I am having a wcf service which is hosted on iis, and I have given all timeout maximum value. When the service method was called at the same by 10 users through Silverlight application, it leads to timeout exception and no call back return to the application. This is not happening for all the time, but once it got failed all the subsequent calls raising the same issue. I have given single instance mode with per call context mode.
Related
I'm developing a UWP client project which need to consume some services of a WCF server. I uses the "add service reference" tool of Visual Studio to auto generate service clients(proxies). The binding type is NetTcpBinding. Below is some code snippet which create the service client:
NetTcpBinding tcpBinding = new NetTcpBinding();
tcpBinding.Security.Mode = SecurityMode.None;
tcpBinding.Security.Transport.ClientCredentialType = TcpClientCredentialType.None;
tcpBinding.Security.Message.ClientCredentialType = MessageCredentialType.None;
MainServiceClient = new MainServiceClient(tcpBinding, new EndpointAddress("net.tcp://localhost:8773/MyWCF/MainService/tcp"));
The question is do I need to call OpenAsync() method of MainServiceClient? It seems the service client can be auto opened when it is first called. But I read from this article that auto-opened service client would have some performance penalty. The article was written in 2007. I just wonder if this mechanism have changed today, especially in UWP project. Can anyone share more light on this topic? Thanks!
To explain this case, you should know three ways to do WCF instance management. WCF has provided three ways by which you can control WCF service instances:Per call, Per session, Single instance.
When we configure a WCF service as per call, new service instances are created for every method call you make via a WCF proxy client.
Very often we need to maintain state between method calls or for a particular session. For those kinds of scenarios, we will need to configure the service per session. In per session, only one instance of a WCF service object is created for a session interaction.
Often we would like to create one global WCF instance for all WCF clients. To create a single instance of a WCF service, we need to configure the WCF service as Single instance mode.
And there are three ways by which you can handle concurrency for each service instance in WCF :single, multiple, and reentrant.
Single: A single request has access to the WCF service object at a given moment of time. So only one request will be processed at any given moment of time. The other requests have to wait until the request processed by the WCF service is completed.
Multiple: In this scenario, multiple requests can be handled by the WCF service object at any given moment of time. In other words, requests are processed at the same time by spawning multiple threads on the WCF server object. So you have great throughput here but you need to ensure concurrency issues related to WCF server objects.
Reentrant: A single request thread has access to the WCF service object, but the thread can exit the WCF service to call another WCF service or can also call a WCF client through callback and reenter without deadlock.
In "Instance mode = Per Session and Concurrency = Single" combination, one WCF service instance is created for every WCF client session because the WCF instance mode is set to per session. All the method are executed in a sequential manner one by one. In other words, only one thread is available for all method calls for a particular service instance.
For the above scenario, you should always open WCF client proxy explicitly before you are making any calls. Because it will maintain service state between method calls and obtain high performance.
For more detail you could refer to "WCF Concurrency (Single, Multiple, and Reentrant) and Throttling" and "Three ways to do WCF instance management".
I have WCF service. I am calling this service from console application. TimeOut for this service is set to default 1 min.
This service calls One function asynchronously whose execution time is not known. But before the execution of this function service TimeOut exception occurs.
Can anybody suggest, How to handle the WCF timeout exception when we are not aware of the time will be taken by the WCF function.
I have a WCF service hosted as Windows Service with most of its methods currently defined as:
[OperationContract(IsOneWay = true)]
But, now I need to send response back to the calling Web application for these service methods.
Now, because service methods are bit heavy (FYI, they are reporting methods that needs to do mail merge for a no. of records), I am thinking to either queue them or to process asynchronously, so essentially when the request is sent to the service it should save the request to database/queue, returning Request-Id to calling Web application.
In the mean-time, WCF service can just process incompleted requests from the queue or database.
Then either calling Web application can ping WCF service for status of request because it has Request-Id or
WCF service can ping back to calling app when the process corresponding to a Request-Id is completed.
To achieve above, can anyone please guide what changes I need to make to my WCF service (which currently has all one way operation)?
Also, please guide me whether I need to go for Asynch operation or message queuing?
Thank you!
Of course, going Async is simple:
remove the OneWay on the OperationContract in question and regenerate your Service WITH Async methods. There's a reason why Silverlight forces you to use Async operations. They do force you to rethink your UI.
I have a scenario in which I have to call a WCF Service from VBScript (yes I know this is sad!)
Now I know that when you instantiate a proxy to the service in .Net code, that first call may take 10 to 20 seconds longer as WCF bootstraps the channel between the proxy and the service. Once that is done, all calls through that same proxy are quick. When that proxy is disposed, it seems that WCF keeps that channel open for short while (a minute or 3), because a second instantiation of a proxy and a call to the same service within that time does not carry the same bootstrapping burden...it executes quickly (sub-second response times).
Using VBScript, however, there is no concept of a proxy that gives you a "handle" on the channel...I'm just using ServerXMLHttp objects to send soap packets to the service address.
I can certainly see that the first call takes a good 10 to 20 seconds longer than any subsequent call to the same service, indicating that WCF bootstrapping.
I can also see that WCF timeout of the channel happening, because as long as my VBScript is making calls to the service not more than 2 or so minutes apart, the calls execute quickly. If I wait longer than that between calls, each call seems to cause a bootstrapping of a new WCF channel.
Is there anything I can do to keep that WCF channel open for longer between calls to the service? I'm thinking along the lines of changing the service instancing to PerSession. And I understand that the duration of a session is defined by the length of the life of the proxy (in .Net code). But in VBScript, there is no proxy!? Any idea what defines the length of a WCF Session when using PerSession instancing and calling from VBScript where there is no proxy? Or is there perhaps a way to get a handle on a proxy in VBScript?
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Shawn.
Here is my scenario, and it is causing us a considerable amount of grief at the moment:
We have a vendor web service which provides base level telephony functionality. This service has a SOAP api, which we are leveraging to build up a custom UI that is integrated into our in house web apps. The api functions on 2 levels. You make standard client calls into the service to initiate actions, such as Login, Place Call, Hang Up, etc. On a different thread, the service sends events back to the client to alert the user of things that are occurring on the system (agent successfully logged in, call was disconnected, etc).
I implemented a WCF service to sit between the web server and the vendor service. This WCF service operates in duplex mode, establishing a 2 way connection with the web server. The web server makes outbound calls to the WCF service, which routes them to the vendor's web service. Events are received back to the WCF service, which passes them onto the web server via a callback channel on the WCF client. As events are received on the web server, they are placed into a hash table with the user's name as the key, and a .NET queue as the value to hold the event. Each event is enqueued to the agent who owns it.
On a 2 second interval, the web page polls the web server via an ajax request to get new events for the logged in user. It hits the hash table for the user key, dequeues any events that are present, and serializes them back up to the web page. From there, they are processed in order and appropriate messages are displayed to the user.
This implementation performs well in a single user scenario. The second I put more than 1 user on the system, I start getting frequent timeouts with the following CommunicationException:
A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond
We are running Windows Server 2008 R2 both servers. Both the web app and WCF service are running on .NET 3.5. The WCF service is running under the net.tcp protocol in duplex mode. The web app is ASP.NET MVC 2.
Has anyone dealt with anything like this scenario? Is there a more efficient way (or a widely accepted pattern) to implement this?
EDIT: One thing I forgot to mention - my thought is that the increased traffic (adding additional users) with only 1 dedicated callback channel is causing locking, which then triggers the timeout. There can be up to 10 consecutive callbacks from the service within any 5 second interval.