SQL Server Express dev setup - access denied whack-a-mole - sql

I have a development environment in which I need to use IIS and SQL Server Express. My connection string looks like this:
<add name="DefaultConnection"
connectionString="Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|\MyProject.mdf;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True"
providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
This works great when I run the app and browse to the site. Data is returned from the database and I can log into Management Studio and view that data. The problem is when I try to push a new data migration using Update-Database.
I then get this error message:
Login failed for user 'AzureAD\MyAccount'
If I remove User Instance=True from my connection string, the Update-Database command suddenly works! Then I refresh my page and see the following error from all endpoints that require the database:
CREATE DATABASE permission denied in database 'master'.
I have already tried the trick of deleting this folder. It did not solve it.
C:\Users\MyAccount\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server Data
What gives?

Figured this out so Ill leave the answer here for the next dev:
As I mentioned, my dev setup is running IIS and SQL Express.
Update the connection string to point to an Initial Catalog=MyDatabase instead of the AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|\MyProject.mdf
Remove User Instance=True. Your connection string now looks like:
Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS;Initial Catalog=FullStackFitness;Integrated Security=True
Create the database by running Update-Database.
Create a SQL login for the app pool account (IIS APPPOOL\ACCOUNT) dbcreator and sysadmin on the database.
I did not test it but I believe you can keep using an mdf file and still get this to work by running only steps 2 - 4.
Troubleshooting Tips
Help troubleshooting the access denied issue came from a tip on Scott Allens blog:
The first step I would recommend is trying to determine what connection string the framework is using, because the exception doesn’t tell you the connection string, and the connection string can be controlled by a variety of conventions, configurations, and code.
To find out the connection string, I’d add some logging to a default constructor in my DbContext derived class.
public class DepartmentDb : DbContext
{
public DepartmentDb()
{
Debug.Write(Database.Connection.ConnectionString);
}
public DbSet<Person> People { get; set; }
}
Run the application with the debugger and watch the Visual Studio Output window. Or, set a breakpoint and observe the ConnectionString property as you go somewhere in the application that tries to make a database connection.

Related

Using SQL LocalDB in a Windows Service

I have a very small test application in which I'm trying to install a Windows Service and create a LocalDB database during the install process, then connect to that LocalDB database when the Windows Service runs.
I am running into huge problems connecting to a LocalDB instance from my Windows Service.
My installation process is exactly like this:
Execute an installer .msi file which runs the msiexec process as the NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM account.
Run a custom action to execute SqlLocalDB.exe with the following commands:
sqllocaldb.exe create MYINSTANCE
sqllocaldb.exe share MYINSTANCE MYINSTANCESHARE
sqllocaldb.exe start MYINSTANCE
Run a custom C# action using ADO.NET (System.Data.SqlConnection) to perform the following actions:
Connect to the following connection string, Data Source=(localdb)\MYINSTANCE; Integrated Security=true
CREATE DATABASE TestDB
USE TestDB
CREATE TABLE ...
Start the Windows Service before the installer finishes.
The Windows Service is installed to the LocalSystem account and so also runs as the NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM user account.
The service attempts to connect using the same connection string used above.
I am consistently getting the following error when trying to open the connection to the above connection string from within the Windows Service:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException (0x80131904): A network-related or
instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to
SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify
that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to
allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 50
- Local Database Runtime error occurred. The specified LocalDB instance does not exist.
This is frustrating because both the msi installer custom action and the Windows Service are running under the same Windows user account (I checked, they're both NT AUTHORITY\System). So why the first works and the second does not is beyond me.
I have tried changing the connection strings used in the custom action and the Windows Service to use the share name (localdb)\.\MYINSTANCESHARE and I get the exact same error from the Windows Service.
I have tried changing the user account that the Windows Service logs on as to my Windows user account, which does work as long as I first run a command to add it to the SQL server logins for that instance.
I've also tried running a console application and connecting to the share name connection string and that works as well.
I've also tried connecting to the share name from SQL Server Management Studio and that works as well.
However none of these methods really solve my problem. I need a Windows Service because it starts up as soon as the computer starts up (even if no user logs on) and starts up no matter which user account is logged in.
How does a Windows Service connect to a LocalDB private instance?
I am using SQL Server 2014 Express LocalDB.
Picking up from the comments on the question, here are some areas to look at. Some of these have already been answered in those comments, but I am documenting here for others in case the info might be helpful.
Check here for a great source of info on SQL Server Express LocalDB:
SQL Server 2014 Express LocalDB
SqlClient Support for LocalDB
SqlLocalDB Utlity
Introducing LocalDB, an improved SQL Express (also look at the Q&A section at the end of the main post, just before the comments, as someone asked if LocalDB can be launched from a service, and the answer is:
LocalDB can be launched from a service, as long as the profile is loaded for the service account.
What version of .Net is being used? Here it is 4.5.1 (good) but earlier versions could not handle the preferred connection string (i.e. #"(localdb)\InstanceName"). The following quote is taken from the link noted above:
If your application uses a version of .NET before 4.0.2 you must connect directly to the named pipe of the LocalDB.
And according to the MSDN page for SqlConnection.ConnectionString:
Beginning in .NET Framework 4.5, you can also connect to a LocalDB database as follows:
server=(localdb)\\myInstance
Paths:
Instances: C:\Users{Windows Login}\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server Local DB\Instances
Databases:
Created via SSMS or direct connection: C:\Users{Windows Login}\Documents or C:\Users{Windows Login}
Created via Visual Studio: C:\Users{Windows Login}\AppData\Local\Microsoft\VisualStudio\SSDT
Initial Problem
Symptoms:
Database files (.mdf and .ldf) created in the expected location:
C:\Windows\System32\config\systemprofile
Instance files created in an unexpected location:
C:\Users\{current user}\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server Local DB\Instances
Cause (note taken from "SqlLocalDB Utility" MSDN page that is linked above; emphasis mine):
Operations other than start can only be performed on an instance belonging to currently logged in user.
Things to try:
Connection string that specifies the database (though maybe a long-shot if the error is regarding not being able to connect to the instance):
"Server=(LocalDB)\MYINSTANCE; Integrated Security=true ;AttachDbFileName=C:\Windows\System32\config\systemprofile\TestDB.mdf"
"Server=(LocalDB)\.\MYINSTANCESHARE; Integrated Security=true ;AttachDbFileName=C:\Windows\System32\config\systemprofile\TestDB.mdf"
Is the service running? Run the following from a Command Prompt:
TASKLIST /FI "IMAGENAME eq sqlservr.exe"
It should probably be listed under "Console" for the "Session Name" column
Run the following from a Command Prompt:
sqllocaldb.exe info MYINSTANCE
And verify that the value for "Owner" is correct. Is the value for "Shared name" what it should be? If not, the documentation states:
Only an administrator on the computer can create a shared instance of LocalDB
As part of the setup, add the NT AUTHORITY\System account as a Login to the system, which is required if this account is not showing as the "Owner" of the instance:
CREATE LOGIN [NT AUTHORITY\System] FROM WINDOWS;
ALTER SERVER ROLE [sysadmin] ADD MEMBER [NT AUTHORITY\System];
Check the following file for clues / details:
C:\Users{Windows Login}\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server Local DB\Instances\MYINSTANCE\error.log
In the end you might need to create an actual account to create and own the Instance and Database, as well as run your service. LocalDB really is meant to be user-mode, and is there any downside to having your service have its own login? And you probably wouldn't need to share the instance at that point.
And in fact, as noted by Microsoft on the SQL Server YYYY Express LocalDB MSDN page:
An instance of LocalDB owned by the built-in accounts such as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM can have manageability issues due to windows file system redirection; Instead use a normal windows account as the owner.
UPDATE (2015-08-21)
Based on feedback from the O.P. that using a regular User account can be problematic in certain environments, AND keeping in mind the original issue of the LocalDB instance being created in the %LOCALAPPDATA% folder for the user running the installer (and not the %LOCALAPPDATA% folder for NT AUTHORITY\System ), I found a solution that seems to keep with the intent of easy installation (no user to create) and should not require needing extra code to load the SYSTEM profile.
Try using one of the two built-in accounts that is not the LocalSystem account (which does not maintain its own registry info. Use either:
NT AUTHORITY\LocalService
NT AUTHORITY\NetworkService
Both have their profile folders in: C:\Windows\ServiceProfiles
While I have not been able to test via an installer, I did test a service logging on as NT AUTHORITY\NetworkService by setting my SQL Server Express 2014 instance to log on as this account, and restarted the SQL Server service. I then ran the following:
EXEC xp_cmdshell 'sqllocaldb c MyTestInstance -s';
and it created the instance in: C:\Windows\ServiceProfiles\NetworkService\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server Local DB\Instances
I then ran the following:
EXEC xp_cmdshell N'SQLCMD -S (localdb)\MyTestInstance -E -Q "CREATE DATABASE [MyTestDB];"';
and it had created the database in: C:\Windows\ServiceProfiles\NetworkService
I was able to solve similar issue in our WiX installer recently. We have a Windows service, running under SYSTEM account, and an installer, where LocalDB-based storage is one of the options for database configuration. For some time (a couple of years actually) product upgrades and service worked quite fine, with no issues related to LocalDB. We are using default v11.0 instance, which is created in SYSTEM profile in C:\Windows\System32\config tree, and a database specified via AttachDbFileName, created in ALLUSERSPROFILE tree. DB provider is configured to use Windows authentication. We also have a custom action in installer, scheduled as deferred/non-impersonate, which runs DB schema updates.
All this worked fine until recently. After another bunch of DB updates, our new release started to fail after having upgraded over the former - service was unable to start, reporting infamous "A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server" (error 50) fault.
When investigating this issue, it became apparent that the problem is in a way WiX runs custom actions. Although non-impersonated CA-s run under SYSTEM account, the registry profile and environment remain that of current user (I suspect WiX loads these voluntary when attaching to user's session). This leads to incorrect path being expanded from the LOCALAPPDATA variable - the service receives SYSTEM profile one, but the schema update CA works with the user's one.
So here are two possible solutions. The first one is simple, but too intrusive to user's system - with cmd.exe started via psexec, recreate broken instance under the SYSTEM account. This was not an option for us as the user may have other databases created in v11.0 instance, which is public. The second option assumed lots of refactoring, but wouldn't hurt anything. Here is what to do to run DB schema updates properly with LocalDB in WiX CA:
Configure your CA as deferred/non-impersonate (should run under SYSTEM account);
Fix environment to point to SYSTEM profile paths:
var systemRoot = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("SystemRoot");
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable("USERPROFILE", String.Format(#"{0}\System32\config\systemprofile", systemRoot));
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable("APPDATA", String.Format(#"{0}\System32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Roaming", systemRoot));
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable("LOCALAPPDATA", String.Format(#"{0}\System32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Local", systemRoot));
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable("HOMEPATH", String.Empty);
Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable("USERNAME", Environment.UserName);
Load SYSTEM account profile. I used LogonUser/LoadUserProfile native API methods, as following:
[DllImport("advapi32.dll", CharSet = CharSet.Unicode, SetLastError = true)]
[return: MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.Bool)]
private static extern bool LogonUser(
string lpszUserName,
string lpszDomain,
string lpszPassword,
int dwLogonType,
int dwLogonProvider,
ref IntPtr phToken);
[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]
struct PROFILEINFO
{
public int dwSize;
public int dwFlags;
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPWStr)]
public String lpUserName;
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPWStr)]
public String lpProfilePath;
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPWStr)]
public String lpDefaultPath;
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPWStr)]
public String lpServerName;
[MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPWStr)]
public String lpPolicyPath;
public IntPtr hProfile;
}
[DllImport("userenv.dll", SetLastError = true, CharSet = CharSet.Unicode)]
[return: MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.Bool)]
static extern bool LoadUserProfile(IntPtr hToken, ref PROFILEINFO lpProfileInfo);
var hToken = IntPtr.Zero;
var hProfile = IntPtr.Zero;
bool result = LogonUser("SYSTEM", "NT AUTHORITY", String.Empty, 3 /* LOGON32_LOGON_SERVICE */, 0 /* LOGON32_PROVIDER_DEFAULT */, ref token);
if (result)
{
var profileInfo = new PROFILEINFO();
profileInfo.dwSize = Marshal.SizeOf(profileInfo);
profileInfo.lpUserName = #"NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM";
if (LoadUserProfile(token, ref profileInfo))
hProfile = profileInfo.hProfile;
}
Wrap this in an IDisposable class, and use with a using statement to build a context.
The most important - refactor your code to perform necessary DB updates in a child process. This could be a simple exe-wrapper over your installer DLL, or stand-alone utility, if your already have one.
P.S. All these difficulties could be avoided, if only Microsoft let uses choose where to create LocalDB instances, via command line option. Like Postgres' initdb/pg_ctl utilities have, for example.
I suggest using a different user account, and not using the System account, by doing the following:-
create a new account on the machine, and set that to be the account
under which the Windows Service runs. It's not good practice to use
the system account just to run an application, anyway, as the
permissions are excessive.
ensure that the permissions on the LocalDB files are set to allow the said user account to access the database (and thus continue to
use Integrated Security)
make sure it works by trying to connect to the DB (once installed) under the same user account by running sqlcmd or Management Studio
under the context of the said user, then connecting with Integrated
Security to ensure it works.
Some other things to try/consider:
have you checked the Windows Event log for any events that might be useful for diagnostic purposes?
Make sure that if you have any other versions of SQL Server (especially prior to 2012) that for the command-line tools, the %PATH% isn't set to find an older tools version first. Older tools don't support LocalDB.
It is possible also (as an alternative) to set up LocalDB to be shared with other users. This involves sharing the instance, and then granting access to other users. See the "Sharing Issues" section in this article: Troubleshoot SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB.
There's also another SO article that may contain some more useful information there in the links within (change the language in the URL from Polish to English by changing pl-pl to en-us). His work-around is using SQL Server accounts, which might not be OK in your case.
This might also be useful, as it relates to security permissions being denied, and possible resolutions: https://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/30383/cannot-start-sqllocaldb-instance-with-my-windows-account
Trevor, the problem you have is with the MSI custom actions. You must configure them with "Impersonate=false" otherwise the custom actions will be executed under the current user context.
BTW what tool are you using to create the installer?
Depending on the tool you use, could you please provide screenshots or code snippets of your custom actions configuration?
The accepted answer from this post will give you some additional information about the different custom action execution alternatives:
Run ExeCommand in customAction as Administrator mode in Wix Installer
You will find additional information about impersonation here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/rflaming/archive/2006/09/23/768248.aspx
I wouldn't create the database under the system's localdb instance. I'd create it under the current user installing the product. This will make life much easier if you need to delete or manage the database. They can do this through sql management studio. Otherwise, you'll have to use psexc or something else to launch a process under the SYSTEM account to manage it.
Once the db is created, then use the share option you mentioned. The SYSTEM account can then access the database through the share name.
sqllocaldb share MSSqlLocalDb LOCAL_DB
When sharing, I've noticed you'll have to restart the the local db instance to actually access the db through the share name:
sqllocaldb stop MSSQLLocalDB
sqllocaldb start MSSQLLocalDB
Also, You may need to add the SYSTEM account as a db reader and writer to the database ...
EXEC sp_addrolemember db_datareader, 'NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM'

Entity framework work locally but not on azure

I have a web project which works perfectly locally.
But when I change the connection string in my published web site on Azure to connect to my database on SQL Azure it will start giving this error.
System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.UnintentionalCodeFirstException: Code generated using the T4 templates for Database First and Model First development may not work correctly if used in Code First mode. To continue using Database First or Model First ensure that the Entity Framework connection string is specified in the config file of executing application. To use these classes, that were generated from Database First or Model First, with Code First add any additional configuration using attributes or the DbModelBuilder API and then remove the code that throws this exception.
at MyClass.OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder) in c:\a\src\MyProject\Model.Context.cs:line 25
at System.Data.Entity.Internal.LazyInternalContext.CreateModelBuilder()
at System.Data.Entity.Internal.LazyInternalContext.CreateModel(LazyInternalContext internalContext)
at System.Data.Entity.Internal.RetryLazy`2.GetValue(TInput input)
at System.Data.Entity.Internal.LazyInternalContext.InitializeContext()
at System.Data.Entity.Internal.InternalContext.GetEntitySetAndBaseTypeForType(Type entityType)
at System.Data.Entity.Internal.Linq.InternalSet`1.Initialize()
at System.Data.Entity.Internal.Linq.InternalSet`1.get_InternalContext()
at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DbQuery`1.System.Linq.IQueryable.get_Provider()
at System.Linq.Queryable.Select[TSource,TResult](IQueryable`1 source, Expression`1 selector)
My Config has:
<connectionStrings>
<add name="MyDBEntities" connectionString="metadata=res://*/MyModel.csdl|res://*/MyModel.ssdl|res://*/MyModel.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string="Server=tcp:[Removed].database.windows.net,1433;Database=MyDB;User ID=[Removed];Password=[Removed];Trusted_Connection=False;Encrypt=True;Connection Timeout=30;"" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient" />
<add name="MyDB" connectionString="metadata=res://*/Model.csdl|res://*/Model.ssdl|res://*/Model.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string="Server=tcp:[Removed].database.windows.net,1433;Database=MyDB;User ID=[Removed];Password=[Removed];Trusted_Connection=False;Encrypt=True;Connection Timeout=30;"" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient" />
</connectionStrings>
I tested using my unit test locally with that connection string and it works from my local machine connecting to SQL Azure database.
Any help appreciated.
I was having this exact problem today; it's my first time deploying to Azure. I've been pulling my hair out, except I don't have any left. I finally figured it out, and it's probably the same issue original poster here is having.
Just like the original poster, I tested in these configurations:
ran WCF Web App from Visual Studio against local DB -- success
deployed WCF Web App from Visual Studio to local IIS, ran against local DB -- success
ran WCF Web App from Visual Studio against Azure SQL DB -- success
deployed WCF App to Azure via Visual Studio, running against Azure SQL DB -- FAILURE!!
After reading another post (Code First vs. Database First) I got a hint. That post says that if "connection string has the metadata, EF thinks it is Model First or Database First" but if it's a "plain connection string, EF thinks it is Code First." I browsed the deployed Azure Web Site's web.config and confirmed that the connection string had the proper references to the Model-First metadata. So what was the problem???
I figured that perhaps the Azure Website wasn't reading the web.config's connection string. Thinking back to how I'd created the Azure Web Site, I remembered that I'd given the Azure SQL DB an alias with the exact same name as my connection string's 'label' in the web.config!! To clarify:
in the Azure admin console I went to the Website settings and reviewed the "connection string" settings "baked in" to my Azure web site as a side-effect of creating-website-with-DB -- connection string 'handle' was "SsnCustInfoModelContainer" -- I'd mistakenly given the connection the same 'handle'/'alias' as my web.config 'handle' for the connection string, thinking this would help. Instead, when EF looks for the connection string, it was finding this 'aliased' handle, which was a "plain" SQL connection string containing no metadata. This 'alias' masked the real connection string specified in the web.config.
So I destroyed my Azure SQL DB and my Azure Web Site. Then I recreated the Azure Web Site, but this time I asked for the connection string 'alias' of "SsnCustInfoModelContainer_Proto" for the connection to the associated Azure SQL Server. After initializing the Azure SQL DB from my local SQL Server Management Studio, I deployed the WCF web app again to the Azure Web Site (I had to download a new deployment profile, of course, to do this), I tried the app again. This time it worked -- the 'alias' "SsnCustInfoModelContainer_Proto" did not conflict with and was not found by EF. EF instead went on to find the true connection string, with all the proper metadata, in the web.config. Problem solved.

Unable to find the requested .Net Framework Data Provider. It may not be installed

I've got an application running on ASP.NET MVC 3 with Entity Framework Code First. In development I was using a SQL Compact database, however upon moving this to my virtual server, I am attempting to target SQL Express.
There were initially issues to do with a "CREATE DATABASE in master" error, which I got around by extracting the model from the SQL Compact database into an SQL script and executing that on the server to create the DB.
I have created a new connection string to point at the SQL Express instance, which uses the EF format:
<add name="LouiseClarkEntities" connectionString="metadata=res://*/Models.LouiseClark.csdl|res://*/Models.LouiseClark.ssdl|res://*/Models.LouiseClark.msl;provider=System.Data.EntityClient;provider connection string="Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS; Initial Catalog=LouiseClark; User ID=<username>; Password=<password>"" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient" />
The error I am now getting when navigating to a page that uses the DB, is:
Unable to find the requested .Net Framework Data Provider. It may not be installed.
I have installed Entity Framework 4.1 on the server to try and see if this would solve the issue, but it didn't seem to do much good.
Snippet from the stack trace on error page:
[ArgumentException: Unable to find the requested .Net Framework Data Provider. It may not be installed.]
System.Data.Common.DbProviderFactories.GetFactory(String providerInvariantName) +1420567
System.Data.EntityClient.EntityConnection.GetFactory(String providerString) +35
[ArgumentException: The specified store provider cannot be found in the configuration, or is not valid.]
Any help would be appreciated, as this has been bugging me for days now!
Thanks,
Chris
Use the normal connection string with code first.
<add name="LouiseClarkEntities" connectionString="Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS; Initial Catalog=LouiseClark; User ID=<username>; Password=<password>" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
On your second problem, and partly the cause of the first too...
what you did wrong is which I got around by extracting the model from the SQL Compact database into an SQL script and executing that on the server to create the DB.
You should use migration scripts for that - and use in PM console then Update-Database -Script to dump out what you need - then deploy that to the server Database.
Problem is that there are CF has its own table and data that needs to be initialized properly. If that doesn't match you'll end up with something like that.

Entity Exception : the underlying provider failed to open

iv'e got a wcf service host hosting a service on IIS7,
iv'e added a database to it's App_Data folder ,
the service is referenced to a DAL project
which holds an Entity Framework model generated from my DB ( The DB from the WCF Service Host )
i keep getting the above entity exception with this inner message :
{"An attempt to attach an auto-named database for file C:\\Users\\eranot65\\Documents\\Visual Studio 2010\\Projects\\CustomsManager\\WcfManagerServiceHost\\App_Data\\CustomesDB.mdf failed. A database with the same name exists, or specified file cannot be opened, or it is located on UNC share."}
iv'e copied the connection string from DAL/app.config to WcfManagerServiceHost/Web.config
add name="CustomesDBEntities" connectionString="metadata=res://*/Model1.csdl|res://*/Model1.ssdl|res://*/Model1.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string='Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename="C:\Users\eranot65\Documents\Visual Studio 2010\Projects\CustomsManager\WcfManagerServiceHost\App_Data\CustomesDB.mdf";Integrated Security=True;Connect Timeout=30;User Instance=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=True'" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient"
this happens when i try to use my data source entity model:
public List<Employee> GetEmployees()
{
List<Employee> employees = null;
using (CustomesDBEntities entites = new CustomesDBEntities())
{
employees = entites.Employees.ToList<Employee>();
}
return employees;
}
it doesn't seem as if the DB is in use some where else ,
(1) how can i check if some other process is holding a handle to my DB ?
(2) in ideas this happens ?
I would consider checking one of two things:
Create a connection to your SQL Express, either in VS server explorer, or by using the SQL management studio, and verify you do not already have a database by that name attached to your server.
Move your project from it's current location to somewhere on the disk which is not user-specific (meaning not on the desktop, documents etc..), for example - c:\temp, c:\projects... The reason for that is that you are running a web application, and in case you run it in IIS, the identity of the worker process is a special identity other than yours which might not have permissions to access the database file since it is located in a private folder of your user
Most likely the problem is that you are opening the database with Visual Studio and your application at the same time. The connection string explicitely configures AttachDbFilename=... AttachDBFilename spins up a user instance of SQL Express attached to a specific DB Filename for single user mode. In single user mode, only one application can open the MDF at a time.
well the answer is always simpler then you would think
all i ended up doing is changing to automatically generated connection string
generated by the EntityFramework model , to a connection string to locate the DB in my App_Data folder
my original connection string :
connectionString="metadata=res://*/Model1.csdl|res://*/Model1.ssdl|res://*/Model1.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string='Data
Source=.\SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename="C:\Users\eranot65\Documents\Visual Studio 2010\Projects\CustomsManager\WcfManagerServiceHost\App_Data\CustomesDB.mdf"
;Integrated Security=True;Connect Timeout=30;User Instance=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=True'" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient"
my edited connection string :
connectionString="metadata=res://*/Model1.csdl|res://*/Model1.ssdl|res://*/Model1.msl;provider=System.Data.SqlClient;
provider connection string='Data
Source=.\SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|\CustomesDB.mdf;Integrated Security=True;;User Instance=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=True'"

SQL Error Login failed for user '(null)'. Reason: Not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection when I'm trying to open the WebPart

I've created a custom Web Part for SharePoint that interacts with SQL.
Everything worked fine on my DEV server.
After I moved the WebPart to the client's server I started having problems.
I get Error Login failed for user '(null)'. Reason: Not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection when I'm trying to open the WebPart.
I've searched for solution for a few hours by now and everything I have found doesn't seem to work in my case.
This is how my connection string looks like:
<add name="MyDataEntities" connectionString="metadata=res://*/MyDataModel.csdl|res://*/MyDataModel.ssdl|res://*/MyDataModel.msl;
provider=System.Data.SqlClient;provider connection string="Data Source=ServerName;Initial Catalog=DBName;
Trusted_Connection=yes;Integrated Security=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=True"" providerName="System.Data.EntityClient" />
The SharePoint Web App with the web part and SQL DB are on two different machines.
Here's what I've tried:
1). Made sure SQL uses Mixed mode authentication
2). Made sure the account I'm using has rights to access SQL
3). Tried replacing Integrated Security=True; in the connection string with the User ID = UserID; Password=Password; where UserID and Password were the account IIS is running under.
I ran profiler while clicking on the link and it looks like the app is not using the account’s credentials and is trying to log in anonymously.
Any help is appreciated, I'm desperate because this must be up and running by tomorrow.
Thanks in advance!
Try SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.sharepoint.spsecurity.runwithelevatedprivileges.aspx
This method will run code as the ASP.Net application pool identity. Wrap your database calls with it.