We're running DC/OS + Marathon on an Azure cluster (ACS). I find myself in situations where it would be very helpful to tunnel into the master node and more specifically - agent nodes. Then I'd like to run bash commands against my services (docker images) that are running. Is this possible?
Thanks in advance!
There's a page on ACS's documentation regarding ssh tunneling into master nodes, it can be found here: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/container-service-connect/
Say you have an Azure Container Service named my-acs running on the East US region, and your user name is myuser, and you would like to access the DC/OS dashboard of your cluster,
sudo ssh -L 80:localhost:80 -f -N my-user#my-acsmgmt.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com -p 2200 -i path/to/your/private/key
If you would like to directly access the terminal of your master, you would use:
ssh my-user#my-acsmgmt.eastus.cloudapp.azure.com -p 2200 -i path/to/your/private/key
However, I do not know how to connect directly into an Agent node.
Related
We have an application which uses SSH to copy artifact from one node to other. While creating the Docker image (Linux Centos 8 based), I have installed the Openssh server and client, when I run the image from Docker command and exec into it, I am successfully able to run the SSH command and I also see the port 22 enabled and listening ( $ lsof -i -P -n | grep LISTEN).
But if I start a POD/Container using the same image in the Kubernetes cluster, I do not see port 22 enabled and listening inside the container. Even if I try to start the sshd from inside the k8s container then it gives me below error:
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl start sshd.service Failed to get D-Bus connection: Operation not permitted.
Is there any way to start the K8s container with SSH enabled?
There are three things to consider:
Like David said in his comment:
I'd redesign your system to use a communication system that's easier
to set up, like with HTTP calls between pods.
If you put a service in front of your deployment, it is not going to relay any SSH connections. So you have to point to the pods directly, which might be pretty inconvenient.
In case you have missed that: you need to declare port 22 in your deployment template.
Please let me know if that helped.
I am using Docker on Mac OS X with Docker Machine (with the default boot2docker machine), and I use docker-compose to setup my development environment.
Let's say that one of the containers is called "stack". Now what I want to do is call:
docker-composer run stack ssh user#stackoverflow.com
My public key (which has been added to stackoverflow.com and which will be used to authenticate me) is located on the host machine. I want this key to be available to the Docker Machine container so that I will be able to authenticate myself against stackoverflow using that key from within the container. Preferably without physically copying my key to Docker Machine.
Is there any way to do this? Also, if my key is password protected, is there any way to unlock it once so after every injection I will not have to manually enter the password?
You can add this to your docker-compose.yml (assuming your user inside container is root):
volumes:
- ~/.ssh:/root/.ssh
Also you can check for more advanced solution with ssh agent (I did not tried it myself)
WARNING: This feature seems to have limited support in Docker Compose and is more designed for Docker Swarm.
(I haven't checked to make sure, but) My current impression is that:
In Docker Compose secrets are just bind mount volumes, so there's no additional security compared to volumes
Ability to change secrets permissions with Linux host may be limited
See answer comments for more details.
Docker has a feature called secrets, which can be helpful here. To use it one could add the following code to docker-compose.yml:
---
version: '3.1' # Note the minimum file version for this feature to work
services:
stack:
...
secrets:
- host_ssh_key
secrets:
host_ssh_key:
file: ~/.ssh/id_rsa
Then the new secret file can be accessed in Dockerfile like this:
RUN mkdir ~/.ssh && ln -s /run/secrets/host_ssh_key ~/.ssh/id_rsa
Secret files won't be copied into container:
When you grant a newly-created or running service access to a secret, the decrypted secret is mounted into the container in an in-memory filesystem
For more details please refer to:
https://docs.docker.com/engine/swarm/secrets/
https://docs.docker.com/compose/compose-file/compose-file-v3/#secrets
If you're using OS X and encrypted keys this is going to be PITA. Here are the steps I went through figuring this out.
Straightforward approach
One might think that there’s no problem. Just mount your ssh folder:
...
volumes:
- ~/.ssh:/root/.ssh:ro
...
This should be working, right?
User problem
Next thing we’ll notice is that we’re using the wrong user id. Fine, we’ll write a script to copy and change the owner of ssh keys. We’ll also set ssh user in config so that ssh server knows who’s connecting.
...
volumes:
- ~/.ssh:/root/.ssh-keys:ro
command: sh -c ‘./.ssh-keys.sh && ...’
environment:
SSH_USER: $USER
...
# ssh-keys.sh
mkdir -p ~/.ssh
cp -r /root/.ssh-keys/* ~/.ssh/
chown -R $(id -u):$(id -g) ~/.ssh
cat <<EOF >> ~/.ssh/config
User $SSH_USER
EOF
SSH key passphrase problem
In our company we protect SSH keys using a passphrase. That wouldn’t work in docker since it’s impractical to enter a passphrase each time we start a container.
We could remove a passphrase (see example below), but there’s a security concern.
openssl rsa -in id_rsa -out id_rsa2
# enter passphrase
# replace passphrase-encrypted key with plaintext key:
mv id_rsa2 id_rsa
SSH agent solution
You may have noticed that locally you don’t need to enter a passphrase each time you need ssh access. Why is that?
That’s what SSH agent is for. SSH agent is basically a server which listens to a special file, unix socket, called “ssh auth sock”. You can see its location on your system:
echo $SSH_AUTH_SOCK
# /run/user/1000/keyring-AvTfL3/ssh
SSH client communicates with SSH agent through this file so that you’d enter passphrase only once. Once it’s unencrypted, SSH agent will store it in memory and send to SSH client on request.
Can we use that in Docker? Sure, just mount that special file and specify a corresponding environment variable:
environment:
SSH_AUTH_SOCK: $SSH_AUTH_SOCK
...
volumes:
- $SSH_AUTH_SOCK:$SSH_AUTH_SOCK
We don’t even need to copy keys in this case.
To confirm that keys are available we can use ssh-add utility:
if [ -z "$SSH_AUTH_SOCK" ]; then
echo "No ssh agent detected"
else
echo $SSH_AUTH_SOCK
ssh-add -l
fi
The problem of unix socket mount support in Docker for Mac
Unfortunately for OS X users, Docker for Mac has a number of shortcomings, one of which is its inability to share Unix sockets between Mac and Linux. There’s an open issue in D4M Github. As of February 2019 it’s still open.
So, is that a dead end? No, there is a hacky workaround.
SSH agent forwarding solution
Luckily, this issue isn’t new. Long before Docker there was a way to use local ssh keys within a remote ssh session. This is called ssh agent forwarding. The idea is simple: you connect to a remote server through ssh and you can use all the same remote servers there, thus sharing your keys.
With Docker for Mac we can use a smart trick: share ssh agent to the docker virtual machine using TCP ssh connection, and mount that file from virtual machine to another container where we need that SSH connection. Here’s a picture to demonstrate the solution:
First, we create an ssh session to the ssh server inside a container inside a linux VM through a TCP port. We use a real ssh auth sock here.
Next, ssh server forwards our ssh keys to ssh agent on that container. SSH agent has a Unix socket which uses a location mounted to Linux VM. I.e. Unix socket works in Linux. Non-working Unix socket file in Mac has no effect.
After that we create our useful container with an SSH client. We share the Unix socket file which our local SSH session uses.
There’s a bunch of scripts that simplifies that process:
https://github.com/avsm/docker-ssh-agent-forward
Conclusion
Getting SSH to work in Docker could’ve been easier. But it can be done. And it’ll likely to be improved in the future. At least Docker developers are aware of this issue. And even solved it for Dockerfiles with build time secrets. And there's a suggestion how to support Unix domain sockets.
You can forward SSH agent:
something:
container_name: something
volumes:
- $SSH_AUTH_SOCK:/ssh-agent # Forward local machine SSH key to docker
environment:
SSH_AUTH_SOCK: /ssh-agent
You can use multi stage build to build containers This is the approach you can take :-
Stage 1 building an image with ssh
FROM ubuntu as sshImage
LABEL stage=sshImage
ARG SSH_PRIVATE_KEY
WORKDIR /root/temp
RUN apt-get update && \
apt-get install -y git npm
RUN mkdir /root/.ssh/ &&\
echo "${SSH_PRIVATE_KEY}" > /root/.ssh/id_rsa &&\
chmod 600 /root/.ssh/id_rsa &&\
touch /root/.ssh/known_hosts &&\
ssh-keyscan github.com >> /root/.ssh/known_hosts
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm install
RUN cp -R node_modules prod_node_modules
Stage 2: build your container
FROM node:10-alpine
RUN mkdir -p /usr/app
WORKDIR /usr/app
COPY ./ ./
COPY --from=sshImage /root/temp/prod_node_modules ./node_modules
EXPOSE 3006
CMD ["npm", "run", "dev"]
add env attribute in your compose file:
environment:
- SSH_PRIVATE_KEY=${SSH_PRIVATE_KEY}
then pass args from build script like this:
docker-compose build --build-arg SSH_PRIVATE_KEY="$(cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa)"
And remove the intermediate container it for security. This Will help you cheers.
Docker for Mac now supports mounting the ssh agent socket on macOS.
I have a Spark installation running under YARN on a remote cluster, with a firewall between me and the head node. I can use a ssh tunnel to access the head node:
> ssh -N -f -L 10000:remotenode:10000 between_machine
and this setup works, for example, to access a HiveServer2 running on remotenote. If Spark was running in cluster mode, I would need to just do the same for the 7077 port and direct the pyspark client to localhost with
> ssh -N -f -L 7077:remotenode:7077 between_machine
> ./pyspark --master spark://localhost:7077
How can I do that with Spark running under the YARN scheduler?
If you are looking for a port to connect, here is a quote from the doc:
You can access this interface by simply opening
http://:4040 in a web browser. If multiple SparkContexts
are running on the same host, they will bind to successive ports
beginning with 4040 (4041, 4042, etc).
If you are just looking for a more universal way to get to the host via ssh "tunnel", you could try ssh working as socks proxy:
ssh user#host -D 20000
And then configuring your browser to connect via socks proxy (host - localhost, port - 20000).
I am new to YCSB and i want to benchmark Redis using more than one cluster. I have tried with only one Redis on my localhost with the following command.
./bin/ycsb load redis -p redis.host=localhost -p redis.port=6379 -P workloads/workloada -p recordcount=200000 -s > d.dat
I am getting the currect ops/sec and other data.
Now i need to know how can run YCSB for more than one cluster.
Can anybody give an answer (steps to run this).
And it would be helpful if anyone can help to run Couchbase YCSB too.
Thanx..!!
The following steps need to be done to perform YCSB bench marking with redis cluster
1) configure redis cluster with different nodes by referring to the document
http://redis.io/topics/cluster-tutorial
2) open the ycsb terminal,set up redis host ip address, port and specify the required parameters needed
./bin/ycsb load redis -p redis.host="ip address" -p redis.port="port" -P workloads/workloada -p recordcount=200000 -s > d.dat
I want to run rabbitmq-server in one docker container and connect to it from another container using celery (http://celeryproject.org/)
I have rabbitmq running using the below command...
sudo docker run -d -p :5672 markellul/rabbitmq /usr/sbin/rabbitmq-server
and running the celery via
sudo docker run -i -t markellul/celery /bin/bash
When I am trying to do the very basic tutorial to validate the connection on http://docs.celeryproject.org/en/latest/getting-started/first-steps-with-celery.html
I am getting a connection refused error:
consumer: Cannot connect to amqp://guest#127.0.0.1:5672//: [Errno 111]
Connection refused.
When I install rabbitmq on the same container as celery it works fine.
What do I need to do to have container interacting with each other?
[edit 2016]
Direct links are deprecated now. The new way to do link containers is docker network connect. It works quite similar to virtual networks and has a wider feature set than the old way of linking.
First you create your named containers:
docker run --name rabbitmq -d -p :5672 markellul/rabbitmq /usr/sbin/rabbitmq-server
docker run --name celery -it markellul/celery /bin/bash
Then you create a network (last parameter is your network name):
docker network create -d bridge --subnet 172.25.0.0/16 mynetwork
Connect the containers to your newly created network:
docker network connect mynetwork rabbitmq
docker network connect mynetwork celery
Now, both containers are in the same network and can communicate with each other.
A very detailed user guide can be found at Work with networks: Connect containers.
[old answer]
There is a new feature in Docker 0.6.5 called linking, which is meant to help the communication between docker containers.
First, create your rabbitmq container as usual. Note that i also used the new "name" feature which makes life a litte bit easier:
docker run --name rabbitmq -d -p :5672 markellul/rabbitmq /usr/sbin/rabbitmq-server
You can use the link parameter to map a container (we use the name here, the id would be ok too):
docker run --link rabbitmq:amq -i -t markellul/celery /bin/bash
Now you have access to the IP and Port of the rabbitmq container because docker automatically added some environmental variables:
$AMQ_PORT_5672_TCP_ADDR
$AMQ_PORT_5672_TCP_PORT
In addition Docker adds a host entry for the source container to the /etc/hosts file. In this example amq will be a defined host in the container.
From Docker documentation:
Unlike host entries in the /etc/hosts file, IP addresses stored in the environment variables are not automatically updated if the source container is restarted. We recommend using the host entries in /etc/hosts to resolve the IP address of linked containers.
Just get your container ip, and connect to it from another container:
CONTAINER_IP=$(sudo docker inspect --format '{{ .NetworkSettings.IPAddress }}' $CONTAINER_ID)
echo $CONTAINER_IP
When you specify -p 5672, What docker does is open up a new port, such as 49xxx on the host and forwards it to port 5672 of the container.
you should be able to see which port is forwarding to the container by running:
sudo docker ps -a
From there, you can connect directly to the host IP address like so:
amqp://guest#HOST_IP:49xxx
You can't use localhost, because each container is basically its own localhost.
Create Image:
docker build -t "imagename1" .
docker build -t "imagename2" .
Run Docker image:
docker run -it -p 8000:8000 --name=imagename1 imagename1
docker run -it -p 8080:8080 --name=imagename2 imagename2
Create Network:
docker network create -d bridge "networkname"
Connect the network with container(imagename) created after running the image:
docker network connect "networkname" "imagename1"
docker network connect "networkname" "imagename2"
We can add any number of containers to the network.
docker network inspect ''networkname"
I think you can't connect to another container directly by design - that would be the responsibility of the host. An example of sharing data between containers using Volumes is given here http://docs.docker.io/en/latest/examples/couchdb_data_volumes/, but I don't think that that is what you're looking for.
I recently found out about https://github.com/toscanini/maestro - that might suit your needs. Let us know if it does :), I haven't tried it myself yet.
Edit. Note that you can read here that native "Container wiring and service discovery" is on the roadmap. I guess 7.0 or 8.0 at the latest.
You can get the docker instance IP with...
CID=$(sudo docker run -d -p :5672 markellul/rabbitmq /usr/sbin/rabbitmq-server); sudo docker inspect $CID | grep IPAddress
But that's not very useful.
You can use pipework to create a private network between docker containers.
This is currently on the 0.8 roadmap:
https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/issues/1143