Codeception API tester require PhpBrowser module and I want to use ZF2 module because I need retrieve some services from ServiceManager.
After update Codeception to 2.2 it throws this exception:
[Codeception\Exception\ModuleConflictException] ZF2 module conflicts
with PhpBrowser
Is there any way to enable ZF2 and PhpBrowser together in Codeception 2.2?
If you have a good reason to use ZF2 in the same suite as PhpBrowser,
you can create your own helper class and load ZF2 module as a dependency.
Configuration:
modules:
enabled:
- PhpBrowser:
url: http://localhost/
- \Helper\Zf2Helper:
depends: ZF2
Code tests/_support/Helper/Zf2Helper.php:
<?php
namespace Helper;
class Zf2Helper extends \Codeception\Module
{
private $zf2;
public function _inject(\Codeception\Module\ZF2 $zf2)
{
$this->zf2 = $zf2;
}
public function doSomethingWithZf2
{
$this->zf2->doSomething();
}
}
Update:
Since Codeception 2.2.2 release it is possible to load services part of ZF2 which enables grabServiceFromContainer method.
Configuration:
modules:
enabled:
- PhpBrowser:
url: http://localhost/
- ZF2
part: services
Thank your for your answer.
Working code with some improvements:
<?php
namespace Helper;
use Codeception\Lib\Interfaces\DependsOnModule;
class Zf2Helper extends \Codeception\Module implements DependsOnModule
{
protected $dependencyMessage = <<<EOF
Example configuring ZF2Helper as proxy for ZF2 module method grabServiceFromContainer.
--
modules:
enabled:
- \Helper\ZF2Helper:
depends: ZF2
--
EOF;
private $zf2;
public function _inject(\Codeception\Module\ZF2 $zf2)
{
$this->zf2 = $zf2;
}
public function _depends()
{
return ['Codeception\Lib\ZF2' => $this->dependencyMessage];
}
public function grabServiceFromContainer($service)
{
return $this->zf2->grabServiceFromContainer($service);
}
}
Related
Assume the following simple web app:
<?php
// src/App/App.php
namespace Practice\Sources\App;
use Closure;
use Laminas\Diactoros\ServerRequestFactory;
use Laminas\HttpHandlerRunner\Emitter\SapiEmitter;
use Psr\Http\Message\RequestInterface;
use Psr\Http\Message\ResponseFactoryInterface;
use Psr\Http\Message\ResponseInterface;
use Psr\Http\Server\RequestHandlerInterface;
class App implements RequestHandlerInterface
{
private Closure $requestProvider;
private ResponseFactoryInterface $responseFactory;
private SapiEmitter $responseEmitter;
public function __construct(ResponseFactoryInterface $responseFactory)
{
$this->requestProvider = fn() => ServerRequestFactory::fromGlobals();
$this->responseFactory = $responseFactory;
$this->responseEmitter = new SapiEmitter();
}
public function run(): void
{
$request = ($this->requestProvider)();
$response = $this->handle($request);
$this->responseEmitter->emit($response);
}
public function handle(RequestInterface $request): ResponseInterface
{
$response = $this->responseFactory->createResponse();
$response->getBody()->write('hello world');
return $response;
}
}
One can easily run it by placing the following code in their web front-controller (e.g. public_html/index.php):
<?php
// web-root/front-controller.php
use Laminas\Diactoros\ResponseFactory;
use Practice\Sources\App\App;
require_once __DIR__.'/../vendor/autoload.php';
$responseFactory = new ResponseFactory();
$app = new App($responseFactory);
$app->run();
Now, I'd like to run Codeception feature tests against it, written in Gherkin. Consider the following simple test:
# tests/Feature/run.feature
# (also symlink'ed from tests/Codeception/tests/acceptance/ )
Feature: run app
Scenario: I run the app
When I am on page '/'
Then I see 'hello world'
To run acceptance tests against it, I have to provide my steps implementation. I'll reuse standard steps for that, provided by the Codeception:
<?php
// tests/Codeception/tests/_support/FeatureTester.php
namespace Practice\Tests\Codeception;
use Codeception\Actor;
abstract class FeatureTester extends Actor
{
// use _generated\AcceptanceTesterActions;
// use _generated\FunctionalTesterActions;
/**
* #When /^I am on page \'([^\']*)\'$/
*/
public function iAmOnPage($page)
{
$this->amOnPage($page);
}
/**
* #Then /^I see \'([^\']*)\'$/
*/
public function iSee($what)
{
$this->see($what);
}
}
<?php
// tests/Codeception/tests/_support/AcceptanceTester.php
namespace Practice\Tests\Codeception;
class AcceptanceTester extends FeatureTester
{
use _generated\AcceptanceTesterActions;
}
# tests/Codeception/codeception.yml
namespace: Practice\Tests\Codeception
paths:
tests: tests
output: tests/_output
data: tests/_data
support: tests/_support
envs: tests/_envs
actor_suffix: Tester
extensions:
enabled:
- Codeception\Extension\RunFailed
# tests/Codeception/tests/acceptance.suite.yml
actor: AcceptanceTester
modules:
enabled:
- PhpBrowser:
url: http://practice.local
gherkin:
contexts:
default:
- \Practice\Tests\Codeception\AcceptanceTester
But now, I want to use same tests code to run these same tests as functional tests using Codeception. For this, I have to enable the module that implements these same steps in functional way. Which one do I use? Codeception provides several, but they're for 3rd party frameworks, e.g. Laravel, Yii2, Symphony etc. What do I do for such a simple app that doesn't use any 3rd party framework?
Here's what I've managed to do. I've created my own \Codeception\Lib\InnerBrowser implementation that inherits from \Codeception\Module\PhpBrowser provided by Codeception, in which I substitute the web client that Codeception uses (it uses Guzzle) with my own implementation (which also inherits from the Guzzle client) that doesn't perform any web requests but requests my app instead:
# tests/Codeception/tests/functional.suite.yml
actor: FunctionalTester
modules:
enabled:
- \Practice\Tests\Codeception\Helper\CustomInnerBrowser:
url: http://practice.local
gherkin:
contexts:
default:
- \Practice\Tests\Codeception\FunctionalTester
<?php
// tests/Codeception/tests/_support/FunctionalTester.php
namespace Practice\Tests\Codeception;
class FunctionalTester extends FeatureTester
{
use _generated\FunctionalTesterActions;
}
In order for this to work, I have to make my app return Guzzle Responses (which implement PSR's ResponseInterface as well) - because PhpBrowser expects its web client to return them - which is why I had to make the ResponseFactory a constructor parameter to be able to substitute it in tests.
<?php
// tests/Codeception/tests/_support/Helper/CustomInnerBrowser.php
namespace Practice\Tests\Codeception\Helper;
use Codeception\Module\PhpBrowser;
use Http\Factory\Guzzle\ResponseFactory;
use Practice\Sources\App\App;
class CustomInnerBrowser extends PhpBrowser
{
private App $app;
public function __construct(...$args)
{
parent::__construct(...$args);
$responseFactory = new ResponseFactory();
$this->app = new App($responseFactory);
}
public function _prepareSession(): void
{
parent::_prepareSession();
$this->guzzle = new CustomInnerBrowserClient($this->guzzle->getConfig(), $this->app);
$this->client->setClient($this->guzzle);
}
}
<?php
// tests/Codeception/tests/_support/Helper/CustomInnerBrowserClient.php
namespace Practice\Tests\Codeception\Helper;
use GuzzleHttp\Client as GuzzleClient;
use Practice\Sources\App\App;
use Psr\Http\Message\RequestInterface;
use Psr\Http\Message\ResponseInterface;
class CustomInnerBrowserClient extends GuzzleClient
{
private App $app;
public function __construct(array $config, App $app)
{
parent::__construct($config);
$this->app = $app;
}
public function send(RequestInterface $request, array $options = []): ResponseInterface
{
return $this->app->handle($request);
}
}
In such a configuration, everything seems to work fine.
But there's a problem. Notice the App::handle() signature:
public function handle(RequestInterface $request): ResponseInterface
- it differs from the one that it implements, which is declared in RequestHandlerInterface:
public function handle(ServerRequestInterface $request): ResponseInterface;
Technically, it's completely legal because it doesn't break the parameter contravariance required by the Liskov Substitution Principle.
The problem that I've faced is that PhpBrowser assumes that it sends a (client-side) RequestInterfaces (over the network) but my app requires a (server-side) ServerRequestInterface instead, to be able to access parameters that are set on the server side such as ServerRequestInterface::getParsedBody(), session etc.
How do I workaround this? Framework modules provided by Codeception already do this somehow... And BTW, haven't Codeception (or someone else) provided yet an easy way to run functional tests against custom code?
Here's composer.json BTW:
{
"require": {
"php": "~7.4",
"laminas/laminas-diactoros": "^2.5",
"laminas/laminas-httphandlerrunner": "^1.3"
},
"require-dev": {
"codeception/codeception": "^4.1",
"codeception/module-phpbrowser": "^1.0.0",
"http-interop/http-factory-guzzle": "^1.0"
},
"autoload": {
"psr-4": {
"Practice\\Sources\\": "src"
}
},
"autoload-dev": {
"psr-4": {
"Practice\\Tests\\Unit\\": "tests/Unit/",
"Practice\\Tests\\Support\\": "tests/Support/",
"Practice\\Tests\\Codeception\\": "tests/Codeception/tests/_support/",
"Practice\\Tests\\Codeception\\_generated\\": "tests/Codeception/tests/_support/_generated/",
"Practice\\Tests\\Codeception\\Helper\\": "tests/Codeception/tests/_support/Helper/"
}
},
"scripts": {
"test-feature": "codecept run --config tests/Codeception/codeception.yml"
}
}
I have Wamp64 running on my Windows 10 machine.
Localhost set up fine and I can see the Wamp64 home page at Localhost.
I've installed Symfony and followed the instructions as per their website.
I set up "project1" at C:\wamp64\www\project1, it has a public directory with an index.php file in it.
When I browse to http://localhost/project1/public/index.php I get an HTTP 404 error
Error page...
Should be getting the Symfony welcome page.
Any help gratefully received
You need to define a route with the path /
routes.yaml:
home:
path: /
defaults: { _controller: 'AppBundle\Controller\DefaultController::index' }
OR
Annotation:
// src/AppBundle/Controller/DefaultController.php
namespace AppBundle\Controller;
use Symfony\Bundle\FrameworkBundle\Controller\Controller;
use Symfony\Component\Routing\Annotation\Route;
class DefaultController extends Controller
{
/**
* Matches / exactly
*
* #Route("/", name="home")
*/
public function index()
{
// ...
}
}
You can also define these with XML and PHP. See the docs.
IF you're using Symfony 4 as suggested in the comments, the namespace is App\Controller and the localtion of your controller is /src/Controller instead of /src/AppBundle/Controller
I am trying to use #BeanParam annotation from JAX-RS.
It was working perfectly fine with Apache cxf 2.7.7 but after upgrading to Apache cxf 3.0.1 it does not work. In my rest service, bean param is null and i get NullPointerException.
I have tried with cxf 3.0.3 but result is same.
My RestService looks like
Class MyService {
#BeanParam
private MyBean params;
#Path("/test")
public Response testIt() {
// params is null here
}
}
class MyBean {
#QueryParam
private String message;
public void setMessage(String message) {
this.message = message;
}
public String getMessage() {
return this.message;
}
}
My dependency in gradle looks like
def cxfVersion = "3.0.1"
ext.libraries = [
cxf: [
"org.apache.cxf:apache-cxf:$cxfVersion",
"org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-frontend-jaxrs:$cxfVersion"
]
Does anybody have any idea what has changed form cxf 2.7.7 to cxf 3.0.x, that will make this non functioning.
I found the problem. It was due to presence of another cxf version jar present on classpath (version 2.3.3) coming from other projects dependencies. Somehow that was getting the precedence over 3.x version and that didn't had support for BeanParam.
Removing that jar from classpath worked for me.
The Swagger documentation covers a number of different ways to configure Swagger in an application. Unfortunately all of them leverage web.xml and rely on hard coding the api version and base url in the web.xml
Is there a way to configure Swagger without using a web.xml and without hardcoding the api version and base path?
I used the following approach to configure Swagger in Glassfish 4 without a resource XML.
Includes the following dependency in by gradle build file (this approach also applies to Maven):
compile ('com.wordnik:swagger-jaxrs_2.9.1:1.3.0') {
exclude group: 'org.scala-lang', module: 'scala-compiler'
}
Create a class that extends javax.ws.rs.core.Application and configure the ApplicationPath e.g.
#ApplicationPath("resources")
public class RESTConfig extends Application {}
2a. Create a class that extends com.wordnik.swagger.jaxrs.config.DefaultJaxrsConfig and annotate as follows:
#WebServlet(name = "SwaagerJaxrsConfig" initParams = {#WebInitParam(name="api.version", value="0.1.0"), #WebInitParam(name="swagger.api.basepath", value="http://localhost:8080/resources"})}, loadOnStartup = 2)
public class SwaagerJaxrsConfig extends DefaultJaxrsConfig{}
The downside of this approach is that the api version and base url of your app is hardcoded in the annotation. In order to get around this I used the following approach instead of the one above
2b. Create a class that extends HttpServlet and performs the bootstrapping done by DefaultJaxrsConfig e.g.
#WebServlet(name = "SwaggerJaxrsConfig", loadOnStartup = 2)
public class SwaggerJaxrsConfig extends HttpServlet {
private Logger log = Logger.getLogger(SwaggerJaxrsConfig.class);
#Inject Version version;
#Override public void init(ServletConfig servletConfig) {
try {
super.init(servletConfig);
SwaggerConfig swaggerConfig = new SwaggerConfig();
ConfigFactory.setConfig(swaggerConfig);
swaggerConfig.setBasePath("http://localhost:8080/resources"); //TODO look up app path
swaggerConfig.setApiVersion(version.getVersion());
ScannerFactory.setScanner(new DefaultJaxrsScanner());
ClassReaders.setReader(new DefaultJaxrsApiReader());
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("Failed to configure swagger", e);
}
}
}
I have YAML config for my symfony2 project using Doctrine2. I'm not understanding how exactly to adapt the cookbook entry to a YAML setup.
My doctrine mapping is at /path/to/my/bundle/Resources/config/doctrine/IpRange.orm.yml
When running PHPUnit, I get the error:
Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\MappingException: No mapping file found named 'Yitznewton.FreermsBundle.Entity.IpRange.orm.yml' for class 'Yitznewton\FreermsBundle\Entity\IpRange'.
Sounds like I need to configure the test rig to use the symfony file naming conventions, but I don't know how to do that.
Using symfony-standard.git checked out to v2.0.7
Here's my test:
<?php
namespace Yitznewton\FreermsBundle\Tests\Utility;
use Doctrine\Tests\OrmTestCase;
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\Driver\DriverChain;
use Doctrine\ORM\Mapping\Driver\YamlDriver;
use Yitznewton\FreermsBundle\Entity\IpRange;
use Yitznewton\FreermsBundle\Entity\IpRangeRepository;
class IpRangeRepositoryTest extends OrmTestCase
{
private $_em;
protected function setup()
{
// FIXME: make this path relative
$metadataDriver = new YamlDriver('/var/www/symfony_2/src/Yitznewton/FreermsBundle/Resources/config/doctrine');
$metadataDriver->setFileExtension('.orm.yml');
$this->_em = $this->_getTestEntityManager();
$this->_em->getConfiguration()
->setMetadataDriverImpl($metadataDriver);
$this->_em->getConfiguration()->setEntityNamespaces(array(
'FreermsBundle' => 'Yitznewton\\FreermsBundle\\Entity'));
}
protected function getRepository()
{
return $this->_em->getRepository('FreermsBundle:IpRange');
}
public function testFindIntersecting_RangeWithin_ReturnsIpRange()
{
$ipRange = new IpRange();
$ipRange->setStartIp('192.150.1.1');
$ipRange->setEndIp('192.160.1.1');
$this->assertEquals(1, count($this->getRepository()
->findIntersecting($ipRange)),
'some message');
}
Looking again at the symfony docs, it seems that integration testing with a live test database is preferred to unit testing for repository classes. That is, there is no support for stubbing EntityManagers.