Trying to make a custom polymer element in ASP.NET 5 in Visual Studio Community. I select "New Project"->"Web"->ASP.NET Core Web Application (.NET Core). In Solution Explorer I add a new file "helloworld.html", in this file I create a new polymer element with this code:
<link rel="import" href="https://polygit.org/components/polymer/polymer.html">
<dom-module id="hello-world">
<style></style>
<template>
<h1>Hello world</h1>
</template>
</dom-module>
<script>
Polymer({
is: "hello-world"
});
</script>
Next I try to implement (add) this element to the DOM that is created by ASP.NET 5, so I make changes in those two files index.cshtml and _layout.cshtml.
The file index.cshtml is:
#{
ViewData["Title"] = "Home Page";
}
<link rel="import" href="~/helloworld.html"/>
<div class="row">
<hello-world></hello-world>
</div>
In _layout.cshtml I add two lines of code:
<link rel="import" href="https://polygit.org/components/polymer/polymer.html">
<script src="https://polygit.org/components/webcomponentsjs/webcomponents-lite.js"></script>
Next I click debug but no Hello World on the screen. Only header and footer from _layout.cshtml
I think
<link rel="import" href="~/helloworld.html"/>
must be outside the { ... }
If not, take a look at the source HTML code and, using F12 (IE/Chrome... debugger), see Network tab for errors.
In addition to what already has been suggested. Are you sure that
<link rel="import" href="https://polygit.org/components/polymer/polymer.html">
<script src="https://polygit.org/components/webcomponentsjs/webcomponents-lite.js"></script>
are in the right place? Load the page, open the developer tools (F12) and in the HTML/DOM view/explorer check that these lines actually appear in the <head> tag of the loaded page. The default ASP.NET Core template contains <environment> tags in _Layout.cshtml. In my test with your code I first put the links into the wrong environment. Now it works for me.
Related
I just downloaded the auth0 quickstart vanilla JS single page application. The menu that you get when you resize the app, does not work.
instead, you get a error that says the collapse.js has a object error.
Okay, this should save some time to other folks who are using auth0.
The problem is here, in the second line.
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/4.3.1/css/bootstrap.min.css">
<script src="https://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jQuery/jquery-3.5.0.slim.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/popper.js/1.14.7/umd/popper.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/4.3.1/js/bootstrap.min.js"></script>
For some reason, jquery-3.5.0 has some problems with the dropdown menu working. The following worked for me.
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/4.3.1/css/bootstrap.min.css">
<script
src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.4.1.slim.js"
integrity="sha256-BTlTdQO9/fascB1drekrDVkaKd9PkwBymMlHOiG+qLI="
crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/popper.js/1.14.7/umd/popper.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/4.3.1/js/bootstrap.min.js"></script>
I am using 3.4.1 jQuery (second line again, above). That got the menu working.
Im trying to run this plugin
https://github.com/jzaefferer/jquery-treeview
In clear html it works, so it means the problem is in my mvc code.
I have following code
<!-- TREEVIEW Plugin -->
<link href="/Content/jquery-treeview/jquery.treeview.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<script src="/Content/jquery-treeview/jquery-1.2.6.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="/Content/jquery-treeview/jquery.treeview.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function () {
$("#treeview ul").treeview();
});
</script>
the link addresses are okay, because they are not underlined and i checked the path manually. In clear HTML the plugin works. I also tried
#Scripts.Render("~/Content/jquery-treeview/jquery-1.2.6.min.js")
or
#Url.Content("~/Content/jquery-treeview/jquery-1.2.6.min.js")
At it seems same (not working). Where is the problem ?
But this code works, so JQuery is loaded.
$(document).ready(function () {
alert("ready!");
});
HTML Code
<div id="treeview">
<ul>
<li>Category
<ul><li>SubCategory</li></ul>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
Mystery revealed, in Shared/_Layout.cshtml JQuery was also included by default so the solution was comment it out :-)
I am trying to workout a HelloWorld example of Bootstrap3 and X-editable. I am attaching my page source code in this post. I am facing two issues.
I am getting the following error when i use mode as 'popup' as soon as i click on the editable link.
TypeError: this.getCalculatedOffset is not a function
If i switch from popup to inline at-least the page appears however, the buttons dont appear correctly.
Any feedback would be appreciated. Page Source is below:-
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>X-Editable Bootstrap Hello World!</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="twitter-bootstrap/css/bootstrap.css" type="text/css"/>
<link href="bootstrap-editable/bootstrap3-editable/css/bootstrap-editable.css" rel="stylesheet">
</head>
<body>
<div class="container">
<h1>Hello World Bootstrap</h1>
<div class="hero-unit">
<p>Hey.. this is my very first XEdit-able Bootstrap site.</p>
<!-- superuser -->
superuser
</div>
</div>
<script src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.0.3.js"></script>
<script src="http://code.jquery.com/ui/1.10.4/jquery-ui.js"></script>
<script src="twitter-bootstrap/js/bootstrap.js"></script>
<script src="bootstrap-editable/bootstrap3-editable/js/bootstrap-editable.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
$.fn.editable.defaults.mode = 'inline';
$(document).ready( function(){
//$('#username').editable();
$('#username').editable( {
type: 'text',
pk: 1,
url: '/post',
title: 'Enter username'
});
} );
</script>
</body>
</html>
Your bootstrap css and js files must be from 2.xx version of bootstrap, that's a problem.
Use x-editable for bootstrap 2 or update your bootstrap to version 3+.
I had the same issue after upgrading from Bootstrap 2 to Bootstrap 3.
I had upgraded Bootstrap's CSS, X-Editable's CSS and JS, but had forgotten to upgrade Bootstrap's JS which was still for v2.
Don't forget to update all files:
Bootstrap 3 .css and .js
X-Editable for Bootstrap 3 .css and .js
Probably a bit late, but hopefully that can still help someone.
I've got a new solution that contains several project 'groups'. Each group contains a Cloud Project, a Web Role Project and a Test Project. All Web Role Projects are MVC4.
One of the Web Roles is the entry point for the visitor. Parts of what the visitor will see, should come from the other Web Roles from within the solution. I cannot get it working and after spending several hours googling, I still cannot solve it. Maybe anyone can be helpful on this issue.
For example, I need to fill the header content with data that I can get from one of the other Web Roles. Let's call that controller HeaderController. The controller in the main project (HomeController) looks like this:
public class HomeController : Controller
{
public ActionResult Index()
{
ViewBag.Message = "Modify this template to jump-start your ASP.NET MVC application.";
//var headerController = new Generic.HeaderFooterContainer.Controllers.HeaderController();
//var foo = headerController.Index().ExecuteResult();
//ViewBag.Header = headerController.;
return View();
}
In the comments are some things I've tried to debug some things.
Here's the page layout of the main project. The body is still empty, as this problem is just about the page header which could be placed as html from the ViewBag or ViewData or even with an own #section.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<title>#ViewBag.Title</title>
<link href="~/favicon.ico" rel="shortcut icon" type="image/x-icon" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
#Styles.Render("~/Content/css")
#Scripts.Render("~/bundles/modernizr")
</head>
<body>
<div class="headerHolder">
<div class="innertube">
<div id="header">
#ViewBag.Header
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="contentHolder">
<div class="innertube">
<div id="content">
#RenderBody()
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="footerHolder">
<div class="innertube">
<div id="footer">
</div>
</div>
</div>
#Scripts.Render("~/bundles/jquery")
#Scripts.Render("~/bundles/bms")
#RenderSection("scripts", required: false)
</body>
</html>
The problem I face is that I just can't find out how I should make this work. How do I get the data in the header? A few things I've noticed are:
If I run the HeaderFooterContainer project in its dedicated solution, it works alright (I can get /Header and get the expected response displayed in the browser window)
If I run the Main project, I can see the home page, but if I ask for /Header, it can find the controller, but not the view. It's probably looking for the view in the main project although it is located in the HeaderFooterContainer project.
I want to display basic portlet on mozilla browser in dojo 1.7, but the following is displaying data as simple text without actually creating any portlet using dojo API. Could anyone please tell me what wrong I'm doing?
<!Doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../lib/dijit/themes/claro/claro.css"/>
<style type = "text/css">
#import "../lib/dojox/widget/Portlet/Portlet.css"</style>
<script src = "../lib/dojo/dojo.js" data-dojo-config = "async: true, parseOnLoad:true" >
dojo.require("..lib/dojox/widget/Portlet");
dojo.require("..lib/dijit/dijit");
</script>
</head>
<body class="claro">
<div data-dojo-type="dojox.widget.Portlet" title="A Simple Portlet">
<div data-dojo-type="dojox.widget.PortletSettings">
This is a simple setting widget.
Put Whatever you like in here
</div>
<div style="height: 100px;">
The contents of the portlet go in here.
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Take a look at dojox.widget.Portlet source code. It's not rewritten to AMD format and therefore you are not able to resolve dependencies. Even the test dojox/widget/tests/test_Portlet.html does not work.
To workaround this switch the loader into sync mode defining async: false or completely omit the definition as in Dojo 1.7 the synchronous mode is default.
There is also another unresolved dependency, which I resolved by explicitly requiring AMD module dijit._Container before requiring dojox.widget.Portlet:
dojo.require("dijit._Container");
dojo.require("dojox.widget.Portlet");
See the working example at jsFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/phusick/MWnYZ/