Forward every third email to a given person - vba

I need something (script, rule) that would forward every third email that comes to my account to some other email address. But I need this to be able to run even when the Outlook/PC is closed/ turned off.
Is it possible to do that?
It's third message to one given person. So every message counts as "third"
- first go to person A, second to person B and third to person C, fourth to person A, fifth to person B etc etc...
Well if I could manage to create the script being server side I would imagine doing something like:
do 3 rules:
Received message = Send message to person A, delete it, turn rule 2
on and turn itself off
Received message = Send message to person B,
delete it, turn rule 3 on and turn itself off
Received message =
Send message to person C, delete it, turn rule 1 on and turn itself
off
This should work, I just don't know if it is possible to make it server-side so Outlook doesn't have to be running.

This would only be possible with a client side rule, which will not run when Outlook is not running. So, no, you cannot do that.

Related

(Neo4j) Carry variable over subsequent queries

I am trying to carry over a variable through 2 subsequent queries. It seems like WITH only helps carry over the variable to the next query, but not any before that. Suggestions?
This is example of what I am trying to do:
Person nodes contain information on publishers, writers and editors (e.g. name, gender, etc.)
Story nodes contain data on Story (e.g. title, publish date, etc.)
IN relationships have categories: created, edited, published.
Return editor-publishers who have edited stories published by another editor-publisher:
assume no duplicate Person names
Find all Persons who have edited at least one story who have also published at least one story
Find list of stories published by these editor-publishers in 1
In all editors of stories in 2, return sublist of these editors also in 1
MATCH (EditorPublisher:Person)-[:IN{category: "published"}]->(:Story) // 1
WHERE (EditorPublisher:Person)-[:IN{category: "edited"}]->(:Story)
WITH COLLECT(EditorPublisher.name) as EditorPublisher_list
MATCH (EditorPublisher_stories:Story)<-[:IN{category: "published"}]-(publisher:Person) // 2
WHERE publisher.name in EditorPublisher_list
WITH EditorPublisher_list // throws error EditorPublisher_list variable not found
WITH COLLECT(EditorPublisher_stories.title) as EditorPublisher_stories_list
MATCH (epe:Person)-[contribution:PLAYED]-(eps:Movie) // 3
WHERE epe.name in EditorPublisher_list
AND eps IN EditorPublisher_stories_list
RETURN epe.name
NVM I got it to work. With does keep the variables if i don't rename them.
I just had to do WITH return.nodes, and call the return.nodes in subsequent queries instead of using in [return.nodes.list]

Trigger splunk alert when received values do not change

I receive exchange rate from an external web service and I log the response received like below (note both line contain data from a single response):
com.test.Currency#366c1a1e[Id=<Null>,Code=<Null>,Feedcode=Gbparslite,Rate=<Null>,Percentaqechangetrigger=<Null>,Bid=93.4269,Offer=93.43987,Mustinvertprice=False],
com.test.Currency#54acb93a[Id=<Null>,Code=<Null>,Feedcode=Gbphkdlite,Rate=<Null>,Percentaqechangetrigger=<Null>,Bid=10.04629,Offer=10.04763,Mustinvertprice=False],
I want to set up an alert which triggers when the last x (x=5) values received did not changed.
Assuming you're looking to alert when a particular field doesn't change after 5 events, you can try the following.
index=data | head 5 | stats dc(Bid) as dv
Then alert if dv equals 1. dc(Bid) calculates the number of unique values of Bid, in this case, over the last 5 events. If there is no difference, they will be 1. If there are multiple values, dc(Bid) will be greater than 1

Am I training my wit.ai bot correctly?

I'm trying to train my Wit.ai bot in order to recognize the first name of someone. I'm not very sure if I well understand how the NLP works so I'll give you an example.
I defined a lot of expressions like "My name is XXXX", "Everybody calls me XXXX"
In the "Understanding" table I added an entity named "contact_name" and I add almost 50 keywords like "Michel, John, Mary...".
I put the trait as "free-text" and "keywords".
I'm not sure if this process is correctly. So, I ask you:
does it matter the context like "My name is..." for the NLP? I mean...will it help the bot to predict that after this expression probably a fist name will come on?
is that right to add like 50 values to an entity or it's completly wrong?
what do you suggest as a training process in order to get the first name of someone?
You have done it right by keeping the entity's search strategy as "free-text" and "Keywords". But Adding keywords examples to the entity doesn't make any sense because a person's name is not a keyword.
So, I would recommend a training strategy which is as follows:
Create various templates of the message like, "My name is XYZ", "I am XYZ", "This is XYZ" etc. (all possible introduction messages you could think of)
Remove all keywords and expressions for the entity you created and add these two keywords:
"a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z"
"XYZ" (can give any name but maintain this name same for validating the templates)
In the 'Understanding' tab enter the messages and extract the name into the entity ("contact_name" in your case) and validate them
Similarly, validate all message templates keeping the name as "XYZ"
After you have done this for all templates your bot will be able to recognise any name in a given template of the message
The logic behind this is your entity is a free-text and keyword which means it first tries to match the keyword if not matched it tries to find the word in the same position of the templates. Keeping the name same for validations helps to train the bot with the templates and learn the position where the name will be usually found.
Hope this works. I have tried this and worked for me. I am not sure how bot trains in background. I recommend you to start a new app and do this exercise.
Comment if there is any problem.
wit.ai has a pre-trained entity extraction method called wit/contact, which
Captures free text that's either the name or a clear reference to a
person, like "Paul", "Paul Smith", "my husband", "the dentist".
It works good even without any training data.
To read about the method refer to duckling.

HL7 ORU sending edits

I use HL7 ORU message to send clinical notes. At present, I just send notes as they are created and saved. But now I need to support edit and delete of the notes and convey the same to the receiving system.
How can I achieve edit / delete with this? I use ORU^R01 structure and use OBR and multiple OBX segments for my information. Thanks.
You will need to confirm with the receiving system how they want edits and deletes conveyed to them. But it is common to use the result status code in OBR-25 and/or the observation result status code in OBX-11.
For example, if the clinical note is edited (aka. corrected or modified) send a C in OBR-25. If the clinical note is deleted send a X in OBR-25. Ultimately you will need to coordinate with the receiving system.
FWIW, I commonly see these values in OBR-25:
P = preliminary
F = final
C = corrected / modified
X = cancelled / deleted / in-error

ROR find by sql to grab email addresses out of IBM iSeries (DB2)

We've been continuously working on this issue for a few months and not getting far with it. Since this was first asked, we changed the code (based on what the original developer for the site suggested), but we are still not getting where we need to be.
I'm relatively new to Ruby and am currently taking some courses to learn more about it, so please bear with me. We're using Ruby 1.9 and Rails 3.2 We use AS/400 for our database. We've tried using Active Record for this before, and it doesn't want to work because of our versions of Ruby and Rails being older combined with getting it to connect with the 400.
We have an online ordering site that you have to have an account set up to access. Depending on what type of account you are set up as, you might have to have your order approved by someone. I.e. if I am a drop ship account, my distributor has to approve what I'm ordering. The way it had been set up, the distributor wasn't getting any kind of approval email.
Each account that requires approval has x number of email addresses attached to it of people who are able to approve the order. We have been told that target_email needs to be a string, so we tried numerous ways of making it a string to no avail. As is, it's only sending the first two email, not the approval email. If we run target_email = Contact.find_by_sql ["SELECT EMAL23 FROM WEBOEL23 WHERE ACT223 =''"] in console, it returns the expected email addresses associated with that account. So we know that's working the way it should... but we're at a loss as to what is wrong with the rest of the code.
# notify Customer
Mailer.deliver_order_coastal_notify_email("", "Coastal Pet Online Ordering<noreply#coastalpet.com>", "Order Confirmation", email_details)
target_email = Contact.connection.select_values "SELECT EMAL23 FROM WEBOEL23 WHERE ACT223 =''"
# Order Approval
if sign_on.acctypw1.strip == "DS" or sign_on.acctypw1.strip == "DSD"
# If there is no distributor email address, the mailer model will substitute in the admin's email from their settings
target_email.each do | email_address | Mailer.deliver_order_distributor_approval_email(email_address, 'Coastal Pet Online Ordering<noreply#coastalpet.com>', "Order Confirmation Approval", email_details)
end
# notify Coastal staff
Mailer.deliver_order_coastal_notify_email("", "Coastal Pet Online Ordering<noreply#coastalpet.com>", "Order Confirmation-Notify Staff", email_details)
end
I tried
target_email = Contact.connection.select_values("SELECT EMAL23 FROM WEBOEL23 WHERE ACT223 = act223").uniq
This works but it sends emails to multiple accounts why this would happen? I think I need to set a value for act223
act223 = "ACT223"
target_email = Contact.connection.select_values("SELECT EMAL23 FROM WEBOEL23 WHERE ACT223 = #{Contact.connection.quote(act223)}").uniq
this throws NameError (undefined local variable or methodact223' for #):`
in development.log.
Here is a link to the relevant table data if more table information is needed just let me know and I can add it to that page. I am looking to do some sort of a join of a field from another table. In this same model I have SignOn.prefdstw1 which gets me the same account number is there a way to Join this field in the query with the 400?
Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Thank you in advance!
find_by_sql always returns an array of model objects, so
Contact.find_by_sql ["SELECT EMAL23 FROM WEBOEL23 WHERE ACT223 =''"]
is not an array of email addresses - it's an array of Contact objects, with only one object
You could either extract the email addresses from this, using something like
Contact.find_by_sql(["SELECT EMAL23 FROM WEBOEL23 WHERE ACT223 =''"]).collect do |contract|
contact.emal23
end
I'm not entirely sure what rails will do to the uppercased column name.
If you don't want to instantiate a whole Contact object just to get the email you could also do
Contact.where("ACT223 = ''").pluck('EMAL23')
which would return an array of emails, assuming that Rails knows that the correct table to use for this is WEBOEL23 - it's not clear to me whether that is the table for Contact (and thus you've use set_table_name to configure this) or whether Contact is just a random model unrelated to that table.
You could also drop down a level and do
Contact.connection.select_values "SELECT EMAL23 FROM WEBOEL23 WHERE ACT223 =''"
which will also return an array of email addresses.
Inside the each loop, target_email is a bareword variable (without quotes), but the first argument to the mailer is the string (within quotes) 'target_email'.
Remove those quotes to get to this (whitespace added for readability):
target_email.each do | email_address |
Mailer.deliver_order_distributor_approval_email(
email_address,
'Coastal Pet Online Ordering<noreply#coastalpet.com>',
"Order Confirmation Approval",
email_details
)
end
Then the mailer should have access to the email address.