Minecraft forge: event when block is generated - minecraft

Is there an event in 1.7.10 for when a block is generated, so i can place something above it. Or do i have to do that within the generation?
I already have looked online but i could not find an
onBlockGenerated
event or something like that.

You need to extend WorldGenerator
class Foo extends WorldGenerator {
protected Block[] GetValidSpawnBlocks() {
return new Block[] { Blocks.quartz };
}
public boolean generate(final World world, final Random rand, final int x, final int y, final int z) {
world.setBlock(x,y+1,z,FooModBlocks.yourFancyBlock,0,2);
}
}
And register it in your iworldgenerator
public class MagicCookieWorldGen implements IWorldGenerator {
private Foo myGenerator;
public MagicCookieWorldGen() {
super();
myGenerator = new Foo();
}
#Override
public void generate(Random random, int chunkX, int chunkZ, World world,
IChunkProvider chunkGenerator, IChunkProvider chunkProvider) {
this.worldGeneration(random, chunkX, chunkZ, world, true);
}
public void worldGeneration(final Random random, final int chunkX, final int chunkZ, final World world, final boolean newGen) {
switch (world.provider.dimensionId) {
case -1: {
this.generateNether(world, random, chunkX, chunkZ, newGen);
break;
}
case 1: {
break;
}
default: {
break;
}
}
}
private void generateNether(final World world, final Random random, final int chunkX, final int chunkZ, final boolean newGen) {
int startX = chunkX * 16;
int startZ = chunkZ * 16;
int startY = 5;
int endX = startX + 16;
int endZ = startZ + 16;
int endY = 65;
for(int x=startX;x<endX;x++)for(int z=startZ;z<endZ;z++)for(int y = startY;y<endY;y++) {
Block block = world.getBlock(x,y,z);
for(Block match : Foo.GetValidSpawnBlocks()) {
if(match == block) {
Foo.generate(world, final Random random, x, y, z);
break;
}
}
}
}
}
Then in your commonproxy in the init phase
GameRegistry.registerWorldGenerator((IWorldGenerator)(StuffLoader.worldGenerator = new MagicCookieWorldGen()), 0);
MagicCookie.log.info("Registered worldgenerator" + StuffLoader.worldGenerator);

Related

Arduino - passing values by reference from lamda to singleton

Hello i am bigginer in programing and i have specific problem.
I have been learning a new ways to write a code in small Arduino project.
that project have multiple objects like distance measuring Senzor, led diods , temperature senzor, etc. And all this objects have its own menu where you can, for example, start a calibration or just get values.
What i need is singleton class that has a function enter_esc() that need a int (*funct)() parameter basically function pointer.
That enter_esc(int (*funct)()) function just looping function until you press escape pin which is defined.
function Calibration() have inside some private: object data types like value or cali_value.
so i tried to insert function Calibration() right into enter_esc(Calibration) but it won't compile becouse i didnt pass that vlaues by reference or copy.
but what i found is lambda.
i made a lamda similar to a Calibration() function and i passed values by reference &{//domething;}
but i had to use enter_esc(std::function<int()>& funct) whitch is only int C++ standard library and not in Arduino C/C++ so my qestion is:
[is there some way how to pass values by reference by using lambda to a singleton class in Arduino ?]
(i konw it can be done differently but like i said i want to learn some new ways to program, also if you have some different way to make it i will by very happy to see it)
10Q for your time :)
//Class.h
#pragma once
class events {
private:
static events e_instance;
int p_menu, p_enter, p_esc, p_up, p_down;
int menuValue;
events();
public:
events(const events&) = delete;
static events& Get();
int ArrowUpDown(int maxVal);
int ArrowUpDown(int p_up, int p_down, int maxVal);
int enter_esc(const std::function<int()>& funct);
};
events events::e_instance;
class deviceBase : public Printables
{
public:
const char* a_pin;
int d_pin;
String type;
String deviceName;
bool inUse;
int actualCount;
public:
String getType() override;
int getActualCount() override;
String getName() override;
String getInUse() override;
};
class senzor : public deviceBase
{
private:
int Value;
int triggValue;
public:
int p_triggValue = 10;
static int allSenzors;
friend events;
senzor();
~senzor();
public:
int getValue();
int Calibration();
void changeTriggVal(int x);
void Reset();
void nullCalibration();
void Menu(int x);
void setName(String deviceName);
void setInUse(bool x);
int getPin();
};
int senzor::allSenzors = 0;
if you have some good advice to my code writing i will be also very glad
//Class.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <functional>
#define LOG(x) std::cout << x << std::endl;
#define PINMENU 12
#define PINENTER 8
#define PINESC 9
#define PINUP 11
#define PINDOWN 13
using String = std::string;
struct Printables
{
virtual String getType() = 0;
virtual int getActualCount() = 0; ;
virtual String getName() = 0;
virtual String getInUse() = 0;
};
#include "Class.h"
events& events::Get() {
return e_instance;
}
int events::ArrowUpDown(int maxVal) {
if (maxVal) {
menuValue = menuValue < maxVal ? menuValue++ : menuValue;
}
if (maxVal) {
menuValue = menuValue > 0 ? menuValue-- : menuValue;
}
return menuValue;
}
int events::enter_esc(const std::function<int()>&funct) {
if (1) {
while (!p_esc) {
auto f = funct;
}
}
return 1;
}
int events::ArrowUpDown(int p_up, int p_down, int maxVal) { return 666; }
events::events() {};
String deviceBase::getType() { return type; }
int deviceBase::getActualCount() { return actualCount; }
String deviceBase::getName() { return deviceName; }
String deviceBase::getInUse() {
String Status;
Status = inUse == 1 ? "Active" : "Deactive";
return Status;
}
senzor::senzor() : Value(0), triggValue(1) {
a_pin = "xx";
type = "[SENZOR]";
deviceName = "[UNKNOWN]";
inUse = 0;
allSenzors++;
actualCount = allSenzors;
a_pin = 0;
}
senzor::~senzor() {
allSenzors = 0;
}
int senzor::getValue() {
Value = 4;
return Value;
}
int senzor::Calibration() {
triggValue = triggValue < getValue() ? getValue() : triggValue;
p_triggValue = triggValue;
return p_triggValue;
}
void senzor::changeTriggVal(int x) {
p_triggValue = x;
}
void senzor::Reset() {
p_triggValue = triggValue;
}
void senzor::nullCalibration() {
triggValue = 1;
}
void senzor::setName(String deviceName) {
this->deviceName = deviceName;
}
void senzor::setInUse(bool x) {
inUse = x;
}
int senzor::getPin() {
return 4;
}
int printsss() {
return 1;
}
////////////////////////////////this what i was writing about//////////////////////////////
void senzor::Menu(int x) {
events::Get().enter_esc([&]() { triggValue = triggValue < getValue() ? getValue() : triggValue;
p_triggValue = triggValue;
return p_triggValue; });
}
but if i use lambda in arduino with enter_esc(int (*funct)()) i get this kind of error
no matching function for call to 'events::enter_esc(senzor::Menu(int)::<lambda()>)'

Optimizing Transposing and Comparison of Concurrent List in Java 8

I have an application in Java 8 Collecting Data of multiple Threads using BlockingQueue.
I need to perform comparison of samples.
But my application is very large, I implemented a mock application (Github) in Java 8.
I'm generating a chunk of bytes (really is random order).
The bytes are stored into ChunkDTO class.
I implemented a capturer the ChunkDTO in a List, code in Capturer class.
Each ChunkDTO of List is translated into a List of Samples (TimePitchValue exactly) returning a nested List (or List of List of TimePitchValue).
Later the nested List is transposed in order to performs comparisons between TimePitchValue with the same time value.
Due to enormous volume of TimePitchValue instances it's consumes huge time in my application.
Here some code (The complete functional Code is in Github) because is still large for this site).
public class Generator {
final static Logger LOGGER = Logger.getLogger("SampleComparator");
public static void main(String[] args) {
long previous = System.nanoTime();
final int minBufferSize = 2048;
int sampleRate = 8192;
int numChannels = 1;
int numBytesPerSample = 1;
int samplesChunkPerSecond = sampleRate / minBufferSize;
int minutes = 0;
int seconds = 10;
int time = 60 * minutes + seconds;
int chunksBySecond = samplesChunkPerSecond * numBytesPerSample * numChannels;
int pitchs = 32;
boolean signed = false;
boolean endianness = false;
AudioFormat audioformat = new AudioFormat(sampleRate, 8 * numBytesPerSample, numChannels, signed, endianness);
ControlDSP controlDSP = new ControlDSP(audioformat);
BlockingQueue<ChunkDTO> generatorBlockingQueue = new LinkedBlockingQueue<>();
Capturer capturer = new Capturer(controlDSP, pitchs, pitchs * time * chunksBySecond, generatorBlockingQueue);
controlDSP.getListFuture().add(controlDSP.getExecutorService().submit(capturer));
for (int i = 0; i < time * chunksBySecond; i++) {
for (int p = 0; p < pitchs; p++) {
ChunkDTO chunkDTO = new ChunkDTO(UtilClass.getArrayByte(minBufferSize), i, p);
LOGGER.info(String.format("chunkDTO: %s", chunkDTO));
try {
generatorBlockingQueue.put(chunkDTO);
} catch (InterruptedException ex) {
LOGGER.info(ex.getMessage());
}
}
try {
Thread.sleep(1000 / chunksBySecond);
} catch (Exception ex) {
}
}
controlDSP.tryFinishThreads(Thread.currentThread());
long current = System.nanoTime();
long interval = TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toSeconds(current - previous);
System.out.println("Seconds Interval: " + interval);
}
}
Capturer Class
public class Capturer implements Callable<Void> {
private final ControlDSP controlDSP;
private final int pitchs;
private final int totalChunks;
private final BlockingQueue<ChunkDTO> capturerBlockingQueue;
private final Counter intCounter;
private final Map<Long, List<ChunkDTO>> mapIndexListChunkDTO = Collections.synchronizedMap(new HashMap<>());
private volatile boolean isRunning = false;
private final String threadName;
private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger.getLogger("SampleComparator");
public Capturer(ControlDSP controlDSP, int pitchs, int totalChunks, BlockingQueue<ChunkDTO> capturerBlockingQueue) {
this.controlDSP = controlDSP;
this.pitchs = pitchs;
this.totalChunks = totalChunks;
this.capturerBlockingQueue = capturerBlockingQueue;
this.intCounter = new Counter();
this.controlDSP.getListFuture().add(this.controlDSP.getExecutorService().submit(() -> {
while (intCounter.getValue() < totalChunks) {
try {
Thread.sleep(100);
} catch (InterruptedException ex) {
LOGGER.log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
}
capturerBlockingQueue.add(new ChunkDTOStopper());
}));
this.threadName = this.getClass().getSimpleName();
}
#Override
public Void call() throws Exception {
long quantity = 0;
isRunning = true;
while (isRunning) {
try {
ChunkDTO chunkDTO = capturerBlockingQueue.take();
if (chunkDTO instanceof ChunkDTOStopper) {
break;
}
//Find or Create List (according to Index) to add the incoming Chunk
long index = chunkDTO.getIndex();
int sizeChunk = chunkDTO.getChunk().length;
List<ChunkDTO> listChunkDTOWithIndex = getListChunkDTOByIndex(chunkDTO);
//When the List (according to Index) is completed and processed
if (listChunkDTOWithIndex.size() == pitchs) {
mapIndexListChunkDTO.remove(index);
TransposerComparator transposerComparator = new TransposerComparator(controlDSP, controlDSP.getAudioformat(), index, sizeChunk, listChunkDTOWithIndex);
controlDSP.getListFuture().add(controlDSP.getExecutorService().submit(transposerComparator));
}
quantity++;
intCounter.setValue(quantity);
LOGGER.info(String.format("%s\tConsumes:%s\ttotal:%05d", threadName, chunkDTO, quantity));
} catch (Exception ex) {
LOGGER.log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
}
LOGGER.info(String.format("%s\tReceived:%05d\tQty:%s\tPitchs:%s\tEND\n", threadName, quantity, quantity / pitchs, pitchs));
return null;
}
private List<ChunkDTO> getListChunkDTOByIndex(ChunkDTO chunkDTO) {
List<ChunkDTO> listChunkDTOWithIndex = mapIndexListChunkDTO.get(chunkDTO.getIndex());
if (listChunkDTOWithIndex == null) {
listChunkDTOWithIndex = new ArrayList<>();
mapIndexListChunkDTO.put(chunkDTO.getIndex(), listChunkDTOWithIndex);
listChunkDTOWithIndex = mapIndexListChunkDTO.get(chunkDTO.getIndex());
}
listChunkDTOWithIndex.add(chunkDTO);
return listChunkDTOWithIndex;
}
}
TransposerComparator class.
The optimization required is in this code, specifically on transposedNestedList method.
public class TransposerComparator implements Callable<Void> {
private final ControlDSP controlDSP;
private final AudioFormat audioformat;
private final long index;
private final int sizeChunk;
private final List<ChunkDTO> listChunkDTOWithIndex;
private final String threadName;
private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger.getLogger("SampleComparator");
public TransposerComparator(ControlDSP controlDSP, AudioFormat audioformat, long index, int sizeChunk, List<ChunkDTO> listChunkDTOWithIndex) {
this.controlDSP = controlDSP;
this.audioformat = audioformat;
this.index = index;
this.sizeChunk = sizeChunk;
this.listChunkDTOWithIndex = listChunkDTOWithIndex;
this.threadName = this.getClass().getSimpleName() + "_" + String.format("%05d", index);
}
#Override
public Void call() throws Exception {
Thread.currentThread().setName(threadName);
LOGGER.info(String.format("%s\tINI", threadName));
try {
int numBytesPerSample = audioformat.getSampleSizeInBits() / 8;
int quantitySamples = sizeChunk / numBytesPerSample;
long baseTime = quantitySamples * index;
// Convert the List of Chunk Bytes to Nested List of TimePitchValue
List<List<TimePitchValue>> nestedListTimePitchValue = listChunkDTOWithIndex
.stream()
.map(chunkDTO -> {
return IntStream
.range(0, quantitySamples)
.mapToObj(time -> {
int value = extractValue(chunkDTO.getChunk(), numBytesPerSample, time);
return new TimePitchValue(chunkDTO.getPitch(), baseTime + time, value);
}).collect(Collectors.toList());
}).collect(Collectors.toList());
List<List<TimePitchValue>> timeNestedListTimePitchValue = transposedNestedList(nestedListTimePitchValue);
} catch (Exception ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
LOGGER.log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
throw ex;
}
return null;
}
private static int extractValue(byte[] bytesSamples, int numBytesPerSample, int time) {
byte[] bytesSingleNumber = Arrays.copyOfRange(bytesSamples, time * numBytesPerSample, (time + 1) * numBytesPerSample);
int value = numBytesPerSample == 2
? (UtilClass.Byte2IntLit(bytesSingleNumber[0], bytesSingleNumber[1]))
: (UtilClass.byte2intSmpl(bytesSingleNumber[0]));
return value;
}
private static List<List<TimePitchValue>> transposedNestedList(List<List<TimePitchValue>> nestedList) {
List<List<TimePitchValue>> outNestedList = new ArrayList<>();
nestedList.forEach(pitchList -> {
pitchList.forEach(pitchValue -> {
List<TimePitchValue> listTimePitchValueWithTime = listTimePitchValueWithTime(outNestedList, pitchValue.getTime());
if (!outNestedList.contains(listTimePitchValueWithTime)) {
outNestedList.add(listTimePitchValueWithTime);
}
listTimePitchValueWithTime.add(pitchValue);
});
});
outNestedList.forEach(pitchList -> {
pitchList.sort(Comparator.comparingInt(TimePitchValue::getValue).reversed());
});
return outNestedList;
}
private static List<TimePitchValue> listTimePitchValueWithTime(List<List<TimePitchValue>> nestedList, long time) {
List<TimePitchValue> listTimePitchValueWithTime = nestedList
.stream()
.filter(innerList -> innerList.stream()
.anyMatch(timePitchValue -> timePitchValue.getTime() == time))
.findAny()
.orElseGet(ArrayList::new);
return listTimePitchValueWithTime;
}
}
I was testing:
With 5 Seconds in Generator class and the List<List<TimePitchValue>> timeNestedListTimePitchValue = transposedNestedList(nestedListTimePitchValue); line in TransposerComparator class, Commented 7 Seconds needed, Uncommented 211 Seconds needed.
With 10 Seconds in Generator class and the List<List<TimePitchValue>> timeNestedListTimePitchValue = transposedNestedList(nestedListTimePitchValue); line in TransposerComparator class, Commented 12 Seconds needed, Uncommented 574 Seconds needed.
I need to use the application at least 60 minutes.
With the purpose of reduce the needed (consumed) time, I have two ways:
I choose for short is to optimize the methods that I am currently using.
That should be successful but longer and is to use GPGPU, but I don't know where to start implementing it yet.
QUESTIONS
This Question is for the first way: What changes do you recommend in the code of the transposedNestedList method in order to improve speed?
Is there better alternative to use this Comparison?
outNestedList.forEach(pitchList -> {
pitchList.sort(Comparator.comparingInt(TimePitchValue::getValue).reversed());
});

How to set both axis's scales to be always the same?

MPAndroidChart allows you to zoom in the X axis, Y axis and both. I would like to rescale the remaining axis (or both) to match the one(s) being scaled.
For that I've created a OnChartGestureListener:
public class ZoomNotDistorting implements OnChartGestureListener {
private Chart chart;
private ViewPortHandler viewPortHandler;
private float startDist = 1f;
private float scaleX, scaleY;
public ZoomNotDistorting(Chart chart) {
this.chart = chart;
this.viewPortHandler = chart.getViewPortHandler();
}
#Override
public void onChartGestureStart(MotionEvent me, ChartTouchListener.ChartGesture lastPerformedGesture) {
int action = me.getAction() & MotionEvent.ACTION_MASK;
if(action == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_DOWN && me.getPointerCount() >= 2) {
startDist = spacing(me);
}
}
#Override
public void onChartGestureEnd(MotionEvent me, ChartTouchListener.ChartGesture lastPerformedGesture) {
switch (lastPerformedGesture) {
case PINCH_ZOOM:
float scale = spacing(me) / startDist; // total scale
boolean isZoomingOut = (scale < 1);
if(isZoomingOut) {
if(scaleX < scaleY) {
viewPortHandler.zoom(scaleX, scaleX);
} else {
viewPortHandler.zoom(scaleY, scaleY);
}
} else {
if(scaleX > scaleY) {
viewPortHandler.zoom(scaleX, scaleX);
} else {
viewPortHandler.zoom(scaleY, scaleY);
}
}
break;
case X_ZOOM:
viewPortHandler.zoom(scaleX, scaleX);
break;
case Y_ZOOM:
viewPortHandler.zoom(scaleY, scaleY);
break;
}
chart.invalidate();
}
#Override
public void onChartLongPressed(MotionEvent me) {}
#Override
public void onChartDoubleTapped(MotionEvent me) {}
#Override
public void onChartSingleTapped(MotionEvent me) {}
#Override
public void onChartFling(MotionEvent me1, MotionEvent me2, float velocityX, float velocityY) {}
#Override
public void onChartScale(MotionEvent me, float scaleX, float scaleY) {
this.scaleX = scaleX;
this.scaleY = scaleY;
}
#Override
public void onChartTranslate(MotionEvent me, float dX, float dY) {}
/**
* returns the distance between two pointer touch points
*/
private static float spacing(MotionEvent event) {
float x = event.getX(0) - event.getX(1);
float y = event.getY(0) - event.getY(1);
return (float) Math.sqrt(x * x + y * y);
}
}
That class doesn't seem to be doing anything,How to set both axis's scales to be always the same?
Also, here is my chart class:
public class MathGraph extends LineChart {
public static final int BOUNDARIES = 100;
public static final int DATA_POINTS = 200;
private static final int LINE_WIDTH = 2;
private LineData data;
public MathGraph(Context context, AttributeSet attrs) {
super(context, attrs);
super.setDescription(null);
//Misc
getLegend().setEnabled(false);
setRenderer(new LineChatRendererNoData(this, mAnimator, mViewPortHandler));
//Lines encasing the chart
getXAxis().setAxisLineWidth(LINE_WIDTH);
getAxisLeft().setAxisLineWidth(LINE_WIDTH);
getAxisRight().setEnabled(false);
//Line for (x; 0)
getAxisLeft().setDrawZeroLine(true);
getAxisLeft().setZeroLineWidth(LINE_WIDTH);
getAxisRight().setDrawZeroLine(true);
getAxisRight().setZeroLineWidth(LINE_WIDTH);
//Line for (0; y)
LimitLine limitLine = new LimitLine(0f);
limitLine.setLineColor(Color.GRAY);
limitLine.setLineWidth(LINE_WIDTH);
getXAxis().addLimitLine(limitLine);
setOnChartGestureListener(new ZoomNotDistorting(this));
}
public void setFunction(Function f) {
if(!f.checkSyntax()) throw new IllegalStateException("Error in function: " + f.toString() + "!");
setDescription(f);
data = null;
LoadFunctionAsyncTask l = new LoadFunctionAsyncTask(f, -BOUNDARIES, BOUNDARIES, DATA_POINTS,
(List<Entry> pointList) -> {
if(data == null) {
ILineDataSet dataSet = new LineDataSet(new ArrayList<>(), null);
dataSet.setValueFormatter(new PointValueFormatter());
dataSet.setHighlightEnabled(true);
for (Entry dataPoint : pointList) {
dataSet.addEntry(dataPoint);
}
data = new LineData(dataSet);
setData(data);
} else {
for (Entry dataPoint : pointList) {
data.addEntry(dataPoint, 0);// 0 is the only dataset
}
data.notifyDataChanged();
notifyDataSetChanged();
invalidate();
}
});
l.execute();
}
private void setDescription(Function f) {
Description desc = new Description();
desc.setText(f.getDescription());
desc.setPosition(16, getBottom() - 16);
setDescription(desc);
}
private class PointValueFormatter implements IValueFormatter {
#Override
public String getFormattedValue(float value, Entry entry, int dataSetIndex, ViewPortHandler viewPortHandler) {
return "(" + entry.getX() + ", " + entry.getY() + ")";
}
}
}
OK, apparently chart.invalidate() isn't enough, the Matrix needs to be refreshed:
Matrix matrix = null;
//...
matrix = viewPortHandler.zoom(scaleX, scaleX);
//...
if(matrix != null) {
viewPortHandler.refresh(matrix, chart, true);
}
As a bonus, the last true in refresh() is for invalidate, so no need for chart.invalidate();.

Getting error c2280 at my Update function (at if (Game::vector.at(i).alivez()) specifically)

I'm having an error doing the Update when checking if(Game::vector.at(i).alivez()), the error is C2280.
The error says: "Enemy &Enemy::operator =(const Enemy &)': attempting to reference a deleted function. Project: Avoidance Game File:xutility
Game.cpp:
void Game::Init()
{
int i = 0;
while(i< Game::Enemies)
{
srand(time(NULL));
Game::vector.push_back(Enemy(0, (rand()% (int)Console::WindowWidth), (rand() % (int)Console::WindowHeight), rand()%1500/1000.0f));
i++;
}
GameOver = false;
Paused = false;
}
void Game::GameMenu()
{
cout << "1. Start Game\n2. Instructions\n3. Close Game\nChoose an option:";
}
void Game::Instructions()
{
Console::Clear();
cout << "Left arrow = left (duh)\nRight arrow = right (surprise)\nSpace Bar = Shoot\nEsc = Close Game\nP Key = Pause\n ";
system("pause");
}
void Game::fire(Player a)
{
a.mX;
}
void Game::Run()
{
while (!GameOver)
{
if (GetAsyncKeyState(VK_ESCAPE))
{
GameOver = true;
}
else if (GetAsyncKeyState((int)'P'))
{
Paused = !Paused;
}
}
}
void Game::Update()
{
if (!Paused)
{
mPlayer.Update();
for (int i = 0; i < Game::Enemies; i++)
{
Game::vector.at(i).Update();
if (Game::vector.at(i).alivez())
{
Game::vector.erase(Game::vector.begin() + i);
i--;
Game::Enemies--;
}
}
}
}
Game.h:
#pragma once
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "targetver.h"
#include <vector>
class Enemy;
class Game
{
int Enemies = 30;
bool Paused;
bool GameOver;
int Score;
Player mPlayer = Player();
std::vector<Enemy> vector;
public:
void Init();
void GameMenu();
void Instructions();
void fire(Player a);
void Run();
void Update();
};
Enemy.h:
class Enemy
{
enum Enemy_type {NormalEnemy};
Game game;
float mX;
float mY;
float speed;
Enemy_type type;
public:
bool alive;
Enemy(int type, int x, int y, float _speed)
{
switch (type)
{
case 0:
type = Enemy_type::NormalEnemy;
break;
}
mX = (float)x;
mY = (float)y;
speed = _speed;
alive = true;
}
float GetX() { return mX; }
float GetY() { return mY; }
bool alivez() { return alive; }
void Kill() { alive = false; }
void Update();
void Draw();
};

Extract common objects from an arraylist

I have a list like shown below. Assume it has 16 Container objects in it. Each Container object is a simple bean, with fields like age, weight, height, etc. How can I create a sub-list that contains common 'Container' objects if a 'Container' object is considered equal if the weight and height are equal?
List<Container> containers = new ArrayList<Container>();
If by "common" containers you mean duplicating ones, then this code might help you:
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class CommonContainers {
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<Container> containers = new ArrayList<Container>(16);
for(int i=0; i<13; i++) {
containers.add(new Container(i, i));
}
//add a few duplicating ones
containers.add(new Container(1,1));
containers.add(new Container(5,5));
containers.add(new Container(6,6));
List<Container> sublist = new ArrayList<Container>();
for (Container c1 : containers) {
for (Container c2 : containers) {
if(c1 != c2 && c1.equals(c2)) {
sublist.add(c1);
}
}
}
for (Container c : sublist) {
System.out.println(c);
}
}
private static class Container {
private int weight;
private int height;
#Override
public String toString() {
return String.format("Container[w=%d,h=%d]", weight, height);
}
public Container(int weight, int height) {
this.weight = weight;
this.height = height;
}
public int getWeight() {
return weight;
}
public void setWeight(int weight) {
this.weight = weight;
}
public int getHeight() {
return height;
}
public void setHeight(int height) {
this.height = height;
}
#Override
public int hashCode() {
final int prime = 31;
int result = 1;
result = prime * result + height;
result = prime * result + weight;
return result;
}
#Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
if (obj == null)
return false;
if (getClass() != obj.getClass())
return false;
Container other = (Container) obj;
if (height != other.height)
return false;
if (weight != other.weight)
return false;
return true;
}
}
}
If you mean something else or need clarification, please let me know.
Thanks John Smith for giving direction on this question. I used the iterator instead and was able to make a nice solution to what I was looking for. below is the solution. Note that .equals is overriden for the Containers comparison. The technique I used will take the master list and create a sub-list while removing elements from the parent list at the same time. The solution can be called recursivly until you convert the master list into a subset of lists.
public List<Container> extractCommonSubList(
List<Container> masterContainerList) {
List<Container> subList = new ArrayList<Container>();
ListIterator<Container> iterator = masterContainerList.listIterator();
// get first item from master list and remove from master list
Container firstContainer = iterator.next();
iterator.remove();
// Add first container to sublist
subList.add(firstContainer);
while (iterator.hasNext()) {
Container container = iterator.next();
// Search for matches
if (firstContainer.equals(container)) {
// containers are a match, continue searching for matches
subList.add(container);
iterator.remove();
continue;
} else {
break;
}
}
// return common list
return subList;
}