TypeScript 2 TSX preserve and noimplicitany error TS2602: the global type 'JSX.Element' does not exist - typescript2.0

I'm using TypeScript 2 and TSX with the preserve (not React) setting and with "noImplicitAny" enabled:
"noImplicitAny": true,
"jsx": "preserve"
The problem is, I keep getting this error when trying to build a simple TSX file:
error TS2602: JSX element implicitly has type 'any' because the global type 'JSX.Element' does not exist.
Here's an example of my TSX file:
'use strict';
import m from './m';
export default {
view() {
return (
<h1>Hello Mithril!</h1>
);
}
};
I'm trying to get TSX working with a non-React stack (Mithril). Thanks in advance!

Answer to original question: (how to solve the TS2602 error)
This is quite simple, as explained here:
As the errors say: "because the global type 'JSX.Element' does not exist"
you can define those types:
declare namespace JSX {
interface Element { }
interface IntrinsicElements { div: any; }
}
I recommend getting the react-jsx.d.ts file from DefinitelyTyped
You can use this file as a source for more complete typings (you'll need definitions for every sub-element in IntrinsicElements, i.e. div, p, a, etc.)
Getting farther with TSX and Mithril:
Once you've solved the typing issues, you'll find that you're not quite there. If you use the "jsx": "preserve" setting, the HTML code will be written directly in the generated js file, without any translation. This of course can't be loaded by a web browser (because it's a javascript file, not an html file).
I think there are two ways to make it work:
First solution that comes to mind is to use "jsx":"react" and write a small wrapper that will forward the calls to mithril, like this:
class React {
public static createElement(selector: string, attributes: object, ...children: Mithril.Child[]): Mithril.Child {
return m(selector, attributes, children);
}
}
This is the solution I'm currently using because it doesn't involve additional tools.
The other solution is to keep "jsx":"preserve" and use Babel, as described in mithril documentation, to translate the jsx file (which is generated by typescript from the tsx file) to a valid js file.
In the end, I've managed to make it work, but I found the process quite messy, with typescript/npm module system getting in the way to have JSX types extend Mithril types (so that your functions can return mithril-compatible types), etc. I had to modify the mithril typings (and drop npm #types/mithril), and add a few modules of my own.
I'm interested to know if someone solved this problem in an elegant and simple way!

Due to the lack of reputation it won't let me comment on youen's answer above so I'll include this in an answer of my own.
First of all, you can include this gist at the top of your project and name it something like mithril-jsx.d.ts so that typescript will see it as a type definition and won't compile it. The linked gist simply declares JSX.element as m.Vnode<any, any> and lists every HTML element under JSX.IntrinsicElements as any. Not a huge deal but a time saver.
Second, and the reason I'm even posting this: You do not need gulp or any other tool to compile .tsx files to mithril-using .js ones. All you have to do is specify these in your tsconfig.json
{
"compilerOptions": {
//...your other stuff here
"jsx": "react",
"jsxFactory": "m"
}
}
More information about the compiler options here: http://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/compiler-options.html

I am also developing with Mithril(2.0.3) and TypeScript(3.5.3).
TS7026: JSX element implicitly has type 'any' because no interface 'JSX.IntrinsicElements' exists.
This error message can be resolved by installing #types/react.
npm install --save-dev #types/react
tsconfig.json has the following settings.
{
"compilerOptions": {
"jsx": "react",
"jsxFactory": "m"
}
}

Related

Vue.js including non-npm JavaScript library

I'm a total beginner with Vue.js and struggling to find the answer to what I feel is a fairly basic need.
I have a JavaScript library that cannot be installed locally and must be imported via script tag in the index.html file in the old-fashioned way:
<script src="https://foo.bar/scriptyscripts.js"></script>
This library has a bunch of methods in it that I need to use in various spots throughout my app, so it's not going to be a problem to load it globally. The issue I'm facing is that it's loading fine, but the methods are not being recognised in components.
I can use the methods and whatnot if I put them all in a script tag in the index.html however doing that rather defeats the whole point of having components.
Can anyone help me with the step that I'm missing to register all of the methods in this loaded js file so my components don't get mad?
Specifically, the script contains require.js and a collection of other things including JQuery.
Including the library makes the method 'require' available, which is used to load other modules on demand - the example being "js/qlik" in the below snippet. "js/qlik" loads JQuery and a stack of stuff associated with "qlik".
//async login method here. not relevant to this problem
login().then(() => {
require.config({
baseUrl:
(config.isSecure ? "https://" : "http://") +
config.host +
(config.port ? ":" + config.port : "") +
config.prefix +
"resources",
webIntegrationId: config.webIntegrationId,
});
//Load js/qlik after authentication is successful
require(["js/qlik"], function (qlik) {
qlik.on("error", function (error) {
$("#popupText").append(error.message + "<br>");
$("#popup").fadeIn(1000);
});
$("#closePopup").click(function () {
$("#popup").hide();
});
var app = qlik.openApp("caa866be-c8e1-44c8-b67b-dac9d24421fa", config);
});
});
The problem I have is that if I load this library in the index.html file and then try to execute the methods in the snippet above in any component, it does not know that the methods are available.
I see:
'Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'js/qlik'
66:11 error '$' is not defined
which indicates that the components are unaware of the methods because they're not registered like they would be if I were importing a packaged afterinstalling it locally via NPM
i.e. Your original js code: function abc(){// sth...}
What you need: window.abc = ()=>{// sth...}
Even if you want it in Vue dom.
You should add vue.prototype.abc = ()=>{//sth...}

Vuelayers vl-style-icon syntax

I've been looking through the vuelayers documentation and have found little info on to use the vl-style-icon module, which is quite important if you want to create icons on your vuelayer map.
I'm pretty sure I have proper syntax when it comes to using it but marker.png won't load in through it. I've tried accessing it as just a normal image and it works fine so it is to my assumption that it's something with my syntax.
Here is my code:
<template>
<vl-map :load-tiles-while-animating="true" :load-tiles-while-interacting="true" style="height: 400px">
<vl-view :zoom.sync="zoom" :center.sync="center" :rotation.sync="rotation" projection="EPSG:4326"></vl-view>
<vl-feature v-for="crime in crimePoints" :key="crime.id">
<vl-geom-point :coordinates="crime.coords"></vl-geom-point>
<vl-style-box>
<vl-style-icon src="./marker.png" :scale="0.4" :anchor="[0.5, 1]"></vl-style-icon>
</vl-style-box>
</vl-feature>
<vl-layer-tile>
<vl-source-osm></vl-source-osm>
</vl-layer-tile>
</vl-map>
</template>
vl-style-box and vl-style-icon are the main points here. I have also checked to see if the points come up without vl-style-box and they do. What could be wrong with my code?
You can try like this:
<vl-style-icon :src="require('./marker.png')" :scale="0.4" :anchor="[0.5, 1]"></vl-style-icon>
</vl-style-box>
If you used Vue CLI to create your vue project include this in your vue.config.js file. First section tells webpack to parse url attribute on custom tags other than what is already configured (Source).
module.exports = {
chainWebpack: config => {
config.module.rule('vue').use('vue-loader').tap(options => {
options.transformAssetUrls = {
'vl-style-icon': 'src',
...options.transformAssetUrls,
};
return options;
});
}
}
Run the following command to verify the correct vue-loader configuration is there
Source
vue inspect > output.js

How to add custom HTML tag TSX

While trying to render a custom HTML tag <my-element> in JSX an error displayed
Property does not exist on type 'JSX.IntrinsicElements'
I've found some examples of how to do that using
declare global {
interface IntrinsicElements {
"my-element": any
}
}
but this produced another error:
ES2015 module syntax is preferred over custom TypeScript modules and namespaces #typescript-eslint/no-namespace
I've found the useful link to Typescript guide which helped me a lot:
The main idea is to create a new file with extension d.ts (e.g. myModule.d.ts) which should contain the following
export as namespace JSX;
export interface IntrinsicElements {
"my-element": any;
}

RquireJS with Module in TypeScript

I'm studing TypeScript and RequireJS.
I want to simple module require but module type information missing.
Is there smart solution in such situation?
requirejs(['backbone'], (Backbone) => {
// In this function.
// Backbone is 'any'
});
requirejs(['backbone'], (BackboneRef: Backbone) => {
// error : Type reference cannot refer to container
// 型参照でコンテナー 'Backbone' を参照できません。
});
To do so you need to do the following:
Download backbone.d.ts from https://github.com/borisyankov/DefinitelyTyped, the backbone.d.ts provides typescript strongly-typed interface, if you use IDE like Visual Studio, you can have all the intellisense support to Backbone
(Optional) Config backbone in RequireJS
In your TypeScript class, you can reference Backbone like the following
`
/// <amd-dependency path="backbone" />;
/// <reference path="path/to//backbone.d.ts" />;
export class YourModel extends Backbone.Model {
}
The amd-dependency tells the compiler how to reference backbone, so it would generate the correct define statement in JavaScript.
The reference provides a way to Backbone's definition for typed check.
Hope this helps! TypeScript eliminates the hell of writing long define or require js statement, which can be error-prone in situation where there are lots of dependencies.

Protractor and Typescript: Class defined in different file but the same module causes 'declaration exception'

I am completely confused what I am doing wrong here.
Say I have a test file 'SimpleTest.ts' containing the following:
/// <reference path="../otherdir/simpleclass.ts" />
module MyModule.SubModule {
describe("this test", () => {
var myObject: SimpleClass = new SimpleClass("");
it("doesn't even get here!", () => {
expect(myObject).toBeDefined();
});
});
}
The class here is defined in a different file, but in the same module, like this:
module MyModule.SubModule {
export class SimpleClass {
constructor(private myMember: string) {}
}
}
So both definitions reside in the same module. Typescript compiles fine, everything looks OK.
But when I start protractor (yes, I have configured 'specs:' path to the files correctly), it stops with the error
this test
encountered a declaration exception - fail
I know that I could get it to work by using module.export and require, but this is not a good solution.
First, I loose the type checking of typescript, when I use javascript 'require', and the type checking is one of the reasons why I'm using it in the first place.
Second, I think this is bad style to mix plain javascript into typescript code.
Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Jörg
Stop using internal modules.
It honestly helped me a lot when trying to understand TypeScript.
My experiences with internal TypeScript modules are answered here
.
You can read the article of Steve Fenton here for more details.
I hope this is of any help still to you.