRazorPages(options =>
{
options.Conventions.AuthorizeAreaFolder("User", "/");
})
added jwt middleware
services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddJwtBearer(options =>
{
added code to login page to call firebase to get token
function login()
{
firebase.auth().signInWithEmailAndPassword(email, password)
.then((userCredential) => {
// Signed in
var user = userCredential.user;
// ...
alert("signed");
})
.catch((error) => {
var errorCode = error.code;
var errorMessage = error.message;
alert(errorMessage);
});
}
got token from firebase.
if i'd call service next, i'd simply put token in "bearer" header.
tried to find how to add header to current browser for future requests and failed.
as i understand, i need this token to be added to auth header ? how ? :)
feeling dumb ;( tried to google, but most samples are for using this token later with api calls.
or i am going in the wrong direction?
tia
ish
well. it seems that it is not possible to add bearer from js, so i switched to cookies
in startup.cs use cookies
options.Events = new JwtBearerEvents
{
OnMessageReceived = context =>
{
context.Token = context.Request.Cookies["bearer"];
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
};
code to login with firebase, put token into the cookie and redirect
function login() {
firebase.auth().signInWithEmailAndPassword(email, password)
.then((userCredential) => {
// Signed in
var user = userCredential.user;
firebase.auth().currentUser.getIdToken(true).then(function (idToken)
{
document.cookie = "bearer" + "=" + idToken;
window.location.href = "/user/index";
}).catch(function (error) {
// Handle error
});
alert("signed");
})
.catch((error) => {
var errorCode = error.code;
var errorMessage = error.message;
alert(errorMessage);
});
}
or the same with firebaseUI
function login1()
{
ui.start('#firebaseui-auth-container', {
signInSuccessUrl: '/User/index',
signInOptions: [
{
provider: firebase.auth.EmailAuthProvider.PROVIDER_ID,
requireDisplayName: false
}
],
callbacks:
{
signInSuccessWithAuthResult: function (authResult, redirectUrl)
{
var user = authResult.user;
firebase.auth().currentUser.getIdToken(true).then(function (idToken) {
document.cookie = "bearer" + "=" + idToken;
}).catch(function (error) {
// Handle error
});
return true;
}
}
});
}
I just need advise if this is feasible. I am developing an authorization for my Shopify app and I need to somewhat store the access token from shopify auth for future verification of my front-end app.
So the first end-point the shopify is calling is this one:
[HttpGet("install")]
public async Task<IActionResult> Install()
{
try
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
var queryString = Request.QueryString.Value;
var isValid = _shopifyService.VerifyRequest(queryString);
if (isValid)
{
var shopifyUrl = Request.Query["shop"];
var authUrl = _shopifyService.BuildAuthUrl(shopifyUrl,
$"{Request.Scheme}://{Request.Host.Value}/api/shopify/authorize",
Program.Settings.Shopify.AuthorizationScope);
return Redirect(authUrl);
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
var exceptionMessage = await ApiHelpers.GetErrors(ex, _localizer).ConfigureAwait(false);
ModelState.AddModelError(new ValidationResult(exceptionMessage));
}
ModelState.AddModelError(new ValidationResult(_localizer["InvalidAuthStore"]));
return BadRequest(ModelState.GetErrors());
}
This works fine and the result of this api call will actually redirect to same link to my api, but this one will authorize the app:
[HttpGet("authorize")]
public async Task<IActionResult> AuthorizeStore()
{
try
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
var code = Request.Query["code"];
var shopifyUrl = Request.Query["shop"];
var accessToken = await _shopifyService.AuthorizeStore(code, shopifyUrl).ConfigureAwait(false);
var identity = User.Identity as ClaimsIdentity;
identity.AddClaim(new Claim(Constants.Claims.AccessToken, accessToken));
// genereate the new ClaimsPrincipal
var claimsPrincipal = new ClaimsPrincipal(identity);
// store the original tokens in the AuthenticationProperties
var props = new AuthenticationProperties {
AllowRefresh = true,
ExpiresUtc = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow.AddDays(1),
IsPersistent = false,
IssuedUtc = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow,
};
// sign in using the built-in Authentication Manager and ClaimsPrincipal
// this will create a cookie as defined in CookieAuthentication middleware
await HttpContext.SignInAsync(CookieAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme, claimsPrincipal, props).ConfigureAwait(false);
Uri uri = new Uri($"{Program.Settings.Shopify.RedirectUrl}?token={accessToken}");
return Redirect(uri.ToString());
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
var exceptionMessage = await ApiHelpers.GetErrors(ex, _localizer).ConfigureAwait(false);
ModelState.AddModelError(new ValidationResult(exceptionMessage));
}
ModelState.AddModelError(new ValidationResult(_localizer["InvalidAuthStore"]));
return BadRequest(ModelState.GetErrors());
}
So the above api will authorize my app in shopify and will return an access token. The accessToken is the one I want to save in the claims identity with Cookie authentication type(this is without authorizing user credentials). Still no errors at that point and after calling the HttpContext.SignInAsync function, I can still view using debugger the newly added claims.
As, you can see in the code, after assigning claims, I call to redirect the app to front-end link(Note: front-end and back-end has different url)
In my front-end app, I have a Nuxt middleware that I put a logic to check the token received from back-end since I only pass the token to the front-end app using query params. Here's my middleware code:
export default function ({ app, route, next, store, error, req }) {
if (process.browser) {
const shopifyAccessToken = store.get('cache/shopifyAccessToken', null)
if (!shopifyAccessToken && route.query.token) {
// if has token on query params but not yet in cache, store token and redirect
store.set('cache/shopifyAccessToken', route.query.token)
app.router.push({
path: '/',
query: {}
})
// verify access token on the route
app.$axios
.get(`/shopify/verifyaccess/${route.query.token}`)
.catch((err) => {
error(err)
})
} else if (!shopifyAccessToken && !route.query.token) {
// if does not have both, throw error
error({
statusCode: 401,
message: 'Unauthorized access to this app'
})
}
} else {
next()
}
}
In my middleware, when the route has query params equal to token= It calls another api to verify the accessToken saved in my claims identity:
[HttpGet("verifyaccess/{accessToken}")]
public async Task<IActionResult> VerifyAccess(string accessToken)
{
try
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{
var principal = HttpContext.User;
if (principal?.Claims == null)
return Unauthorized(_localizer["NotAuthenticated"]);
var accessTokenClaim = principal.FindFirstValue(Constants.Claims.AccessToken);
if (accessToken == accessTokenClaim)
{
return Ok();
}
else
{
return Unauthorized(_localizer["NotAuthenticated"]);
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
var exceptionMessage = await ApiHelpers.GetErrors(ex, _localizer).ConfigureAwait(false);
ModelState.AddModelError(new ValidationResult(exceptionMessage));
}
ModelState.AddModelError(new ValidationResult(_localizer["InvalidAuthStore"]));
return BadRequest(ModelState.GetErrors());
}
Looking at the code above, it always fails me because the claims identity that I saved on the authorize endpoint was not there or in short the ClaimsIdentity is always empty.
Here's how I register the Cookie config:
private void ConfigureAuthCookie(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddAuthentication(option =>
{
option.DefaultAuthenticateScheme = CookieAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme;
option.RequireAuthenticatedSignIn = false;
})
.AddCookie(options => {
options.ExpireTimeSpan = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(60);
options.SlidingExpiration = true;
options.Cookie.Name = "shopifytoken";
});
services.Configure<CookiePolicyOptions>(options =>
{
options.MinimumSameSitePolicy = SameSiteMode.None;
});
}
and I also put a app.UseAuthentication() and app.UseAuthorization() on my Startup.Configure
Please let me know if this seems confusing so I can revised it. My main goal here is to be able to access that accessToken that I saved in the ClaimsIdentity so that I can verify the token. The reason why I did this because currently the shopify does not have an API for verifying access token. So when a user access my app link like this one http://example.com/?token=<any incorrect token> then they can already access my app.
I'm tring to login via my own service. This is what I have now:
manifest.json
"background": {
"scripts": ["background.js"]
}
background.js
chrome.browserAction.onClicked.addListener(function(tab) {
chrome.tabs.create({
url: 'index.html'
});
});
index.html is where all the extension's logic resides. Here I have a function that starts authentication process:
function goLogin(callback)
{
var redirectUrl = chrome.identity.getRedirectURL('receiveToken');
chrome.identity.launchWebAuthFlow({
url: 'http://todolist.dev/app_dev.php/login?response_type=token&redirect_url=' + redirectUrl,
interactive: true
}, function(redirectUrl) {
if (!redirectUrl) {
return;
}
// Get an access token from the url and save it in localStorage
var queryString = decodeURIComponent(redirectUrl.substr(redirectUrl.indexOf('?') + 1));
var params = queryString.split('&');
var accessToken = null;
for (var i = 0; i < params.length; i++) {
params[i] = params[i].split('=');
if (params[i][0] == 'access_token') {
accessToken = params[i][1];
break;
}
}
localStorage.setItem('accessToken', accessToken);
callback();
});
}
The problem is that the popup with the service's login page sometimes doesn't open or opens and closes automatically with the response that the user didn't approve access. Sometimes when the popup opens and I try to login with wrong credentials several times, the popup closes automatically as well (with the same "you didn't approve access" response). In the backend I don't have any restrictions to a number of login attempts.
In the backend I have a FOSUserBundle with overridden AuthenticationSuccessHandler (it does what the default success handler does + returns an access token).