I'm trying to train a sequence to sequence model using tensorflow. I see that in the tutorials, buckets help speed up training. So far I'm able to train using just one bucket, and also using just one gpu and multiple buckets using more or less out of the box code, but when I try to use multiple buckets with multiple gpus, I get an error stating
Invalid argument: You must feed a value for placeholder tensor 'gpu_scope_0/encoder50_gpu0' with dtype int32
From the error, I can tell that I'm not declaring the input_feed correctly, so it is expecting the input to be of the size of the largest bucket every time. I'm confused about why this is the case, though, because in the examples that I'm adapting, it does the same thing when initializing the placeholders for the input_feed. As far as I can tell, the tutorials also initialize up to the largest sized bucket, but this error doesn't happen when I use the tutorials' code.
The following is what I think is the relevant initialization code:
self.encoder_inputs = [[] for _ in xrange(self.num_gpus)]
self.decoder_inputs = [[] for _ in xrange(self.num_gpus)]
self.target_weights = [[] for _ in xrange(self.num_gpus)]
self.scope_prefix = "gpu_scope"
for j in xrange(self.num_gpus):
with tf.device("/gpu:%d" % (self.gpu_offset + j)):
with tf.name_scope('%s_%d' % (self.scope_prefix, j)) as scope:
for i in xrange(buckets[-1][0]): # Last bucket is the biggest one.
self.encoder_inputs[j].append(tf.placeholder(tf.int32, shape=[None],
name="encoder{0}_gpu{1}".format(i,j)))
for i in xrange(buckets[-1][1] + 1):
self.decoder_inputs[j].append(tf.placeholder(tf.int32, shape=[None],
name="decoder{0}_gpu{1}".format(i,j)))
self.target_weights[j].append(tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=[None],
name="weight{0}_gpu{1}".format(i,j)))
# Our targets are decoder inputs shifted by one.
self.losses = []
self.outputs = []
# The following loss computation creates the neural network. The specified
# device hosts the trainable tf parameters.
bucket = buckets[0]
i = 0
with tf.device(param_device):
output, loss = tf.nn.seq2seq.model_with_buckets(self.encoder_inputs[i], self.decoder_inputs[i],
[self.decoder_inputs[i][k + 1] for k in
xrange(len(self.decoder_inputs[i]) - 1)],
self.target_weights[0], buckets,
lambda x, y: seq2seq_f(x, y, True),
softmax_loss_function=self.softmax_loss_function)
bucket = buckets[0]
self.encoder_states = []
with tf.device('/gpu:%d' % self.gpu_offset):
with variable_scope.variable_scope(variable_scope.get_variable_scope(),
reuse=True):
self.encoder_outputs, self.encoder_states = get_encoder_outputs(self,
self.encoder_inputs[0])
if not forward_only:
self.grads = []
print ("past line 297")
done_once = False
for i in xrange(self.num_gpus):
with tf.device("/gpu:%d" % (self.gpu_offset + i)):
with tf.name_scope("%s_%d" % (self.scope_prefix, i)) as scope:
with variable_scope.variable_scope(variable_scope.get_variable_scope(), reuse=True):
#for j, bucket in enumerate(buckets):
output, loss = tf.nn.seq2seq.model_with_buckets(self.encoder_inputs[i],
self.decoder_inputs[i],
[self.decoder_inputs[i][k + 1] for k in
xrange(len(self.decoder_inputs[i]) - 1)],
self.target_weights[i], buckets,
lambda x, y: seq2seq_f(x, y, True),
softmax_loss_function=self.softmax_loss_function)
self.losses.append(loss)
self.outputs.append(output)
# Training outputs and losses.
if forward_only:
self.outputs, self.losses = tf.nn.seq2seq.model_with_buckets(
self.encoder_inputs, self.decoder_inputs,
[self.decoder_inputs[0][k + 1] for k in xrange(buckets[0][1])],
self.target_weights, buckets, lambda x, y: seq2seq_f(x, y, True),
softmax_loss_function=self.softmax_loss_function)
# If we use output projection, we need to project outputs for decoding.
if self.output_projection is not None:
for b in xrange(len(buckets)):
self.outputs[b] = [
tf.matmul(output, self.output_projection[0]) + self.output_projection[1]
for output in self.outputs[b]
]
else:
self.bucket_grads = []
self.gradient_norms = []
params = tf.trainable_variables()
opt = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(self.learning_rate)
self.updates = []
with tf.device(aggregation_device):
for g in xrange(self.num_gpus):
for b in xrange(len(buckets)):
gradients = tf.gradients(self.losses[g][b], params)
clipped_grads, norm = tf.clip_by_global_norm(gradients, max_gradient_norm)
self.gradient_norms.append(norm)
self.updates.append(
opt.apply_gradients(zip(clipped_grads, params), global_step=self.global_step))
and the following is the relevant code when feeding in data:
input_feed = {}
for i in xrange(self.num_gpus):
for l in xrange(encoder_size):
input_feed[self.encoder_inputs[i][l].name] = encoder_inputs[i][l]
for l in xrange(decoder_size):
input_feed[self.decoder_inputs[i][l].name] = decoder_inputs[i][l]
input_feed[self.target_weights[i][l].name] = target_weights[i][l]
# Since our targets are decoder inputs shifted by one, we need one more.
last_target = self.decoder_inputs[i][decoder_size].name
input_feed[last_target] = np.zeros([self.batch_size], dtype=np.int32)
last_weight = self.target_weights[i][decoder_size].name
input_feed[last_weight] = np.zeros([self.batch_size], dtype=np.float32)
# Output feed: depends on whether we do a backward step or not.
if not forward_only:
output_feed = [self.updates[bucket_id], self.gradient_norms[bucket_id], self.losses[bucket_id]]
else:
output_feed = [self.losses[bucket_id]] # Loss for this batch.
for l in xrange(decoder_size): # Output logits.
output_feed.append(self.outputs[0][l])
Right now I'm considering just padding every input up to the bucket size, but I expect that this would lose some of the advantages of bucketing
Turns out the issue with this was not in the feeding of the placeholders, but was later on in my code where I referred to placeholders that weren't initialized. As far as I can tell when I fixed the later issues this error stopped
Related
I am working on a multi-class classification task using my own images.
filenames = [] # a list of filenames
labels = [] # a list of labels corresponding to the filenames
full_ds = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((filenames, labels))
This full dataset will be shuffled and split into train, valid and test dataset
full_ds_size = len(filenames)
full_ds = full_ds.shuffle(buffer_size=full_ds_size*2, seed=128) # seed is used for reproducibility
train_ds_size = int(0.64 * full_ds_size)
valid_ds_size = int(0.16 * full_ds_size)
train_ds = full_ds.take(train_ds_size)
remaining = full_ds.skip(train_ds_size)
valid_ds = remaining.take(valid_ds_size)
test_ds = remaining.skip(valid_ds_size)
Now I am struggling to understand how each class is distributed in train_ds, valid_ds and test_ds. An ugly solution is to iterate all the element in the dataset and count the occurrence of each class. Is there any better way to solve it?
My ugly solution:
def get_class_distribution(dataset):
class_distribution = {}
for element in dataset.as_numpy_iterator():
label = element[1]
if label in class_distribution.keys():
class_distribution[label] += 1
else:
class_distribution[label] = 0
# sort dict by key
class_distribution = collections.OrderedDict(sorted(class_distribution.items()))
return class_distribution
train_ds_class_dist = get_class_distribution(train_ds)
valid_ds_class_dist = get_class_distribution(valid_ds)
test_ds_class_dist = get_class_distribution(test_ds)
print(train_ds_class_dist)
print(valid_ds_class_dist)
print(test_ds_class_dist)
The answer below assumes:
there are five classes.
labels are integers from 0 to 4.
It can be modified to suit your needs.
Define a counter function:
def count_class(counts, batch, num_classes=5):
labels = batch['label']
for i in range(num_classes):
cc = tf.cast(labels == i, tf.int32)
counts[i] += tf.reduce_sum(cc)
return counts
Use the reduce operation:
initial_state = dict((i, 0) for i in range(5))
counts = train_ds.reduce(initial_state=initial_state,
reduce_func=count_class)
print([(k, v.numpy()) for k, v in counts.items()])
A solution inspired by user650654 's answer, only using TensorFlow primitives (with tf.unique_with_counts instead of for loop):
In theory, this should have better performance and scale better to large datasets, batches or class count.
num_classes = 5
#tf.function
def count_class(counts, batch):
y, _, c = tf.unique_with_counts(batch[1])
return tf.tensor_scatter_nd_add(counts, tf.expand_dims(y, axis=1), c)
counts = train_ds.reduce(
initial_state=tf.zeros(num_classes, tf.int32),
reduce_func=count_class)
print(counts.numpy())
Similar and simpler version with numpy that actually had better performances for my simple use-case:
count = np.zeros(num_classes, dtype=np.int32)
for _, labels in train_ds:
y, _, c = tf.unique_with_counts(labels)
count[y.numpy()] += c.numpy()
print(count)
I am trying to convert facebooks' fast-text model to tensorflow-hub format. I have attached two main files for the purpose.
def _compute_ngrams(word, min_n=1, max_n=3):
BOW, EOW = ('<', '>') # Used by FastText to attach to all words as prefix and suffix
ngrams = [] # batch_size, n_words, maxlen
shape = word.shape # batch_size, n_sentenes, n_words
maxlen = 0
for b in range(shape[0]): # batch
ngram_b = []
for w in word[b]:
ngram = []
extended_word = BOW + "".join( chr(x) for x in bytearray(w)) + EOW
if w.decode("utf-8") not in global_vocab:
for ngram_length in range(min_n, min(len(extended_word), max_n) + 1):
for i in range(0, len(extended_word) - ngram_length + 1):
ngram.append(extended_word[i:i + ngram_length])
else:
ngram.append(w.decode("utf-8") )
ngram_b.append(ngram)
maxlen = max(maxlen, len(ngram))
ngrams.append(ngram_b)
for batches in ngrams:
for words in batches:
temp = maxlen
r = []
while temp > len(words):
r.append("UNK")
temp = temp - 1
words.extend(r)
return ngrams
def make_module_spec(vocabulary_file, vocab_size, embeddings_dim=300,
num_oov_buckets=1):
def module_fn():
"""Spec function for a token embedding module."""
words = tf.placeholder(shape=[None, None], dtype=tf.string, name="tokens")
tokens = tf.py_func(_compute_ngrams, [words], tf.string)
embeddings_var = tf.get_variable(
initializer=tf.zeros([vocab_size + num_oov_buckets, embeddings_dim]),
name=EMBEDDINGS_VAR_NAME,
dtype=tf.float32
)
lookup_table = tf.contrib.lookup.index_table_from_file(
vocabulary_file=vocabulary_file,
num_oov_buckets=num_oov_buckets,
)
ids = lookup_table.lookup(tokens)
#combined_embedding = tf.reduce_mean(tf.nn.embedding_lookup(params=embeddings_var, ids=ids), axis=2)
combined_embedding = tf.nn.embedding_lookup(params=embeddings_var, ids=ids)
hub.add_signature("default", {"tokens": words},
{"default": combined_embedding})
return hub.create_module_spec(module_fn)
The model is created as expected with tf-hub format.
But when I try to use the above created model, I get this error.
The sample testing code to use tf-hub model created above is attached below.
with tf.Graph().as_default():
module_url = "/home/sahil_wadhwa/tf-hub/tf_sent"
embed = hub.Module(module_url)
embeddings = embed([["Indian", "American"], ["Hello", "World"]])
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
sess.run(tf.tables_initializer())
result = sess.run(embeddings)
print(result)
print(result.shape)
The error I get is here.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/sahil_wadhwa/.local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/tensorflow/python/ops/script_ops.py", line 195, in __call__
raise ValueError("callback %s is not found" % token)
ValueError: callback pyfunc_0 is not found
[[{{node module_apply_default/PyFunc}} = PyFunc[Tin=[DT_STRING], Tout=[DT_STRING], token="pyfunc_0", _device="/job:localhost/replica:0/task:0/device:CPU:0"](Const)]]
Been stuck with this for a long time, any help here would be useful.
Thanks in advance.
Answered on https://github.com/tensorflow/hub/issues/222:
Hi Sahil,
the issue here is that tf.py_func cannot be serialized. Serializing
arbitrary Python functions is not supported (for multiple reasons).
I see you are creating ngrams from a token if not present in the vocabulary
(btw, are the ngrams actually in the FastText vocabulary to be looked up or
does it contain only full words?).
One way of solving this could be to rewrite your _compute_ngrams function
in TensorFlow (maybe you could use this directly or at least get some
inspiration:
https://www.tensorflow.org/tfx/transform/api_docs/python/tft/ngrams).
I am dealing with an issue in my conversion over to the Dataset API and I guess I just don't have enough experience yet with the API to know how to handle the below situation. We currently have image augmentation that we perform currently using queueing and batching. I was tasked with checking out the new Dataset API and converting over our existing implementation using it rather than queues.
What we would like to do is get a reference to all the paths and handle all operations from just that reference. As you see in the dataset initialization, I have mapped the parse_fn to the dataset itself which then goes about reading the file and extracting the initial values from the filenames. However when I then go about calling the iterators next_batch method and then pass those values to get_summary, I'm now getting an error around shape. I have been trying a number of things which just keeps changing the error and so I felt I should see if anyone on SO saw possibly that I was going about this all wrong and should be taking a different route. Does anything jump out as absolutely wrong in my use of the Dataset API?
Should I not be calling the ops this way any longer? I noticed the majority of the examples I saw they would get the batch, pass the variables to the op and then capture that in a variable and pass that to sess.run, however I haven't found an easy way of doing that as of yet with our setup that wasn't erroring so this was the approach I took instead (but its still erroring). I'll be continuing to try to trace down the problem and post here should I find anything, but if anyone sees something please advise. Thanks!
Current Error:
... in get_summary summary, acc = sess.run([self._summary_op,
self._accuracy], feed_dict=feed_dict) ValueError: Cannot feed value of
shape (32,) for Tensor 'ph_input_labels:0', which has shape '(?, 1)
Below is the block where the get_summary method is called and error is fired:
def perform_train():
if __name__ == '__main__':
#Get all our image paths
filenames = data_layer_train.get_image_paths()
next_batch, iterator = preproc_image_fn(filenames=filenames)
with tf.Session(config=tf.ConfigProto(gpu_options=gpu_options)) as sess:
with sess.graph.as_default():
# Set the random seed for tensorflow
tf.set_random_seed(cfg.RNG_SEED)
classifier_network = c_common.create_model(len(products_to_class_dict), is_training=True)
optimizer, global_step_var = c_common.create_optimizer(classifier_network)
sess.run(tf.local_variables_initializer())
sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
# Init tables and dataset iterator
sess.run(tf.tables_initializer())
sess.run(iterator.initializer)
cur_epoch = 0
blobs = None
try:
epoch_size = data_layer_train.get_steps_per_epoch()
num_steps = num_epochs * epoch_size
for step in range(num_steps):
timer_summary.tic()
if blobs is None:
#Now populate from our training dataset
blobs = sess.run(next_batch)
# *************** Below is where it is erroring *****************
summary_train, acc = classifier_network.get_summary(sess, blobs["images"], blobs["labels"], blobs["weights"])
...
Believe the error is in preproc_image_fn:
def preproc_image_fn(filenames, images=None, labels=None, image_paths=None, cells=None, weights=None):
def _parse_fn(filename, label, weight):
augment_instance = False
paths=[]
selected_cells=[]
if vals.FIRST_ITER:
#Perform our check of the path to see if _data_augmentation is within it
#If so set augment_instance to true and replace the substring with an empty string
new_filename = tf.regex_replace(filename, "_data_augmentation", "")
contains = tf.equal(tf.size(tf.string_split([filename], "")), tf.size(tf.string_split([new_filename])))
filename = new_filename
if contains is True:
augment_instance = True
core_file = tf.string_split([filename], '\\').values[-1]
product_id = tf.string_split([core_file], ".").values[0]
label = search_tf_table_for_entry(product_id)
weight = data_layer_train.get_weights(product_id)
image_string = tf.read_file(filename)
img = tf.image.decode_image(image_string, channels=data_layer_train._channels)
img.set_shape([None, None, None])
img = tf.image.resize_images(img, [data_layer_train._target_height, data_layer_train._target_width])
#Previously I was returning the below, but I was getting an error from the op when assigning feed_dict stating that it didnt like the dictionary
#retval = dict(zip([filename], [img])), label, weight
retval = img, label, weight
return retval
num_files = len(filenames)
filenames = tf.constant(filenames)
#*********** Setup dataset below ************
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((filenames, labels, weights))
dataset=dataset.map(_parse_fn)
dataset = dataset.repeat()
dataset = dataset.batch(32)
iterator = dataset.make_initializable_iterator()
batch_features, batch_labels, batch_weights = iterator.get_next()
return {'images': batch_features, 'labels': batch_labels, 'weights': batch_weights}, iterator
def search_tf_table_for_entry(self, product_id):
'''Looks up keys in the table and outputs the values. Will return -1 if not found '''
if product_id is not None:
return self._products_to_class_table.lookup(product_id)
else:
if not self._real_eval:
logger().info("class not found in training {} ".format(product_id))
return -1
Where I create the model and have the placeholders used previously:
...
def create_model(self):
weights_regularizer = tf.contrib.layers.l2_regularizer(cfg.TRAIN.WEIGHT_DECAY)
biases_regularizer = weights_regularizer
# Input data.
self._input_images = tf.placeholder(
tf.float32, shape=(None, self._image_height, self._image_width, self._num_channels), name="ph_input_images")
self._input_labels = tf.placeholder(tf.int64, shape=(None, 1), name="ph_input_labels")
self._input_weights = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, shape=(None, 1), name="ph_input_weights")
self._is_training = tf.placeholder(tf.bool, name='ph_is_training')
self._keep_prob = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, name="ph_keep_prob")
self._accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(self._correct_prediction, tf.float32))
...
self.create_summaries()
def create_summaries(self):
val_summaries = []
with tf.device("/cpu:0"):
for var in self._act_summaries:
self._add_act_summary(var)
for var in self._train_summaries:
self._add_train_summary(var)
self._summary_op = tf.summary.merge_all()
self._summary_op_val = tf.summary.merge(val_summaries)
def get_summary(self, sess, images, labels, weights):
feed_dict = {self._input_images: images, self._input_labels: labels,
self._input_weights: weights, self._is_training: False}
summary, acc = sess.run([self._summary_op, self._accuracy], feed_dict=feed_dict)
return summary, acc
Since the error says:
Cannot feed value of shape (32,) for Tensor 'ph_input_labels:0', which has shape '(?, 1)
My guess is your labels in get_summary has the shape [32]. Can you just reshape it to (32, 1)? Or maybe reshape the label earlier in _parse_fn?
I found a peculiar property of lstm cell(not limited to lstm but I only examined with this) of tensorflow which has not been reported as far as I know.
I don't know whether it actually has, so I left this post in SO. Below is a toy code for this problem:
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
import time
def network(input_list):
input,init_hidden_c,init_hidden_m = input_list
cell = tf.nn.rnn_cell.BasicLSTMCell(256, state_is_tuple=True)
init_hidden = tf.nn.rnn_cell.LSTMStateTuple(init_hidden_c, init_hidden_m)
states, hidden_cm = tf.nn.dynamic_rnn(cell, input, dtype=tf.float32, initial_state=init_hidden)
net = [v for v in tf.trainable_variables()]
return states, hidden_cm, net
def action(x, h_c, h_m):
t0 = time.time()
outputs, output_h = sess.run([rnn_states[:,-1:,:], rnn_hidden_cm], feed_dict={
rnn_input:x,
rnn_init_hidden_c: h_c,
rnn_init_hidden_m: h_m
})
dt = time.time() - t0
return outputs, output_h, dt
rnn_input = tf.placeholder("float", [None, None, 512])
rnn_init_hidden_c = tf.placeholder("float", [None,256])
rnn_init_hidden_m = tf.placeholder("float", [None,256])
rnn_input_list = [rnn_input, rnn_init_hidden_c, rnn_init_hidden_m]
rnn_states, rnn_hidden_cm, rnn_net = network(rnn_input_list)
feed_input = np.random.uniform(low=-1.,high=1.,size=(1,1,512))
feed_init_hidden_c = np.zeros(shape=(1,256))
feed_init_hidden_m = np.zeros(shape=(1,256))
sess = tf.Session()
sess.run(tf.global_variables_initializer())
for i in range(10000):
_, output_hidden_cm, deltat = action(feed_input, feed_init_hidden_c, feed_init_hidden_m)
if i % 10 == 0:
print 'Running time: ' + str(deltat)
(feed_init_hidden_c, feed_init_hidden_m) = output_hidden_cm
feed_input = np.random.uniform(low=-1.,high=1.,size=(1,1,512))
[Not important]What this code does is to generate an output from 'network()' function containing LSTM where the input's temporal dimension is 1, so output's is also 1, and pull in&out initial state for each step of running.
[Important] Looking the 'sess.run()' part. For some reasons in my real code, I happened to put [:,-1:,:] for 'rnn_states'. What is happening is then the time spent for each 'sess.run()' increases. For some inspection by my own, I found this slow down stems from that [:,-1:,:]. I just wanted to get the output at the last time step. If you do 'outputs, output_h = sess.run([rnn_states, rnn_hidden_cm], feed_dict{~' w/o [:,-1:,:] and take 'last_output = outputs[:,-1:,:]' after the 'sess.run()', then the slow down does not occur.
I do not know why this exponential increment of time happens with that [:,-1:,:] running. Is this the nature of tensorflow hasn't been documented but particularly slows down(may be adding more graph by its own?)?
Thank you, and hope this mistake not happen for other users by this post.
I encountered the same problem, with TensorFlow slowing down for each iteration I ran it, and found this question while trying to debug it. Here's a short description of my situation and how I solved it for future reference. Hopefully it can point someone in the right direction and save them some time.
In my case the problem was mainly that I didn't make use of feed_dict to supply the network state when executing sess.run(). Instead I redeclared outputs, final_state and prediction every iteration. The answer at https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/issues/1439#issuecomment-194405649 made me realize how stupid that was... I was constantly creating new graph nodes in every iteration, making it all slower and slower. The problematic code looked something like this:
# defining the network
lstm_layer = rnn.BasicLSTMCell(num_units, forget_bias=1)
outputs, final_state = rnn.static_rnn(lstm_layer, input, initial_state=rnn_state, dtype='float32')
prediction = tf.nn.softmax(tf.matmul(outputs[-1], out_weights)+out_bias)
for input_data in data_seq:
# redeclaring, stupid stupid...
outputs, final_state = rnn.static_rnn(lstm_layer, input, initial_state=rnn_state, dtype='float32')
prediction = tf.nn.softmax(tf.matmul(outputs[-1], out_weights)+out_bias)
p, rnn_state = sess.run((prediction, final_state), feed_dict={x: input_data})
The solution was of course to only declare the nodes once in the beginning, and supply the new data with feed_dict. The code went from being half slow (> 15 ms in the beginning) and becoming slower for every iteration, to execute every iteration in around 1 ms. My new code looks something like this:
out_weights = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([num_units, n_classes]), name="out_weights")
out_bias = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_classes]), name="out_bias")
# placeholder for the network state
state_placeholder = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [2, 1, num_units])
rnn_state = tf.nn.rnn_cell.LSTMStateTuple(state_placeholder[0], state_placeholder[1])
x = tf.placeholder('float', [None, 1, n_input])
input = tf.unstack(x, 1, 1)
# defining the network
lstm_layer = rnn.BasicLSTMCell(num_units, forget_bias=1)
outputs, final_state = rnn.static_rnn(lstm_layer, input, initial_state=rnn_state, dtype='float32')
prediction = tf.nn.softmax(tf.matmul(outputs[-1], out_weights)+out_bias)
# actual network state, which we input with feed_dict
_rnn_state = tf.nn.rnn_cell.LSTMStateTuple(np.zeros((1, num_units), dtype='float32'), np.zeros((1, num_units), dtype='float32'))
it = 0
for input_data in data_seq:
encl_input = [[input_data]]
p, _rnn_state = sess.run((prediction, final_state), feed_dict={x: encl_input, rnn_state: _rnn_state})
print("{} - {}".format(it, p))
it += 1
Moving the declaration out from the for loop also got rid of the problem which the OP sdr2002 had, doing a slice outputs[-1] in sess.run() inside the for loop.
As mentioned above, no sliced output for 'sess.run()' is much appreciated for this case.
def action(x, h_c, h_m):
t0 = time.time()
outputs, output_h = sess.run([rnn_states, rnn_hidden_cm], feed_dict={
rnn_input:x,
rnn_init_hidden_c: h_c,
rnn_init_hidden_m: h_m
})
outputs = outputs[:,-1:,:]
dt = time.time() - t0
return outputs, output_h, dt
I would like to use the sparse_softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits
with the julia TensorFlow wrapper.
The operations is defined in the code here.
Basically, as I understand it the first argument should be logits, that would normally be fed to softmax to get them to be category probabilities (~1hot output).
And the second should be the correct labels as label ids.
I have adjusted the example code from the TensorFlow.jl readme
See below:
using Distributions
using TensorFlow
# Generate some synthetic data
x = randn(100, 50)
w = randn(50, 10)
y_prob = exp(x*w)
y_prob ./= sum(y_prob,2)
function draw(probs)
y = zeros(size(probs))
for i in 1:size(probs, 1)
idx = rand(Categorical(probs[i, :]))
y[i, idx] = 1
end
return y
end
y = draw(y_prob)
# Build the model
sess = Session(Graph())
X = placeholder(Float64)
Y_obs = placeholder(Float64)
Y_obs_lbl = indmax(Y_obs, 2)
variable_scope("logisitic_model", initializer=Normal(0, .001)) do
global W = get_variable("weights", [50, 10], Float64)
global B = get_variable("bias", [10], Float64)
end
L = X*W + B
Y=nn.softmax(L)
#costs = log(Y).*Y_obs #Dense (Orginal) way
costs = nn.sparse_softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(L, Y_obs_lbl+1) #sparse way
Loss = -reduce_sum(costs)
optimizer = train.AdamOptimizer()
minimize_op = train.minimize(optimizer, Loss)
saver = train.Saver()
# Run training
run(sess, initialize_all_variables())
cur_loss, _ = run(sess, [Loss, minimize_op], Dict(X=>x, Y_obs=>y))
When I run it however, I get an error:
Tensorflow error: Status: Incompatible shapes: [1,100] vs. [100,10]
[[Node: gradients/SparseSoftmaxCrossEntropyWithLogits_10_grad/mul = Mul[T=DT_DOUBLE, _class=[], _device="/job:localhost/replica:0/task:0/cpu:0"](gradients/SparseSoftmaxCrossEntropyWithLogits_10_grad/ExpandDims, SparseSoftmaxCrossEntropyWithLogits_10:1)]]
in check_status(::TensorFlow.Status) at /home/ubuntu/.julia/v0.5/TensorFlow/src/core.jl:101
in run(::TensorFlow.Session, ::Array{TensorFlow.Port,1}, ::Array{Any,1}, ::Array{TensorFlow.Port,1}, ::Array{Ptr{Void},1}) at /home/ubuntu/.julia/v0.5/TensorFlow/src/run.jl:96
in run(::TensorFlow.Session, ::Array{TensorFlow.Tensor,1}, ::Dict{TensorFlow.Tensor,Array{Float64,2}}) at /home/ubuntu/.julia/v0.5/TensorFlow/src/run.jl:143
This only happens when I try to train it.
If I don't include an optimise function/output then it works fine.
So I am doing something that screws up the gradient math.