In this segmentation tutorial, the preprocessing normalizes image values into [0, 1].
However, according to the document of MobileNetV2 (https://www.tensorflow.org/api_docs/python/tf/keras/applications/mobilenet_v2/preprocess_input), the preprocess step normalizes data to the interval [-1, 1].
Which preprocessing is the correct one and why?
If you want to train your own network from scratch, you can apply any normalization you see fit, or even no normalization at all, it's your choice!
If, instead, you want to reuse the pretrained models (e.g.: by setting weights='imagenet' in the definition of MobileNetV2), then you should use the specific preprocessing in https://www.tensorflow.org/api_docs/python/tf/keras/applications/mobilenet_v2/preprocess_input, since this model has been trained with this specific preprocessing (normalization to [-1, 1]).
Although you should, you could also treat the MobileNetV2 pretrained model as a static blackbox transformation, and plug in any normalization you want. The downside: you could almost surely make better use of this black box by applying the standard normalization.
For legacy_seq2seq, it just supports the input with a list of 2D Tensors.
If a model has more parameters for each inputs. says,
[[1,2], [2,3], [3,4]...] instead of [1, 2, 3, 4, ....], it cant use legacy_seq2seq to have batch methods.
So, how to implement a multidimensional input rnn in batch method with tensorflow?
Or it doesnt exist?
Multi-dimensional RNNs are well supported in Tensorflow, but not added to the legacy seq2seq interface. Please use the current (dynamic_rnn) API and you'll see that multi-dimensional tensors work fine (there are even pre-made multi-dimensional RNN cells in contrib).
I'm looking for a way to achieve multiple classifications for an input. The number of outputs is specified, and the class sets may or may not be the same for the outputs. The sample belongs to one class of each class set.
My question is, what should the target data and the output layer look like? What activation, loss and training functions could be used, and how should the layer be connected to the hidden layer? I'm not necessarily looking for an optimal solution, just a working one.
My current guess on what could work, is to make the target data be multiple concatenated one-hot vectors and the output layer have as many softmax units as the number of vectors. I don't know how the layers would be connected with that solution and how the net would figure out the sizes of class sets. I think a label powerset would not work for my needs.
I think the matlab patternnet function can create a net that does that, but I don't know how the resulting net works. Code for TensorFlow or Keras would be very welcome.
Maybe it's not a good time to response to the question, but I am working on the multi-label classification and just found an solution.
As for Keras, there's a example:
target label: [1, 0, 0, 1, 0]
output layer: Dense(5, activation='sigmoid')
loss: 'binary_crossentropy'
That will work well if dataset is big enough.
I'm looking at TensorFlow implementation of ORC on CIFAR-10, and I noticed that after the first convnet layer, they do pooling, then normalization, but after the second layer, they do normalization, then pooling.
I'm just wondering what would be the rationale behind this, and any tips on when/why we should choose to do norm before pool would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
It should be pooling first, normalization second.
The original code link in the question no longer works, but I'm assuming the normalization being referred to is batch normalization. Though, the main idea will probably apply to other normalization as well. As noted by the batch normalization authors in the paper introducing batch normalization, one of the main purposes is "normalizing layer inputs". The simplified version of the idea being: if the inputs to each layer have a nice, reliable distribution of values, the network can train more easily. Putting the normalization second allows for this to happen.
As a concrete example, we can consider the activations [0, 99, 99, 100]. To keep things simple, a 0-1 normalization will be used. A max pooling with kernel 2 will be used. If the values are first normalized, we get [0, 0.99, 0.99, 1]. Then pooling gives [0.99, 1]. This does not provide the nice distribution of inputs to the next layer. If we instead pool first, we get [99, 100]. Then normalizing gives [0, 1]. Which means we can then control the distribution of the inputs to the next layer to be what we want them to be to best promote training.
Normalization is just normalization. After normalizaion, max value is still max value among all.
So Normalization->Pooling or Pooling->Normaliazaion results same.
This question already has answers here:
What are logits? What is the difference between softmax and softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits?
(8 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
In the following TensorFlow function, we must feed the activation of artificial neurons in the final layer. That I understand. But I don't understand why it is called logits? Isn't that a mathematical function?
loss_function = tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(
logits = last_layer,
labels = target_output
)
Logits is an overloaded term which can mean many different things:
In Math, Logit is a function that maps probabilities ([0, 1]) to R ((-inf, inf))
Probability of 0.5 corresponds to a logit of 0. Negative logit correspond to probabilities less than 0.5, positive to > 0.5.
In ML, it can be
the vector of raw (non-normalized) predictions that a classification
model generates, which is ordinarily then passed to a normalization
function. If the model is solving a multi-class classification
problem, logits typically become an input to the softmax function. The
softmax function then generates a vector of (normalized) probabilities
with one value for each possible class.
Logits also sometimes refer to the element-wise inverse of the sigmoid function.
Just adding this clarification so that anyone who scrolls down this much can at least gets it right, since there are so many wrong answers upvoted.
Diansheng's answer and JakeJ's answer get it right.
A new answer posted by Shital Shah is an even better and more complete answer.
Yes, logit as a mathematical function in statistics, but the logit used in context of neural networks is different. Statistical logit doesn't even make any sense here.
I couldn't find a formal definition anywhere, but logit basically means:
The raw predictions which come out of the last layer of the neural network.
1. This is the very tensor on which you apply the argmax function to get the predicted class.
2. This is the very tensor which you feed into the softmax function to get the probabilities for the predicted classes.
Also, from a tutorial on official tensorflow website:
Logits Layer
The final layer in our neural network is the logits layer, which will return the raw values for our predictions. We create a dense layer with 10 neurons (one for each target class 0–9), with linear activation (the default):
logits = tf.layers.dense(inputs=dropout, units=10)
If you are still confused, the situation is like this:
raw_predictions = neural_net(input_layer)
predicted_class_index_by_raw = argmax(raw_predictions)
probabilities = softmax(raw_predictions)
predicted_class_index_by_prob = argmax(probabilities)
where, predicted_class_index_by_raw and predicted_class_index_by_prob will be equal.
Another name for raw_predictions in the above code is logit.
As for the why logit... I have no idea. Sorry.
[Edit: See this answer for the historical motivations behind the term.]
Trivia
Although, if you want to, you can apply statistical logit to probabilities that come out of the softmax function.
If the probability of a certain class is p,
Then the log-odds of that class is L = logit(p).
Also, the probability of that class can be recovered as p = sigmoid(L), using the sigmoid function.
Not very useful to calculate log-odds though.
Summary
In context of deep learning the logits layer means the layer that feeds in to softmax (or other such normalization). The output of the softmax are the probabilities for the classification task and its input is logits layer. The logits layer typically produces values from -infinity to +infinity and the softmax layer transforms it to values from 0 to 1.
Historical Context
Where does this term comes from? In 1930s and 40s, several people were trying to adapt linear regression to the problem of predicting probabilities. However linear regression produces output from -infinity to +infinity while for probabilities our desired output is 0 to 1. One way to do this is by somehow mapping the probabilities 0 to 1 to -infinity to +infinity and then use linear regression as usual. One such mapping is cumulative normal distribution that was used by Chester Ittner Bliss in 1934 and he called this "probit" model, short for "probability unit". However this function is computationally expensive while lacking some of the desirable properties for multi-class classification. In 1944 Joseph Berkson used the function log(p/(1-p)) to do this mapping and called it logit, short for "logistic unit". The term logistic regression derived from this as well.
The Confusion
Unfortunately the term logits is abused in deep learning. From pure mathematical perspective logit is a function that performs above mapping. In deep learning people started calling the layer "logits layer" that feeds in to logit function. Then people started calling the output values of this layer "logit" creating the confusion with logit the function.
TensorFlow Code
Unfortunately TensorFlow code further adds in to confusion by names like tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits. What does logits mean here? It just means the input of the function is supposed to be the output of last neuron layer as described above. The _with_logits suffix is redundant, confusing and pointless. Functions should be named without regards to such very specific contexts because they are simply mathematical operations that can be performed on values derived from many other domains. In fact TensorFlow has another similar function sparse_softmax_cross_entropy where they fortunately forgot to add _with_logits suffix creating inconsistency and adding in to confusion. PyTorch on the other hand simply names its function without these kind of suffixes.
Reference
The Logit/Probit lecture slides is one of the best resource to understand logit. I have also updated Wikipedia article with some of above information.
Logit is a function that maps probabilities [0, 1] to [-inf, +inf].
Softmax is a function that maps [-inf, +inf] to [0, 1] similar as Sigmoid. But Softmax also normalizes the sum of the values(output vector) to be 1.
Tensorflow "with logit": It means that you are applying a softmax function to logit numbers to normalize it. The input_vector/logit is not normalized and can scale from [-inf, inf].
This normalization is used for multiclass classification problems. And for multilabel classification problems sigmoid normalization is used i.e. tf.nn.sigmoid_cross_entropy_with_logits
Personal understanding, in TensorFlow domain, logits are the values to be used as input to softmax. I came to this understanding based on this tensorflow tutorial.
https://www.tensorflow.org/tutorials/layers
Although it is true that logit is a function in maths(especially in statistics), I don't think that's the same 'logit' you are looking at. In the book Deep Learning by Ian Goodfellow, he mentioned,
The function σ−1(x) is called the logit in statistics, but this term
is more rarely used in machine learning. σ−1(x) stands for the
inverse function of logistic sigmoid function.
In TensorFlow, it is frequently seen as the name of last layer. In Chapter 10 of the book Hands-on Machine Learning with Scikit-learn and TensorFLow by Aurélien Géron, I came across this paragraph, which stated logits layer clearly.
note that logits is the output of the neural network before going
through the softmax activation function: for optimization reasons, we
will handle the softmax computation later.
That is to say, although we use softmax as the activation function in the last layer in our design, for ease of computation, we take out logits separately. This is because it is more efficient to calculate softmax and cross-entropy loss together. Remember that cross-entropy is a cost function, not used in forward propagation.
(FOMOsapiens).
If you check math Logit function, it converts real space from [0,1] interval to infinity [-inf, inf].
Sigmoid and softmax will do exactly the opposite thing. They will convert the [-inf, inf] real space to [0, 1] real space.
This is why, in machine learning we may use logit before sigmoid and softmax function (since they match).
And this is why "we may call" anything in machine learning that goes in front of sigmoid or softmax function the logit.
Here is G. Hinton video using this term.
Here is a concise answer for future readers. Tensorflow's logit is defined as the output of a neuron without applying activation function:
logit = w*x + b,
x: input, w: weight, b: bias. That's it.
The following is irrelevant to this question.
For historical lectures, read other answers. Hats off to Tensorflow's "creatively" confusing naming convention. In PyTorch, there is only one CrossEntropyLoss and it accepts un-activated outputs. Convolutions, matrix multiplications and activations are same level operations. The design is much more modular and less confusing. This is one of the reasons why I switched from Tensorflow to PyTorch.
logits
The vector of raw (non-normalized) predictions that a classification model generates, which is ordinarily then passed to a normalization function. If the model is solving a multi-class classification problem, logits typically become an input to the softmax function. The softmax function then generates a vector of (normalized) probabilities with one value for each possible class.
In addition, logits sometimes refer to the element-wise inverse of the sigmoid function. For more information, see tf.nn.sigmoid_cross_entropy_with_logits.
official tensorflow documentation
They are basically the fullest learned model you can get from the network, before it's been squashed down to apply to only the number of classes we are interested in. Check out how some researchers use them to train a shallow neural net based on what a deep network has learned: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.6184.pdf
It's kind of like how when learning a subject in detail, you will learn a great many minor points, but then when teaching a student, you will try to compress it to the simplest case. If the student now tried to teach, it'd be quite difficult, but would be able to describe it just well enough to use the language.
The logit (/ˈloʊdʒɪt/ LOH-jit) function is the inverse of the sigmoidal "logistic" function or logistic transform used in mathematics, especially in statistics. When the function's variable represents a probability p, the logit function gives the log-odds, or the logarithm of the odds p/(1 − p).
See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logit