SELECT CASE WHEN name='AUTHUAT' then 'pramod' else 'ladkat' end from v$database;
output:
name
pramod
i Want output as :
__name____|_other name____
pramod | ladkat
To get the expected result you have to use the following query and you can avoid else part in the case if you want to display data in matched condition only. You can also set NULL or '' in else to display NULL or Blank value in case of mismatch:
SELECT
CASE WHEN name='AUTHUAT' THEN 'pramod' ELSE 'ladkat' END name,
CASE WHEN name='AUTHUAT' THEN 'ladkat' ELSE 'pramod' END other_name
FROM v$database;
You're maybe looking for conditional aggregation ?
SELECT MAX(CASE WHEN name='AUTHUAT' then 'pramod' else 'ladkat' end) as name,
MAX(CASE WHEN name='AUTHUAT' then 'pramod' else 'ladkat' end) as other_name
from v$database;
Related
I have a table which consists of data where in I'm having trouble counting the corresponding rows.
Here is the sample table:
I am expecting an output like this:
You can do conditional aggregation:
select
sum(case when result = 'X' then 1 else 0 end) count_x,
sum(case when result is null then 1 else 0 end) count_blank
from mytable
I assume that by blank you mean null. If not, then you can change the condition in the second sum() from result is null to result = ''.
If you are running MySQL, this can be shortened a little:
select
sum(result = 'X') count_x,
sum(result is null) count_blank
from mytable
I am trying to apply two conditions in one SQL Query.
(select DISTINCT (
CASE WHEN (
ABC.GemUserID = '99' )
OR ABC.GemUserID != '99'
THEN 'Yes'
ELSE 'No'
END)) AS AllWell
This gives me output as "Yes" where as the CASE is true only for 1 file like below :
Current Result:
99 , Yes
99 , Yes
99 , Yes
Expected Result:
99 , No
99 , No
99 , Yes
I am using the below query but the SQL Query Intellisence is identifying it as wrong.
Wrong Query:
(select DISTINCT (
CASE WHEN ( ABC.GEMUserID = '99' THEN 'Yes' else 'No'
CASE WHEN ( ABC.GEMUserID != '99' THEN 'No' else 'Yes'
END)) AS AllWell
After fixing the above Wrong Query:
(select DISTINCT
(CASE WHEN ABC.GemUserID = '99' THEN 'Yes' else 'No' END),
(CASE WHEN ABC.GemUserID != '99' THEN 'No' else 'Yes' END))
AS AllWell
But I am getting error:
Msg 116, Level 16, State 1, Line 17 Only one expression can be
specified in the select list when the subquery is not introduced with
EXISTS.
How to fix this?
select distinct is -- itself -- part of SQL syntax. The distinct is not a function. It should not be followed by parentheses. So, if I understand your question:
select DISTINCT
( CASE WHEN ABC.GEMUserID = '99' THEN 'Yes' else 'No' END),
( CASE WHEN ABC.GEMUserID <> '99' THEN 'No' else 'Yes' END) as AllWell
Do you plan on giving the first column a name?
select DISTINCT
CASE WHEN ABC.GEMUserID = '99' THEN 'Yes'
ELSE 'No' -- This is automatically When ABC.GEMUserID <> '99'
END AS AllWell
According to the error, your query is a subquery (probably behind IN?) in a larger SQL command. Therefore, it is not possible for such subquery to return more than one column.
So your first query, you've said:
CASE WHEN userID = 99 OR userID != 99
In other words:
CASE WHEN 1=1
This is why it returns yes for everything (not sure what the difference between your current and expected result should be considering that the userID is 99 for all rows).
For your erroneous query, seems you're returning that select in the middle of another select (since you alias it at the end). Due to that, you cannot return more than one column in your nested select. You do not need the second CASE statement, simply change your query to:
(select DISTINCT
CASE WHEN ABC.GemUserID = '99' THEN 'Yes' Else 'No' End) AS AllWell
Assuming that you hold the missing pieces to the query such as the FROM.
I've a table in my database for which I need to check if all rows have one field not null.
If there are no row or if there is at least 1 row with the field null => true
If there are rows and they are all with the field not null => False
Is there a way to do this in on simple query? Or I need to check if my table is empty first then if it's not check if I've a row with the field value empty ?
This will count how many NULL values you have in a field;
SELECT
SUM(CASE WHEN FieldName IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) NullValues
FROM TableName
Will return 0 if there are no NULL values, and will return the number of NULLS if there are any present.
If you actually want to return a value as 'True' or 'False' then do this;
SELECT CASE
WHEN a.NullValues > 0
THEN 'True'
ELSE 'False'
END CheckField
FROM (
SELECT
SUM(CASE WHEN FieldName IS NULL
THEN 1
ELSE 0
END) NullValues
FROM TableName
) a
Use count(*) and count(field) and compare the two:
select
case when count(*) > 0 and count(*) = count(field) then 1 -- not empty and no nulls
else 0 end as isgood
from mytable;
Oracle SQL has no boolean data type , so I use 1 for true and 0 for false. You can replace this with whatever you like (e.g. 'true' instead of 1 and 'false' instead of 0).
As to turning this into a predicate (correlated to a main query), you'd use something along the lines of:
select ...
from main
where exists
(
select 1
from mytable
where mytable.colx = main.coly
having count(*) > 0 and count(*) = count(field)
);
You can do this with aggregation. However, it is difficult to understand what you are asking for. If you want to check that a field has no NULL values, you can do:
select (case when count(*) > 0 then 1 else 0 end) as HasNullValues
from t
where field is null;
Alternate way I found using max with putting null first:
select case when
max(field) keep (dense_rank first order by datfin desc nulls first) is null then 1
else 0 end as flag
from MYTABLE;
I have a query that where i need to put condition when case statement is true.I have tried like this but not geeting the correct value.
SELECT
name,count(CASE WHEN date_part('year',time_stamp) = 2016 THEN answ_count end) AS Year15
FROM
companies companies
where
(CASE when no_answer='f' then value_s IS not NULL or value_n IS not NULL end )
SELECT name,
count(CASE WHEN date_part('year',time_stamp) = 2016 THEN answ_count end) AS Year15
FROM
companies companies
where
CASE when no_answer='f' then value_s ELSE '1' end IS not NULL
OR CASE when no_answer='f' then value_n ELSE '1' end IS not NULL
CASE is an expression, you can only specify a value after the THEN part, not a condition like you did THEN value_s IS NOT NULL
You can't use case like that.
It's hard to figure out what you are trying to do, but test the result of the case, rather than putting the test inside the case, like this:
...
where CASE when no_answer='f' then value_s else value_n end
IS not NULL
I am using double case sentence to get a value from column in a table based on 2 conditions that are available in 2 other columns in same table , and else (otherwise) the function should give null when it is null or 0 when it is 0 .
Example of code is below :
CASE CODE
WHEN 'ABC'
CASE NAME WHEN 'XYZ'
THEN 'VALUE'
ELSE NULL
END
ELSE NULL
END
The problem is if I use NULL after else then it gives all ( both null values and values with 0 ) as NULL , or if I use 0 instead of NULL after ELSE then both null and 0 values are given as 0 .
I have tried to write the sentence in many ways but I dont know its not working . Hopefully somebody can give me some good solution regarding this.
CASE WHEN CODE = 'ABC' AND NAME = 'XYZ' THEN 'VALUE' ELSE NULL END
I believe you want:
CASE WHEN CODE = 'ABC' AND NAME = 'XYZ' THEN 'VALUE' ELSE NULL END
This structure of the CASE statement is more flexible than sticking the field name before WHEN.
Are you trying to do something like this?
(CASE when CODE = 'ABC' and NAME = 'XYZ'
THEN 'VALUE'
when code = '0' or name = '0'
then '0'
ELSE NULL
end)
Or perhaps it is this (based on the fact that you are trying to get something from a column):
(CASE when CODE = 'ABC' and NAME = 'XYZ'
THEN value
when value is NULL or value = 0
then value
ELSE NULL
end)
Based on your comment, I think this will work:
(CASE when CODE = 'ABC' and NAME = 'XYZ'
THEN value
ELSE NULL
end)
Or is it this:
(CASE when CODE = 'ABC' and NAME = 'XYZ' and value <> '0'
THEN 'value'
when CODE = 'ABC' and NAME = 'XYZ' and value = '0'
then '0'
ELSE NULL
end)
However, I think this is equivalent to your original nested two-case version.