I am in the process of migrating to Ansible roles model and I have the following structure -
../roles/vms/tasks/main.yml
---
# To Create VMs on the VMware vCenter Server
- name: Creation of Windows 8.1 VMs
vsphere_guest:
vcenter_hostname: "name"
guest: "{{ item }}"
from_template: yes
template_src: "templatename"
validate_certs: no
esxi:
datacenter: dc
hostname: hname
with_items: "{{ vmname81 }}"
../roles/vms/vars/main.yml
---
vmname81:
- Client1
- Client2
- Client3
vmname10:
- Client4
- Client5
playbook.yml
---
# To Create VMs on the VMware vCenter Server
- hosts: localhost
name: Creation of Windows 8.1 VMs
roles:
- { role: vms }
As you can see in the playbook, I am trying to create Windows 8.1 VMs but I am unable to figure out how to pass the vmname81 in the roles for the creation of 8.1 VMs. The inputs provided here needs to be used by with_items in the /tasks/main.yml so that I three Windows 8.1 VMs are created. I am also interested to know if this can be done in a better way.
You shouldn't add VM names to a role, role should be generic.
Replace with_items: "{{ vmname81 }}" to with_items: "{{ vm_names }}"
Move vars (vmname81, vmname10) to your playbook/hosts/groups vars
Apply role like this:
- hosts: localhost
name: Creation of Windows 8.1 VMs
roles:
- role: vms
vm_names: "{{ vmname81 }}"
Related
I have built a playbook in ansible that creates 2 groups of ec2 instances.
In a second playbook, I want that the first play lists the existing group to the user so the user can choose one. Then in a second play, use this group in hosts
---
- name: playbook
hosts: localhost
vars_prompt:
- name: groupvar
prompt: "Select a group"
private: no
tasks:
- name: task 1
debug:
msg: "{{ groupvar}}"
- name: Another play
hosts: "{{ groupvar }}"
# ...
How can I pass on the value of groupvar to the second play in this playbook?
Note: make sure you are not simply re-inventing the existing --limit option of the ansible-playbook command line
As you found out, vars_prompt do not survive the play they're declared in. In that case you have to use set_fact. Here is an example using your above code as a starting point:
- name: playbook
hosts: localhost
vars_prompt:
- name: groupvar
prompt: "Select a group"
private: no
tasks:
- name: task 1
debug:
msg: "{{ groupvar }}"
- name: Save value in a fact for current host
set_fact:
groupvar: "{{ groupvar }}"
- name: Another play running on above chosen group
# Remember we have set the fact on current host above which was localhost
hosts: "{{ hostvars['localhost'].groupvar }}"
# ... rest of your play.
I am using Ansible and vCenter to provision a VM. When I run my playbook, I get an authentication error:
Cannot complete login due to an incorrect user name or password.
However, using the same credentials, I am able to log into vCenter manually.
Here is my simplified playbook:
---
- name: create a new VM on an ESX server
hosts: localhost
connection: local
tasks:
- name: include vars
include_vars:
dir: 'group_vars/prod'
files_matching: 'secret-esx.yml'
- name: gather facts from target host
local_action:
module: vmware_vm_facts
hostname: vi-devops-esx9.lab.vi.local
username: "{{ esx_username }}"
password: "{{ esx_password }}"
validate_certs: no
register: qe_facts
Why can I access vCenter, but vmware_vm_facts cannot with the same credentials?
My hostname was incorrect. Fixing my hostname fixed the authentication error.
I'm following the documentation for creating an instance using Ansible
http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/guide_gce.html
However, when I run this I get:
Required 'compute.zones.list' permission for 'projects/quick-line-137923'
I don't know where I'm meant to configure these permissions for a service account, because the documentation seems to suggest that you can only configure permissions for a service account on an instance that is already created:
"You can set scopes only when you create a new instance"
When I try to grant IAM permissions for this service account (admin), it isn’t in the list and when I select the service account in ‘service accounts’ I’m asked to add a member for domain wide permissions, nowhere to assign permissions to this service account for the compute.zones.list
Any help?
My playbook looks like so:
- name: "Create instance(s)"
hosts: localhost
gather_facts: no
connection: local
vars:
machine_type: n1-standard-1 # default
image: ubuntu-1404-lts
service_account_email: admin-531#quick-line-137923.iam.gserviceaccount.com
credentials_file: /Users/Mike/Downloads/project.json
project_id: quick-line-137923
tasks:
- name: "Launch instances"
gce:
instance_names: dev
machine_type: "{{ machine_type }}"
image: "{{ image }}"
service_account_email: "{{ service_account_email }}"
credentials_file: "{{ credentials_file }}"
project_id: "{{ project_id }}"
tags: webserver
register: gce
- name: "Wait for SSH to come up"
wait_for: host={{ item.public_ip }} port=22 delay=10 timeout=60
with_items: gce.instance_data
- name: "Add host to groupname"
add_host: hostname={{ item.public_ip }} groupname=new_instances
with_items: gce.instance_data
- name: "Manage new instances"
vars_files:
- "vars/webserver.yml"
hosts: new_instances
connection: ssh
sudo: True
roles:
- geerlingguy.apache
- geerlingguy.php
- geerlingguy.drush
- geerlingguy.mysql
Add the Compute Instance Admin and Service Account Actor roles to the service account.
You also have to activate the service account. The gcloud tool can be used: https://cloud.google.com/sdk/gcloud/reference/auth/activate-service-account .
We are currently using Ansible in conjunction with OpenStack. I've written a playbook (to deploy new server via OpenStack) where i use the module os_server where i use auto_ip: yes, the new server will become an IP Address assigned from the OpenStack Server.
If I use the -vvvv output command, i get a long output where in the middle of that output an IP-Address is listed.
So, cause I am a lazy guy, I want to put just this IP Address in a variable and let me show this IP Address in an extra field.
It should look like this:
"........output stuf.....
................................
.............................
..............................
..............................."
"The IP Adress of the New server is ....."
Is there any possibility you know to put these IP Address Field in a variable or to filter that output to the IP Address?
If you need an screenshot to see what I mean, no problem just write it and I'll give it to you!
Ansible OpenStack module uses shade python package to create a server.
According to the shade source code, create_server method returns a dict representing the created server.
Try to register the result of os_server and debug it. The IP Address should be there.
Example :
- name: launch a compute instance
hosts: localhost
tasks:
- name: launch an instance
os_server:
state: present
...
auto_ip: yes
register: result
- debug: var=result
Also, you can have a look to this sample playbook which does exactly this.
Here's an excerpt:
- name: create cluster notebook VM
register: notebook_vm
os_server:
name: "{{ cluster_name }}-notebook"
flavor: "{{ notebook_flavor }}"
image: "CentOS-7.0"
key_name: "{{ ssh_key }}"
network: "{{ network_name }}"
security_groups:
- "{{ cluster_name }}-notebook"
auto_ip: yes
boot_from_volume: "{{ notebook_boot_from_volume }}"
terminate_volume: yes
volume_size: 25
- name: add notebook to inventory
add_host:
name: "{{ cluster_name }}-notebook"
groups: notebooks
ansible_ssh_host: "{{ notebook_vm.openstack.private_v4 }}"
ansible_ssh_user: cloud-user
public_ip: "{{ notebook_vm.openstack.public_v4 }}"
public_name: "{{ lookup('dig', notebook_vm.openstack.public_v4 + '/PTR', wantlist=True)[0] }}"
tags: ['vm_creation']
I have 2 app servers with a loadbalancer in front of them and 1 database server in my system. I'm provisioning them using Ansible. App servers has Nginx + Passenger and running for a Rails app. Will use capistrano for deployment but I have an issue about ssh keys. My git repo is in another server and I have to generate ssh public keys on appservers and add them to the Git server(To authorized_keys file). How can I do this in ansible playbook?
PS: I may have more than 2 app servers.
This does the trick for me, it collects the public ssh keys on the nodes and distributes it over all the nodes. This way they can communicate with each other.
- hosts: controllers
gather_facts: false
remote_user: root
tasks:
- name: fetch all public ssh keys
shell: cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub
register: ssh_keys
tags:
- ssh
- name: check keys
debug: msg="{{ ssh_keys.stdout }}"
tags:
- ssh
- name: deploy keys on all servers
authorized_key: user=root key="{{ item[0] }}"
delegate_to: "{{ item[1] }}"
with_nested:
- "{{ ssh_keys.stdout }}"
- "{{groups['controllers']}}"
tags:
- ssh
Info: This is for the user root
Take a look to the authorized_key module for getting info on how to manage your public keys.
The most straightforward solution I can think of would be to generate a fresh key pair for your application, to be shared accross all your app instances. This may have security implications (you are indeed sharing keys between all instances!), but it'll simplify a lot the provisioning process.
You'll also require a deploy user on each app machine, to be used later on during deployment process. You'll need your public key (or jenkins one) on each deploy user's authorized_keys.
A sketch playbook:
---
- name: ensure app/deploy public key is present on git server
hosts: gitserver
tasks:
- name: ensure app public key
authorized_key:
user: "{{ git_user }}"
key: app_keys/id_dsa.pub
state: present
- name: provision app servers
hosts: appservers
tasks:
- name: ensure app/deploy user is present
user:
name: "{{ deploy_user }}"
state: present
- name: ensure you'll be able to deploy later on
authorized_key:
user: "{{ deploy_user }}"
key: "{{ path_to_your_public_key }}"
state: present
- name: ensure private key and public one are present
copy:
src: keys/myapp.private
dest: "/home/{{ deploy_user }}/.ssh/{{ item }}"
mode: 0600
with_items:
- app_keys/id_dsa.pub
- app_keys/id_dsa
I created a parameterized role to make sure ssh key pair is generated in a source user in a source remote host and its public key copied to a target user in a target remote host.
You can invoke that role in a nested loop of source and target host lists as shown at the bottom:
---
#****h* ansible/ansible_roles_ssh_authorize_user
# NAME
# ansible_roles_ssh_authorize_user - Authorizes user via ssh keys
#
# FUNCTION
#
# Copies user's SSH public key from a source user in a source host
# to a target user in a target host
#
# INPUTS
#
# * ssh_authorize_user_source_user
# * ssh_authorize_user_source_host
# * ssh_authorize_user_target_user
# * ssh_authorize_user_target_host
#****
#****h* ansible_roles_ssh_authorize_user/main.yml
# NAME
# main.yml - Main playbook for role ssh_authorize_user
# HISTORY
# $Id: $
#****
- assert:
that:
- ssh_authorize_user_source_user != ''
- ssh_authorize_user_source_host != ''
- ssh_authorize_user_target_user != ''
- ssh_authorize_user_target_host != ''
tags:
- check_vars
- name: Generate SSH Keypair in Source
user:
name: "{{ ssh_authorize_user_source_user }}"
state: present
ssh_key_comment: "ansible-generated for {{ ssh_authorize_user_source_user }}#{{ ssh_authorize_user_source_host }}"
generate_ssh_key: yes
delegate_to: "{{ ssh_authorize_user_source_host }}"
register: source_user
- name: Install SSH Public Key in Target
authorized_key:
user: "{{ ssh_authorize_user_target_user }}"
key: "{{ source_user.ssh_public_key }}"
delegate_to: "{{ ssh_authorize_user_target_host }}"
- debug:
msg: "{{ ssh_authorize_user_source_user }}#{{ ssh_authorize_user_source_host }} authorized to log in to {{ ssh_authorize_user_target_user }}#{{ ssh_authorize_user_target_host }}"
Invoking role in a loop:
- name: Authorize User
include_role:
name: ssh_authorize_user
vars:
ssh_authorize_user_source_user: "{{ git_user }}"
ssh_authorize_user_source_host: "{{ item[0] }}"
ssh_authorize_user_target_user: "{{ git_user }}"
ssh_authorize_user_target_host: "{{ item[1] }}"
with_nested:
- "{{ app_server_list }}"
- "{{ git_server_list }}"
I would create a deploy user that is restricted to pull access to your repos. You can either allow this through http or there are a few options to do it over ssh.
If you don't care about limiting the user to read-only access to your repo then you can create a normal ssh user. Once the user is created you can use Ansible to add the user's public key to the authorized key file on the git server you can use the authorized key module.
Once that is setup you have two options:
If you use ssh use ssh key forwarding so that the user that is used to run the Ansible task sends his public key to the dev server.
Temporarily transfer the key and use the ssh_opts git module option to use the deploy user's public key.
Use the openssh_keypair and authorized_key module to create and deploy the keys at the same time without saving it into your ansible host.
- openssh_keypair:
group: root
owner: root
path: /some/path/in/your/server
register: ssh_key
- name: Store public key into origin
delegate_to: central_server_name
authorized_key:
key: "{{ssh_key.public_key}}"
comment: "{{ansible_hostname}}"
user: any_user_on_central
Will create and/or make sure the ssh key on your server will enable ssh connection to central_server_name.
I wanted to contribute this code by removing the shell module and using slurp. Thanks a lot Jonas Libbrecht for the code. It is quite useful.
- name: Get ssh keys
slurp:
src: /home/nsbl/.ssh/id_ed25519.pub
register: ssh_keys
tags:
- ssh
- name: Check keys
debug: msg="{{ ssh_keys['content'] | b64decode }}"
tags:
- ssh
- name: deploy keys on nodes 1
authorized_key:
user: root
key: "{{ item[1] }}"
delegate_to: "{{ item[0] }}"
with_nested:
- "{{ groups['cluster'] }}"
- "{{ ssh_keys['content'] | b64decode }}"
tags:
- ssh
Thanks community.
This is what I use to exchange RSA keys between multiple hosts (many to many). I have variations that create the user accounts with the key pairs and also to deal with 'one to many' and 'many to one' scenarios.
#:TASK: Exchange SSH RSA keys between multiple hosts (many to many)
#:....: RSA keypairs are created as required at play (1)
#:....: authorized_keys updated at play <root user (2a.1 & 2a.2)>, <non root user (2b.1)>
#:....: -- We need a 2a or 2b option becasue there is a 'chicken & egg' issue for the root user!
#:....: known_hosts files are updated at play (3)
#:REQD: *IF* your security policy allows:
#:....: -- Add 'host_key_checking = False' to ansible.cfg
#:....: -- Or use one of the variations of 'StrictHostKeyChecking=no' elsewhere:
#:....: e.g. inventory setting - ansible_ssh_common_args='-o StrictHostKeyChecking=no'
#:....: - or - host variable - ansible_ssh_extra_args='-o StrictHostKeyChecking=no'
#:USER: RUN this as the 'root' user; it hasn't been tested or adapted to be run as any other user
#:EXEC: ansible-playbook <playbook>.yml -e "nodes=<inventory_hosts> user=<username>"
#:VERS: 20230119.01
#
---
- name: Exchange RSA keys and update known_hosts between multiple hosts
hosts: "{{ nodes }}"
vars:
ip: "{{ hostvars[inventory_hostname]['ansible_default_ipv4']['address'] }}"
tasks:
- name: (1) Generate an SSH RSA key pair
community.crypto.openssh_keypair:
path: "~{{ user }}/.ssh/id_rsa"
comment: "{{ user }}#{{ ip }}"
size: 2048
- name: (2) Retrieve RSA key/s then exchange it with other hosts
block:
- name: (2a.1) Retrieve client public RSA key/s to a variable
slurp:
src: ".ssh/id_rsa.pub"
register: rsa_key
# Using the debug module here seems to make the slurp above more reliable
# as during testing not all hosts that were slurped worked.
- debug:
msg: "{{ rsa_key['content'] | b64decode }} / {{ ip }} / {{ user }}"
- name: (2a.2) Exchange RSA keys between hosts and update authorized_key files
delegate_to: "{{ item }}"
authorized_key:
user: "{{ user }}"
key: "{{ rsa_key['content'] | b64decode }}"
with_items:
- "{{ ansible_play_hosts }}"
when: item != inventory_hostname
when: user == "root"
- name: (2b.1) Exchange RSA keys between hosts and update authorized_key files
block:
- delegate_to: "{{ item }}"
authorized_key:
user: "{{ user }}"
key: "{{ rsa_key['content'] | b64decode }}"
with_items:
- "{{ ansible_play_hosts }}"
when: item != inventory_hostname
when: user != "root"
- name: (3) Ensure nodes are present in known_hosts file
become: yes
become_user: "{{ user }}"
known_hosts:
name: "{{ item }}"
path: "~{{ user }}/.ssh/known_hosts"
key: "{{ lookup('pipe', 'ssh-keyscan -t rsa {{ item }}') }}"
when: item != inventory_hostname
with_items:
- "{{ ansible_play_hosts }}"