I have a Datatable with 3 columns, and one search box.
Any keyword in the search box should match the beginning of either Column 1, 2 or 3.
Example:
Given keyword "apple", these 3 rows will match:
"Apple pie" - "dessert" - "handmade"
"New pear dessert" - "dessert" - "apple tree"
"New apple dessert" - "apple dessert" - "handmade"
This row should not match:
"Old apple dessert" - "dessert" - "handmade apple product"
Code:
For exact match on beginning of any of 3 Column:
searchBox.on('keyup', $.proxy(function (e) {
// how to merge the search result?
this._table.column(0).search('^' + searchBox.val(), true,
false).draw();
this._table.column(1).search('^' + searchBox.val(), true,
false).draw();
this._table.column(2).search('^' + searchBox.val(), true,
false).draw();
}, this));
I found a solution.
According to the Datatable, we need a custom filter to achieve OR-condition on multiple columns: https://datatables.net/forums/discussion/11728/filtering-datatable-columns-using-or-logic
$.fn.dataTable.ext.search.push(function (settings, data, dataIndex) {
var keyword = searchBox.val();
keyword = keyword.toUpperCase();
var productDesc = data[1].toUpperCase();
var productExch = data[3].toUpperCase();
var productSymbol = data[5].toUpperCase();
if (productDesc.startsWith(keyword) || productExch.startsWith(keyword) || productSymbol.startsWith(keyword)) {
return true;
}
return false;
});
searchBox.on('keyup', $.proxy(function (e) {
this._table.draw(); // this._table.search(searchBox.val()).draw();
}, this));
Related
has data
items = {
0: {id:1,name:'foo'},
1: {id:2,name:'bar'},
2: {id:1,name:'foo'}
};
I wont get counted elements like this
result = {
0: {id:1,name:'foo', count:2},
1: {id:2,name:'bar', count:1}
};
lodash has function _.countBy(items, 'name') it's got {'foo': 2, 'bar':1}, i need id too.
If pure JS approach is acceptable, you can try something like this:
Logiic:
Loop over array and copy the object and add a property count and set it to 0.
Now on every iteration update this count variable.
Using above 2 steps, create a hashMap.
Now loop over hashMap again and convert it back to array.
var items = [{
id: 1,
name: 'foo'
}, {
id: 2,
name: 'bar'
}, {
id: 1,
name: 'foo'
}
];
var temp = items.reduce(function(p,c){
var defaultValue = {
name: c.name,
id: c.id,
count: 0
};
p[c.name] = p[c.name] || defaultValue
p[c.name].count++;
return p;
}, {});
var result = [];
for( var k in temp ){
result.push(temp[k]);
}
console.log(result)
I have the following index in ravendb, Changes_Which is a named field and this maps to a sub collection
public My_Index()
{
Map = revisions => from revision in revisions
from change in revision.Changes
where (revision.AuditedType == "typeA")
select
new
{
revision.ChangeTimestamp,
Changes_Which = change.Which
};
}
the json for a revision looks like:
{
"AuditedType" : "typeA",
"Changes": [
{
"SubWhich": null,
"Which": "Regulation",
"Original": "Unknown",
"New": "Yes"
},
{
"SubWhich": null,
"Which": "Other",
"Original": "Unknown",
"New": "Yes"
},
{
"SubWhich": null,
"Which": "Regulation",
"Original": "Unknown",
"New": "Yes"
}
]
"ChangeTimestamp": "2011-05-03"
}
I am trying to filter the results from the index using the Changes_Which field:
var q = session.Advanced.LuceneQuery<revision>("My_Index/Index")
.WaitForNonStaleResultsAsOfLastWrite()
.AddOrder(paging.SortColumn, paging.SortOrder == "desc")
.Skip(((paging.CurrentPage - 1) * paging.RecordsPerPage))
.Take(paging.RecordsPerPage);
if (fromDate > DateTime.MinValue && toDate > DateTime.MinValue)
{
q = q.WhereGreaterThanOrEqual("ChangeTimestamp", fromDate)
.AndAlso()
.WhereLessThanOrEqual("ChangeTimestamp", toDate.AddDays(1).AddMinutes(-1));
}
if (removeNoChange)
{
q = q.AndAlso().Not.WhereEquals("Changes_Which", "Regulation");
}
This line:
q = q.AndAlso().Not.WhereEquals("Changes_Which", "Regulation");
does work, but only removes the first match on "Which": "Regulation", the third one in the collection remains.
Any suggestions appreciated.
The reason for this is that you are outputting different index entries for the same document.
When searching in RavenDB, you are searching on documents, and in your case, you filtered out the first index entry on that document, but there are other index entries that match, so it is returned.
You are probably better off with:
Map = revisions => from revision in revisions
where (revision.AuditedType == "typeA")
select
new
{
revision.ChangeTimestamp,
Changes_Which = revision.Changes.Select(chnage => change.Which)
};
This will output just a single entry per document (which is recommended) and will result in filtering of all documents that were changed because of Regulation
I have a question about the pie chart in c3.js.
How can I add the total count of a pie chart in the title??
var title = new Array('data1.sql','data2.sql')
var dtitle = new Array('title1','title2')
var chart = new Array('chart0', 'chart1')
for(var i = 0; i < title.length; i++){
chart[i] = c3.generate({
bindto : '#chart' + i,
size: {
height: 550,
width: 800
},
data : {
url : '/json/sql/data/test/' + title[i],
mimeType : 'json',
type : 'donut'
},
donut: {
title: dtitle[i] + ' - Total:' ,
label: {
format: function(value, ratio, id) {
return value;
}
}
}
});
}
The annoying thing here is that the title option can take a function, but the chart variable is not initialised within it so using the c3 api methods can't be done at this point.
So the best (maybe only) way is to add an onrendered callback that adds up the data as you'd need to anyways and then replace the text in the chart's title text using a spot of d3:
onrendered: function () {
var data = this.api.data();
var total = data.reduce (function (subtotal, t) {
return subtotal + t.values.reduce (function (subsubtotal,b) { return subsubtotal + b.value; }, 0);
}, 0);
d3.select(this.config.bindto + " .c3-chart-arcs-title").text("Total: "+total);
}
Edit: If you want it to keep track of a total as you hide/show series use this
var data = this.api.data.shown.call (this.api);
instead of
var data = this.api.data();
Hi I just want to populate the select or comboBox.
I am able to populate both with the searchAttr to any string from JSON. But not so when there are null values.
JSON string :
[{"batch":"0000001000"},{"batch":"0000"},{"batch":""},{"batch":null}]
dojo code:
var selBatch = new ComboBox //located at the left side of the page and it is the second select box in a row
(
{ id:'ID_selBatch',
value:'',
searchAttr:'batch',
placeHolder:'Select...',
style:{width:'150px'},
}, 'node_selBatch'
);
on(selTest, 'change', function(valueCard)
{
var selectedTest = this.get('displayedValue');
var selBatch = registry.byId('ID_selBatch');
console.debug('Connecting to gatherbatches.php ...');
request.post('gatherbatches.php',
{ data:{nameDB:registry.byId('ID_selPCBA').value, nameCard : valueCard},
handleAs: "json"}).then
(
function(response)
{
var memoStore2 = new Memory({data:response});
selBatch.set('store', memoStore2);
selBatch.set('value','');
console.debug('List of batches per Test is completed! Good OK! ');
},
function(error)
{
alert("Batch's Error:"+error);
console.debug('Problem: Listing batches per Test in select Test is BAD!');
}
);
selBatch.startup();
});
Error :
TypeError: _32[this.searchAttr] is null
defer() -> _WidgetBase.js (line 331)
_3() -> dojo.js (line 15)
_f.hitch(this,fcn)(); -> _WidgetBase.js (line 331)
Please advise though it might strange to have null values populate in the select box but these null values are related to data in other columns in database, so the null values included so that I can apply mysql scripts later. Or do you have other better suggestion?
Clement
You can create a QueryFilter as in this jsfiddle to achieve what you want, but it might be simpler to have two data items. Your original model with possibly null batch properties, and the model you pass to the store which is used by the ComboBox.
But anyway, this can work:
function createQueryFilter(originalQuery, filter) {
return function () {
var originalResults = originalQuery.apply(this, arguments);
var results = originalResults.filter(filter);
return QueryResults(results);
};
}
and
var memoStore = new Memory({
data: data
});
memoStore.query = createQueryFilter(memoStore.query, function (item) {
console.log(item);
return !!item.batch;
});
and the dummy data:
function createData1() {
var data = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
data.push({
name: "" + i,
batch: (0 === i % 2) ? "batch" + i : null
});
}
return data;
}
Screenshot. The odd numbered batch items are null in my example.
I have placed a textbox widget inside grid cell by using formatter. However, I cannot move my cursor around nor select text inside the textbox.
E.g.
http://jsfiddle.net/g33m9/69/
Does anyone know how to fix this?
Thanks
You need to set the column as 'editable' so that the Grid component will know how to handle keypressed events. So a modification to the layout is in order
from
var layout = [[
{name: 'Column 1', field: 'col1'},
{name: 'Column 2', field: 'col2', width:'200px', formatter: func}
]];
to
var layout = [[
{name: 'Column 1', field: 'col1'},
{name: 'Column 2', field: 'col2', width:'200px', formatter: func, editable: true}
]];
Edit state activates by doubleclick.
Now, OP wants it to be a fully bloated widget, popping up in the editable state. For this to be scaleable up with any number of rows/columns i will restrict this to the edit state, so that the value simply shows text but once double-clicked it will pop a FilteringSelect. Same principle goes with the dijit widget ValidationTextBox.
Currently (1.7.2) the possible celltypes are:
dojox.grid.cells.Bool
dojox.grid.cells.ComboBox
dojox.grid.cells.DateTextBox
dojox.grid.cells.Select
Catch me SEO:
example of custom dojox.grid cellType widget - semi-programmatic
First step - create some data
var i = 0,
data = {
identifier: 'id',
items: [
{ id: i, value: 'val'+i++},
{ id: i, value: 'val'+i++},
{ id: i, value: 'val'+i++},
{ id: i, value: 'val'+i++}
]
},
// The item label which holds visible value and which holds the value to represent
searchAttr = 'value',
valueAttr = data.identifier,
// The store to use for select widget
store = new dojo.data.ItemFileReadStore({ data: data }),
// And the options, reassembling the valid options we will present in dropdown
// Used when cellType is dojox.grid.cells.Select to name the allowable options
options = [];
dojo.forEach(data.items, function(it) { options.push(it[searchAttr])});
Tricky part - Define a cellType
Lets extend the existing dojox.grid.cells.Cell, it has two key features - an edit-state-formatter and the default-formatter. The default would work just fine. Last but not least, we'll override the '_finish' function allthough allow the Cell to process its own definition too.
var whenIdle = function( /*inContext, inMethod, args ...*/ ) {
setTimeout(dojo.hitch.apply(dojo, arguments), 0);
};
var FilteringSelectCell = declare("dojox.grid.cells.FilteringSelect", [dojox.grid.cells.Cell], {
options: null,
values: null,
_destroyOnRemove: true,
constructor: function(inCell){
this.values = this.values || this.options;
},
selectMarkupFactory: function(cellData, rowIndex) {
var h = ['<select data-dojo-type="dijit.form.FilteringSelect" id="deleteme' + rowIndex + '" name="foo">'];
for (var i = 0, o, v;
((o = this.options[i]) !== undefined) && ((v = this.values[i]) !== undefined); i++) {
v = v.replace ? v.replace(/&/g, '&').replace(/</g, '<') : v;
o = o.replace ? o.replace(/&/g, '&').replace(/</g, '<') : o;
h.push("<option", (cellData == v ? ' selected' : ''), ' value="' + v + '"', ">", o, "</option>");
}
h.push('</select>');
return h;
},
textMarkupFactory: function(cellData, rowIndex) {
return ['<input class="dojoxGridInput" id="deleteme' + rowIndex + '" data-dojo-type="dijit.form.ValidationTextBox" type="text" value="' + cellData + '">']
},
// #override
formatEditing: function(cellData, rowIndex) {
this.needFormatNode(cellData, rowIndex);
var h = (cellData == "W1")
? this.textMarkupFactory(cellData, rowIndex)
: this.selectMarkupFactory(cellData, rowIndex);
// a slight hack here, i had no time to figure out when the html would actually be inserted to the '<td>' so.. Use 'debugger' statement and track function to hook into
whenIdle(function() {
dojo.parser.parse(dojo.byId('deleteme' + rowIndex).parentNode);
var w = dijit.byId('deleteme' + rowIndex);
w.focus()
});
return h.join('');
},
// clean up avoiding multiple widget definitions 'hanging'
_finish: function(inRowIndex) {
this.inherited(arguments)
dijit.byId('deleteme' + inRowIndex).destroy();
},
// needed to read the value properly, will work with either variant
getValue: function(rowIndex) {
var n = this.getEditNode(rowIndex);
n = dijit.getEnclosingWidget(n);
return n.get("value");
}
});
Last bit, a new layout
var layout = [[
{ name: 'Column 1', field: 'col1' },
{ name: 'Column 2', field: 'col2',
cellType: FilteringSelectCell, options: options, editable: true
}
]];
Running sample here http://jsfiddle.net/dgbxw/1/